Uncyclopedia:VFH/Interstate 95 (2nd nomination)

Article: Interstate 95	Score: -1
Nominated by:	I appreciate Interstate 95 was already nominated in 2013, but it wasn't successful. There are a few things why this one will be successful. First of all, this is our most detailed interstate article. Some(like Interstate 61), were so bad they had to be deleted. Some like Interstate 81 are stubs and very new, and even Interstate 11, one of our most descriptive articles, is not that great. But then is I-95. It goes in detail every state, has a map, and is our best interstate article. I propose we put it up for VFH. Gale5050 Complain about me! 16:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
For: 2	As nominator, I obviously Support this proposal. Gale5050 Complain about me! 16:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC) Support. Ok, I thinked 'bout it and I think dat... It's a rough diamond, it lacks some mini chiselling, but I really love this mess On the Road. Ps: lol, where is the final North Pole-Nuuk-Reykjavík-Eskifjörður-Thurso-Inverness-Aberdeen-Edinburgh-Newcastle-Leeds-Sheffield-Birmingham-Wolverhampton route section? :) 𝕎𝕠𝕝𝕧𝕖𝕣 𝕎𝕒𝕝𝕓𝕣𝕠 12:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Against: 3	Against Terrible. -- The Zombiebaron 19:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Against. I am with Zombie here (hi btw, Long time no see). *Sir Severian* (Sprich mit mir!) Severian (talk) 07:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC) Against. i just don't like it Jabberwock (talk) 13:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. This article needs some more pretty heavy editing. It is a typical encyclopedia article on a generic topic that has been edited and filled in by so many users that it is without a real concept and is mostly a mishmash of stuff and some humour. While I think Gale has done a good job fixing the article (you have injected something of a concept into it, made some cuts and added a little humour) I think it has some way to go before it is featurable. Most articles like these require heavy cuts and rewriting some material and the need to have an overarching concept that you remold the article into. Plus a good injection of humour here and there. I'll happily do a pee review if requested. I'll give this my vote if it is reworked. ShabiDOO 12:10, 23 September 2020 (UTC) Comment. @Shabidoo: in a few hours i can request. not now though. it does need expansion, I'll admit. Gale5050 Complain about me! 12:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC) Yeah, this article has some decent humor, but it doesn't quite have a coherent concept yet. I'm not really sure what the best way to improve it would be. MrX blow me 17:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC) @MrX: this is honeslty one of our best Interstate articles, and the only one we could get into FA, besides maybe Interstate 17. It accurately goes through every state with a hefty sense of humor. This has recieved I think 301 edits, but after DWIII recatogorised it on Christmas 2019 no one edited until I came around. While I have fixed up the article and did a good job expanding it(I am one of the most important aspects of the interstate highway system), I will say it needs more work before it becomes featured. Having said that, I put it up for pee review, so if you or anyone else feels like reviewing it, we can improve this to FA extent. Back when I used to edit Wikipedia(see contributions for wp: User: Gale5050 and wp: User: 47.16.99.72)I used to also edit this, but because of people like Cards84664, Imzadi1979, and Dough4872, it is not as important, and my edits are reverted 50% of the time. This is definitely an area I am experienced, and I’d like to see an article I’ve seriously contributed to become featured. Yes, I will agree there are issues, but they are easily fixable. Gale5050 Complain about me! 18:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC) Considering Zombiebaron wants to huff all interstates, he’ll never support. So now we need 6-7 support votes, because someone opposes. Gale5050 Complain about me! 20:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Comment. @Severian: listen. I know you don't like it and it's understandable. I didn't pick the article because it was good, but because all the surrounding articles were bad. I hoped for a pee review that never came that you can do if you want(please don't make time bound promises!). I want an interstate article and if I have one, this is what I do. I have also done a good job revamping the article, even after the pee review was declined and after it was posted. Gale5050 complain about me! 17:48, 22 October 2020 (UTC) Gale, knock it the fuck off with your snarky pettiness. ShabiDOO 22:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC) @Gale5050: nö, don't want to do a review. sorry, Hipp is doing it anyway. Comment. I am not trying, but I seriosuly need to point out the issue. Also, you don't need to be so angry over 1 comment. Gale5050 complain about me! 20:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC) Abstain. This article has way too many red links and is a bit too random. The funny parts are potholed (lame joke intended) with red links and formatting. I'll do the Pee Review and hopefully patch this up a bit. ~ Hipponias^CUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles 11:42, 31 October 2020 (UTC)