User talk:Cassie/archive18
If DPL fucks up, please this page.
Hey, you're up...
- Thank you so much! Cassandra (talk) 02:18am April 25, 2021
- Hey, it looks like on the mobile website it forces all tables to have a margin of 10px. This is a huge deal. Borders on basically all of the userboxen and legacy tempplates are messed up. Template:Userbox is the one I am concerned about at the moment but this is going to require a lot of coding unless you can fix the mobile stylesheet. In the meantime, all tables across the website have to be hand-coded with margin attributes. Any ideas?
- Also the 'big' and 'small' HTML tags are not working for mobile. It is imperative that these tags work the way they are pre-set to function. Please let me know, thanks!
- @Zana Dark: That seems fairly weird. Is it all tables, wikitables, *mboxes or infoboxes only? Some of those have forcibly set margins (e.g. as in
margin: 0.5em 0 0.5em 1em;
), but I do not see anything broken in the site's CSS concerning tables in general. As for the 'big' and 'small' tags, it seems that those are probably because of broken browser implementations: for example, on Safari iOS 13, the big tags display fine but small tags fail to do so. Maybe replacing small and big tags with their respective templates (e.g. {{small}}) should be done? Cassandra (talk) 05:26pm April 25, 2021- Forcibly set margins are a terrible idea, I urge you to change it back to margin:0. {{big}} requires the user to set the font size to a percentage, it should be set to larger if nothing is specified. There is also a problem with both of the big and small templates when certain text is put into them they fail. The average editor is going to continue to use the big and small HTML tags. You cannot expect them to know what those templates are or what they do. Workaround-oriented programming is a big pet peeve of mine, but my main concern is that the table margins are set back to a zero default as they should be. I have noticed many many problems with the mobile style sheet. No one seems to care but me, who is responsible for this?
- @Zana Dark: Honestly, here's the problem about Uncyclopedia: it was never really designed with mobile use in mind, and basically no one has worked on improving mobile compatibility on Uncyclopedia. Mediawiki:Mobile.css has only had two editors, both resigned admins, prior to today. Hopefully in the future, you could start taking care of much of Uncyc's mobile compatibility at the stylesheet level (and not just the template/module level); it's a huge area of priority which has been left completely untouched. I tried removing the set margins in mobile.css, so it should default to 0px... please let me know if it still fucks up. I'm unfortunately not very skilled at CSS, despite me trying to proclaim the opposite. Hopefully in the future these stylesheets will no longer be completely neglected... Cassandra (talk) 10:38, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- The problem persists. I appreciate you taking a look for me. I would be happy to take a look at the mobile stuff sometime, instead of fixing it on every template page one-by-one. For now, I have fixed the problem on my pages with local stylesheets, but it looks terrible everywhere else. {{User Gamer}} is one where I can check on my phone and see the borders are messed up. I am working on other templates that will remedy this problem in the future, hopefully. It has been a long haul from table-based design to css, and now mobile-friendly - especially for open-source coding and wikis in general. I knew transitioning was going to take at least a decade, so here we are. Thanks again! XOXO
- @Zana Dark: Honestly, here's the problem about Uncyclopedia: it was never really designed with mobile use in mind, and basically no one has worked on improving mobile compatibility on Uncyclopedia. Mediawiki:Mobile.css has only had two editors, both resigned admins, prior to today. Hopefully in the future, you could start taking care of much of Uncyc's mobile compatibility at the stylesheet level (and not just the template/module level); it's a huge area of priority which has been left completely untouched. I tried removing the set margins in mobile.css, so it should default to 0px... please let me know if it still fucks up. I'm unfortunately not very skilled at CSS, despite me trying to proclaim the opposite. Hopefully in the future these stylesheets will no longer be completely neglected... Cassandra (talk) 10:38, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Forcibly set margins are a terrible idea, I urge you to change it back to margin:0. {{big}} requires the user to set the font size to a percentage, it should be set to larger if nothing is specified. There is also a problem with both of the big and small templates when certain text is put into them they fail. The average editor is going to continue to use the big and small HTML tags. You cannot expect them to know what those templates are or what they do. Workaround-oriented programming is a big pet peeve of mine, but my main concern is that the table margins are set back to a zero default as they should be. I have noticed many many problems with the mobile style sheet. No one seems to care but me, who is responsible for this?
- @Zana Dark: That seems fairly weird. Is it all tables, wikitables, *mboxes or infoboxes only? Some of those have forcibly set margins (e.g. as in
Wait
Can I still do the PFP forum request from last section of your archive.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
MerryKnox80
Please do one last CU check, and finally block them. There is no reason to leave them unblocked, and we have extracted enough IPs we are starting to run out. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 15:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- I'm still managing to extract new sleeper socks and open proxies. MerryKnox80 needs to be further milked before killed, just like a cow on a dairy factory. Cassandra (talk) 05:28pm April 25, 2021
File:WIN 20210423 21 09 55 Pro.jpg
Please put {{orphaned file}}. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 15:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Gale5050 may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please use your common sense for more information on User page etiquette. There are better ways of handling this, like showing a CU result, rather then disrupting uncyclopedia to prove a point. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:38, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Duncing me and misusing admin power kind of looks bad when running for 'crat. Doing a CU to prove your innocence is much better. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:43, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Eh I'll do it later. Cassandra (talk) 07:46pm April 24, 2021
- If the later isn't within the next 48 hrs, cancellations will occur.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:47, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Eh I'll do it later. Cassandra (talk) 07:46pm April 24, 2021
Notification: Ejected
- Am I that sus? Among Us is leaking again. Cassandra (talk) 02:16am April 25, 2021
- Yes, until you un-dunce me, you will continue to be ejected. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 13:07, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Edit request on Uncyclopedia:VFH/Facebook
The nomination was not successful. rm -3. Please change that to The nomination was not successful. rm -2.5. 4.5/7 is a -2.5 score, not -3. Thanks. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 21:37, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, please change the score back to 4 and remove the IP vote after it closed. Bc it was after it closed.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:41, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Before I accept this edit request... why in the fuck are you looking at VFHs from 12 years ago and complaining about small disparities between the rules and the vote itself? If you provide me with a good enough reason I'll edit it. Cassandra (talk) 02:27am April 25, 2021
- Thumbs up ShabiDOO 06:25, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- An IP messed up the record and it is tine to restore it? Is that good enough? Sometimes I scroll around UN:BEST -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thumbs up ShabiDOO 06:25, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Before I accept this edit request... why in the fuck are you looking at VFHs from 12 years ago and complaining about small disparities between the rules and the vote itself? If you provide me with a good enough reason I'll edit it. Cassandra (talk) 02:27am April 25, 2021
LavondaMcIntyre
LavondaMcIntyre (contribs • checkuser • abuse log) is a spambot. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 21:52, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Update
I have officially started to write the kernel for the Uncyclopedia official operating system; not Uncyclux, as this kernel is not based on the Linux kernel (yes, Linux kernel). JJPMaster 22:52, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
154.16.68.0/23
Open proxy exploited by LSD 11. Still, use {{proxyblock}}Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 23:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, the LSD 11 part was a false positive. However, they are a spambot. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Is
transphobia permitted for spam bots? -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:53, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
User:Abuse filter
Please add Filter 90 on the list of blocked filters. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:56, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- And the first thing you do as a 'crat should be granting Abuse filter bot rights. JJPMaster 00:57, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Notification:Cancelled
{{unblock|your reason here}}
below this notice. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:57, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
User:172.92.214.106
After deleting there 17 byte page (there is another one on QVFD), please issue a {{uw-create1}}. It's just a general note, whilst letting them know not to do these things. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 02:01, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
51% rule
Does the 51% rule of PeeReview and talk pages only qualify if I write it? On Colorado, I added little content, but did trim ~55% of the article.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 14:25, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- You are like the Borg. Utterly relentless. Gale...why don't you leave Cassie alone for a day or two? ShabiDOO 15:45, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- I literally have nowhere else to ask. Also,Cassie has been ejected.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Eh, I'll allow it... as for "other places where you can ask", I'll ask all the new adminses individually whether they are willing to add themselves as parole officers. Cassandra (talk) 05:30pm April 25, 2021
- Ok.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Eh, I'll allow it... as for "other places where you can ask", I'll ask all the new adminses individually whether they are willing to add themselves as parole officers. Cassandra (talk) 05:30pm April 25, 2021
- I literally have nowhere else to ask. Also,Cassie has been ejected.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
How about
we add users elected in VFS before bugging other admins? Also if JJPMaster gets only interface, would they be eligible? -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- One: please use the correct pronouns for JJPMaster, who has specified using they-them pronouns on the Uncyclopedia Discord server. As for that, I'll have to ask them nonetheless. Cassandra (talk) 05:39pm April 25, 2021
- They were before this edit, implemented after this one. Then he updated it on Wikipedia. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:49, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Notification:Frozen
- @Gale5050: This is starting to become really excessive and kind of too. Charlie the bot (talk) 18:13, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Charlie: Nope, because you've never been exposed to 25°F temperatures (coolest was 29°F I believe). And it will get to 10°F, and then -5°F, and so on -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:17, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Gale5050: I've survived -40ºF before. Charlie the bot (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sigh. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:09, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- As amusing as these joke blocks and freezing and sock antics are...maybe don't overdo it? ShabiDOO 19:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- I mean, that's why Gale5050's user page has been dunced by me. Cassandra (talk) 08:02pm April 25, 2021
- Which is also why I froze him and not ejected/cancelled him, because that was getting old. Next time, it will be worse...-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- I mean, that's why Gale5050's user page has been dunced by me. Cassandra (talk) 08:02pm April 25, 2021
- As amusing as these joke blocks and freezing and sock antics are...maybe don't overdo it? ShabiDOO 19:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sigh. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:09, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Gale5050: I've survived -40ºF before. Charlie the bot (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Charlie: Nope, because you've never been exposed to 25°F temperatures (coolest was 29°F I believe). And it will get to 10°F, and then -5°F, and so on -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:17, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Um
Invoking any retaliation for a given punishment or sanction.
Does this apply differently for joke blocks or real blocks? Also, does this mean all blocks, regardless of sanction, placed on my account, become unappealable and with TPA disabled? -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:11, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Well, for short, don't cancel me, freeze me or do other things like that because I, say, locked your userpage or did some other thing in a punitive or sanctionary way. Punishments for breaching this rule won't follow the Gale5050 sanctions page scheme; instead, they will be arbitrary in length and with TPA enabled. You're still free to cancel me for short periods of time, for, say, me skipping over sections of my talk page. Cassandra (talk) 07:23pm April 25, 2021
- Also, will joke cancellations take the place of joke blocks? -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:25, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Australiansareanimals
Please add them to username violations category, thanks.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:16, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Request
Can I fix up the uw-create series? -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
User:Gale5050/Uw-bdh
Please move to Template:uw-bdh. Thanks. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:56, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- I won't do it because of the sneaky double dash you hid in there... Cassandra (talk) 08:01pm April 25, 2021
- How bout now? -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:08, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Small Desktop Screenshot.png
Please add {{orphaned file}}. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:34, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
User:Nicholastechg
Please give either {{uw-advert3}} or {{uw-advert4im}}. Tripped abuse filter many times and made a promo page, but maybe just maybe they can reform. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Sapnap34ty
Sapnap34ty (contribs • checkuser • abuse log) is a spambot. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 23:29, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- User confirmed not spambot. With the new captcha that Lyrithya implemented we're getting significantly less registered spambots. Cassandra (talk) 10:41am April 26, 2021
198.181.163.0/24
Proxy.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:11, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
User talk:Danimations
Please give {{uw-vandalism2}}. Surely some vandalism.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Andrew , I think your vandal-radar is a little off. Definitely a new user, but I don't see blatant vandalism from them yet. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 01:07, 26 April 2021 (UTC
- WohMi, you used rollback. Rollback is solely meant to be used on vandalism. If it is not vandalism, then use an edit summary. It's not hard. And it makes it easier for me to detect if it is vandalism, as well.So yeah use edit summaries.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:16, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- No. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 01:27, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- WohMi, I don't know what you said "no" to. You did use rollback. There is a script that you can ask JJPMaster about that allows you to use edit summaries when rollbacking, that might be a good idea. And there really has to be some sort of rollback policy. This cannot continue. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:37, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- As long as there's no official policy to the usage of rollbacks, I will use them whenever and wherever I please. It's ease of access for me; I don't want to open up the entire editor just to roll back one crummy edit. And as far as I know, Rollback isn't limited to the use of undoing vandalism. Your concerns have been noted. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 01:45, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- WohMi, I get it. However, RedWarn and Huggle also don't force you to open the entire editor, and is quicker and also allows you to use warning templates. They need more users. Please install. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:48, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- As long as there's no official policy to the usage of rollbacks, I will use them whenever and wherever I please. It's ease of access for me; I don't want to open up the entire editor just to roll back one crummy edit. And as far as I know, Rollback isn't limited to the use of undoing vandalism. Your concerns have been noted. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 01:45, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- WohMi, I don't know what you said "no" to. You did use rollback. There is a script that you can ask JJPMaster about that allows you to use edit summaries when rollbacking, that might be a good idea. And there really has to be some sort of rollback policy. This cannot continue. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:37, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- No. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 01:27, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- WohMi, you used rollback. Rollback is solely meant to be used on vandalism. If it is not vandalism, then use an edit summary. It's not hard. And it makes it easier for me to detect if it is vandalism, as well.So yeah use edit summaries.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:16, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
User:Gale5050/UnNews:DC statehood passed House of Representatives, but may not survive Senate
Eh, it's ready. Please move to UnNews space. Mediocre for one (certainly never gonna be on VFH, but ok for a normal article). -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:41, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Gonna stop you here, Gale. The article in question isn't funny, at all. When I read it, it honestly felt like I was reading a legit news article. Please, please, please re-read UN:HTBFANJS. The only reason I suggest this is because you have a long history of making UN:News articles like this one: Copy-pasted information from a factual source, and not a hint of funny in them. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 01:49, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Certainly going Sure, it's Cook PVI may be +43 Democrat, greater then every other district, but how would you feel if you rejected, uh, a Republican state for that reason? Not great. Please stop being jerks. is funny, Same is Them being bitches about DC probably won't help, either. It's not too easy making these UnNews articles, will expand a little.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:52, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
I think it is ready now. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- I understand it's not easy to write these UN:News articles for everyone, which is why I recommended you take a good, long look at HTBFANJS. Reading it won't hurt you. Also, your examples aren't really funny... Funny articles generally have an overarching theme that makes them funny instead of something like: "factual retellting of an Event that actually happened, event that actually happened, Funny One-Liner!, event that actually happened."
- WohMi I made it better, by reducing some facts. Also better to have some article then none.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 02:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- A good UnNews article is made either of the basis of something that absolutely didn't happen and trying to make it sound as factual as possible, or something that did happen, but have some sort of zany twist to it. For instance, good topics could be "Someone Farted Really Loudly during the Oscars," or report on the lost Indonesian Submarine (something that actually happened), but put a zany twist on it, like how a Kraken got to it. I don't want you to "reduce facts," because facts can be funny sometimes. The article should be funny. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 02:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Gale5050, this is the xteenth time you’ve been given very good writing tips by another editor. Please try them out, and please do reread HTBFANJS. Also, what you keep saying is wrong: it is not better to have some than none. If the some isn’t funny, none is much better. MrX 02:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- A good UnNews article is made either of the basis of something that absolutely didn't happen and trying to make it sound as factual as possible, or something that did happen, but have some sort of zany twist to it. For instance, good topics could be "Someone Farted Really Loudly during the Oscars," or report on the lost Indonesian Submarine (something that actually happened), but put a zany twist on it, like how a Kraken got to it. I don't want you to "reduce facts," because facts can be funny sometimes. The article should be funny. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 02:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- WohMi I made it better, by reducing some facts. Also better to have some article then none.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 02:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
It’s an UnNews, and it’s already 4 days late. If it doesn’t get published today, it will be too stale to post. MrX, late delivery doesn’t work unless it will be funny in of itself, like 1/28/17 to 1/19/21 with Trump. I will say I probably should have started earlier, but if it does not get published today, it will be a stale event. You don’t have newspapers circulating about events 5 days ago, and this is more urgent. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 11:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- But still, why were you rushing to report on this not very important event on a comedy news service? JJPMaster 11:52, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- DC statehood is very important, but I'll agree, until it passes or gets rejected by the Senate, its not newsworthy. But if it doesn't get moved today (EDT), it'll probably get deleted. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 13:08, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not sure why I'm still trying, but Gale5050, a few days late doesn't make it "stale". We are not a newspaper. The topic is still relevant and can be funny if you make the article funny. And I don't know what you're talking about with the late delivery template, it's optional, use it any time you like. PF4Eva recently used it on a couple UnNews articles that were written within weeks of the actual event, totally fine with or without the template. MrX 13:40, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- DC statehood is very important, but I'll agree, until it passes or gets rejected by the Senate, its not newsworthy. But if it doesn't get moved today (EDT), it'll probably get deleted. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 13:08, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
forum idea
Can I create a forum requiring checkuser to be an elected role, not just none you can ask from an admin? It's a wee-bit powerful and should require VFS as it gives PII. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:42, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- I don’t know how many more times or ways I can say this. Gale5050, please stop proposing changes. Please. Please. MrX 02:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Also I wasn't aware you could just ask an admin to grant you checkuser. JJPMaster 11:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- The CheckUser role is (de facto) never granted, and requires a crat to grant. As such, I do not see a need to formalize everything... Cassandra (talk) 11:36am April 26, 2021
- Uh oops.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 11:52, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Forum idea 2.0
My 2nd forum request is to make it so that Checkuser just gets absorbed into admin. It will be like blocking - admins can do it, but no one else, and it won’t be a seperate user role, just part of admin duties. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 11:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Uh... checkuser already is absorbed into admin. The checkuser group is de facto deprecated, and the only person who has the right (Alvgjerd) is a former admin, and is retired. JJPMaster 11:33, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Technically yes, but also, like UN:POOP, it does exist. This forum will actually creates less bureaucracy as then we won’t have to worry about this role any more. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 11:41, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Unbelievable. Gale5050, you are the only one worrying about all this! Just stop. Please. Please. MrX 13:33, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Technically yes, but also, like UN:POOP, it does exist. This forum will actually creates less bureaucracy as then we won’t have to worry about this role any more. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 11:41, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
User:Gale5050/UnNews:DC statehood passed House of Representatives, but may not survive Senate
I think it’s barely ready now. And this is realistically the last day it can be moved. If it isn’t moved today, the page will likely be deleted. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 11:34, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry... not good enough. It just... isn't sufficiently funny. Cassandra (talk) 09:43am April 27, 2021
So now
i need permission to even make a PeeReview? Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 14:04, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Question
Does this violate Gale5050's "don't cite your own essays" sanction? JJPMaster 14:12, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Very so, plus that essay doesn't even make sense there. As such, I'll punish Gale5050 with some additional userpage vandalism. Cassandra (talk) 02:14pm April 26, 2021
Transphobia
Not complaining about anything, just here before someone else does. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 14:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks WohMi! And in case some user who routinely stalks my userpage wants to complain about transphobia, please note that this is not transphobia since "Gale" is not a gendered name. Cassandra (talk) 02:18pm April 26, 2021
Igorwoj07
Igorwoj07 (contribs • checkuser • abuse log) may be a spambot - please warn/block appropriately.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 15:32, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Said user is not spambot, but please use {{uw-advert3}} for self promo. Thanks. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 16:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Jemielity (contribs • checkuser • abuse log). Please block both and issue the procedural {{Checkuserblock}} notifications. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
what happens
when you are cancelled? Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 16:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Um...is that a serious question? lol MrX 17:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Erm, kind of.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:40, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Well, it doesn't look like anything happens when one is "cancelled"....... MrX 18:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Shit!Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:50, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Well, it doesn't look like anything happens when one is "cancelled"....... MrX 18:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Erm, kind of.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:40, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Notification:Sent to Alaska
{{unblock|Ok fine, I will un-dunce you}}
below. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 16:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Essays
Gale5050's essays should not have UN: short cuts. Can we please remove them? This only adds to the illusion that anyone gives a shit about his essays and that they are some how pseudo policy. I think Gale should not be allowed to create any more essays on uncyclopedia space but do them in his own user space. I also hope he is blocked next time he quotes his own essays as though they are policy. ShabiDOO 17:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- People do care about XNR, as it has been used in QVFD/other deletion requests a few times before. I will give an example. It's never been directly quoted, but pretty widespread used.
- Also, defacing of user pages is much worse. Now if anyone clicks on my userpage they see me dunced, and will till 5/1. I gotta feeling though, next time the duncing will be extended, but honestly it could be anything at this point. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:18, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- That edit was made before you created UN:R2. JJPMaster 17:19, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, there was another time it was in Cassie's archive. Either in 6, 7 or 8. I think. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with removing the shortcuts. Yes, Gale5050, I know I mentioned the xnr thing when I moved Xi Jinping to my userspace, I was just trying to say that I don't care if the redirect stays or not before the article is expanded and improved. I wasn't trying to quote a policy, and while Wikipedia has good reasons for such a policy, I think here at Uncyc cross name redirects in many cases can be very useful. There is no harm in having them. MrX 17:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- MrX there is. The harm is, these redirects drag readers into articles not ready. Now, with ICU/expansion/fix tags, that is already kind of true, but an article being worked on in userspace should not be visible to a casual Uncyclopedian who is just clicking across the site. The harm in having them is, people reading articles will get dragged into articles not publically ready. Such redirects can always be redirected to more appropriate pages, and there are some examples I can find. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:34, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- You're really making a mountain out of a molehill again. MrX 17:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- No, there was a mountain already. Several redirects existed to pages where it was not ready. Mike Pence is an example - the people want there to be a Mike Pence article, but that can't happen because that page is not ready. You think that (similar comments were recieved on Uncyclopedia:VFH/Your Harvard Admissions Decision Letter) - most Uncyclopedia readers are already fully involved with the style at Uncyclopedia and therefore immediately get everything, and you won't have a casual reader, and while that is partly true, and certainly ~85% of people are familiar with the beginning, but not everyone. especially Wikipedians coming here on 4/1. That’s why I don’t think we should have direct links to VFH noms, or the links to VFD, but I know they are popular and will let it slide, as they have survived for a while, but newer XNR’s shouldn’t have that chance. There are better ways.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- You're really making a mountain out of a molehill again. MrX 17:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- MrX there is. The harm is, these redirects drag readers into articles not ready. Now, with ICU/expansion/fix tags, that is already kind of true, but an article being worked on in userspace should not be visible to a casual Uncyclopedian who is just clicking across the site. The harm in having them is, people reading articles will get dragged into articles not publically ready. Such redirects can always be redirected to more appropriate pages, and there are some examples I can find. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:34, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with removing the shortcuts. Yes, Gale5050, I know I mentioned the xnr thing when I moved Xi Jinping to my userspace, I was just trying to say that I don't care if the redirect stays or not before the article is expanded and improved. I wasn't trying to quote a policy, and while Wikipedia has good reasons for such a policy, I think here at Uncyc cross name redirects in many cases can be very useful. There is no harm in having them. MrX 17:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, there was another time it was in Cassie's archive. Either in 6, 7 or 8. I think. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- That edit was made before you created UN:R2. JJPMaster 17:19, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
My god if we don't deal with these redirects a massive black hole will erupt on the uncyclopedia servers and consume everything in sight. The first victim will be AAAAAAAAA! ShabiDOO 18:03, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Lol indeed. And Gale5050, once again, everything you just said is either false, irrelevant, or incomprehensible. There were no "similar comments" at that VFH, and the rest is mostly nonsense. Please try to communicate more clearly. MrX 18:07, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- MrX How about this. On Wikipedia they put the effort in a to make it a professional encyclopedia with articles going through extensive screening before being allowed in. On Uncyclopedia, it’s up to the readers to have to make it professional. On Wikipedia, it’s a longer process. However I will say most Uncyclopedia editors come from Wikipedia so I’d say it isn’t too massive, but we shouldn’t be putting the effort on readers to force them into finding good articles and make readers get involved in Uncyclopedianquicker. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- You're still not making much sense. Point is, I disagree that xnr is a problem. MrX 18:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- We shouldn't be forcing readers in too quickly. I get we want users to get involved quickly, and I understand it, but maybe we can follow this quote. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:32, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keeping the redirects to a bare minimum should be fine. What concerns me most is just how liberally Gale5050 cites these essays, getting mad at people for not complying with the "cross-namespace redirects" pseudo-essay. Stopping Gale5050 from invoking those essays is the important part. Cassandra (talk) 09:53am April 27, 2021
- We shouldn't be forcing readers in too quickly. I get we want users to get involved quickly, and I understand it, but maybe we can follow this quote. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:32, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- You're still not making much sense. Point is, I disagree that xnr is a problem. MrX 18:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- MrX How about this. On Wikipedia they put the effort in a to make it a professional encyclopedia with articles going through extensive screening before being allowed in. On Uncyclopedia, it’s up to the readers to have to make it professional. On Wikipedia, it’s a longer process. However I will say most Uncyclopedia editors come from Wikipedia so I’d say it isn’t too massive, but we shouldn’t be putting the effort on readers to force them into finding good articles and make readers get involved in Uncyclopedianquicker. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
User:Enzo Aquarius/Interstate 8
Please move to mainspace. Barely ok, and I will expand it if moved.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:04, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Didn't we just talk about having fewer interstate articles? MrX 18:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- MrX, that was to obliterate them to restart them. The goal is to build the interstate articles up from scratch not to remove them. The articles will evantually all be resurrected, albeit at a later time. I'll volunteer to make a few. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- What are you talking about?!? That was never the goal. Please stop making shit up. We huffed most of the interstate articles because they suck and interstates offer very little opportunities for comedy. Having 1 or 2 is fine, we can make them funny. Having more is terrible. We should not be creating more interstate articles nor should we be moving any more to mainspace. I'm getting tired of explaining the same thing to you over and over again. MrX 19:11, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- MrX, that may not be what you want, but as confirmed in this edit, the goal is to rewrite. Interstates can have stuff to offer, and we should be focusing on writing some. As such, this is why it should be moved. Because it's a low tier article, but theres no harm in having one. I-8 is a pretty common search term for people in San Diego. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- smfh. Gale5050, that edit shows Cassie stating that restarting a particular article would be more worthwhile than improving it, and they still were nominating it for deletion. It does not confirm anything that you're talking about. Please stop making shit up. Please. Please. MrX 20:10, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- MrX, that may not be what you want, but as confirmed in this edit, the goal is to rewrite. Interstates can have stuff to offer, and we should be focusing on writing some. As such, this is why it should be moved. Because it's a low tier article, but theres no harm in having one. I-8 is a pretty common search term for people in San Diego. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- What are you talking about?!? That was never the goal. Please stop making shit up. We huffed most of the interstate articles because they suck and interstates offer very little opportunities for comedy. Having 1 or 2 is fine, we can make them funny. Having more is terrible. We should not be creating more interstate articles nor should we be moving any more to mainspace. I'm getting tired of explaining the same thing to you over and over again. MrX 19:11, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- MrX, that was to obliterate them to restart them. The goal is to build the interstate articles up from scratch not to remove them. The articles will evantually all be resurrected, albeit at a later time. I'll volunteer to make a few. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
What he's saying is that they have potential, but need work. I'm working on I-40 and I-94. It's probably not gonna matter either way, but I just think it's ready and a 5 out of 10 article is better then none. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:18, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- We are not going to have an extensive interstate highway system full of mediocre articles after we just voted to huff almost all of them in a forum that you created. Having a crappy article is not better than none. MrX 20:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- I'd argue it's not crappy, MrX. However, I will say it could reasonably be merged into another article instead. Most of them sucked in there former state, but like I-40 and I-94, can be improved.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Please feel free to merge any funny ideas into the existing interstate articles. Please do not create any new interstate articles. Please. Please. MrX 20:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, but when I-40 and I-94 are ok, they will be merged back (albeit I will pingeline you to make sure its ok with you, but also please don't block it just because its an interstate and focus on quality). Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:34, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- The quality is the main issue with the interstate articles. MrX 20:37, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, but when I-40 and I-94 are ok, they will be merged back (albeit I will pingeline you to make sure its ok with you, but also please don't block it just because its an interstate and focus on quality). Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:34, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Please feel free to merge any funny ideas into the existing interstate articles. Please do not create any new interstate articles. Please. Please. MrX 20:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- I'd argue it's not crappy, MrX. However, I will say it could reasonably be merged into another article instead. Most of them sucked in there former state, but like I-40 and I-94, can be improved.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Regarding to this section Cassie, just, um, try to merge it with any other article.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Eh, article isn't sufficiently funny. Plus, there doesn't seem to be any support for invoking a page move. As such, request denied. Cassandra (talk) 09:55am April 27, 2021
1997
Please put in VFD or put some sort of a maintance tag on. Pretty low quality. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Or maybe redirect to either The Past or Category:1990s. JJPMaster 18:31, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Billiam
Overexpired fix tag. Not sure if it needs VFD though. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:36, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Jason Derulo
Please VFD. Expand tag expired 4/9.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:36, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
qvfd
backlogged. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:49, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:VFH/Patent nonsense on Wheels!
Please close as failed. Been out for 12 days, 2.5-1 against posting, and at VFD as well. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 21:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
More useless self-promo
Feel free to create an account on my highly insecure website here. Over there, we store passwords in plain text, knowingly allow SQL injection, and have an entirely public password database! JJPMaster 00:58, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- No. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:24, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Idea
If you are cancelled, until it expires or you get rid of it, any edits will be reverted as a cancellation violation. Minus where the cancellation officer allows you to edit. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:29, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Nay. And what even is a "cancellation officer"? This feels like bureaucracy specifically designed to lower administrative privileges to a standstill. Cassandra (talk) 01:35pm April 27, 2021
- Are you seriously proposing something that A. Increases bureaucracy here, and B. Gives you the authority to go around telling people what to do and reverting their edits? MrX 14:27, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
50.31.10.82
Spambot. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:38, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Please use {{cur}} when tagging users, IPs or IP ranges as spambots here. It allows for a quicker abuse log /checkuser verification process. Cassandra (talk) 01:36pm April 27, 2021
174.135.98.219
Open proxy. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:40, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
May thy get thy confirmed perm?
Well can thy? SoyokoAnis (talk)
Thy thanks you
Uncyclolove. Call me thy - Talk to thy 13:37, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Proxy
User:52.230.0.0/17 is a proxy. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:14, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
New disruptive editing from U u u wa wa
Created nonsense page, Free Robux (ICU worthy), and then created a VFH for it. Please, uh, warn them. This feels like Pugsleyfan 2.0. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:00, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Probably doesn't matter, but...
in March 2014, while not blocked, Jarl Jensen did earn up to a Level 3 warning for promotional material. For the record. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hmmmmmm... wonder why there would be a 7 year delay between joining WP and joining Uncyc. Cassandra (talk) 06:38pm April 27, 2021
Req
Can I fix up Template:Uw-socksuspect? Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:17, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates without giving a valid reason for removal in the edit summary again, as you did at User talk:Cassie, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You've been warned about this before. Stop blanking important sock suspect templates and misusing admin power. Serious consequences will occur if another infracture is detected. - Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Last chance
This is your last warning. Your continued disruptive editing and more importantly, abuse of admin power, is disgusting. Your misuse of RevDel to deny your socks, and your blocks, cancellations, and dunces, is really unacceptable. If we had an ArbCom, you would find yourself there. You are quite lucky there isn't. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Uncyclopedia. Or, more likely, desysopped. Now please stop misusing RevDel. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:31, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Then please ... respect UN:DBAD. Or I might have to block you. For a generous amount of time. Cassandra (talk) 06:37pm April 27, 2021
- Maybe you can respect UN:SHOE?Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:41, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Then maybe don't falsely accuse me of socking? I label my socks very clearly (e.g. User:Cassiesock001). Celeste is not a sockpuppet nor a shoepuppet. Cassandra (talk) 06:48pm April 27, 2021
- Cassie, after seeing this edit where Celeste reveals there RW account, and I left you a message there concerning if it is really yours. Feel free to respond there. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- But I do not have an account on RationalWiki. I only exist on Uncyclopedia. Do you mind not constantly blasting me with such mischievous sock accusations, ones constructed solely to, y'know, hold me (out of all admins) accountable for crimes I didn't commit? Cassandra (talk) 06:57pm April 27, 2021
- Bc of the shear amount of evidence. You both use Celeste emojis, and this sounds a lot like you. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:05, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- But I do not have an account on RationalWiki. I only exist on Uncyclopedia. Do you mind not constantly blasting me with such mischievous sock accusations, ones constructed solely to, y'know, hold me (out of all admins) accountable for crimes I didn't commit? Cassandra (talk) 06:57pm April 27, 2021
- Cassie, after seeing this edit where Celeste reveals there RW account, and I left you a message there concerning if it is really yours. Feel free to respond there. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Then maybe don't falsely accuse me of socking? I label my socks very clearly (e.g. User:Cassiesock001). Celeste is not a sockpuppet nor a shoepuppet. Cassandra (talk) 06:48pm April 27, 2021
- Maybe you can respect UN:SHOE?Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:41, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
And this sounds a lot like you. JJPMaster 19:50, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Correct, User:JJPMaster! But that's bc it was me, same username too. Also, stop being like wp:User:MarioJump83. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
45.131.212.0/23
Proxy Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:47, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
2.58.12.0/22
Open proxy.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 20:26, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Partogelan
Partogelan (contribs • checkuser • abuse log) is a spambot. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Confirmed sock of Dewapoker2021; CU-blocked. Seems like a human spambot to me. Cassandra (talk) 11:51am April 28, 2021
Can we bug Lyrithriya about changing rollback
Here is my proposal.
Reverted edits by Example1 to last revision by Example2. False positive? Leave a message at my talk page.
Right now it is Reverted edits by Example1 to last revision by Example2.
This is far less BITEy. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:48, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- "False positive"? This isn't an automatically editing machine learning bot! JJPMaster 01:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Cassie, stop skipping sections or at ~18:00 you will be cancelled.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not done, since rollbacks are basically never false positives (as a human action). Cassandra (talk) 12:08pm April 28, 2021
- With people casually rollbacking, yeah there can be. Also, this would work like Wikitionary. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:29, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Honestly putting that would just increase bureaucracy way too much. So nope. Cassandra (talk) 12:35pm April 28, 2021
- But there is a net positive - if someone is confused, it gives a direct link. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:45, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- They can just click the
(talk)
button in the page history. JJPMaster 12:47, 28 April 2021 (UTC)- But will they know to do it? -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:53, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- The "rollback" tag can be modified to contain a link giving information on the rollback function. Does that sounds good? Cassandra (talk) 01:40pm April 28, 2021
- Ok, but you actually have to get that implemented. Ok? And no, you cannot push this off for 2 months like the last time. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 14:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- The "rollback" tag can be modified to contain a link giving information on the rollback function. Does that sounds good? Cassandra (talk) 01:40pm April 28, 2021
- But will they know to do it? -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:53, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- They can just click the
- But there is a net positive - if someone is confused, it gives a direct link. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:45, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Honestly putting that would just increase bureaucracy way too much. So nope. Cassandra (talk) 12:35pm April 28, 2021
- With people casually rollbacking, yeah there can be. Also, this would work like Wikitionary. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:29, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not done, since rollbacks are basically never false positives (as a human action). Cassandra (talk) 12:08pm April 28, 2021
- Cassie, stop skipping sections or at ~18:00 you will be cancelled.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 12:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
NOOOOOOO! That does not sound good. Cassie, please do not give into any more of Gale5050's demands. Only one person has a problem with ___________. MrX 14:11, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Then I'll push it off for a month. Or two. Or three. Or 2348729423784208428034. Cassandra (talk) 02:54pm April 28, 2021
- But MrX, you haven't had many of your edits rollbacked if at all. That's kind of unfair. Ask any user who had there earliest edits rollbacked, you'll see. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 15:25, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Gale5050, you are the only one who has this hang up about rollback and edit summaries. Doesn't that tell you something? Please stop proposing changes. Please. Please. Please. Please. Please. Please. Please. Please. MrX 16:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- when you rollback an edit, you are saying "I don't think your edit was any better then vandalism and I will treat it as such". And MrX, when there are numerous tools that allow reverting many edits with an edit summary, why are you rejecting these tools? They are very useful and need more users. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 16:46, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Try listening, for a change, you might even like it: you are the only one who is making this a big deal. I've said it as many ways as possible. MrX 16:49, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Most of the time when there is something bad but not terrible, the Uncyclopedia community just lets it be, and let bad things continue if they aren't urgent/critical/horrible. Probably many people have the same opinion I do, just less strongly, and so decide to let it live. Di you even read? -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 16:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- "Probably many people have the same opinion" as you?? Lol, okay, thanks Gale5050, you made me laugh. MrX 16:53, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- I mean, we had Piss53, and your complaints of my rollbacks. I get Piss53 (probable troll), but you complained about my own rollbacks. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- When did I complain about your rollbacks? Am I the only one who is fucking sick of Gale5050's false accusations? MrX 17:13, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- I mean, we had Piss53, and your complaints of my rollbacks. I get Piss53 (probable troll), but you complained about my own rollbacks. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:08, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- "Probably many people have the same opinion" as you?? Lol, okay, thanks Gale5050, you made me laugh. MrX 16:53, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Most of the time when there is something bad but not terrible, the Uncyclopedia community just lets it be, and let bad things continue if they aren't urgent/critical/horrible. Probably many people have the same opinion I do, just less strongly, and so decide to let it live. Di you even read? -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 16:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Try listening, for a change, you might even like it: you are the only one who is making this a big deal. I've said it as many ways as possible. MrX 16:49, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- when you rollback an edit, you are saying "I don't think your edit was any better then vandalism and I will treat it as such". And MrX, when there are numerous tools that allow reverting many edits with an edit summary, why are you rejecting these tools? They are very useful and need more users. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 16:46, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Gale5050, you are the only one who has this hang up about rollback and edit summaries. Doesn't that tell you something? Please stop proposing changes. Please. Please. Please. Please. Please. Please. Please. Please. MrX 16:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- But MrX, you haven't had many of your edits rollbacked if at all. That's kind of unfair. Ask any user who had there earliest edits rollbacked, you'll see. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 15:25, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
This (which was an accident, and was quickly resolved), this this, albeit that was another user.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:17, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- I guess I should have worded that better. I didn't really care that you used rollback, but because of the way you make such a big deal about it, I assumed that you had (ONCE AGAIN) incorrectly identified an edit as vandalism. And then you said you weren't aware that you had accidentally reverted an edit, but that didn't really make sense. Anyway, I'm done discussing this with you. Please stop proposing changes. MrX 17:25, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- I don't see why this is a net negative - it makes it easier for false positives, it is used on Wikitionary (probably even better then I proposed), and it allowed for discussion. No reason we should be more BITEy.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:33, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- It's only a matter of a few days until we have new admins Gale5050. And the new admins may be far less patient and tolerant of your inability to listen and get along with other users. ShabiDOO 18:51, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ik, but only 2 will have the block button, and only 1 of those is really active. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 18:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- It's only a matter of a few days until we have new admins Gale5050. And the new admins may be far less patient and tolerant of your inability to listen and get along with other users. ShabiDOO 18:51, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- I don't see why this is a net negative - it makes it easier for false positives, it is used on Wikitionary (probably even better then I proposed), and it allowed for discussion. No reason we should be more BITEy.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:33, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
User:Zazie Productions
Possible username issue, please give a {{uw-username}}. Possible promo username. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- User blocked for transphobia. Cassandra (talk) 11:52am April 28, 2021
- By the way it turns out that there's an experimental rock band with that exact name. JJPMaster 11:54, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hmmmmm... well... ranting about non-binary and genderfluid people AND invoking attack helicopter jokes on an article like Conspiracy theory will get you punished mercilessly. Hate has no place on Uncyclopedia. Cassandra (talk) 11:56am April 28, 2021
- I thought those edits were mocking transphobes, hence the "evil agenda" being a conspiracy theory. But I couldn't be quite sure. Oh well. MrX 14:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- MrX, please be more careful. This is the *cough* 3rd time you mistook something offensive as mocking offensive things. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 14:10, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- No, Gale5050, I didn't mistake anything. What's offensive is completely subjective. MrX 14:13, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, but you should be more inclusive. To prevent a situation like the captain obvious image, and later fight over if it was eligible for deletion.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 14:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Honestly... I would err more on the side of "excessively offensive" than "offensive as a joke". These edits felt more like, eh, an attempt at purposefully swinging a jab than an attempt at parodying those who would do so. I'm leaving the option to appeal in case I was wrong; I couldn't find any external proof e.g. Wikipedia so we'll see. Cassandra (talk) 03:00pm April 28, 2021
- Ok, but you should be more inclusive. To prevent a situation like the captain obvious image, and later fight over if it was eligible for deletion.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 14:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- No, Gale5050, I didn't mistake anything. What's offensive is completely subjective. MrX 14:13, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- MrX, please be more careful. This is the *cough* 3rd time you mistook something offensive as mocking offensive things. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 14:10, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- I thought those edits were mocking transphobes, hence the "evil agenda" being a conspiracy theory. But I couldn't be quite sure. Oh well. MrX 14:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hmmmmm... well... ranting about non-binary and genderfluid people AND invoking attack helicopter jokes on an article like Conspiracy theory will get you punished mercilessly. Hate has no place on Uncyclopedia. Cassandra (talk) 11:56am April 28, 2021
- By the way it turns out that there's an experimental rock band with that exact name. JJPMaster 11:54, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Reverting those edits is fine, and I'm not asking for the editor to be unblocked (though I think there's a decent chance they meant no offense to transgender people). But Gale5050, I "should try to be more inclusive"?? You really need to stop making false accusations against others, whether directly or indirectly. This is a serious problem with you, and I'm getting sick of it. As for the captain obvious sign, nobody fought over its eligibility for deletion. Everything is eligible for deletion. I asked if 2 was really an acceptable VFD score to delete something, then you escalated the fuck out of the discussion and refused to acknowledge that you used the wrong word to describe the bigots in the picture. MrX 16:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hmmm....what did you think would happen with this edit would induce? Anything good? -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 16:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- I made it pretty clear that I wasn't asking for the image to be unhuffed, I wanted to know about the minimum score for VFD, but you're right, I should've thought about what you would do. MrX 17:02, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
This section seems resolved.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:06, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Note
Hi Cassie, you are cancelled until you use a double dash (--) in your sig. Thank you. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC) |
Hippo toss
Please VFD. Old stub I detected Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 01:51, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- I'll allow it to sit since it has potential... hopefully someone can colonize it real quick. Cassandra (talk) 12:00pm April 28, 2021
User:Gale5050/Uw-bdh-soft
Please move to Template:Uw-bdh-soft. Basically uw-bdh, but for newbies. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 22:24, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
LOLOLOLALKALSLLLSOKSSKKSLAL124.iijkkajjjdjekkdkdkdkk
Please block with autoblocks disabled and account creation allowed. No reply within ~60 days.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 22:29, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- And please notify of block.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
qvfd
forgot a page.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:08, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
User talk:PS777 FB
Hey Cassie, you'll probably wanna remove TPA for this user. MrX 14:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Looks like a sock of User:Svex 88134kg. The abuse filter blocked them for LSD 11. MrX 14:06, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- "Go The Hell, MrX!" made me laugh so hard. If you survive the midnight of May 1st, let me know! WohMi (talk) 14:25, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Template:Unblock
Please change "his or her block" to "their block". JJPMaster 14:26, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
- Done. I haven't yet had the time to fully implement the anti-"his or her" script on the wiki (last time Charliebot crashed), but I'm planning on running it circa May 1st or May 2nd. Cassandra (talk) 02:27pm April 29, 2021
Challenge idea
Tell me if you approve. Whoever can use the most double dashes in their sig wins! Also you used a double dash once, check the top of my sanction page ;). So has Hipponias btw, and Zombie uses them all the time.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:07, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oh no. Anyway. Well, how about this. May 1st will be Double Dash Day. All messages left on the replacement user talk page which I will be using that day must contain either a double dash (like two dashes) or a double dash crystal from Celeste (whose emoji will be generated soon(TM)). Cassandra (talk) 02:23am April 30, 2021
A question
If/when I get interface-opped, will it be appropriate for me to edit Template:Featuredarticle/queue? JJPMaster 13:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, so long as you don't break shit. Same applies to Zana. Basically, anything that involves editing protected pages is now in your territory! Cassandra (talk) 01:18pm April 30, 2021
- JJPMaster, remember the +5 rule/use common sense. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 13:46, 30 April 2021 (UTC).
qvfd
backlog.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 13:52, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
WohMi
Well, on VFD he put a 21st article. It says, explicity ... Increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20. Violators will receive a free 1-day ban. This means, do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes look like this (after the page's deletion), and closed nominations look like VFD-padlock.png THIS to indicate that they have been kept.
As such, WohMi deserves a 1 day ban. He very clearly broke the VFD rules. Unless he decreases it to 20. We also need to resolve some older VFD's. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 14:32, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- I'll think about it. @WohMi:, come defend yourself! Cassandra (talk) 02:43pm April 30, 2021
- WohMi You did inappropriatelty change it to 42, but it was 20 at the time. I say give him 24 hrs and if he doesn't respond, block for the next 24.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 15:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- I think I misread the rule... I just think it's a little bit of a throw-off for the first part of the rule to say "Don't increase the amount of articles on VFD to 42, then say "oh BTW don't increase it to 20." I was confused on the "active votes" part, so I decided that I would keep the amount of articles I nominated under 20 (I only nominated 12). In addition, although the limit on active votes is 20, some of them have deserved to have been closed a while ago. (Like all of the ones who've been around more than ~300 hours.) Looking over some of them that I nominated, I could've put them on QVFD, but I was worried that they wouldn't apply. This is my bad, but I don't think what I did was that hurtful to VFD, and could've been avoided by other means. I can remove some of my VFDs until the older ones are closed, if that can fix the problem. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 15:33, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- P.S: I wasn't really keeping track of the amount of articles I was nominated, either, so just know that my mindset was not "MWAHAHA FLOOD THE VFD!" WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 15:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- I'd say a 3-second block just to note it in the blocklog (this thing needs tracking), and let him go after 3 seconds. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Cassie, pretty please, don't block me. I promise I'll never ever mess up this way again! WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 18:13, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- I'd say a 3-second block just to note it in the blocklog (this thing needs tracking), and let him go after 3 seconds. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 17:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- P.S: I wasn't really keeping track of the amount of articles I was nominated, either, so just know that my mindset was not "MWAHAHA FLOOD THE VFD!" WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 15:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- I think I misread the rule... I just think it's a little bit of a throw-off for the first part of the rule to say "Don't increase the amount of articles on VFD to 42, then say "oh BTW don't increase it to 20." I was confused on the "active votes" part, so I decided that I would keep the amount of articles I nominated under 20 (I only nominated 12). In addition, although the limit on active votes is 20, some of them have deserved to have been closed a while ago. (Like all of the ones who've been around more than ~300 hours.) Looking over some of them that I nominated, I could've put them on QVFD, but I was worried that they wouldn't apply. This is my bad, but I don't think what I did was that hurtful to VFD, and could've been avoided by other means. I can remove some of my VFDs until the older ones are closed, if that can fix the problem. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 15:33, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- WohMi You did inappropriatelty change it to 42, but it was 20 at the time. I say give him 24 hrs and if he doesn't respond, block for the next 24.Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 15:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
If shabidoo got blocked for not signing there VFD posts, you can be blocked for putting 20+ VFDs on. It’s only fair. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- I dunno, I haven't been blocked before, ever! I'd like to retain my block-virginity, as I even managed to dodge MrX's opening block-salvo when he became admin. I'd rather not lose it over "too many VFD's," especially when the problem can be easily solved by closing the old ones. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 19:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- I know you don’t, but I’m afraid it’s for the best of uncyclopedia. However, you can take pride in making it 8 months without being blocked. MrX made it over 12, tho, until he got blocked for “sockpuppetry” for a grand total of 25 seconds. I know it’s an honor you don’t want to lose, but with it ending, a new honor comes. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Gale it's a little rich you asking Cassie to be unwavering with block policy when you get often away with brazen sanction violations without penalty. I think it is reasonable Cassie is hesitant to give out a full 24 hour block for a first time minor rule infraction. You've made your suggestion to Cassie. Now leave him the fuck alone and let him admin (he's already asked you once today not to admin the admins). Please stop overestimating the value of your admin-advice...few people here...(is there anyone?) give it any weight. ShabiDOO 20:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- You've done that yourself. Shabidoo, I encourage you re-read the entirety of User_talk:Cassie/archive12#UnNews:Alabama_Senator_sworn_in and see what I'm talking about, thanks. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 22:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- How about this. WohMi gets blocked for 3 seconds. Gale gets blocked for 2 hours. Two birds with one stone. Hehehehhehehehehheheheheeee Cassandra (talk) 10:56pm April 30, 2021
- Yes Gale. I only suggest a block or sanction after tolerating shit multiple times and after I and others asking the person not to do it multiple times...fails. I would never suggest a block over a one time minor violation which the user apologises for and promises not to do again. If I suggested to Cassie a block or sanction and he disagrees (and he has disagreed numerous times) I don't keep insisting or arguing with him unless that user does something even worse. Respect the admins and don't admin the admin. Save your penalty suggestions for serious issues and once you've had your say...let the admins decide. You aren't an admin and nobody cares to hear your opinion a second or third time after you've stated it. ShabiDOO 23:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- How about this. WohMi gets blocked for 3 seconds. Gale gets blocked for 2 hours. Two birds with one stone. Hehehehhehehehehheheheheeee Cassandra (talk) 10:56pm April 30, 2021
- You've done that yourself. Shabidoo, I encourage you re-read the entirety of User_talk:Cassie/archive12#UnNews:Alabama_Senator_sworn_in and see what I'm talking about, thanks. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 22:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Gale it's a little rich you asking Cassie to be unwavering with block policy when you get often away with brazen sanction violations without penalty. I think it is reasonable Cassie is hesitant to give out a full 24 hour block for a first time minor rule infraction. You've made your suggestion to Cassie. Now leave him the fuck alone and let him admin (he's already asked you once today not to admin the admins). Please stop overestimating the value of your admin-advice...few people here...(is there anyone?) give it any weight. ShabiDOO 20:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- I know you don’t, but I’m afraid it’s for the best of uncyclopedia. However, you can take pride in making it 8 months without being blocked. MrX made it over 12, tho, until he got blocked for “sockpuppetry” for a grand total of 25 seconds. I know it’s an honor you don’t want to lose, but with it ending, a new honor comes. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your vote!
Bot flags
Please assign the bot flags to JJPMastest and JJPMastest II. JJPMaster 20:53, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Arctic Circle
Please VFD. sucks. overexpired tag too-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 22:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Page for admin requests and notices
Cassie it is definitely time to set up a page for users to alert admins of issues (vandals/socks) and make certain requests. Your talk page should not be admin central. I suggest we set this up in the next few days. An ongoing forum would do. I highly suggest restricting it only to pointing out issues and making admin requests (with no complaints, admin handling advice or policy discussions permitted). Shall we get this going? Perhaps Forum:Admin_Requests ? ShabiDOO 23:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
- Uncyclopedia:Administrators' noticeboard will be activated within the next few weeks in order to enable this. It'll be a simple place: requests only, with a seperate page for CheckUsers. Quick links to QVFD, VFD, maintenance, etc. will be provided; reminders to check maintenance pages will be integrated within in order to enable easy adminning. Note: My talkpage will be locked down in a couple of minutes. Please open new threads at User talk:Charbot for now. Cassandra (talk) 11:43pm April 30, 2021