From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Your Harvard Admissions Decision Letter
|
Score: 5
|
| Nominated by:
|
This page is... good... I think. It was only created two weeks ago, but it is quite nice. JJP...MASTER![talk to]JJP... master? 00:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
|
For: 5
|
 For. Cuz I'm into that whole Yale thing. MrX blow me  18:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)- For. Outrageously helarious. Well done DoctorJones! ShabiDOO 20:23, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- For -- The Zombiebaron 20:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- For. Uhhh, can I vote for my own article? DoctorJones (talk) 03:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, by all means! You can nominate your own articles too. MrX blow me 03:26, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- For. and viffing. Cassandra (talk) 09:32am January 5, 2021
|
Against: 0
|
 Against. Ehhhhhh, sorry. Not good enough. By the way, the user used {{username}} on it for anyone reading so its not directed personally to you. Gale5050 complain about me! 01:10, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gale5050, I was literally shaking my head with my face in my palm when I read this. Look, you're welcome to vote for or against any article for any reason. You're also welcome to count the words in an article and call it too short for VFH even though you voted for an article that was even shorter. But you don't need to give us a big bold disclaimer about the username template. We all get the joke. I hope one day you will realize how unnecessary everything you do is. MrX blow me 19:03, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- @MrX: I sort of get it now. However, that was 3 months ago. Gale5050 complain about me! 20:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
 Abstain. Well I sort of get the joke now. However, I am not sure how comfotorable I am with this, and I mean, we are having ten concurrent nominations. I did do a re-read, and it's ok. Abstain.. Gale5050 complain about me! 20:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Number of current VFH is irrelevant. The more the better. Some years ago we used to feature a new article every day. If you have issues with the featuring system (you're the first person I've heard complain in 10 years) then start up a forum on it and propose something different. ShabiDOO 22:04, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Because we're not trying to improve the articles. What I'm proposing is that we as a community, find issues, instead of voting on it. This way, we can improve question VFH articles. We should also have a good article equivalent. Gale5050 complain about me! 23:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gale the process is through votes. What is considered a feature worthy article depends on your fellow users, their own personal tastes and the relative quality of other articles. Try not to take it so hard when a nomination doesn't pass. I've had many failed nominations. Even the famed Aleister and our prolific Leverage have had failed nominations. Getting constructive criticism is a rarity in the real world of writing. Try to have fun here, work hard on your articles and when you do give constructive feed back try to be very specific and actually help people. "I don't get it" or "it needs work" doesn't help anyone improve their articles. Also...take something from the good ones. This article here is superbly crafted and hilarious. Enjoy it and let it inspire you. ShabiDOO 00:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- I'll say this, imagine you were a casual reader on Uncyclopedia. And you were seeing the main page. And you say this. Would you laugh? Most people would be confused. Considering how new it is, it's not that it should be put up on the main page for everyone to see. They won't understand it, is what there doing. Gale5050 01:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- While I disagree with everything you just said Gale5050, I have a question: what would you change about the article to make it appeal to this fictional casual reader? As Shabidoo says, please try to keep your feedback constructive. -- The Zombiebaron 03:09, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
UNCYC VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
For. Cuz I'm into that whole Yale thing. 
Against. Ehhhhhh, sorry. Not good enough. By the way, the user used {{
Abstain. Well I sort of get the joke now. However, I am not sure how comfotorable I am with this, and I mean, we are having ten concurrent nominations. I did do a re-read, and it's ok. 