Uncyclopedia:VFH/Wikia Inc. Corp. Ltd.

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Wikia Inc. Corp. Ltd. (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Wikia Inc. Corp. Ltd.	Score: 12
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
For: 18	Nom+For. This got me laughing out loud. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC) For. Despite the ad for Illogicopedia at the end. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:48, 6 August 2009 (UTC) For.Pretty good--98.110.117.33 14:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC) For because of the Illogicopedia ad at the end! Muahahaha! ~ Readmesoon 15:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Weak for. Comes off a bit ranty, but still works for a feature. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 15:20, Aug 6 Weak for. Per Led. A bit of spit and polish here and there would help. Maybe tone down the worst ranty bits and make it a bit more deadpan? MrN 15:41, Aug 6 For. I followed the link here from ?pedia and loved it. /me awaits the "Who are you?"s T3 17:09, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Abstain. This is well written and hilarious , though I am hesitant to vote strong for because we should not be encouraging putting in-house jokes on the front page. Whose with me ? T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC) For. I enjoyed it ChiefjusticeDS 17:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Yeahp Although I agree with TKF. Injokes are the devil. Injokes and red links. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Abstain. And I lolled at TKF trolling. In-joke indeed. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:43, 7 Aug Abstain per TKF. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC) For. InMooseWeTrust 02:01, 9 August 2009 (UTC) For Staircase CUNt 02:03, 9 August 2009 (UTC) For. Again I failed to laugh. That's enough for a forrrrrr. Style  Guide 09:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC) For. Because of Hindleyite's comment. Nameable • mumble? 12:58, 17 August 2009 (UTC) For. 72.88.46.43 20:20, 17 August 2009 (UTC) The most factual article on Wikipedia Uncyclopedia. For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) For. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 15:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Against: 6	Against. Just didn't do it for me. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 20:59, Aug 6 Against. per Necro, a bit too in-jokey. Mn-z 05:06, 7 August 2009 (UTC)  Against. Not because it isn't funny but my standard objection to navel gazing as a VFH. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 06:04, 7 August 2009 (UTC) against. a good article, but didn't resonate with my humor frequency to the extent where i'd support it for the front page. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:23, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Against. This seems to be a hate letter to Wikia barely disguised as an article. The constant plugs for ?pedia littered about are rather annoying as well. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 05:58, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Got some good parts, well written, but I think it can be much more than what it is at the moment - mainly settling scores between ?pedia and Wikia. ~ 09:24, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Comments	I just removed the sysop protection which has been on the Wikia article for a while now. Edit away guys. :-) MrN 15:41, Aug 6 Lemme just point out that this was in no way meant to be an in-joke as people seem to be interpreting it, and I think you guys are looking at the article through Uncyclopedia spectacles. Look at it this way: if you'd never heard of Wikia before, would you find it funny? I hope so, but there's an awful lot there for people who are aware of the Wikia situation as a whole as well. It's supposedly a tongue-in-cheek satire of how Wikia completely sells out its wikis and does not particularly care for its users. I will also say the comment that it's a bitter rant is a valid one. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 10:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.