From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnPoetia:Paradise Abridged
|
Score: 18 thousand lines
|
| Nominated by:
|
—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:42, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 18
|
- Self-Nom & Self-For. My epic Judeo-Christian satirical parody of John Milton's Paradise Lost. It's a little on the long side, though not as long as the first book might make you think (don't worry, they're not all that long). Also, with the exception of maybe this, I don't think I've ever worked so hard on a single article before. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:42, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Epic from Guildy. John Milton had no idea.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:08, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
 For. —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:24, 19 August 2010- For, as per my PLS judgifyin'. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 02:13, Aug 19 2010
- For. tl;dr, but it's probably funny.User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:30, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I am one of the rare few who actually reads supposedly "tl;dr" literature. I must say, your parody of the Victorian language from the original Paradise makes this God damned fantastic (looks like I'm headed to Hell). S3ahawk 07:05, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
- For.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:28, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
- tl;dr but I'm a sucker for literature parodies
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  09:31, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Haaaaa! Funnybony
   12:14, Aug 19 12:14, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Blimey! mAttlobster. (hello) 18:57, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Definite For. An amazing masterwork apparently written by someone either forced to read the source material at some point or very familiar with the style. We've seen Milton, so how soon can we expect La Commedia? Only joking. How 'bout just the Paradiso? Probably not that much of a stretch to tackle Dante after all of that, right?.
 KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 19:43, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Naturally. —BUGFUCK WHORE
 Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [21:55 19 August 2010]
- I thought this was a pretty stellar article and then I discovered there was actually more than the descriptions of the books.
               Sir MacMania GUN—[21:59 19 Aug 2010]
- For. Holy buckets... O_o ~
 *sqlorsh* (harass) (stalk) -- 20100820 - 04:41 (UTC)
- For. Sheeeit.
  - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 06:01, Friday 20 August 2010 -
- Loleth. Megaman126512 06:30, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
- For although it's not quite as in depth as I would have liked. Nominally Humane! some time Friday, 14:13, Aug 20 2010 UTC
- For. Nothing really needs to be said. Dr. Fenwick 21:55, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
- Note. For those of you that are stupid, those things that say "Clicketh here for Book..." are actually links that take you to the poem's various books, so by all means click them. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:43, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Do you have to rub it in so much? Jeez. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 02:13, Aug 19 2010
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For. 
