Uncyclopedia:VFH/Hard to read

Article: Hard to read	Score: 2 and a half seizures
Nominated by:	The Dit 04:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
For: 10	For it is very Uncyclopedia. --The Dit 04:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC) For I like things that blink, okay? -- Le Cejak • <-> 04:49, 12 October 2007 (UTC) For --Dossier 05:24, 12 October 2007 (UTC) For Tampa 05:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC) For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 21:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC) 4 -- A page that is both funny and original. If you actually read it, it has a bunch of uncyc-y humor, plus the interesting features of a gimmick. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:41, Oct 13 For. Reminds me a little of my own Ekrpat. Only a little. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 12:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC) For! mE lIK ESfunnys --Trar (talk\|contribs\|grueslayer) 17:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC) For, but ONLY BECAUSE OF THE LAST PARAGRAPH. I was going to vote Against until I read that. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 18:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC) For WTF? Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:31, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Against: 8	OH DEAR GOD MY EYEBALLS —Hinoa talk.kun 05:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Please, no We have a couple of such pages now, and this is the most obnoxious of them all. And the content wasn't funny at all, just the difficulty of reading with flashes around you. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 05:36, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Against. Annoying =/= funny. Sir Groovester \| Contributions \| Talk Page 08:34, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Against. Like the concept, like the article, but not for the front page. HowTo:Be Hard to Read, on the other hand, would be better. EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 15:49, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Weak Against - very unique article Cajek, it was an impressive article if you ask me, but I can't allow all those annoying gif images to be on the Main Page--*Sir* Manforman 23:04, 12 October 2007 (UTC) no problem -- Le Cejak • <-> 23:20, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Against This just isn't funny. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:42, 13 October 2007 (UTC) Against Themed articles are funny... but not this one. It may have been funny but my eyes were bleeding too much to see it. --Moneke 11:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Against. I acctaully huff articles like this on site, most of the time. Sadly, this one snuck by me. -- The Zombiebaron 09:38, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Hinoa, did you read it? -- Le Cejak • <-> 05:27, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Abstain I'm undecided. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 08:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC) I have to say that behind the initial gimmick of it being hard to read, there is actually an element of intelligence (er, call it wit or something like that) if you bother to read it. That was definitely the reason why I nominated it and not just dismissed it as another Uncyclopedia mess. --The Dit 14:53, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Hey Dit, if it fails, help me make it VFH worthy. That would rock. Le Cejak • <-> 15:12, 12 October 2007 (UTC) 'Fraid I'll have to abstain on this one, as per Kip. It's a perfectly good idea and executed well enough, but I have to agree with Manforman. RabbiTechno 11:38, 13 October 2007 (UTC) Abstain I need to think about this one. It's got a good concept, but the joke drags on for a while. I only got through half the article; it was too difficult to read (though that might be in part because of my computer settings). --YeOldeLuke 00:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)