Uncyclopedia:VFH/Charlie Kaufman

Article: Charlie Kaufman	Score: 8 portals into the minds of concerned, bewildered and depressed men
Nominated by:	Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 21:47, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
For: 12	For + Self-Nom. I was commanded by der UnFührer to nominate this --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 20:40, October 23, 2009 (UTC) Very For. Per my review. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:50, October 23, 2009 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:35, 23 October 2009 For I like it... --Matfen815 17:02, October 23, 2009 (UTC) For. This is the kind of article I like alot. Brilliant ideas, clever language and funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:09, October 23, 2009 (UTC) For. Just as I was staring thoughtfully ahead, almost getting bored with the repetition, you changed it. A well-timed switch. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 22:58, October 23, 2009 (UTC) For. ChiefjusticeDS 10:17, October 25, 2009 (UTC) For. *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate). 11:25, October 25, 2009 (UTC) For. I dont know who he is either, but reading this told me exactly who he is and in a very enjoyable way... Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 18:15, October 26, 2009 (UTC) For. • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 03:24, October 27, 2009 (UTC) For*. Really well done. --UU - natter 12:05, Oct 28* For. InMooseWeTrust 18:00, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
Against: 4	I am not indie enough to understand who this "Charles Kaufberg" character is. TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 10:00, October 25, 2009 (UTC) against. a little per murderfrog, a little per not finding enough chuckles. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:48, October 28, 2009 (UTC) Alright then. And dude, quit with this fucking after-the-fact justifications of your poor decisions. You said the same bullshit when I critiqued Plink for PLS. If you want to stick by your poor choices that's 100% fine, but don't try to undermine my criticisms by making up some half-assed reasoning for article elements just to retort every critical comment. You're a decent writer, but here's yet another tip: respect your elders (especially ones who were WOTY and have decent bullshit detectors). --THINKER 00:53, November 2, 2009 (UTC) What? Maybe there's a minor misapprehension here. All I did was disagree with your opinion. I respect your view, but I disagree. I do have a history of accepting criticism. Sorry if you took my comment personally, but I meant no disrespect at all, and I fail to read disrespect in my comment. Apologies. -- GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 05:50, November 2, 2009 (UTC) Against. Another hollywood bum nobody has heard of EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 22:09, Sunday 15 November 2009
Comments	Abstain on account of lack of knowledge about the subject matter. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 05:40, Oct 23 2009 I knew people would be abstaining on this one. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:50, October 23, 2009 (UTC) Glad I didn't disappoint. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 04:48, Oct 25 2009 Abstain. cause I'm a n00b and I don't know tihs dude -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 04:13, Oct 26 ~~Abs.~~ pending some style improvement. The tip template is not the right choice for its use here. Like what I see comedy-wise though: I'll give it another more thorough read through if the formatting gets worked out. I'm rooting for ya as Kaufman is ripe for the treatment, the sad, brilliant motherfucker he is.. --THINKER 06:08, October 26, 2009 (UTC) I think the Tip template enhances the amusement of the amusing juxtaposition of all of those similar white male in abject isolation staring thoughtfully ahead poses - one from each film - and it got a great response in the review. This may be a matter of taste - I am in love with its use here. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 06:39, October 26, 2009 (UTC)