Forum:Geo's message
Before you delete this, to the moderators, may I just state a point. Please hear me out because I think it is a very valid point.
I think you should stop having a go at everyone and anyone. Do you have nothing else to do? There have been loads of complaints and I would like to address them.
It has been said if someone says that loads of other people suck cock, they probably suck cock themselves, because they have nothing better to do in their poor lonesome life.
A great many people have been angry about what you have said about numerous people, including the band AC/DC, who are legends of rock.
Additionally, many people's pages have been deleted for so-called "crass humour" or being "unfunny" - which isn't even a word. Many of these pages are humerous in the eyes of the viewing public, but have been deleted by sad sacks like you. All you care about is people who have no life, spending every day making a page for this abomination of a site. You should respect that all people do not have the time to do this, and are not wasters like your regular posters.
Finally, Wikipedia should be insulted by this site. I myself have retrieved a lot of my information through the useful tool itself. I don't think you should slag off Wikipedia because it is one of the most well known and greatest sites ever made. This parody is just a javascript copied, content free version, which is funny, but it should give credit to Wikipedia for being the model.
I do think this site is a funny one, but I also think you should try to insult less people and give people a chance. If a page is crass or lacking wit, you should send it back to the person via email, and tell them what was wrong with it. Instead of saying:
"This page has recently been deleted. Don't worry, you didn't miss much, it sucked balls anyway"
This insults the author and lowers their self esteeem.
If you have read this and are just gonna delete it without taking consideration. Fuck you. Fuck the lot of you!
However, if you are considering this seriously, I thank you for that consideration
Moderators, begin serious discussion here
- I was tempted to delete this, but when I saw this that if I did I'd be fucked from here to eternity, I said - hell! Let the community decide. Should we shut down this abomination of a site? ~ Mordillo where is my JESUS FUCKING CHRIST PISS? 10:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- I personally am insulted that Wikipedia has copied so much from us. I mean did they even give any credit? No....well fuck them! -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Mhaille, "your remark will soon be deleted. Don't worry, you woudn't miss much, it sucks balls anyway". And anyway, you're a Javascript copy anyway. ~ Mordillo where is my JESUS FUCKING CHRIST PISS? 11:11, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Can I be the first to link to Uncyclopedia is the worst? Thanks. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- I think I'm in the wrong section. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with whoever wrote that. AC/DC are legends of rock. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 01:40, 25 Dec 2007
- Serious discussion -- 01:41, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
- Why is it that so many people demand that we work so hard to make this site better for them when they are clearly unwilling to put in enough effort to read the beginner's guides. Oh, that's right, they don't know how hard it would be for the admins to do everything the way they want because their time is worth so much more than ours. Thanks guy. --Sir gwax (talk) 03:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Non-mods, begin other discussion here?
I love the way people come on here, insult the hell out of us, and then expect us to take their suggestions seriously!
A few thoughts, Geo-the-IP:
- We get loads of crap articles submitted per day. The vast majority of those need deleting. If an article is worth saving, we have the {{construction}} tag for the author, or the {{ICU}} tag for anyone who finds it. Or people can register and create the articles in their userspace. We offer advice about how to improve articles, and support if requested, but the vast majority of what gets deleted is crap, and deserves to go.
- As for the wikipedia thing - this is an equal opportunities humour wiki - we take the piss out of anything, including ourselves. Saying wikipedia should be above this would be to make a worrying exception and set a precedent. We bite the hand that feeds us as we bite all other hands. But none of it should be hateful, just humourous. Hatecruft generally gets dealt with on VFD. And besides, we have some wikia staffers contibuting here - so they can't have that much of a problem with it...
- The AC/DC article is crap, agreed - that's a problem with being a wiki. AC/DC are a huge and popular band, and as such their page gets a lot of attention. Unfortunately, a lot of this is from stoopid teenagers who think it's funny to put randumb insults in. If you don't like it, you can change it - that's the joy of a wiki. But try to make it funny - OK?
- And as for the comment about regular contributors being "sad sacks" without a life, and "wasters" - to borrow one of your other poetic phrases - fuck you. Way to make a sweeping generalisation and alienate the people you are trying to appeal to. We do have lives and so forth (well, most of us anyway!) but spend time on here as a constructive outlet. Perhaps you should try to find one instead of complaining like this?
OK, exhale UU. Honestly, I don't normally get sucked in by this sort of crap, preferring to read the misguided comment, laugh and go on my merry way. But I felt like venting today. And I feel better now. I'm off to spread joy and goodwill and other seasonal gubbins. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- We have Wikia staffers here? Hell! I'd better leave! they might see me! -- sannse (talk) 12:39, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey, Geo: "Nothing, nothing is above satire!" John Clease said that, apropos a call by some archbishop that religion should be above satire. AC/DC is certainly not above satire. As for you "fucking" me, I think that I speak for a number of folks here who do not have sex with anonymous strangers. Pieface 13:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- err, Satire does not equal humour, god sake, you should have realised that by now, sometimes satire is funny, but funny doesnt make it satire. Most articles on uncyc are humour not satire, im not going to start this whole argument again, i just wanted to point out how quoting John Clease in such a context is quite wrong.--Sir Silent Penguin "your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 14:19, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- My apologies. I should have mentioned that John Clease was foaming at the mouth and rolling around on the studio floor at the time. And he did not say it so much as screamed it. That enough context for you? And, I will quote or misquote John Cleese whenever I please, mister not so silent penguin. Pieface 14:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Whether the AC/DC article is satire or not is irrelevant. The point is that we can, and should, make fun of whatever target we please. AC/DC don't get a let off because they are "legends of rock". Then where does it stop? Maybe I have a particular preference for Showaddwaddy. Should an article on them be off limits?
- My apologies. I should have mentioned that John Clease was foaming at the mouth and rolling around on the studio floor at the time. And he did not say it so much as screamed it. That enough context for you? And, I will quote or misquote John Cleese whenever I please, mister not so silent penguin. Pieface 14:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- What amazes me most about these sorts of posts is that the users assume that every article is written by and personally approved by the mythical being that is "uncyclopedia". I certainly haven't written anything about AC/DC (apart from comparing them to the legends of rock that are showaddywaddy). -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 18:02, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
"Additionally, many people's pages have been deleted for so-called "crass humour" or being "unfunny" - which isn't even a word." My favorites are when the whiny little twats think they sound smart. Can someone add this to Uncyclopedia is the worst, please? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 14:31, Dec 24
“Tell Geo he/she can suck my dick too!”
Is this the "worst" moment of 2007? Is this Geo person 12 or something? Think he/she knows everything, but doesn't know jack-squat and really nobody cares anyway? --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 17:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Well, this is seriously boring.
I come here from Uncyclopedia is the worst and expect a lot of complaining in capital letters and FU's and whatnot. This is just a lot of illegitimate complaints with one or two "fuck you's" at the end. Booor-ing. Blank a few pages or throw in a few curse words. I did like the cock bit though. At least you included cock. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 15:36 Dec 24, 2007
FU SKULLTHUMPER! YOU ARE THE WORSTEST! ~ Mordillo where is my JESUS FUCKING CHRIST PISS? 15:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Skullthumper DOES enjoy a well crafted cock.... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- No, you are mistaken, that's Olipro. ~ Mordillo where is my JESUS FUCKING CHRIST PISS? 15:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- No, Olipro will happily accept any old cock. Skullthumper has specific tastes.... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- /me looks down at 'package', moves from the Olipro line to the Skullthumper line. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:27, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- /me checks out 'package' and moves MO from the Skullthumper line to the Mhaille line. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- /me looks down at 'package', moves from the Olipro line to the Skullthumper line. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:27, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- No, Olipro will happily accept any old cock. Skullthumper has specific tastes.... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- No, you are mistaken, that's Olipro. ~ Mordillo where is my JESUS FUCKING CHRIST PISS? 15:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- I heard that Vince McMahon loves cocks as well. At least DX seems to think so. In the WWE Raw in Iraq special, John Cena dressed up as Santa Claus and read a letter from 100 years ago that a young Vincent Kennedy McMahon wrote to Santa asking for a rooster and a Red Ryder BB gun, thus proving that even the young Vince McMahon loves cocks as well. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 05:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Somewhat interesting
This IP comes from Glasglow, Scotland, where two members of AC/DC were born. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 17:08, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Very extremely mildly interesting
If you added up all the numbers in that IP, it comes to 47. • <-> (Dec 24 / 17:16)
- One thing I hate is when people add lame ass jokes to forums, specifically when it overshadows a good comment. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 17:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
It's no 36. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 01:55, 25 Dec 2007
Very very extremley interesting
Dividing 47 by Cajek equals __NOCAJEK__-- 17:54, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Possibly interesting
A teaspoon contains 120 drops of water. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 18:04 Dec 24, 2007
Possibly almost kinda interesting...
Dr. Mr. Skullthumper doesn't have an MD nor a PHD. -- 18:33, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Not interesting in the slightest
And yet you still look. Merry Christmas! Merry merry merry edits. PEEING 20:14, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, this is my section. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
...Wait, what am I doing here?--<<>> 19:03, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Step on it Neddy!
I CAN'T, IT'S A GEO! - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 01:56, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Whoring (VERY interesting)
Vote for me on VFH. -- 20:50, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
- Lies! You're not on VFH. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:53, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
I was gonna say something about this
But it looks like everyone else has already said it. So I'll just say: "Yeah! What they said!" --EMC [TALK] 21:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC)