User talk:Zombiebaron/archive13

Hey Hey

Guess who's hated by noobs everywhere! LJLEGO IS HATED BY NOOBS EVERYWHERE! Just wanted to let you know in case you cared.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Oh boy. What have you done now, laddy? -- The Zombiebaron 16:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

This should cover it. Take a look. Laugh at noobish idiocy. And then cry because Spang banned her before you could.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, I guess she didn't see who deleted it. Also, I don't think "noobs everywhere" hate you. Just the banned ones. -- The Zombiebaron 17:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. But aren't those the ones that make the biggest splash?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Ah, but ussually they are the ones whome are forgotten the fastest. Much like that Benson chap. Don't worry if you've never heard of him. He went away rather quickly. -- The Zombiebaron 01:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I know all about BENSON. Isn't he Tortilla's arch-Ouroboros?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:20, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm gonna pretend like I know what your talking about, and then bugger off. -- The Zombiebaron 22:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

*AHEM*

This. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

That? -- The Zombiebaron 02:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

The baseball bat. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 02:53, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

And a favor too..-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Flipwit

He's in IRC, talking him through the pros and cons of hitchhiking wiki-editing. So I've put him on probation and removed the ban. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Alrighty. -- The Zombiebaron 17:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks and request

First, the thanks. Thanks for nomming me for AotM.

Second, the request. May I please have Game:TextAdventurer in my userspace?

Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

Here it is, and your welcome. -- The Zombiebaron 16:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Please delete

Please delete this picture: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Image:Cameltoe1.jpg. It is EXTREMELY offensive because it looks like a child pornography picture and I posted the original picture to an International Crime website. I think you were there during the time on the IRC. Nevertheless, please huff it. It is a disgrace and should not of existed in the first place. --Eiyuu Kou 00:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, good sir, I hate to break it to you, but that is not pornography. Websters dictionary defines "pornography" as: "the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement". This is neither a "depicition of erotic behavior" or, as far as I can tell, "intended to cause sexual excitement". It is tasteless, humourless, poorly done, and probably offends some people, but those reasons alone are not reason enough for me to delete it on sight. I advise you to nominate it for VFD, afterwhich it will either be deleted or kept (although I'm fairly certain that it will be deleted). -- The Zombiebaron 16:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

User:Flipwits changed the image. I am wondering if you saw the new revision or the severely perverted one. You might of seen the new revision, so can you check the image's history? --Eiyuu Kou 23:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Lo

T'other day, 31st of July if my somewhat shaky memory serves me rightly, you asked me on IRC if I might be able to do you a favour - I missed this message until I'd already /quitted. Wondered what is was, and if I might in some way still be of service? RabbiTechno 17:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure, but it was probably some sort of graphical manual laborly task. It's probably for the best that you missed out. :) -- The Zombiebaron 14:47, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

I'd have refused anyway, on account of your spelling of labourly, you Colonial. :) RabbiTechno 18:23, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, now you've got colour in my cheeks. My spelling skills ain't what they used ta be. -- The Zombiebaron 18:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

THANK'D

Greetings Uncyclopedia, and welcome to UnNews. In a bizarre turn of events today, a local man by the name of RAHB, was awarded the Emanuel Goldstein Award of Excellence in the Distribution of Misinformation. In a press conference today, RAHB said that he would like to thank all those who made his receiving this award possible. And he did so too. Until next time Uncyclopedia. Stay safe, or have a potluck, or have a nice whatever. Whichever way you look at it...sign off lines suck.

Thanks comrade...this template sucks -RAHB 04:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Yarrrrr welcome, matey. -- The Zombiebaron 13:01, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Ooh, thank you again!

Hmmm, what shall I say to the gobshite admin who voted for me so strongly in Writer of the Month? Well, obviously, thank you very much for the super-flattering "Strong For," which came as a surprise to me. I wish I could say I wanted to nominate you for something, but it seems as if you've won everything that I would do it for! >_<. In any case, thanks again, and keep on voting so blindly.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, I've never been nommed for WotM...not that I'd win...Oh, and your welcome, hunny buns. -- The Zombiebaron 18:42, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks muchly!

Thank you for voting For me, of course. You voted for Dr. Skullthumper for Noob of the Month! Yes, really. You did, honest. Check the history logs. You still don't remember? Maybe you were drunk, or something. Well anyway — just take my word for it, you did. So as a thank you, I've decided to give you one of the few existing Magic 8.1 balls. Unlike the Magic 8 ball, it will never give you an inaccurate answer. I've made sure of that. Use it wisely. Like as a paperweight.

– Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 12:07 Dec 08, 2024 04:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. -- The Zombiebaron 16:22, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Trivium Article

Sorry to be so cynical, but why have you removed the 'VFD' banner on the Trivium article? This page is clearly not worthy of Uncyclopedia and needs AT LEAST rewriting and/or deleting.

Please take more notice next time

--Urmu 21:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Hate to be cynical? I think what your doing is called "ignorant", buddy. First off, I archived the reason, thus giving to no excuse for having to come down to my talkpage looking like an asshole. Secondly, I should probably be the one telling you that you should take more notice. See that {{ICU}}? Yah. The one at the bottom of the page? Gonna claim that you didn't see it the first time, eh? Well, it was there. So, before you start whining to me, try looking at the facts first, okay? -- The Zombiebaron 16:22, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Katie Manure

Hi there, why was Katie Manure deleted and is it alright if I recreate it?

Hi again. Sometimes the page is there and sometimes it isn't. I'm just going to copy the text from the page when its there and save it in when its not there. If that makes sense86.155.75.91 10:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

That page was deleted because the {{expand}} tag which had been added over a month before hand had run out, and the page wasn't very funny. There are no accidental deletions. Somebody weighted the page carefully before deleting it. Therefore, to create the page exactly as it was before helps nobody. I am going to redelete the page, and the next time that you want to create it, try something different. -- The Zombiebaron 14:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

My Apologies

I sincerely apologize for what I did. I had no idea that I wasn't supposed to warn a noob to possibly save them from being banned. Damn me to hell! I clearly broke Rule #2 -'Don't be a dick' - and deserved to be blocked. Next time I'll think twice about trying to help a fellow Uncyclopedian. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃

Oh, that last bit was a bit out of line. I'm not telling you not to help. In fact, you weren't being a dick. It's just that saying "Hey, don't do this or you'll be banned." without the power to ban confuses people. In the future, you should try making statements such as "Creating vanity pages multiple times is against Uncyclopedia policy, please stop.". That way, your not threatening that which you cannot do, and are also getting the message across that they should stop. -- The Zombiebaron 22:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Alright. Gotcha. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃

Dendrophilia

Like, two days ago, you huffed an article called Dendrophilia because it was inactive for a week. Could you please restore it to a subpage of my name? -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 17:57, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

There you go. -- The Zombiebaron 18:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much! -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 18:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Look, a Shiny Award!

Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:05, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Yay! Mass media! Oh, and your welcome. -- The Zombiebaron 16:18, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

sorry

I was looking at your page when I accidendly ruined it

--Paperclips 13:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, just as long as it was an accident. -- The Zombiebaron 15:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Maybe you want to take and Anaesthetic break and call me in a Week

It has been the third time in the past few days that this page, always having the WIP mark on it, has been wiped out. The wiki software logs make it difficult to trace deleted pages.

• How much time will it take You to write it?
• How strongly is wikia set against drug use?
• Does the uncyclopedia or wikia have a specific policy for deterring writers?
• and if so, am I one of those writers?

--Ohadaloni 17:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Zombiebaron! He linked to one of my articles! Cut him some slack for leaving a rude message.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

No, no, yes, no, in no fixed order. Also stop creating stubs if you have no intention of writing the article yourself. Uncyclopedia exists to parody online encyclopedias, so please either write encyclopedia style articles or don't bother. Thanks. :) -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

The fact that you would bother to recreate a page 3 times before even bothering to voice your complaints is probably the first thing wrong here. If you care enough the third time, where were you on the first and second deletions, buddy? Seems to me like you don't really have a right to complain. Also, that being said, that page is crap and shows little sign of getting any better, so, either make it better, or it'll be deleted in seven days, and no amount of complaining will keep you unbanned if you recreate it. -- The Zombiebaron 22:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Well said. In fact, I think you should take a look at his talk page. It's quite a spectacle. Note how Mhaille, Modusoperandi, and I all attempt to remain civil, while the wild Ohadaloni stalks its prey without abandon. It even accused me of being an admin! :0! Oh noes!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, I know what I'm featuring tonight. Unless Spang gets there first again. -- The Zombiebaron 22:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

You should at least attempt to get a consensus. I mean, don't pay attention to it or anything, but at least pretend it's being taken into consideration.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:55, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

No no no. That's where Rcmurphy's plan failed. Because people felt they had control, they were angry when the illusion was stripped away. This way, there will never have been an illusion, and I'll be able to use my illusionary powers elsewhere. Also, bonus points if you can find two Guns 'n' Roses refrences in what I just said. -- The Zombiebaron 22:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

The first one I see relates to Axl Rose: he's a giant dick. He makes his fans think he cares about when they want his album released, which pisses them off when it's revealed that he doesn't. The second is when you said "find two Guns 'n' Roses refrences," thus referencing Guns 'n' Roses. Where's my points?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

The points are right beside that cake. No no. Not the pink cake. The green cake. -- The Zombiebaron 14:20, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh rly? I see no points, only Yoinxx. Check out the Village Dump to see why Gert5 is an idiot (hint: it's related).-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

And the best part is that I acctaully own a game of Monopoly already. I guess that means that I already have $15,140 in fake money, so who needs more? I mean, the deed to Baltic Ave. only cost me $60. -- The Zombiebaron 22:41, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah. COME ON IRC NOW!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:46, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't take orders from you. I don't take orders from nobody. -- The Zombiebaron 22:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

You Delete Stuff

I was off at recent changes, fresh off my newest article, and I saw that you delete 172 pages.  !!! I'd give you that mega deletion award crap, but you already have one.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Then why not give me anouther one? People who say "It's the thought that counts" are lonely and depressed. Also, thanks for noticing. -- The Zombiebaron 15:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough.

Mega Deletion Award! This Admin has successfully beaten the crap out of many, many articles in rapid succession. Fear them greatly.

Also, how could I not notice? I've been hitting those recent changes like nobody's business. It's rather satisfying work, adding to QVFD and saying "Ha, your crap will be set up the bomb." Good times....Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, thanks. For both things. And that third thing that you don't know about yet. -- The Zombiebaron 16:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

....ICUing RadicalX's Corner? I'm sorry! I didn't mean to.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Well it did remind me to archive it. God it was getting long, eh? -- The Zombiebaron 16:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Certainly. I'm happy to say that I created one of the images that was later archived. God, I'm adequate!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Also, DAMN YOU! ICUing an article that I QVFD'd. Grrr, too many vigilant users! It's clear I'm not wanted.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, they weren't "huff on sight". I mean, they weren't good, but they weren't that bad. -- The Zombiebaron 16:17, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. Also, I command you to get onto IRC. This method of conversing = annoyingzor.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

I can't. First off, my normal computer is out of reach, and I hate chatzilla with a flaming passion. Also, I'm just about to go out, so there would be no point in me going off and finding my other computer. I will, however, be on IRC in the near future. -- The Zombiebaron 16:51, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. Enjoy your being out.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Mr. Hankey

I did not realize that the {{expansion}} tag had a time limit. If I did I would have asked Todd_Lyons if I could remove it. If you check the history you'll see it was much shorter when he added that. Here is the conversation we had prior to him adding it.[1] Based on that could you please restore it? --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 02:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

It does have a limit, just because it makes any easy way of finding short pages that havn't been edited in a month. But, because you namedropped Todd so much, I'll bring it back for you. Don't get any idea though. Had you not mentioned Todd, I'd be lecturing you about Helium right now. -- The Zombiebaron 02:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I like helium, though not as much as nitrous oxide. --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 03:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

No problem. I prefer iron oxide on my bugers, personally. -- The Zombiebaron 03:08, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Problems with Roman Dog Bird

Whenever I try making an edit on the Hikari page, it ends up getting reverted, no matter what. It's not even vandalism, what's worse. I fear that he may be engaging in an edit war with anyone who touches that page, minor edit or not.

I'm not touching that article anymore until Roman Dog Bird stops reverting that page when even the slightest edit appears. People can edit the page on Hikari whenever they want, right? Nope, he gets defensive when even a simple edit lands on that page. If something can be done without conflict, notify me. Jema56 06:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Have you tried talking to him politely on his talk page? That normally helps. Once you've done that you may have no more problems. -- The Zombiebaron 19:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Star

Please don't ban me. --AAA! (AAAA) 03:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Ban? You? For this? Well, it did cross my mind... -- The Zombiebaron 03:17, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Suggest "Is" be restored

It is actually pretty good. If you don't think so, I could put it in my user space and work on it as time permits. Professor Fate 16:51, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

P.S. It is Is. Or rather, it was.

Since you were the second person to request it, I restored it. -- The Zombiebaron 22:59, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

69.105.96.36

Ban him. We've been stuck in a 30 minute revert war. Do it for the "nigger cunts"! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:31, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

You've been around far to long to be able to claim that you don't know the proper channels for stuff like this. Just because I swing by to check VFP doesn't mean I care. Also, learn how to use my talkpage. -- The Zombiebaron 03:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Vandal alert!

Special:Contributions/69.105.96.36. Ban indefintely! --AAA! (AAAA) 03:32, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

You've been around far to long to be able to claim that you don't know the proper channels for stuff like this. Just because I swing by to check VFP doesn't mean I care. Also, learn how to use my talkpage. -- The Zombiebaron 03:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

69.105.96.36 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Ban him now! --General Insineratehymn 03:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

You've been around far to long to be able to claim that you don't know the proper channels for stuff like this. Just because I swing by to check VFP doesn't mean I care. Also, learn how to use my talkpage. -- The Zombiebaron 03:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Question about {{expand}}

I noticed from your above explanation (or below, since you seem to do things differently here) that you deleted a slew of articles because they had been tagged with {{expand}}. Pardon my ignorance, but is that really what is supposed to be done with articles marked for expansion? All the tag says is "This article needs to be expanded. Though short, this article has some potential. Please expand it into a full uncyclopedia article." Nothing about being huffed or mercilessly destroyed or whatever, like some other tags.

If it really is common procedure to delete articles that haven't been expanded since being tagged, there should at least be a warning to that effect, right? I bring this up because one of my articles (Is) was in the aforementioned slew and I hadn't thought it would be deleted. If there was a warning, I probably would have put more effort into expanding it. -kotra 00:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

The reason for the deletion is acctaully quite straightforward. You see, we don't just delete them right away. We don't even wait 7 days, as we do with {{ICU}} and {{WIP}}s. We wait a month. In this case, we waited for more then a month with most of them. If, in the span of a month, an article that has been tagged as short is not edited (which is how we measure when to delete them), it is bolded on a list, and the death squad takes over. Even more complexly, the death squad isn't really called "the death squad", and they sometimes save several articles each month.
Now, to your specific case. If you would like, I can recreate the article that you linked too in your user subspace so that you can work on expanding it without any possible threat to it at all. Just say yes, and I'll do it. Hopefully that answers all your questions, -- The Zombiebaron 02:00, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank the fellow up this page for swinging me into restoring. -- The Zombiebaron 23:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

I can't believe you banned me!

AND after what I wrote about you in the UgotM...You're not getting invited to Rosh Hasahna's dinner! ~ 22:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Dag, and here I was looking forward to having you all over again. :( -- The Zombiebaron 02:04, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Recent Deletion

Hey, I'm basically a nub on this site, but today you deleted the article on the Red Cross that I had edited heavily and the only reason given was that it was monthly maintenance. To be honest, this is the first time I've checked Uncyclopedia in a few weeks due to some internet problems, and I get on to find out the article I made the most edits on was deleted. With as much crap as is allowed on this site, I tried really hard to make my edits intelligent and improve upon what was posted before, which if you checked the history was quite horrible. Is there any way I could get more explanation on why it was deleted? I'm not trying to whine or anything, I was just curious. Thanks. - Ninjaphobos 21:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, I'm very glad that you asked. You see, late last night, as I was wondering around Uncyclopedia, I noticed that nobody had deleted the articles tagged with the {{expand}} tag for over 3 months. This meant that there were literally over 400 pages that I deleted last night. I didn't make the deletion summary very specific on any of them, due to the javascript that I was using to help me. If you could kindly link me to the article that was deleted, I would be happy to restore it somewhere where you can work on it in privacy. -- The Zombiebaron 21:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok! Ok!

Geez, you win, I'm sorry, have a pack of cookies, now please let me back on the IRC. :P - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 20:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Sure thing cheif. -- The Zombiebaron 20:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Herro?

Where have you been on IRC lately? Are you buggering off chasing the dames? If so, I forgive you. Otherwise, I don't. :D-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Sweet, you forgave me before I even opened my mouth. But, I assure you, I will probably be back tommorow. Don't hold your breath. -- The Zombiebaron 04:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Also, how'd things go with that chick? She ever show up, or no?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Erm...why don't you pm me about that little tidbit of my personal life? That would be much better. :) -- The Zombiebaron 19:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

For you, sir:

Mega Deletion Award! This Admin has successfully beaten the crap out of many, many articles in rapid succession. Fear them greatly.

For your work cleaning out both ICU and QVFD in one massive deletion binge. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you kindly. -- The Zombiebaron 02:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Sex Seafood

Okay, this is a pretty massive project that will eventually encompass a number of pages. Basically, we're going to create an entire DVD-article around our collaboration Sex Seafood. Currently, we (THE and myself) need a film poster for UnScripts:Sex Seafood: An Exploration in Flim by Peter Bogdanovich and Unrelated Quotes Guy. Preferably something with a lobster in it.

That by itself would be enough. Depending on how much work you'd like to put into it, we could also use a number of "screenshots," for various placement throughout the project. Beyond that, it can be as little or as much as you'd like to contribute. Perhaps when its ready we can discuss a Menu graphic for the root article and other grapical-type additions. Let me know what you think. --THINKER 00:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, pretty much anything that's even remotely relevant would be splendid. For the poster, perhaps a lobster reading a philosophy textbook, with the title above him? Or if you don't want to have the lobster be altered in any way, you could just have a picture of a lobster in a tank, or on a plate, with Peter Bogdanovich and Unrelated Quotes Guy Present: SEX SEAFOOD or something like that at the top, maybe even with little pictures of Unrelated Quotes Guy and Bogdanovich at the top. Let me or the thinker know if you've got somethin' for us, or you just have an idea you think would work. --THE 12:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I meant to do something for you chaps last week, but then I had a bit of a something and decided that I wasn't really in the mood for doing it. Rest assured, the moment that I have some free time in the upcoming few days, you boys will be the first thing that I do. -- The Zombiebaron 19:30, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Hey, Zombie! So, back from your vacation from the intarwebzor?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Gawd, you could at least have used a seperate heading to ask that. That question had nothing to do with Sex Seafood. Well, unless you count what I did on my vacation... -- The Zombiebaron 19:38, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

New section header? Pah, that is for lesser men. Or, as it were, me. Just bein' difficult.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Or goldfish. I once saw a goldfish that could go off topic like nobody's buissness. His name was Frank. -- The Zombiebaron 19:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Done. -- The Zombiebaron 18:34, 30 July 2007 (UTC)