User talk:Orian57/Archive16
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User talk:Orian57. |
There is no hope for this poor page now
Well I never, pristine purity? This cannot be allowed to remain for any significant time. I shall do what must be done. I am unashamed. --UU - natter 15:25, Jul 10
- UU!!! /me dive tackles UU/ I've missed you so much! How you doing? what did I miss? Orian57 Talk 15:27 10 July 2009
- You missed everything exciting that could possibly happen in the history of this site. It will never be that fun again. Also, you missed Anderson taking a couple of wickets, but unfortunately the Aussies taking almost complete control of the first test. And I know that will upset you massively. --UU - natter 15:32, Jul 10
- Oh you haven't changed a bit have you! We should go for coffee - or a meal even, be good to catch up after all these years, I'll even give you a signed copy of my latest novel - my edititor says it's gonna be huge! Orian57 Talk 15:36 10 July 2009
- Heh, you said tit! --UU - natter 15:39, Jul 10
- Yeah. I left all that gay stuff behind a while ago, have you met my wife? Orian57 Talk 15:41 10 July 2009
- I can't work out which is the better work of fiction - that comment or the novel... --UU - natter 15:45, Jul 10
- Is it me or did this text just get bigger? Also the novel. Made the wife up in three seconds flat. The novel took much much longer. Orian57 Talk 15:48 10 July 2009
- 10 minutes? 15? --UU - natter 15:49, Jul 10
- No but seriously, this text. Also why is my new header only working on this page and not the others? Orian57 Talk 15:51 10 July 2009
- Text looks OK to me. Far as I can see. Of course, it is friday, so I'm not really concentrating. --UU - natter 15:56, Jul 10
- I swear it looked bigger! And it's yay it's Friday! The conclusion to Torchwood - they killed Ianto last night! How could they!? Orian57 Talk 15:59 10 July 2009
- Never mind that - 5 o'clock has ticked past - I'm outta here! Kapwinnnnng! --UU - natter 16:11, Jul 10
- Meem-eep Orian57 Talk 16:12 10 July 2009
- I promised myself I wasn't going to do this, but I can't let this go. More beer, more beer. More beer, more beer. More beer, more beer, more be-e-e-e-er! Oh yeah. Oim from Oz. Edit #991 Pup 23:58, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Meem-eep Orian57 Talk 16:12 10 July 2009
- Never mind that - 5 o'clock has ticked past - I'm outta here! Kapwinnnnng! --UU - natter 16:11, Jul 10
- I swear it looked bigger! And it's yay it's Friday! The conclusion to Torchwood - they killed Ianto last night! How could they!? Orian57 Talk 15:59 10 July 2009
- Text looks OK to me. Far as I can see. Of course, it is friday, so I'm not really concentrating. --UU - natter 15:56, Jul 10
- No but seriously, this text. Also why is my new header only working on this page and not the others? Orian57 Talk 15:51 10 July 2009
- 10 minutes? 15? --UU - natter 15:49, Jul 10
- Is it me or did this text just get bigger? Also the novel. Made the wife up in three seconds flat. The novel took much much longer. Orian57 Talk 15:48 10 July 2009
- I can't work out which is the better work of fiction - that comment or the novel... --UU - natter 15:45, Jul 10
- Yeah. I left all that gay stuff behind a while ago, have you met my wife? Orian57 Talk 15:41 10 July 2009
- Heh, you said tit! --UU - natter 15:39, Jul 10
- Oh you haven't changed a bit have you! We should go for coffee - or a meal even, be good to catch up after all these years, I'll even give you a signed copy of my latest novel - my edititor says it's gonna be huge! Orian57 Talk 15:36 10 July 2009
- You missed everything exciting that could possibly happen in the history of this site. It will never be that fun again. Also, you missed Anderson taking a couple of wickets, but unfortunately the Aussies taking almost complete control of the first test. And I know that will upset you massively. --UU - natter 15:32, Jul 10
Ianto!
Thanks for not at all letting-that-slip-at-all-to-someone-who-may-not-have-finished-watching-it Orian. But anyway, real thankies now!
CHEERS!
Thanks for voting for this. Cat appreciates it too. Or I think she does, because she's chewing the carpet quite happily.
Hang on a second, that doesn't look like the carpet. No! She wouldn't! Not the cabbages...!!!
Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 11:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
=) Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:03, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry! I cried though! Poor Ianto. The whole of this series was awsome and it comes a brilliant conclusion. And you're welcome, I loved that article just as much as I did Ianto. Orian57 Talk 12:13 11 July 2009
Hi! (Or, Yet Another Exclusive Convo between Methy and Orian)
I'll be on and off during the summer, I have less free time on my hands, apparently I was beaten with a bat until I took a restaurant job to pay part of the rent or something. How are you doing? Also, do you like my sig? No? OKay. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (18:19 07-12-2009)
- Oh hey, cool. I've been trying to find work too, but you know credit crunch. Or something. It's good to see you! Also, would you vote on this for me? It's not getting enough attention. I have two other things on VFH too but they're doing fine. That was just plain whoreing, how you don't mind. And your sig looks more yellow and it's in english, both improvements in my book. :D Orian57 Talk 18:24 12 July 2009
- Oh it changes colour! that's cool too. Orian57 Talk 18:25 12 July 2009
- I forgot to tell you that 3 days ago, I was here for two years. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (18:30 07-12-2009)
- Yeah you were under a different name for long enough, but I never really new you untill you became Methy. Anyway, good to see you around again! Orian57 Talk 18:32 12 July 2009
- I'm guessing either names or activity depend on the amount of people who know you. Probably both. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (18:37 07-12-2009)
- Activity more than names I'd imagine. I didn't avoid you as Jasper I just didn't see you much. Also :) Orian57 Talk 18:42 12 July 2009
- By the way, "It was a promise I gave, it's a promise you'll get" is another way of saying, "Don't forget, I'm nomming you in January". METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (18:44 07-12-2009)
- Yes but I'd like to get at least over 20 features before deserving writer of the year. Thanks though, check out my user page and the read tab at the top to see my latest works. Orian57 Talk 18:47 12 July 2009
- You only need like 8 more features. After Trapped at Sea, you'll only need 7, you can manage that for the next 5 or 6 months. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (18:52 07-12-2009)
- Yeah, I've got 3 articles on VFH right now, so I'll most likely have 15 by the end of the month. But I'll probably end up trying to get into the top five in Hall of Shame. But yeah, I really apreciate your support! Orian57 Talk 18:55 12 July 2009
- Always supporting you since August 2008. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (18:57 07-12-2009)
- That shit (actually it's not that bad, but it does need some clean up)? What about Insomnia? It was much better and it was July 08. Orian57 Talk 19:01 12 July 2009
- I wasn't Vote For-ing until August. I voted for your Why? Don't You Have A Girlfriend. It was my
firstsecond vote in VFH. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (19:06 07-12-2009)- Cool. Also thanks for those other votes too! I'm pretty much gauranteed, three more features. I'll be ahead of UU then! And some other people. :) Orian57 Talk 19:11 12 July 2009
- Once you get ahead of Cajek, who knows what will happen? METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (19:24 07-12-2009)
- Well if that happens I'll almost certainly deserve it. Unless I cheat and just write twenty more Joshy Articles (I'm not gonna do that though, too pleased to have gotten away with LazyTown). Orian57 Talk 19:27 12 July 2009
- So your Joshy phase is over, now comes your encyclopedic phase? You know what I've noticed? There was no sexual reference throughout this entire conversation. Should we take our pants off? METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (19:35 07-12-2009)
- I've only done one good encyclopedic article, although I'm working on another. I really like UnScrits actually. I think that's gonna be my next phase. And what! I've been masturbating this whole time and never mentioned it!? Orian57 Talk 19:39 12 July 2009
- You have? You've been fapping so quietly I couldn't hear. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (19:41 07-12-2009)
- /fap fap fap fap-fap-fap-fap-fap--TEAR/ Shit. I didn't know it could come off! Orian57 Talk 19:43 12 July 2009
- I've only done one good encyclopedic article, although I'm working on another. I really like UnScrits actually. I think that's gonna be my next phase. And what! I've been masturbating this whole time and never mentioned it!? Orian57 Talk 19:39 12 July 2009
- OH god! Another 911 situation! Where's RT when you need him? Where's the fucking insurance company? WHY WAS MY DAD A SCIENTOLOGIST?! METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (19:50 07-12-2009)
- So your Joshy phase is over, now comes your encyclopedic phase? You know what I've noticed? There was no sexual reference throughout this entire conversation. Should we take our pants off? METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (19:35 07-12-2009)
- Yeah, no. Stop confusing our fathers! Yours was Catholic, and a rapist, mine was a Atheist turned Scientologist. ~ (19:59 07-12-2009)
- Well if that happens I'll almost certainly deserve it. Unless I cheat and just write twenty more Joshy Articles (I'm not gonna do that though, too pleased to have gotten away with LazyTown). Orian57 Talk 19:27 12 July 2009
- I wish I had an interesting life like that. The TV always makes it look like fun. Orian57 Talk 20:24 12 July 2009
- Once you get ahead of Cajek, who knows what will happen? METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (19:24 07-12-2009)
- I've heard that a life is a good thing to have. I might try it at some stage. Pup 21:55, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Cool. Also thanks for those other votes too! I'm pretty much gauranteed, three more features. I'll be ahead of UU then! And some other people. :) Orian57 Talk 19:11 12 July 2009
- It's not so great. We sort of hate each other. We sort of want to shoot each other in the face. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (15:24 07-13-2009)
- I wasn't Vote For-ing until August. I voted for your Why? Don't You Have A Girlfriend. It was my
- Well obviously I was being frivolous. Dunno about Puppy though, he seems just Austraillian enough to like it. Orian57 Talk 15:37 13 July 2009
- That shit (actually it's not that bad, but it does need some clean up)? What about Insomnia? It was much better and it was July 08. Orian57 Talk 19:01 12 July 2009
- Life is good. Doesn't have anything to do with being an Aurstraialllaiain. Has something to do with Prozac. Pup 07:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Always supporting you since August 2008. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (18:57 07-12-2009)
- Yeah, I've got 3 articles on VFH right now, so I'll most likely have 15 by the end of the month. But I'll probably end up trying to get into the top five in Hall of Shame. But yeah, I really apreciate your support! Orian57 Talk 18:55 12 July 2009
- You only need like 8 more features. After Trapped at Sea, you'll only need 7, you can manage that for the next 5 or 6 months. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (18:52 07-12-2009)
- Yes but I'd like to get at least over 20 features before deserving writer of the year. Thanks though, check out my user page and the read tab at the top to see my latest works. Orian57 Talk 18:47 12 July 2009
- By the way, "It was a promise I gave, it's a promise you'll get" is another way of saying, "Don't forget, I'm nomming you in January". METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (18:44 07-12-2009)
- Activity more than names I'd imagine. I didn't avoid you as Jasper I just didn't see you much. Also :) Orian57 Talk 18:42 12 July 2009
- I'm guessing either names or activity depend on the amount of people who know you. Probably both. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (18:37 07-12-2009)
- Yeah you were under a different name for long enough, but I never really new you untill you became Methy. Anyway, good to see you around again! Orian57 Talk 18:32 12 July 2009
- I forgot to tell you that 3 days ago, I was here for two years. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (18:30 07-12-2009)
- Oh it changes colour! that's cool too. Orian57 Talk 18:25 12 July 2009
WASSAP?
It's been a while Orian, hasn't it?Cmc MgrMr. Isaak - "Wiry" - Sean 00:17, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- It has. Now sort your sig. Put it in a template and then go to my preferences and enter: {{subst:nosubst|template name}} then click the custom sig box. Also Greak to see ya about, I thought you'd left. Orian57 Talk 00:21 13 July 2009
Re:Thanks
No problem, but I hate zombies. They scare the living dead crap out of me. Loved the article though. Padddy5 23:11, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Fast zombies are scary. But slow ones are just pointless, as I showed in my article. Also in future you can just edit up the header on your page, I'll have put it on my watchlist. :) Orian57 Talk 23:13 14 July 2009
This is my 1,100th edit
Which given that it's a milestone, it seems a shame that I actually have nothing to say. Pup 08:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah my 10,000th edit was something like putting a comma in a pee review I'd just submitted but not proof read. Orian57 Talk 10:07 15 July 2009
Welcome template
Hey there.
I found Template:Welcome, which was different from your message, and I am busy.
Pee Review --> "...Reviews are a requirement of you wish to self-nominate an article..." should be "if", I imagine. I also figure the page is probably protected, so if you don't mind, I'll leave this in your hands.
Thanks. 1½ (T C E) 11:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Just found it (I presume) in your userspace, another nice reason for me not to edit it, eh? :P 1½ (T C E) 11:34, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks, I'll sort that out. Also do you have your sig in a template, you should, if you do then it's leaking, I think possibly what Necropaxx said in the next conversation was actually to you. so see if you can sort that out, if you need me to explain what I mean then I will. Orian57 Talk 14:57 16 July 2009
You're sig code's leaking.
I think I see the problem. I'll see what I can do... • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:40, Jul 16
- Hm. It looks like the problem is in your "My preferences" thingie. You'll have to do it. You're missing a ">" at the end of one of your span tags. Hope this helps. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:46, Jul 16
press
howdy, orian. the signpost is considering running a story on your recent string of success, and possible causes. would you care to comment? 15:21, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well I suppose it's down to being fantastic. And unemployed. But mostly being fantastic. Also I'm hoping to beat my record of 4 in a month, so I need at least one more. Not to mention the way VFH is I could probably get Soap Operas featured if I wanted. *hint hint* Orian57 Talk 15:30 16 July 2009
- Om nom nom METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (15:47 07-16-2009)
Collab?
Remember considering it long ago in days untold? I'm considering it again. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (15:44 07-16-2009)
UnSignpost: July 16nd, 2009
The Newspaper With Love In Every Paragraph!
July 16th, 2009 • Issue 56 • This is a Pathetic Joke
User Return Causes Widespread Panic This week noted user An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays returned to the wiki, and immediately rendered that return "triumphant". However, other users are beginning to feel the effects of the presence of this primate whose quantum mechanical properties dictate that he be only during certain periods of the week. This incident left onlookers shocked, and worrying if something similar could happen to them. Not since the return of a scantily-clad Olipro has this website seen such a display of sheer terror mixed with complete confusion (and in the case of Olipro, a bit of curious arousal mixed in). The aforementioned incident involved one user who had AATOEOT embedded in his dreams. Most curiously, this episode seems to have happened on a Friday night, a time period when an An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays should decidedly not exist. Nearly a week has passed without further disruptions, although that may be partially due to Ape's ban after being kicked off of the Uncyclopedia island during a rousing game of Uncyclopedia Survivor. Regardless of the reasons behind the strange occurrences, users should be sure to keep an eye out for strange occurrences on and off the wiki...particularly on Thursdays. Flood of Crap Nearly Overflows VFD For the last few days, an explosion of nominations has inundated Uncyclopedia's waste removal system, Votes for Deletion. After a period of low activity, where there would typically be just a few to several nominations, things picked up last week. In the last few days, the situation has accelerated into what is being called by experts a "shit-ton" of undesirable content festering in the dark, unvisited corners of the wiki. Said undesirable content is currently being read, discussed, and dealt with accordingly, as is the usual procedure at the highly efficient VFD. Circumstances have escalated to the point of rattling a few relaxed admins. One such incident involved a user getting the customary one-day ban for increasing the active nomination count past twenty, when the user in question had, in fact, only increased the number of active noms to twenty. Owing to the normal tendency of the article count of VFD to stay in the low single digits lately, the lapse is certainly forgiveable, and was quickly corrected. Afterwards the two parties exchanged pleasantries and shared a S'Mores which was roasted over the open bonfire of newly deleted articles. Former poopsmith MrN9000 commented on the situation, saying, "Well you know I fancy the standards at VFD have improved significantly in recent times. Not so long ago it would often just be a quick "Short and Shit" vote from UU, and the latest stub was on for a huffing. These days we are spending more time voting on closer votes and are deleting much better articles than we used to! Something VFD is really proud of." In a final display of VFD patriotism, MrN added, "CHECK THE PAGE HISTORY BEFORE NOMINATING YOU BUGGERS!" Orian57 On Fire Noted rainbow-colored user Orian57 has recently enjoyed a remarkable string of success (pictured on right). He has scored an unprecedented natural hat trick of features, with UnBooks:Daddy, There's a Zombie in the Garden, LazyTown, and UnScripts:Trapped at Sea reaching the front page on consecutive days. Not since the time of such legends as Savethemooses and The Thinker have such lofty VFH records been broken. Although in the case of STM, there were probably mitigating factors involved, like wooden articles rather than aluminum, or something. Or aluminium, that strange substance only found in England by mining thousands of millions of other strange occurences, such as referring to the trunk of a car as a "boot". This god-like spasm of awesomeness is fresh on the heels of Orian's Writer of the Month win in June of this year. Since the beginning of that month, he has seen six of his works grace the front page, and he shows no signs of slowing down. When reached for comment, he explained, "Well I suppose it's down to being fantastic. And unemployed. But mostly being fantastic." The UnSignpost would like to congratulate Orian on his recent spat of win, and express hopes he will continue the pattern well into the future. |
| |||||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
I had to steal this paper! And i'm bloody in it! Orian57 Talk 03:27 17 July 2009
A question for your Oriany contemplation
Morning chap. As someone with more features to their name than me (congratulations on that, by the way) and whose opinion on funny therefore is far more worthwhile than my own, can you give me a vague opinion on an idea I had? The basic intro is here. I'm considering putting flesh on its bones, but can't decide it it'll be worth bothering. The intro isn't funny as it stands, but do you think the idea it sets up has the potential to work, or should I just sick to creative ban reasons for now? I'm trying to find something that would re-ignite my writing mojo - doing lobster with Caj and Gerry reminded me that I like writing stuffs, but I've been struggling to find time, find an idea, and find the inclination to write something of my own again. Is this the place to start or not? A quick answer is all I seek. Pippings. --UU - natter 09:23, Jul 17
- It seems interesting, like you said not lol right now but it could be. also how does this strike you? I'm worried it's not funny and already a bit long dispite not being done with the first section yet. Also this seems like fun but we've probably already got stuff like it. Thoughts? Orian57 Talk 16:17 17 July 2009
1200 edits
Looking back on the last 100 edits, and not much has changed. Pup
- Is this as shit as I suspect? I have a feeling it's not going anyplace funny. Orian57 Talk 15:19 18 July 2009
- Judgement is too askew at the moment - it's 1:30am and I'm only staying awake as I need to go and pick someone up from a party. Quick question - I've just had an article huffed that I didn't want to be and I'm trying to work out who did it and why. What would you do in my position? Pup
- Aah, worked it out - all is good. What's you opinion on this? I know it needs something, but I'm not sure what. Pup
- Being honest I'd find a concept that people will read. We already have backwards and it's just the same and (in my opinion) not funny. even if you bother reading it forwards, which is pretty difficult for most people. Basically this is like your other one with the dissapearing text whose name I can't remember, it's just the one clever and visual joke, which, for me, isn't enough. So for this I don't actually know what I'd do, probably something about a guy thinking back, but doing it so much he misses out on the now. But again this is just my opinion. but that script of mine, is it shit? Orian57 Talk 15:44 18 July 2009
- Just finished reading it. The genre is ripe for the ridicule - well and truly otherwise stuff like Scary movie wouldn't work. I'd probably put in more breaking the fourth wall stuff about how they have to do certain things a certain way as that's what the formula says. Stuff like "Oh, we have to end up in the same room together because that's the way this genre works." Think about the internal commentary in Scary movie - that kind of thing. There are a couple of giggles in there. It'll need substantial work to get it working though, and to be honest I don't see it being feature worthy.
- Regarding Thinking back (and Vitligo) - they're both experiments in visual humour that's textually based. Thinking back was also to get me used to working in MediaWiki. To be honest I didn't even know that there was a "backwards" until I'd finished this. I actually didn't put Vitiligo forward for VFH, and at this stage probably wouldn't have voted for it if it weren't for my ego - I personally think it's the weakest article that I've done with the exception of maybe my list and carebears. Note how I don't link them from here - tells you something Pup
- Regarding my script. That's what I thought, not feature worthy so no point (now a days I only really write something if I intend it to be a feature). Also I dislike breaking the fourth wall, it can be good but I wouldn't base a whole article around it. but I do apreciate your feed back because now I can get rid of it and move on.
- And it's good to see where you can go with things like that but I just dont think they do justice to writing, because the joke isn't in what's written but the font or colour and so you've bassically got a picture. Anyway, congratulations on your edit count, I have over 11,000 now. Orian57 Talk 16:17 18 July 2009
- I have over 1,000, but mainly because I never click the preview button. Also, can I get some opinions on my script? ~~Sir Fightstar Rocks! CUN 21:55, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- I live by the preview button now... I've fixed a couple of minor spelling issues with the script, so I have no major issue with spelling or grammar. Obviously this is almost pure quotation so there's no issue with prose. Plot line is negligible, but then again it's meant to be.
- I like the homage to the futuristic police movie. Watchmen, Logan's Run, and RoboCop and a few other bits and pieces spring to mind. I was waiting for the "Hand in your badge" line to spring into the mix. It is a little American centric, but given that most of these movies are American based there's no issue there. (Actually, even if it wasn't there'd be no issue, just a bunch of people from UK and Australia whining about it.)
- I don't know about the Mexican bit. Aren't we able to pick on terrorists from an unnamed country? It seems to be de rigueur for western countries when trying to justify war. "...and end our lives in the peril of flames." actually makes no sense in English, even though I knew what you were trying to say. "Peril" means danger, so either change to "...live our lives..." or just drop out the "...peril of..."
- I like the start where his boss is trying to explain to Tarabonn that Jill is dead. I'd probably extend that a bit, have each part of the story being brought out a bit at a time so that the Boss says everything short of the word "dead" and Tarabonn still not get it.
- All in all it has promise. Steal as much as you can from the genre and use it. The more clichés from the movies the better. Pup
- I have over 1,000, but mainly because I never click the preview button. Also, can I get some opinions on my script? ~~Sir Fightstar Rocks! CUN 21:55, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Being honest I'd find a concept that people will read. We already have backwards and it's just the same and (in my opinion) not funny. even if you bother reading it forwards, which is pretty difficult for most people. Basically this is like your other one with the dissapearing text whose name I can't remember, it's just the one clever and visual joke, which, for me, isn't enough. So for this I don't actually know what I'd do, probably something about a guy thinking back, but doing it so much he misses out on the now. But again this is just my opinion. but that script of mine, is it shit? Orian57 Talk 15:44 18 July 2009
- Aah, worked it out - all is good. What's you opinion on this? I know it needs something, but I'm not sure what. Pup
- Judgement is too askew at the moment - it's 1:30am and I'm only staying awake as I need to go and pick someone up from a party. Quick question - I've just had an article huffed that I didn't want to be and I'm trying to work out who did it and why. What would you do in my position? Pup
Hey
I know you love my talk page, but i think that Benson is offended. He has a whole forum dedicated to something like that. zh 12:54, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
1255 edits
Which is such a sucky number. If I had been thinking clearer I would have done this five edits ago. Got a little sidetracked with the PEEreview of the Bible. While I'm here though, I have one of yours that I'll look at tomorrow (as my blushing bride is telling me to leave the computer alone). But if you have the opportunity I'd like a sort perspective on this incomplete article. Pup
- okay, I looked at it. I'll look again tomorrow. Pup
- All right. I've slept on it, and in the cold light of the morning, I still don't like it. Concept is good, but execution is a little meh... I'd drop out larger parts of the first chapter - although I like the bit about getting into the warehouse and being completely redirected it doesn't fit in with the rest of the article. The actions scene is a little clunky and confusing. again, this is said all strictly IMHO. Pup
Hi Hi!
Uh yeah, I haven't been doing much recently, but had an idea. This is very much in the idea stage, but can I ask some advice (as you are the master of funny, literally) - Do you think this is a) vaguely funny or has the possibility to be funny and b) work better as an UnScript or an UnTweet or what? Thank you plentifully! Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 19:00, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Or, of course, you could ignore me. *hint hint*. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 11:49, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
No, wait. That's not what I meant at all! Please! Hello? Don't ignore me! Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 11:50, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- You know what I might do? I might just carry on talking to myself here on your talk page. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 11:51, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, this is pretty fun. I mean, not super duper fun, but HI NAMEABLE!!! You look hot. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 11:52, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Why, thank you, Nameable. I might just say you are looking pretty fine yourself. So, what you up to? Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 11:53, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Me? Oh, I'm just hanging around on Orian's talk page. I have absolutely no reason, but meh. What about you, handsome chappie? Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 11:54, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, you flatter me. Well I'm writing User:Nameable/Severe Nasal-Specific Seborrhoeic Dermatitis as a matter of fact. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 11:55, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Awesome. I think it's almost as good as Affair and Corn Flakes. Wonder who wrote those smashing articles, Nameable? Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 11:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- It was me! Ho ho ho! I do enjoy talking to you, Nameable. By the way, I love your sig. Really goes with Orian's talk page. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 11:57, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- You are so right. So does yours! Smashing. Hey, do you reckon Orian will mind we have taken over his talk page? Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 11:58, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Nah. I'm sure he'll be ecstatic with Nameable goodness! Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 11:59, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- But maybe it's a Nameable overdose, Nameable? Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:00, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- You are such a wimp, Nameable. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:01, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- But, we could get banned, Nameable! Banned! Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:02, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- For this? This is just a little bit of self-talking. No harm in that, is there Nameable? Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Suppose so. Hey, you like this? User:Nameable/UnScripts:Nurseryland Police Dept, Interview Transcripts, 1998 Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- No. As a matter of fact, I don't. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:05, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- OK, no need to be harsh! It's only in the beginning stages! Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:06, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Alright. Hey, do you reckon we might have the longest self-conversation in Uncyclopedic history here? Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:07, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe. What are we doing again? Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:08, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Waiting for Orian. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:09, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oh yeah. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:10, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- You know, we should tell him to read all the above links when he gets back. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:10, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yep. Or we could just finish them and put them on pee review. Who knows if he's ever coming back? Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:11, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, that's a thought...PEE REVIEW! Why didn't we think of that before? Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Beats me. You must be stupid, Nameable. Anyway, I'm off! Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 12:13, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- Mad as in crazy? Me? Never. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 19:53, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- I think you mean SCHIZOPHRENIC! But that's not mad. In fact, I'd say it was our best quality. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 19:53, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Actually I think you meant !EID ,REKCUF-REHTOM ,EID dissociative identity disorder. Pup
- Well of course I meant dissociative Identity Disorder. It's just that he got it wrong. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 08:58, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, that's not fair! It wasn't me! I hate you, Nameable. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 08:59, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- Me? Okay, it was me. Damn you, Nameable, and your meddling personalities! Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 09:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'm confused! You're one of my personalities! Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 09:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- That's true. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 09:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'm a different one. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 09:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- Shit. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 09:02, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
So I talked to you that one time for like 2 minutes before one of my best friends who was in Texas (far from me) got online and I had to talk to him and totally blew you off, but in a non-sexual way.
And you did not have an over-the-top Scottish accent. What's up with that? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 15:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- I am ashamed of Scotland and wish disassociate myself from it. Orian57 Talk 15:13 21 July 2009
- Ah. Well I guess that makes sense. But now you are not generic.... I like others to be generic. I get a laugh out of it. What I'm saying is that I'm unable to get a laugh at your expense. Good luck with your self respect or whatever.... Douche bag. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 15:16, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
UnSignpost: July 23rd, 2009
Telling You Stuff You Already Knew, But With Different Words!
July 23rd, 2009 • Issue 57 • The Newspaper That Won't Tell Everyone That You Wet the Bed! Oops...
Uncyclopedia Users Form Fantasy Football League This week, several Uncyclopedians banded together under the leadership of one Guildensternenstein to form some sort of "Fantasy Football" organization. What exactly this entails is unclear, but it appears that the football- and soccer-related fantasies of the participating members will be carried out in the semi-private confines of the forums. Reactions were mixed to this development, with some users expressing emotions ranging from apathy to indifference. Others voiced concern about children, decency, and lewd public conduct. "My little boy came home today saying something about going to another boy's house to perform football fantasies!" said one outraged and confused mother. Regardless of the small amount of negative feedback, participants are eager to begin fantasizing about their favorite football players, such as David Beckham. Bradaphraser had this to say: "The Fantasy Football League is a chance for Uncyclopedians to get away from the hustle and bustle of everyday Uncyclopedia work and actually have some fun for a change. While I usually am busy with the administrating task of sitting on my lazy ass and doing nothing, this gives users a chance to see me in a more relaxed state." "I fully expect that this venture will be just as successful as my recent run for the Presidency," continued Brad, "which I lost to Bradford Lyttle of the Pacifist party by a mere 110 votes. I fully expect to win one or possibly even two games in this upcoming season, assuming of course that a draft is eventually held." Said draft is scheduled to begin immediately, and assuming only a small portion of footballers flee to Canada to evade this draft, the Uncyclopedia Fantasy Football League will be ready to hold its first game by opening day. Village Dump Suffers From Rash of Inactivity In a startling development, activity on Uncyclopedia's main gathering place, the Village Dump, has all but ceased. With The UnIdiot registering the sole comment in the last three full days, the normal flow of important, relevant conversation in the Forums appears to have dried up. While an excess of users can usually be found loitering aimlessly in the halls of the Dump, it appeared all but deserted as of press time. Several theories have been raised, ranging from the intriguingly possible (July weather causes Uncyclopedians to go outside) to the exceedingly headache-inducing (Uncyclopedians are being abducted by giant space cabbages). However, one of the more interesting theories comes from our lead scientist and nature correspondant, DogNewspaper (unavailable for picture). He claims that while the Village Dump itself along with associated forums such as the Ministry of Love and the Help forum has seen a decline in activity, the so-called Benson's House of Pancakes has seen a shocking upswing in activity. In the same time frame that only a single edit was made in the Village Dump, sixteen different topics were edited in Benson's Breakfast Domicile. DogNewspaper, that earlier mentioned nature correspondant, calls this a migration. "Woof," he claimed, elaborating that many users were unable to adapt to conditions found in the normal Village Dump, and were forced to relocate to the more hospitable Benson-related location. It is here, in the BHOP, that users are free to create topics concerning their own birthdays, the anniversaries of their birth, and memorials commemorating the day they were born. Whether the mass exodus is complete or not has yet to be seen. |
| |||||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
A request for a PEE
Orian, correct me if I'm wrong but did you not write a series of articles as Joshy, an incredibly irritating small child with an annoying tendency to get featured? If you did I have just come across an article written in a similar style sitting in the PEE queue. I thought that since you write in this style more than me you might give more pertinent feedback. I asked that nobody reviews for a couple of days so you could do it, but that, admittedly, is not much of a guarantee. Just comment on the PEE page for the article if you are going to review, if you aren't, comment and I will magically appear and review it myself. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
- You know I was just thinking about doing a review (can't find an idea suitable to use in an article so might aswell be useful in other ways), and seen as how you were so nice about me I can't really refuse now, can I? However it'll have to wait for now because I'm working on another piece of writing that i hope will one day make known among the sci-fi freeks community and slightly more well off than I am now. :) Orian57 Talk 19:12 26 July 2009
- Oh good, means another I don't feel obliged to do. Pup
Hi Hi! The Prodding Continues...
So, you know when I went mad on your page? Like, er, just up there? With the dissociative identity disorder? Yeah, well, I think I'm cured now. But there is something which you could help me out with if you saw fit. However, you would only have to do it if you had the time and wanted to, obviously. But yeah. How are you? Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 15:19, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Best Fwiend (who's gay)
Why you no get me pwesent yet? Onwy about a week til my birfday 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 23:26,29July,2009
- what kind of presents would a for nd a haf yirz old kid want? What? Do you want barney the retarted dinosaur to sing at your birfday part? No, we cant afford that.. You'll have to do with the singalong CD Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 23:59 July 29 '09
- Stop bullying him! That's my job. me starts chanting "Cheddr is a poo head/ cheddar is a poo head" And I'm thinking about it, but I've bassically hit a wall when it comes to finding good ideas for anything. Hit a wall and fallen down a well of acid in the dark with no trunks on and headache. Orian57 Talk 00:35 30 July 2009
- Strangely, the story I wrote for Mahm00shA was easier to write than any other article I did, and it's funnier than most of them. And I'm not a poo-head! Your face is a poo-head! WAHHHH!!! – Preceding unsigned comment added by CheddarBBQ (talk • contribs)
- Yeah. But you didn't sign so bassically I have to kill you know, in seven days. Orian57 Talk 01:10 30 July 2009
- Strangely, the story I wrote for Mahm00shA was easier to write than any other article I did, and it's funnier than most of them. And I'm not a poo-head! Your face is a poo-head! WAHHHH!!! – Preceding unsigned comment added by CheddarBBQ (talk • contribs)
- Stop bullying him! That's my job. me starts chanting "Cheddr is a poo head/ cheddar is a poo head" And I'm thinking about it, but I've bassically hit a wall when it comes to finding good ideas for anything. Hit a wall and fallen down a well of acid in the dark with no trunks on and headache. Orian57 Talk 00:35 30 July 2009
Tremble in the face of my feminine pheromones!
Just wanted to contaminate your talk page with girl cooties ^_^ --Dame 12:10, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- /Me gets my flamethrower/ Orian57 Talk 12:12 30 July 2009
- The only flammable things would be my clothing... Do you REALLY wanna go there Orian, I mean that could lead to serious questions about your sexuality. --Dame 12:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- /Me gets my Ice machine./ Orian57 Talk 12:55 30 July 2009
- I think the cold will "raise" the same issue. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 15:46,30July,2009
- ?????? Orian57 Talk 15:57 30 July 2009
- Cheddar is referring to the phenomenon whereby when you get girls cold in the frontal region, they get temporarily sexier.
- /me shakes head in disgust/ Freeks. Orian57 Talk 17:32 30 July 2009
- I thought that men had nipples too! Pup
- Yeah, but men with hard nipples don't get sexier. Unless they got those nice, pancake nipples. Those can't be anything but sexy. (Also, Orian, could I get my flamethrower back please? I'm getting lonely without it. I'm trying to burn shit with my oil-lamp right now, and it's just not the same.) Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 21:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe we should do the democratic Uncyclopedia thing and have a vote as to who thinks that erect nipples on men are sexy. Pup
- Against.
- Against the vote, or against the fact that erect men's niples are sexy? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 23:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Please don't describe that as a "fact."
- Also, "erect men's nipples" doesn't necessarily have the same meaning as "men's erect nipples." 23:43, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
23:42, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Stopit! All this talk of man nipples is defeating the purpose of my girl cooties contamination! I'm trying to de-Eric-ify myself here. :/ --Dame 23:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, this thread has been derailed. This may call for emergency measures, like posting a picture of yourself in a very cold room. whistles innocently
- Careful! You could poke somebody's eye out with those things. Pup
- Yeah, this thread has been derailed. This may call for emergency measures, like posting a picture of yourself in a very cold room. whistles innocently
- Please don't describe that as a "fact."
22:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against the vote, or against the fact that erect men's niples are sexy? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 23:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Against.
- Maybe we should do the democratic Uncyclopedia thing and have a vote as to who thinks that erect nipples on men are sexy. Pup
- Yeah, but men with hard nipples don't get sexier. Unless they got those nice, pancake nipples. Those can't be anything but sexy. (Also, Orian, could I get my flamethrower back please? I'm getting lonely without it. I'm trying to burn shit with my oil-lamp right now, and it's just not the same.) Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 21:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- I thought that men had nipples too! Pup
17:07, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- /me shakes head in disgust/ Freeks. Orian57 Talk 17:32 30 July 2009
- Cheddar is referring to the phenomenon whereby when you get girls cold in the frontal region, they get temporarily sexier.
- ?????? Orian57 Talk 15:57 30 July 2009
- I think the cold will "raise" the same issue. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 15:46,30July,2009
- /Me gets my Ice machine./ Orian57 Talk 12:55 30 July 2009
-
- ARGH! ARGH! ARGH!!! Orian57 Talk 05:05 31 July 2009
- okay, ignoring sexual prefs, I'd still say picture #2 is cuter than #1. She has a nicer smile. Pup
- No, she has horrible breast mutations. Orian57 Talk 05:56 31 July 2009
- Are you referring to the mutations on her breasts or are you suggesting that her breasts are in point of fact mutations? --Dame 11:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- the first one. Although point #2 is just as valid. Orian57 Talk 11:52 31 July 2009
- According to my old anthropology professor, breasts aren't mutations - they're an evolutionary process whereby the buttocks were relocated to the woman's chest so that men can see them when the woman is sitting down. 15:19, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- the first one. Although point #2 is just as valid. Orian57 Talk 11:52 31 July 2009
- Are you referring to the mutations on her breasts or are you suggesting that her breasts are in point of fact mutations? --Dame 11:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- No, she has horrible breast mutations. Orian57 Talk 05:56 31 July 2009
- okay, ignoring sexual prefs, I'd still say picture #2 is cuter than #1. She has a nicer smile. Pup
- ARGH! ARGH! ARGH!!! Orian57 Talk 05:05 31 July 2009
- The only flammable things would be my clothing... Do you REALLY wanna go there Orian, I mean that could lead to serious questions about your sexuality. --Dame 12:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
I see you're having that problem, too.
I don't know why it is, though I suspect it's due to Wikia doing something. Also, here is the answer to your other question. Well, the answer is a yes. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:21, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks Dex! Here was me thinking it was a wizard, or something Orian57 Talk 15:33 31 July 2009
Thanks
Lots of good advice in the review of What I did in my hols. Thanks--Sog1970 16:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
A possible collab
The idea is Why?:I became a nihilist? Please consider. ~~Sir Fightstar Rocks! CUN 03:38, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- I honestly can't say that title brings many ideas to mind, care to expand on your concept? Orian57 Talk 10:15 2 August 2009
Sigh!
I never visit the forums or IRC, so I'll just dump it here cause this is where all the cool kids hang out. Due to the cessation of unemployment, I will not be as focused on my Uncyclopeadian duties as I was previously. (Actually having said that, please feel free to vandalise my talk page as much as you like while I'm gone. You know, turn the lights on and off and get the mail so people think that I'm home.) Pup
Hi Hi! A Question For You
Do I exist? /mopes Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 15:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Did somebody say something? Pup
- Oh my god I knew it! Nameable • mumble? 11:49, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hey! It's that Puppy on the Radio - he's back! Yay! I'm so happy now. (@Nameable: I'm so sorry for being so useless - but this weekend has been busy, my grandparents are up so I've not had much time. What my excuse was before now I'm not yet sure. I'll look into it when I can.) Orian57 Talk 11:53 4 August 2009
- Don't worry. There is no need anymore. But I now feel eligible to be a bit of a whore. Meh. Nameable • mumble? 12:05, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hey! It's that Puppy on the Radio - he's back! Yay! I'm so happy now. (@Nameable: I'm so sorry for being so useless - but this weekend has been busy, my grandparents are up so I've not had much time. What my excuse was before now I'm not yet sure. I'll look into it when I can.) Orian57 Talk 11:53 4 August 2009
- Oh my god I knew it! Nameable • mumble? 11:49, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
UnSignpost: July 30th, 2009
All your readers are belong to us
July 30th, 2009• Issue 58• Now Delivered Trendily Late!
Uncyclopedia Users Alter Time Itself This week: an update. As previously reported in an earlier news story, one month ago several well-known contributors went on a campaign to try and delete time itself. It is said they were trying to bring about an end to unfunniness throughout history, with the slight side effect of non-existence. But just as it looked as if their plan would come to fruition, cooler heads prevailed and stopped everything in its tracks. Since then, the plan has changed. Instead of deleting all that ever was, the users have decided it would be much more prudent to just change all of history to their liking. Several users have been seen spending their free time on User:Gwax/Timeline rebuild, in some cases changing events one year at a time, and in others trying to change entire millennia. How they are able to do this, no one is sure, though rumors of a DeLorean DMC-12 have been circulating. The outcomes of the project have, thus far, been very good Remarks from the community on the process have been nothing but positive. "In order to walk the road of peace, we need to climb the mountain of conflict," notable scholar TKF exclusively commented. We have our entire staff working around the clock to figure out what this means as we speak. Town drunk Dexter111344 was also heard mumbling about the subject. He blamed wizards for the whole thing, before stumbling away, probably to make more links to A wizard did it. Regardless, whether its wizards or time machines, the editing of the past continues as we speak, and will continue until all of history has been changed. Or until we get bored and move onto something else. Uncyclopedia Editors Conflicted Over Story Topic Owing to the large amount of things happening in the last week, and also to the fact that this issue is unforgivably late, the editors of the UnSignpost were unable to settle on a single topic for the second story of this week's edition. The editors were also unable to agree on either two topics for a rare three-story issue or how many UnSignpost editors it takes to screw in a lightbulb (the UnSignpost staff has been left to ponder this question in the dark). As a decision could not be reached, it was decided after much deliberation and petty arguing that all of the candidate stories be mentioned rapid-fire in a single story, so as to confuse and irritate the reader and cause him to be required to navigate back to this issue to click on all of the links. These stories are as follows: Zombiebaron returns and petitions to end voting. His effort is parodied, rebutted, and parodied again. A link to Requested Articles is placed on the sidebar and MadMax commences handing out badges to requested article creators. Zombiebaron returns again to demand reskins, which we understand means he needs to replace all of his undead flesh with "fresh flesh". Cajek returns, but not really. VFH maxes out at 23 nominations at press time, including some discussion-inducing selections. More events certainly occured, but we can't be arsed to list everything for you. |
| ||||||
UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox |
Hi again! (Methy/Orian Convo 2)
I've still been knee-deep in shit since I got that job, I don't think I'll be that active anymore, I'll probably be like VGDictator and stop by every few months. It's as if we're all reaching a crucial point in our lives where we all have things to do in real life. Weird... METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (03:48 08-4-2009)
- Yeah, not me. While you are here though could you help make sure Daddy, There's a Zombie in the Garden gets into the top 3? A vote under LazyTown and Trapped at Sea wouldn't be a bad thing either. ;) Also I hope the shit isn't too bad. Orian57 Talk 08:40 4 August 2009
- It smells like Whoppers and frying oil. And you know I'd do anything for you, even if it's just voting. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (20:07 08-4-2009)
- Hey you should get on Skype! Free internet phone, and theres a load of other uncyc types on there too. Orian57 Talk 20:17 4 August 2009
- It smells like Whoppers and frying oil. And you know I'd do anything for you, even if it's just voting. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (20:07 08-4-2009)
Poke!
George, my love! Hi. How are ya? Skype killed my account momentarily (has been for the last seventeen hours), and I've been pretty much unable to recover it right now. If you're planning on being online at all today, email me (sillyelfcat@yahoo.com). I'm sending goatse christmas cards this year. Anyways.
Fish and tofu,
Quick Question
On my "Pious Christians..." article on VFH, you wrote Abstain, but put your vote/comment in the Against section. Is it an Against vote, or an Abstain put in the wrong section? I don't want to correct whichever mistake it was, because I'm unsure. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:08, 5 August 2009 (UTC)