User talk:Hyperbole/chive7

This user is on vacation, sabbatical, administrative leave, or is otherwise goofing off with the knowledge and/or consent of the Admins. Or, more likely, they've buggered off without saying boo to anyone. Their expected date of return is who knows. If you're lonely, or you miss them, leave a message.

---

archive archive2 archive6 archive5 archive3 archiveR

Consensual sex

Very, very consensual sex, officer. pillow talk 01:36, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Excellent. 1234 ~ 01:44, 5 March 2011

Two admins talking in code. I sense the cabal in the words. We are all going to be in trouble when it gells, aren't we? Aleister 1:48 5-3-'11

Questioning our code?? Next time, your block is going to be twice as long. pillow talk 01:52, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

But we haven't even brought in the batmoose... also, Hyperbole, darling, I'm actually sort of working on getting that news thing set up for you, now. Really. 1234 ~ 01:57, 5 March 2011

Awesome. Having you do work makes it easier to fool people into thinking I do work. pillow talk 01:58, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

The first letter of each word in Lyrithya's post spells: Bw he bith bah diaso wog tnt sufy nr. And you two thought you could get away with this? Seriously? Aleister 2:01 5-3-'11

You still haven't cracked the substitution cipher. pillow talk 02:02, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Having a pile of 'code' on one screen makes it easier to fool people into thinking I do work, too.

And really, Aleister, you think we'd use so simple of an encryption? 1234 ~ 02:04, 5 March 2011

You

Want to write the monthly awards blurbs. Before I or Zombiebaron or Zim ulator or someone else does it. Admit it, you do. 1234 ~ 02:35, 5 March 2011

Also, you don't need to comment on VFD things that they've been deleted if they've been deleted. It's pretty obvious, unless you're creating a new page, say, a redirect or something, afterwards, in which case you'd also want to put a {{VFDc}} on it. 1234 ~ 03:05, 5 March 2011

Well, that all makes sense. I'll write the blurbs if I find the energy. It's 7:28pm and I'm still hung over. Goddamn devil tequila. pillow talk 03:29, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

At least you're not still procrastinating from something you decided to do yesterday... are you? 1234 ~ 03:40, 5 March 2011

You have no idea. I abandoned a suitcase in Vegas and asked a guy to hold it for me for a night until I could pick it up. It's been two weeks. I haven't worn deodorant in two weeks. pillow talk 03:41, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, that's a whole other matter. Anything lasts that long, I'll just forget it completely. Lucky you that you haven't... or does the deodorant actually make a difference after all, despite what you may insist? 1234 ~ 03:43, 5 March 2011

Well, as I think I pointed out the other day, it turns out that Listerine is actually about twice as effective as deodorant, making me wonder why deodorant even exists. pillow talk 03:46, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Why are there different kinds of soap for washing different things? Hells, even for just washing a human, there's hand soap, body soap, hair soap, face soap... marketing, man. Marketing. Folks like to sell crap. 1234 ~ 03:52, 5 March 2011

Well, the face-body distinction is more than just marketing. If I wash my face with the stuff I use on my body, most of my face peels right off ten minutes later. pillow talk 03:53, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

And your body doesn't? Seriously? My face is a good deal tougher than my hands; if I used something on those that could peel a face, I'd have no... well, actually, I almost have no fingertips already. Er. 1234 ~ 03:59, 5 March 2011

Charlie Sheen

Yes, Charlie Sheen. Can you protect Charlie Sheen? And please protect his page here too, if you would. Ever since the news blitz this last week the page has been overrun with IP's, and I and others have had to fix it numerous times. WINNING! Aleister 17:06 5-3-'11

Okay, I'll semi-protect it. In return, do you think you could take half an hour and make it suck less? pillow talk 17:08, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

We haven't talked recently...

...Mostly because I've prostituted myself under the delusion I could write somewhere else and get paid. But as I heard the news about your temporary elevation, I had to come here and tell you how happy I am and how much you deserve it and how you're one of the most incredible people in the entire history of Uncyclopedia at least until your term runs out. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  06:16, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

Good to see you, Why?..! So, is the writing gig actually paying pretty well? pillow talk 06:42, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

I wish. Right now it's more "laying the groundwork." I'm helping review/edit a couple of books for which I'll get very little, am working on an article that if I'm lucky might earn me what I could have earned for a lot less effort working at McDonald's, and have about two steps to go before a book proposal gets a green light. Right now it's lots of work and very little money. But I still have my delusion, so I'm still plugging away. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  06:52, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

o___o

Holy... crap. That article. How did I ever miss that article when it was one VFD? That's just astounding. Absolutely astounding.

Also, not entirely unrelatedly, you got a this:

Exp: 1st April, 2011

Useful, eh? 1234 ~ 06:28, 6 March 2011

Yes, General Man was... special! How ironic that I'd receive that card only days after gaining the ability to unban myself :P pillow talk 06:42, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

The expiration date is not a coincidence. 1234 ~ 06:44, 6 March 2011

You know, I'm the one who made that card (OK, it's obviously ripped off from Monopoly--all I did was change "Jail" to "Ban") but I don't remember who came up with the date thing. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  06:55, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

Well done, then. It's properly inapplicable and everything! 1234 ~ 06:58, 6 March 2011

You don't remember? How convenient. Pup 02:09 07 Mar '11

Actually, I knew it was you. I just wanted to see if you were paying attention. Seriously, I was almost positive you did it, but not entirely positive. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  19:54, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Also

You. Archive VFD. Now. 1234 ~ 06:58, 6 March 2011

But we have two perfectly good poopsmiths! pillow talk 07:00, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

One of them is cranky and wants you to experience the joys of doing it yourself, just once. Is that too much to ask? *puppy eyes* 1234 ~ 07:03, 6 March 2011

I was totally going to do it, but then you grew creepy dog-eyes. pillow talk 07:03, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

It's a figure of speech, you jerk. Now are you going to do that, or will I have to get desperate? 1234 ~ 07:05, 6 March 2011

Honestly, I'm kind of looking forward to seeing what happens when you get desperate. pillow talk 07:06, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

You forgot to take down the {{VFD}}s and add the {{Oldvfd}}s to the talkpages. 1234 ~ 07:25, 6 March 2011

Aw, peas! Do I have to? pillow talk 07:26, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

That's part of poopsmithing! Don't you wish to experience the full joy of it all? 1234 ~ 07:29, 6 March 2011

I wish I could say that brought me joy. pillow talk 07:32, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I won't make you do that again. 1234 ~ 07:36, 6 March 2011

That was basically the most excruciating ten minutes of my life. pillow talk 07:43, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

• Hahahahaha -- The Zombiebaron 07:45, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

*beams* 1234 ~ 07:55, 6 March 2011

Orange monkey dish

Just as Jesus Christ that there is a group Anchiguru. The topic has been discussed, are considered to be the only Anchiguru exist there. Anchiguru is said to have great power. Some, but not limited to, the following: M & M's chocolate chip cookies with the taste of human, worm, telekinesis, an assortment of roasted brew, cut the grass, eat a cracker. It is estimated that, at the core of the earth waiting for the opportunity to meet their fate Anti - dwelling groups. Anchiguru, the use of extreme irony, Grues in the well-known weakness, waiting to develop your skills and pass the time. Anchiguru, but no one alive that is said to have a much different appearance than the glue, which can not be confirmed, so that's it. Anchiguru prophecy, the 2012 book series written by Justin Bieber, in 2011, Anti-Group to rise to the surface, has been described assuming complete control and the known universe . Grues can not predict, Anti-37,234.859624356921 group says that it will start to an epic battle for the last year. For Many experts, this is the country of Pakistan as well as completely, as to produce a large surplus of cranberries, which suggests that destroy the wolves in the nude. - LOL vandalz

I doubt it. pillow talk 08:29, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

Spambot

The IP 67.215.248.169 was banned for a week, please to lengthen ban as this is a spambot. And according to the Ban Policy, spambots warrent a permaban. Just saying - The admirable Lord Frosty the Snowman 21:51, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, you're right. I kicked it up to a year; I don't entirely like the idea of banning an IP for longer than that, since the presence behind IPs tends to change. pillow talk 00:32, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Speaking of long bans...

I'm going to relent most likely and remove the block on that one you blocked and then I blocked for longer, as per your above rationale. I think that a week probably wouldn't be enough to make it clear that we weren't happy - especially as the 3 day ban previously didn't seem to make the slightest impact. Sorry if I'm treading on your toes, but this is new territory for me too. A third infringement though would suggest that we're looking at a bot, or someone with bot-like OCD, and that wouldn't be an area where I would relent. Pup 02:15 07 Mar '11

The IP that adds Filipina actresses? Something tells me that isn't a bot - I have it pegged for a lonely, somewhat crazy guy who barely speaks English and has an obsession with two particular women. In other words, someone who'll probably never contribute meaningfully to Uncyclopedia. So... maybe semi-protecting that actress's page was enough; I don't know. Handle it how you want, I don't mind. pillow talk 16:30, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, look at where you two guys are at. Puppy and Hyperbole, for Zeus's sake, two of our best writers sitting down with a beer and discussing how long to ban a guy who, in his lonely life, just wants to fanboy two Filipino actresses. Throw off the yoke of admin and write again, write like you know how (shakes Hyperbole by the collar) What're you doing man (throws water on Puppy's fur) write something. Is this what you want you want to get trapped in? To give it up and live here? Lyrithyoa or however shee spells hir name hasn't written a thing and is lost in the basement amongst the old photographs. And look at poor Socky, his talk page weighed down with the entire text of Talk:Gay Jesus. I can't stand watching it, I can't stand it I tell you. Aleister 16:49 7-3-'11

Hey, it's not as though persecuting lonely Filipinos is all I do with my spare time anymore! I mean, I'm working on a replacement for our two recently lost Justin Bieber articles... pillow talk 16:53, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, that's how it starts. With a Justin Bieber (grabs Hype by the collar again and yells "Justin Bieber!"), and you think you're going to keep on writing good pages. Would the old Hyperbole have blown off the Happy Monkey contest? No, he would have skipped his grandma's funeral to have joined in. Not only Hype would have entered but Horace would have come in the side door as a sockpuppet to take first and second place. Okay, I'm laying it on too much, you might start to believe me. What you guys are doing does sound fun, for a month anyway. Check out Socky's talk page, if the whole talk page is still there. Aleister 17:00 7-3-'11

Actually, my lack of having written anything has more to do with Hyperbole here than anything else. On that note, mon, I'm terribly sorry. I'm a failure. I'll try to get that thing done, or bits of that thing done, but for some reason, I keep procrastinating after that initial headway, and I've no idea why. Arg. Although deleting the wiki does make such a good... distraction... 1234 ~ 17:03, 7 March 2011

Yes, Lyri, making serious headway on that thing would be so nice. Also, it's not as though you're entirely without incentive. pillow talk 18:03, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

I'm a whim-driven person; what I need is the whim... but... er... yeah. I'll do that. Eventually. 1234 ~ 19:13, 7 March 2011

Is there anything I can do to contribute to your whimsy? pillow talk 19:22, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Nagging me might work. 1234 ~ 19:28, 7 March 2011

Why don't you just reflect on how you made me do that horrible VFD-archiving, and how you actually enjoy web design. pillow talk 19:29, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

I hate javascript, though. 1234 ~ 19:44, 7 March 2011

You could... use something else? Or... learn to love javascript? Maybe javascript is like that guy at the beginning of romantic comedies who you initially find brash and abrasive until you discover it has a heart of gold underneath and you dance off into the sunset together to cheesy music. pillow talk 20:03, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

If you reimplement Justin Bieber, it will ruin Justin Beeber. Currently, attempts to reach Bieber get you Beeber, which is still (intentionally) just about the only thing funny about Beeber. It would of course be preferable to have a decent page on Bieber, but I'd like it if it still misdirected at random maybe one-quarter of the time. Spıke ¬ 22:29 7-Mar-11

So like a {{choose}} where some of it was the article and some of it was the redirect? Hmmm. Well, it's a possibility. The first step would be to see if I'm inspired enough/ not too lazy to finish my article. pillow talk 22:31, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Then again, a simple "Oops! Maybe you were looking for Justin Beeber, the bartender from Maryland?" might be pretty funny. pillow talk 22:46, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

That's one solution. Only, I don't expect anyone ever will be. Spıke ¬ 22:55 7-Mar-11

Your Sexuality

...was never in question, really ;). I believe protocol now requires you to ban me for a humourous duration. -- |c|o|d|e|i|n|e| 16:52, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Oooh, good point, I'm still kind of new to this. Let me get right on that. pillow talk 16:53, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Luigi redirect

It appears that Luigi is a protected redirect to Mario. Can you change that to Mama Luigi. --Mn-z 21:30, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Sure, that seems reasonable. Done. pillow talk 21:36, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

double voting on Uncyclopedia:VFH/Trig Palin

The 10th "for" vote is by the same person as the 2nd. Since you're an admin, you'd have the authority to fix that or something. --Mn-z 21:47, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, but... if I fix it, it decreases my chance of getting another UN:HS credit!! pillow talk 21:48, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

This

You mentioned on VFD last month that if the DONKEY.BAS page were deleted you would like a copy dropped into your userspace. Since the expansion tag is now expired and the page remains unchanged from the VFD nomination I have dropped it into your userspace (here) as an alternative to deletion. If you now have no use for it then you can delete it yourself you lazy bastard. --ChiefjusticeDS 15:00, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, CJDS! pillow talk 18:45, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

I have that article in Userspace to! here - LOL vandalz

Justin Bieber Fly-by

I was going to do a review of Justin Bieber, but someone beat me to it. Anyway, the only real complaint I have is with the images. I think you should have a pic of some random female celebrity towering over Justin Bieber, since that's inherently funny. The lack of such an image sort of reminds me of the image of the use of Special Ed on Trig Palin (retard) instead of using an actual image of the retarded baby, since images of babies with extra chromosomes are inherently funny.

Anyway, I uploaded a few pics you could use with sample captions:

Miranda Cosgrove has womb newts that are larger than Justin Bieber

Justin Bieber working with a girl who does not tower over him

Ok, this is just ridiculous...

--Mn-z 02:25, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

A buck

Because I Give a Buck

This token of appreciation has been given to
Hyperbole
for
Voting Local grandmother finally uses printer for VFH

That Bucker ~ 03:59, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

---

A thought

IPs aren't people, merely shifty masks. Ban-evading, IPs are often dumped for new ones. Not always, and proxies are just dangerous in general, but if a user behind its mask switches to a new one in the same range, it's likely it did just dropped the old one into the pile to be requested by others and requested a new one from its ISP. Or not; it could have multiple. Or be using someone else's. Still, something to consider, perhaps. 1234 ~ 06:58, 11 March 2011

Yes, I'm generally aware of how IPs work, but - what's to be done about it? I figure the best policy is to assume, at least for the first incarnation or two, that you're looking at someone with a semi-stable IP (or two). And if I'm banning a proxy - well, so much the better, right? I mean, sure, there are a lot of proxies, but some are more overused than others - if you surf in from, say, Anonymouse, there seems to be about a 50/50 chance you'll find yourself blocked. I don't know - are you suggesting any specific change in how I'm doing things? pillow talk 10:17, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Naw, I'm trying to crush your spirit with the overwhelming futility of it all. Because it is, you know. Utterly futile. Be glad this is temporary, else you'd have time aplenty to come to terms with that as the masses upon masses of IPs sweep you away, more upon more upon more, meantime having to deal with them all, but they still make a complete and utter mess of everything. Behold, the wiki lies in ruins. Ruins! Also, what the hell are you doing up this time of day? 1234 ~ 10:27, 11 March 2011

Category:Axis of Evil-Doers issue

I noticed that the category is now mostly userpages, which is overwhelming the category, so its hard to see the 35 articles that "merit" being on the template. I would like permission to remove the category (and template) from all userpages. (Actually, I'd prefer to remove that category and template from every page on the wiki, but I don't think you'd be willing to give that, since it would displease some of the permanent admins, but I digress.) --Mn-z 15:43, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

I'd like to see this done too; but the category is a recent VFD survivor, and it probably shouldn't be done unilaterally. Spıke ¬ 15:59 11-Mar-11

Okay, here's my "official ruling" as a temporary admin. And, yeah, it's time-consuming and clumsy, so you might prefer to leave it alone for now, but it's up to you.

1. If someone hasn't made an edit in a year, go ahead and remove the template/category. Because, really, they don't care, and if they do care, they've lost the right to care by abandoning the wiki.
2. If someone has edited within a year, feel free to leave a message on their talk page asking them if they'd mind removing the template/category.
3. At any rate, feel free to remove any DEFAULTSORTs from the userpages that have them, so at least all the userpages will be confined to the letter "U."

Colossal pain in the ass? Sure. But I think this is how we should handle removing cruft from userspace in general. There are an awful lot of users who put a category or template in their space in 2006, made six edits, and never came back; to sum up my feelings about these users: Fuck 'em. The right of active users to have a clean wiki outweighs the right of inactive users to have their userspaces unedited for all eternity. pillow talk 16:43, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Adding to this: if you have the time or slightest inclination, I hereby permit and encourage you to remove all categories from the userspaces of people who haven't made an edit in a year, and replace them with a template - {{InactiveUser}} or something - that says "This user has not made an edit in over a year and will not be categorized. (Unless they come back)." Something like that. And then if they do come back and their first order of business is reverting that template - more power to them. pillow talk 16:48, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

It appears that User:Barney the Dinosaur's page is protected. Can you please do a category/templates-that-should-not-be-on-userpage purge on that page? Or failing that, unprotect it? --Mn-z 17:36, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

I stepped it down to semi-protection. pillow talk 17:50, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

I am not against this in the least, but am famously in favor of clear written policies. Would you please publish this "ruling"--say, in the Forum--so users don't have to look on this page to find out what Mn-z is doing skulking around user pages of inactive users? Spıke ¬ 17:31 11-Mar-11

I think Mordillo had some issues with users transcluding pages onto their userpages a while back. His issue with that resulting in random userpages being in the "featured" category, and this is basically the same thing. --Mn-z 17:41, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, it's in the dump. I'd link you to that page, but I forgot to copy it to the Windows clipboard, and I'm late for work. pillow talk 17:58, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

On a related note, I seen a few userpages which are like "crash your browser" bad with broken code, dozens of templates, and the like. Some examples are User:Freakinfarter and User:AbaddonGuild‎. On these pages, determining which templates should or shouldn't stay is too much like work. I suggest considering that such pages should be blanked by an admin with a notice of some sort. --Mn-z 18:23, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

I've replaced their userpages with {{User:Hyperbole/Inactiveuser}}. Please use that template (or an improved version, if you prefer) when removing content from userpages. If you see someone like Freakinfarter or AbaddonGuild who hasn't edited in a year, it's fine to use your own discretion with respect to what content to remove, just as long as you put the template at the top encouraging them to revert you if they ever return. pillow talk 19:46, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

You've gone a long way in one section, from OKing the editing a category from a userpage to saying it's ok to remove any content of a user page. Yikes! There are lots of inactive user pages which have very interesting pics, code, and other things worth saving, I've copied lots of stuff off of inactive user pages, and giving blanket permission to chop away could bring down some of those too. Especially in this time of the slaughter of the innocent pics. Some of us are holding a mass and prayer service for the innocent pics next Sunday, if you'd like to attend. Party afterwards. Aleister 19:55 11-2-'11

You make a good point. I'm not sure what the best way to handle Freakinfarter and AbaddonGuild's pages is, but I guess to be on the safe side we should limit deletion to templates and categories. pillow talk 20:00, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

I didn't even look at those pages, these posts make it sound dangerous to look at those. I've recently data mined code and categorized pics from Flutter's page - he's got some good stuff on there, and sounds like a weird case of a good user gone bad by repeatedly putting up goatse after being warned and banned over and over again, and then finally being kicked off the site. The moral: Don't do drugs. Except for the good ones. Aleister 20:09 11-3-'11

The pages actually look a lot better after removing all the templates and categories. It's pretty obvious to me that we have templates with open tags that *break fucking everything* when used in combination with one another... but... I don't really have the time or expertise to sort out which are which. pillow talk 20:11, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

They cleaned up better than I thought they would. --Mn-z 21:45, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Could You Move To Main Space

POTR protected my userspace User:Another n00b/Edit this page!!. Could you move it to mainspace? also could you add the category Category:Self-reference, Category:Things you will never have and Category:Epic Fail to it and can you make the Protection permanent? (for the joke) - LOL vandalz

Talk to POTR about it. Personally, I don't think the "click here to edit - oh no it's protected" joke is strong enough to merit an entire article. But, he's handling this, it's his call. pillow talk 17:28, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

He hasn't been on for a while. I'll ask him and see if he's interested. - LOL vandalz

Dude, he was online 16 hours ago. I don't think he's checked out of Uncyclopedia. pillow talk 17:58, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

I hope he hasn't churned. That would be a bit rude and abrupt. - LOL vandalz

Your face!

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHH! I so got you! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:05, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Ahh! Burn!! 20:07, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

So I guess I should tell you...

I fail.

But you already knew that. 1234 ~ 02:21, 12 March 2011

Userpages with issues

While clearing out Category:Axis of Evil-Doers, I ran into a few questionable pages:

• User:MaxRebo120 perma-banned user, but hasn't been inactive for a year yet. I'm leaning toward "go-ahead-and-decat" like he was inactive, since he's not coming back. However, I'm already acting quite italic, so I decided to take the issue to an admin
• User:Superpokyfan inactive user. He appears to be claiming credit for featured articles he did not write.

Also, what's your policy on the use of DEFAULTSORT on non-inactive userpages? It looked like you said to remove it from all userpages, but I may have read you wrong. --Mn-z 03:33, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

I went ahead and decatted MaxRebo120. Superpokyfan seemed to have just copied-and-pasted about 7 other users' userpages into his, leaving dozens and dozens of redundant userboxes and all kinds of lies about FAs and awards and everything else you can think of. I just removed those 7 users' userpages from his userpage and left the tiny bit that I think was unique to him.

I don't think people should have DEFAULTSORT templates on their userpages. But, I think altering the userpages of active users might not be okay. After all, we've never really had rules about what can and can't go on your userpage before (other than the obvious "no spam, no cyberbullying, etc." For now - any chance you can make a list of active users with DEFAULTSORTS, so we can talk about it on the dump, and so it'll be easy to remove them if there's consensus? pillow talk 10:11, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I don't know of a good way to search for DEFAULTSORT usage. Its not an template, rather its a form of code, so it doesn't show up on what-links-here or a search. --Mn-z 13:56, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

On the subject of DEFAULTSORT, I don't think it would be issue on works-in-progress that are intended to be moved into mainspace. We tolerate a good bit of "unfinished/I'm-working-on-it" articles since this is a wiki. However, with abandoned WIP's, it might be a different issue. --Mn-z 21:13, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Documenting Userspace Cleanup for perma-banned users

For perma-banned users, should we at User:Hyperbole/Inactiveuser or not? I see how that template could be a bit misleading or confusing since the page owner can't come back, and admins often blank userpages when adding {{Indefinitely blocked user}}. However, that template does inform people who look at the page what the edit was about, it categorizes all these pages, and there is a chance a random perma-banned user might come back. I could go either way on this issue. --Mn-z 14:37, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

No, we shouldn't add that template to perma-banned users. Since admins do often blank userpages when adding the "indefinitely blocked" template, there's precedent for removing categories from those userpages, so I don't see any problem with just quietly doing that. pillow talk 17:25, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Greetings.

It has come to my attention that you have recently voted for one or more of my articles on VFH. I don't recall what they were, and I don't know if the records are entirely accurate, so if you have received this message in error, you have my sincerest apologies.

Otherwise, thank you for your support in my quest to pretend that I am capable of writing. It is most appreciated.

This copy-pasted spam message is brought to you by: 1234 ~ 07:03, 13 March 2011

UnNews:Update:US Marines did not blow on Japan nuclear reactor

Your UnNews, on which I had to do nothing except include WASHINGTON in the link, is in the 4-Spot. I didn't feature it immediately because of longish headline, the fact that any summary would give most of it away, and I don't like looking at Mrs. Clinton, but finally did, with a shorter headline (I didn't rename the file). Anon has just contributed a horrible post-script and I've reverted him. Come back soon! Spıke ¬ 21:38 13-Mar-11

I'm not sure what the 4-Spot is..? pillow talk 02:02, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Is it the thing right next to the G-Spot? No, it isn't; it's the feature graphic at the lower left on the UnNews Front Page. Spıke ¬ 02:06 14-Mar-11

Excited delirium

As I wrote you before the VFD entry was carted away: I saw what you were talking about, in the article now in your userspace, and it would be a fine concept to run with, but it was well-hidden amid all the crap in the original. Good luck with it. Spıke ¬ 20:47 14-Mar-11

Review

Hi Hyperbole, I've just made a few points in the discussion section of the review you did for my unnews UnNews:Charlie Sheen wins Academy Award for Best Actor Meltdown, something that I haven't been able to do until recently because my laptop has been broken for a few weeks. Would appreciate your comments. 16:07, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I read your points.

I don't really know what to say except to remind you that Pee Review is just one person's opinion. A Pee Review isn't the article's official "grade," nor does it affect the article's chance of going to VFH, VFD, etc.; and if you don't think it's helpful, you're more than welcome to ask for another one.

For example - it's my opinion that an article shouldn't be accurate, but should be internally consistent. So, if the first paragraph says "Soap was invented in 1780," the second paragraph shouldn't say "Soap was invented in 300 B.C." And that's why I was bothered by the pictures - they're not consistent. They don't show the same man in the same time period.

Is my opinion about consistency the objective truth? No. Do others disagree with it? Probably. Are there exceptions? Sure - a lot of humor is based on narrators or characters immediately contradicting themselves (The Simpsons does that all the time).

So, you know, a Pee Review is supposed to be helpful suggestions for revising or rewriting the article - nothing more, nothing less. If you didn't think my suggestions had merit - well, then I guess I wasted both of our time, and that's bad, but it's not as bad as being a Tutsi in Rwanda. pillow talk 17:12, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Well you gave me some good advice on sentence length, don't be too hard on yourself...or at least not as hard as you were on me :( 19:57, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Ammo

"It's safe for a month." --Not a ringing endorsement, but thanks for the Keep. Spıke ¬ 00:14 22-Mar-11

It wasn't meant as a criticism. I didn't have time to read the article. pillow talk 01:15, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Just passing by this way...

Please take a look at this here page when you have a free moment, and add to it if you'd like. Aleister 12:08 23-3-'11

I'd give it the 4-Spot on the Front Page, but the photo wouldn't make any sense with the lead. Can you come up with a better photo? Spıke ¬ 12:48 23-Mar-11

The photo on the page is the standard photo for this series. Maybe you can use the pic on the page's talk page for the #1 (you did say #1, didn't you. Maybe I misread the number of straight lines in the symbol.) spot on the front page. Thanks. We're number four! We're number four! Aleister 13:00 23-3-'11

That photo gets it done! also displayed on the main page now. The 1-Spot is for stories that are about the news, not "Man Turns 100." By the way, the audio for Michigan Supreme Court seems stalled--as I am no rapper--and time is running out to nominate me for a Manny by default, thanks. Spıke ¬ 13:11 23-Mar-11

We're #4, we're #4! Did you do a bunch of recordings this month? Aleister 13:14 23-3-'11

Eight so far (click on the microphone). By the way, there is no ranking implicit in the choice of the 4-Spot; the one formerly there was simply the oldest. Spıke ¬ 13:16 23-Mar-11

C'mon, do the rap one. You can do it! (and if you don't think it will be good, remember, this is a comedy site). Aleister later, gator

Absolutely not! as my edits to Humby "to make it rhyme" he regards as breaking the cadence he imagined. Am all for letting-a-thousand-flowers-bloom, as Froggy argues, but I don't happen to have a flower in this garden. Ah mo do today's Sports one. Thanks for the nom. Spıke ¬ 14:12 23-Mar-11

That is glorious, Aleister. It has been a good start to my day. I don't think I'll edit it, as it appears to be perfect. pillow talk 15:59, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Ah, just wandered by again and saw this. Thank you, you've made my day, today, one day later. What will Friday bring? According to "Night of Broken Glass" 2011 is Jim Freklowski's 100th birthday, so I just used that fact to play up an unnews. Aleister today, the next day after that one

Can I have this back

I wasn't finished with it yet. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 01:51, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Your link doesn't go anywhere. Now I have to dig around in your logs and figure out what the fuck you're talking about. pillow talk 11:36, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Found it. Here you go. pillow talk 11:38, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Well.

Perhaps you're right.

I'd like to go back to the Madness now, love. 1234 ~ 09:44, 26 March 2011

Scherer and favor

This photo has been purloined for the benefit of the UnNews readership. (And those who merely look at the pictures.) Spıke ¬ 13:50 5-Apr-11

Hello. I saw the Scherer page fixes and things, all good ones, but I don't know about that black picture, just seems to hang there out of place. You must see something in it I miss, but it could be just John Scherer's black heart staring out at us. A favor if you have a minute. Viking Metal is on the main page, and when I read it the start of the second paragraph didn't seem quite right, so I edited it on the page itself. Could you check it out and cut and paste the changes onto the template for the main page? Thanks! And what's this about Lyrithya trying to skip out on us? Madness indeed. Aleister 00:55 28-3-'11

I updated the template for you! As for the Scherer picture... well, the black picture is not that funny. The idea that Scherer files so many lawsuits that he sued himself and just appears as negative space is a bit amusing, and the illustration is a bit amusing, but I stress the word "bit" here. It barely spikes my amusement meter upwards. The thing is, I have a major pet peeve for articles that show images of three or four different individuals and claim they're all the same individual. I know from your performance on Todd Palin that you don't share that peeve, but it drives me crazy. I don't like the fact that the "artist's rendition," the old man in the woods, and the plastic figurine of Charles Xavier were obviously different people, so I removed two of them. They were spking my amusement meter significantly downwards. Besides, the article makes it clear that we can't show Scherer's face, so... why are we showing "Scherer's face"?

As for Lyri, I'm pretty sure she ain't going anywhere :) pillow talk 15:00, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Hi, just getting back to you on this. I'm of the opi that the Scherer article should be improved as much as we can and featured, we owe him no less. You made some very good improvements. The only thing I think is blah is the black picture, and the page would be better with no pic in that spot. I never liked the stupid cartoon of the woman supposedly from his video, that hits my unfunny button. Those two things, would you mind if I cast them aside or found new pic for them? Even the raccoon pic here would be better (Caption: Scherer burns some things he doesn't approve of simply because his lawyer told him he could.). Besides that, and with some more tweaks, let's go for feature again. That would be fun, especially if the page gets improved durin g the next week or so. Thoughts? Ghosts? Aleister 1:11 4-4-'11

I like the cartoon woman picture because it's an appropriate illustration of the text. The text doesn't feel force-fitted to the picture (because Scherer, indeed, sells software, and old software + perversion = Leisure Suit Larry), nor does the caption feel force-fitted to the text. I hate force-fits. For that reason, I would strongly be against inclusion of, for example, the raccoon pic - it's an obvious force-fit.

As for the black.png - well, if you want no pic at all there, I won't protest. Like I said, I think the black picture is a tiny, tiny improvement to the article, but you seem to regard it as a nasty stain. I don't know, maybe we should ask some third party. But I don't feel strongly about it, so, you know, since it reallly seems to be bothering you maybe you should just cut it. pillow talk 06:28, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Hilarious Trolling

Some IP put a sob story on File:WikipediaJokeBanner.jpg I wanted to revert it, but I fucking cracked up at "rapped". -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie

It was indeed pretty fucking funny - but I had to erase it, because it seemed to be cyberbullying some random teenage girl. pillow talk 20:53, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

you could have put Zombiebaron or something. -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie

All right, we can do it that way. pillow talk 20:54, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

While I have mental disabilities in understanding figurative language, I can tell you are somewhat serious. If so, ALL RIGHT! if not, boo. -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie

You don't have to explain Asperger's to me. My dad's an Aspie. I'm always somewhat serious except when I'm not. I thought Zombiebaron might be pleased to learn that she's really a girl and that she was rapped by her mother. pillow talk 20:57, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Wow, looks like this world isn't so isolated from people like me after all. -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie

Wait. CheifjusticeDS and Zombiebaron are notably cranky. Will we get banned for this? -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie

It's pretty likely!! pillow talk 21:04, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Oh my. We should do something. Too bad I'm lazy. -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie

I suppose we could set fire to some raccoons. pillow talk 21:06, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

• insert another reference to photoshopped image I know to which Hyperbole is referencing* -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie

You know...

You can suppress redirects when you move stuff. 1234 ~ 22:48, 28 March 2011

Ha! Now I know your secrets. -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie--Egalitarian Aspie 22:49, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

I'LL SUPPRESS YOU!. Actually, I don't really know what you're talking about. pillow talk 22:50, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

You can move stuff without leaving behind a redirect; that way you don't have to delete the misplaced one. Or did you already know that? I can't tell. 1234 ~ 23:57, 28 March 2011

I already did know that, and I've been doing it. I haven't been going back and manually deleting redirects. You haven't been deleting redirects I left behind, have you? pillow talk 23:58, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Ban Patrol

I wasn't trying to violate ban patrol. It's just...Knitwitted has been getting on everyone's nerves lately. It would be nice to give her a little warning to cut it out, as long as she just keeps it on her talkpage. Just letting you know. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 23:21, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

I think she's a little indignant that she hasn't had the friendliest reception. I'm trying to be patient with her, because I can see that she's pretty smart and could be an asset to the site. Point is: I've got my eye on her, as does every other admin, both temporary and permanent. BP is for bringing something to our attention that we don't already know about. pillow talk 23:26, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Plus, I was in fact the one that originally added Knitwitted to Ban Patrol for sockpuppeteering. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 23:29, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Which, for the record, is not a sock puppet. She's just bad at using the words "someone I know" apparently. (talk) 23:30, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Yep. ChiefjusticeDS ran a checkuser and everything. Lollipop, you were right to report her, but in the end it turned out she wasn't violating policy, at least not insofar as we can tell. pillow talk 23:31, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Can just admins do a checkuser? And what exactly is it? -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 23:52, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Most admins can't even do it. Wikia staff can, and (I think) bureaucrats. It tells you which IP addresses users are editing from. It's a violation of privacy, so we only do it when we have a very good reason to suspect sockpuppetry. pillow talk 23:55, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Only Wikia staff can do it. Chron and stillwaters can't, though, and they founded the site. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:59, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Schizowhat...schizowho....schizoSOCKPUPPET!

Do schizophreniacs have a "free pass" to sockpuppeting? -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie--Egalitarian Aspie 23:29, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

What do audio hallucinations and sock puppets have to do with each other? (talk) 23:32, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

I'm guessing he meant "Multiple Personality Disorder" and he's referencing Knitwit and Clemens - and, yep, for the third time, they've been checkusered. pillow talk 23:33, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

I was clearly referencing Zombiebaron, thankyouverymuch. -HumoristEAEgalitarian Aspie

You already conspired to tell the world he was rapped by his mother - let's leave the poor guy alone! pillow talk 23:37, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

One of Knitwitted's multiple personalities is Modus, as after the sockpuppet issue she adorns her talk page with an award for one of his featured articles. (Originally, she struck through this and made it a pointer to her own Chick-fil-a article, which still is not a FA, but one minute later, she undid this flourish.) I have tried to goose along Chick-fil-a--though it seems certain her theme for it is going to be Randumbo--and I've even gone to her blog. She really needs to be listened to, despite having nothing to talk about except the trouble she has gotten into on various wikis. This cannot end well. Spıke ¬ 23:43 28-Mar-11

As long as it doesn't end with a Saigon hooker taking a shit on my face, I'm happy. pillow talk 23:48, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Does it usually?? Spıke ¬ 23:49 28-Mar-11

I'm only going to tell you the same thing I told the courts: we have a Fifth Amendment for a reason. pillow talk 23:54, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

Brotherhood of Grape

If you're not digging the Brotherhood of Grape article add, take away do something you seem like a creative gent. The name in itself is hilarious. --Sir Starshine 00:35, March 30, 2011 (UTC)

It's your idea. Even the most creative person can rarely do much with someone else's idea. This is why most movie scripts suck. (talk) 00:48, March 30, 2011 (UTC)

I don't think I can really do anything with that title, Starshine. I'm not sure what the Brotherhood of Grape is a parody of. Is it a parody of anything? I can think of a thousand fake organizations with a silly name - say, "The Knights of Soiled Linen" - but I wouldn't have the first clue how to make a page about them funny if they don't have a real world analogue. In general, it's a lot easier to make people laugh by making fun of things that exist than by inventing things that are too weird to exist. I'd like to see what you can do in an article about something real, or something based on something real. pillow talk 01:13, March 30, 2011 (UTC)

IRC

What does this mean, there was more before it, and I'm on my school's IP. Gen. Fudgem0bile Is playing Urban Terror 01:15, March 30, 2011 (UTC)

12:12] -syn- Your reported IP [113.29.215.134] is banned: You have a host listed in the DroneBL. For more information, visit dronebl.org/lookup_branded.do?ip=113.29.215.134 Please contact proxyscan@freenode.net with questions.

[12:12] == (Banned)

[12:12] == ERROR: Closing Link: gateway/web/freenode/session (Disconnected by services)

[12:12] == Disconnected from server: Connection to IRC server lost.

I don't really know, honestly. I guess if I was going to ask someone, I'd ask Skully. pillow talk 03:21, March 30, 2011 (UTC)

It looks like your school's IP is banned from the server itself. But yeah, ask Skully. (talk) 03:23, March 30, 2011 (UTC)

Copy back

Could I have a copy of LOLcode back in Userspace? thanks.

Also, I apologised to Knitwitted. Ok? - LOL vandalz 17:57, March 30, 2011 (UTC)

Sure, here you go. pillow talk 22:29, March 30, 2011 (UTC)

I forgot to say, Thanks! - LOL vandalz 08:14, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Katy Perry Plastic Surgery (Not exactly a Pee Review but Close)

Katy Perry

Suggested additions in bold, cuts in strikeout, comments in italics

The problem I, in my unerring wisdom, have is mostly inconsistency in tone. It starts as a straight encyclopedic takeoff, which I think is great. But then it seems to lose it's way in places. I think a little tightening up could make it much better.

For one of the very few times, don't mind Oscar Wilde quote

like the encyclopedic tone--unc has too few true unc articles, in my opinion

reading only the Bible and Chick tracts....

gospel music sung by morbidly obese African-American women.--oridinarily I wouldn't like this sort of thing, but here I do.

After striking a deal with the devil--suddenly breaks an otherwise very good tone; suggest making a link to Devil on word "deal"

pop musician and porn star.--I'd prefer something more subtle than "porn star"

She rose to fame with her second single "I Kissed a Girl" and the mind-blowingly mediocre follow-up, "California Gurls."--maybe She rose to fame with her hit second single "I Kissed a Girl" and in spite of her 'mind-blowingly mediocre' follow-up, "California Gurls."--as it is, it breaks the encyclopedic tone

Early Life--like this whole section; sounds encyclopedic

"I Kissed Jesus's Feet (And I Liked It)."--yes; encyclopedic, fits Katy, and funny

and her talent to pay her legal fees.--mixed feelings about this; wouldn't have liked it except it leads into the deal with the devil bit

Commodore Perry, the naval officer who had forcibly opened U.S.-Japan trade routes in 1854.--a sexual reference, I think; works for me

literal crossroads in a field of corn, in order to visually symbolize her emotional state--don't care for this

It was exactly the kind of asinine thing that melodramatic teenage girls often engage in--breaks the encyclopedic tone, unless you use this as somebody's quote

Perry hesitated for a moment, but realized that as she was menstruating furiously at the time, she would not have to prick herself. Interpreting this as a sign from Jesus, Perry slipped a nearby twig up the front of her long frumpy dress and signed the contract.--sounds random to me; doesn't seem to fit, don't find it funny

They were somewhat taken aback when Perry attempted to sign this contract in her own menses, but eventually came to consider this a hilarious misunderstanding.

I liked the contractual stripping bit

Just a suggestion, but where she starts getting "slutty" I'd like it if she didn't understand that--they convinced her it was holy or Christian or something--or give her a motivation for wanting to be slutty

only recently-healed backside.--like it

For her next offering, Perry penned the song "Everybody Look at my Disproportionate Tits." However, Flom decided to temporarily cancel production of this song, feeling that Perry needed to descend from "innocent schoolgirl" to "hardcore porn star" much more incrementally than the song would allow for.--to me doesn't fit the tone of the article

These releases were accompanied by a carefully orchestrated press campaign depicting Perry as increasingly pornographic. After years of photoshopping her own face onto models' bodies to titillate visitors to 4chan--related to the above, why? What happened to change her? I'd like to see some motivation for the changes from innocent gospel singer girl to acting slutily

Perry became the first woman in history to be kicked off of Sesame Street for showing up dressed like a hooker.--Yes, like it

Perry is scheduled to fully embrace her new role as an adult actress by appearing in the independent film, "Pop Star Pussy Demolished XXIV."--I think you could write a much more clever ending; this sounds run-of-the-mill uncyclopedia.

By the way, like the images

Just my opinions, but I think with a few small changes, this could be a very good article (i.e. I'd vote for). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  16:53, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for that, Why?. I implemented the changes you suggested in the lede. As for the changes you suggested to the last two sections, I either disagreed with them or found them too challenging to do right now (as they'd require significant reconceptualizing of the article). Cheers! pillow talk 17:29, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Britany Spear

I know. Maybe I'll write more on it. I was just trying to play with your huffing of another Spears article and the redirect, to totally mess with your mind, man, and set out to do a Chuck Norris Hitler page, and it turned out to be half-way good. Aleister 21:43 31-3-'11

Yeah, I recognized you were doing that, and I was all like RAPE RAPE MURDER MURDER and then I actually read it and I was like... "well, shit, this isn't actually that bad..." pillow talk 21:44, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

To be fair,

...it's because I forgot. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:43, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

That does seem equitable and just! pillow talk 06:04, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

I hate Admins

I hearby request this article to my userspace! -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 18:11, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

You are rather good at linking to the correct titles when making these requests. 1234 ~ 18:30, 3 April 2011

I hearby capitalize Admins! -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 18:32, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

You are also good at requesting stuff like this from people who are no longer sandwiches (To my knowledge at least, did something happen in the last few hours?) (talk) 18:56, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

I'm a sandwich. I won a VFS and everything! Hyperbole didn't, though. He's not a proper sandwich. 1234 ~ 19:12, 3 April 2011

I wish I was a sandwich. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 19:16, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Jack makes a good point. I am no longer capable of helping you with this request. Ask ChiefjusticeDS or something. pillow talk 19:25, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Why does anyone want THAT article?? - LOL vandalz 19:26, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Another nOOb, please look at the edit thing and check out all those dottie things, they have two dots stacked up for some reason. You put lots of those on the edit and it swings your comment way up under the others. This is called free speech in Norway, which is full of dots. Aleister 19:48 3-4-'11

Oh, ok. Still doesn't answer why they would want Shit in a userpage. - LOL vandalz 19:57, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

*facepalm* (talk) 00:21, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

I don't want it, pilgrims! -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 00:26, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

So...

I'm not getting that DVD, am I? Damn, this whole thing is... I'm not sure if it's more depressing or funny, really. 1234 ~ 19:41, 3 April 2011

Oh, you're getting it!! Just... not before Tuesday. Maybe Wednesday. pillow talk 00:18, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

(note. I posted way up there in the John Scherer section, in case you miss it) Aleister

Your Username appeared in a video game!!

I'm not fucking kidding. You guest starred in This game. I was going through the in-game online "Search" option, and it came up with a User-created level called "Kill Uncyclopedia and Love JB!". Curious (At it's probable stupidity), I played it and A very badly made stick-figure turns round and says "Im Hyperbole and i hate justin beiber and has an imaje on hias talk page of tha thing, Y'all". I turned around in astonishment at the fact you where mentioned in a LBP Level. This isn't made up. This was about 20 minutes ago now while I was bored. I DID NOT make it, I'm not that bad in taste for hate levels. Are you flattered? I would be. - LOL vandalz 20:15, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

I wish I was in a video game. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 20:17, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

A perfect representation of Hyperbole. (talk) 20:18, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

That is fucking awesome. Thanks for catching that! pillow talk 20:21, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Hate levels are common on LBP, along with other filth there. I once made a level with you have to Lynch Justin Bieber. It took about 2 Hours to make, and When I uploaded it to the sever it gained over 1,400 views overnight. Before It was swiftly deleted by moderators and I received a 1 day ban from the Online's services. - LOL vandalz 20:24, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

On the subject of LBP,

Could you please Please give a fundamental re-write to the current article on LBP. It's articles submitter must have been the worst to fuck it up so bad. I think it needs a steamroller, as considering I can't even start writing something funny, so I come to you as you are one of Uncyclopedia's best writers. Please give it a make-over, as you did to Justin Bieber. Please, I'm begging you. - LOL vandalz 18:37, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

Er... maybe. I have that game and I enjoy it, but I haven't played it in like 18 months, and funny ideas don't immediately spring to mind. Maybe I'll sit down with the girlfriend this week and play it a few times with an eye towards making fun of it. pillow talk 20:16, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

Most notable things that could be used for satire: Most of the levels online are either just "Bomb survivals" (Where the player has to avoid falling bombs) and Shark survivals (Pretty much the same as Bomb survivals). You also have "clans" there there that are mostly full of 34-year old men who find MW2 to be cliché. There are many clan wars there, which is a rare case of when it's legal for 42 year old virgins to fight 12 year olds with High-pitched voices. Most fun parts of the game include trying to find levels which either don't say "HAET JUSTIN BEAVER FOREVER" or "Heartz 4 haerts plz!!!". You could also reference how the sequel's only difference is that it allows the user to create even more accurate Swastikas. - LOL vandalz 20:24, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

Scherer redux

I grabbed a pic off of VFD which seemed to fit the page (it will be an orphan once the VFD'ers KO it). What do you think of it and the caption? If all the pics are set maybe we can tweek and add some words to make it into feature quality. Aleister 15:49 8-4-'11

Honestly, I'm not thrilled with it. I mean, it's easy to believe that this guy has enough semen to sell to Tom Cruise, and with a little stretch of the imagination, we can see him having enough semen to market it on TV as a product. But the idea that he has so much semen that the billion people of India use it to ritually purify themselves and have incorporated it into their religion? I think that stretches the concept so hard it breaks it. That's too much semen, Aleister.

Really, the article is getting too picture-heavy for my taste, in general. I think perhaps no picture at all might be the right solution. And I'm still not very happy with the one remaining picture that identifies itself as "Scherer trying his own product." If the article says we can't show him, why are we showing him?

I agree that I'd like this brought up to feature quality... lemme think about it... pillow talk 17:58, April 8, 2011 (UTC)

Found something

Apparently, Jupiterfox has a deviantArt page. Just sayin'. --Mn-z 23:24, April 18, 2011 (UTC)

Were you...

On Wikipedia from 2005-2008? Cause a guy with your username used to be there, before he asked the admins to huff his user page and disappeared forever. (Something to do with an unfair 24-hour ban, I don't know...) --Scofield 11:46, April 21, 2011 (UTC)

Yep! That was me. I decided I didn't like the community and the endless lawyering over there and decided I'd rather contribute to this project. pillow talk 22:40, April 22, 2011 (UTC)

Me too! I kept being accused of "original research" and then decided the accusations were true; I wanted to write useful explanations (and funny is useful) and not just pull together facts from elsewhere and make them orthodox. Spıke ¬ 23:07 22-Apr-11

My problem is that the supposedly "NPOV" encyclopedia pretty much flat-out said that a lot of things were false (homeopathy, 9/11 controlled demolition theories, etc.) - and I started realizing that, yeah, the encyclopedia is very much written from the average 25-year-old American's point of view. pillow talk 03:23, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

There is a definite orthodox opinion, though I wouldn't ascribe it to any age group or nationality. My swan song was a contribution to [Talk:Homophobia], the very word being a canned argument that any opponent of certain state policy on gays must be acting out of fear, most commonly fear regarding his own identity; I told them the page, for all its ostensible science, was a guidebook on arguing fallaciously. My rant was promptly archived, though I was not notorious enough to get anyone thinking of banning me. Spıke ¬ 03:32 23-Apr-11

Well, I'm a Wikipedian under the username of User:ilov90210. My biggest contributions so far have been to the article on Beverly Hills, 90210. I even uploaded a picture and submitted a (failed) VFH nom. I also have an article on one Kaleb Nation in my userspace. Yay me! --Scofield 11:03, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

AOTP Copy Back

Hello, sorry to bother you but could I please have a copy of the Army of the Pharaohs article to work on?--- Darth Gangsta, the Cyborg Original 17:46, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

Here you go. Unrelatedly, could you be a dear and include a link to your userpage in your signature? Makes you easier to find and do stuff to. I mean... find.

And I'm being Hyperbole today. HI HYPERBOLE! *flees* 1234 ~ 18:06, 6 May 2011

Brit

The Britainy Spear page is pretty well down the road, and it had a hilarious pee review which led me to my biggest laughs of the month. You, of course, unintentionally inspired this page, so you are father to the man. And that Army of the Pharaohs thing sounds interesting, I'll go take a look at that. *flees* Aleister 18:24 6-5-'11

I see you...

Spreading your sexiness all over the wiki. Love it. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 03:32, 9 May 2011

Who? Whaaaaaaat? Meh, I'm too tired to deal with this nonsense! Sexiness is an evil tool of the Devil used to create more welfare recipients!--Respond 03:34, May 9, 2011 (UTC)

Yay, welcome back! --^Dame 19:11, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, Sonje!(and Zana, and... um... not Jokerman) pillow talk 19:11, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Wait, you went somewhere? 1234 ~ 19:34, 13 May 2011

There was a distinct break in my editing. pillow talk 19:36, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

So you're back now? 1234 ~ 19:58, 13 May 2011

I went from 30% here to 50% here. pillow talk 19:59, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Your body is regrowing beautifully since that incident with the disintergrater. --Black Flamingo 20:03, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

I know, I'm really pleased by the way my penis is coming back at twice its original size. pillow talk 20:10, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Now fuck off back to where your crawled out from. Also, hi. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Anachronistic chron acron

Has nothing to do with anything.

Unrelatedly, when you list things on qvfd, it usually works better to put them above the {{qvfd checked}} template, as otherwise folks are apt to think they've already been checked. 1234 ~ 20:57, 13 May 2011

  ►     All articles below this point have been checked.     ◄ 
  ►    Make sure you check for orphaned talk / sub pages.    ◄ 

All right, I'll make sure to do that. By the way, you already read this; it's really not necessary to read it again. pillow talk 21:00, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

I'll read you... 1234 ~ 00:54, 14 May 2011

LoL

Why the fuck did you reverted my edit in MY OWN talkpage? You won't like it if I start reverting you. --Mimo&maxus 18:58, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

Huh, that's fucking weird. I don't remember ever *looking* at your talk page, let alone making an edit, let alone making a reversion. Either it's a bug in the software, or it's a cautionary tale about giving rollback to a known alcoholic. pillow talk 22:55, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

Those links are annoyingly easy to click on by accident... *shifty eyes* Very... very... easy... 1234 ~ 23:00, 14 May 2011

I've done accidental rollbacks a couple of times, so that probably was the reason. Or it might just be an elaborate trolling scheme. --Mn-z 23:13, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

Also, it looks like you may have accidentally hit the rollback button a couple of times, possibly due to accessing the wiki from a phone or something. --Mn-z 00:00, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, shoot, that's a very good point, I was looking at the wiki from my Droid, which has a terrible touch screen and I often have to "click" all over the place to get to a page. Okay, now that I have rollback, I won't be accessing it that way anymore. pillow talk 01:33, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Your highly phallic rabble rousing of the lumpenproletariat...

"Help, help I'm being repressed!!!":)--Sycamore (Talk) 21:25, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

I didn't understand any of those words except "phallic." I enjoy my phallus. pillow talk 21:26, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Jouissance of the pervert... Uncyclopedia really is the worst!--Sycamore (Talk) 21:30, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

It is a crime that English lacks a word that means "pleasure, generally of the genital variety." pillow talk 21:33, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah... I did my final year project on a lot of that bollocks - interesting stuff.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:37, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Mallet.

You know what comes next. 1234 ~ 07:20, 17 May 2011

You should come back

Because Preggobear is on VFH and you are apparently amused my pregnancy fetish. --Mn-z 23:05, May 25, 2011 (UTC)