From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search

DO...
For nominators: DO...
- Find articles that suck by checking here, here and here. Many articles avoid the police for years before someone trips over them.
- Read Uncyclopedia's deletion policy to make sure the article is eligible. If you abuse VFD you will be abused with the claw-end of a hammer, Jon Hamm style!
- Check the page-history! It may have been vandalized or just edited by morons. If so, find a better version and revert to it.
- Add
{{vfd}} to the article. Failure to do so may result in hemorrhoids. You have been warned.
- Vote and include a comment as to why you have nominated the article.
- Only nominate one article per nomination. Subpages don't count.
- Please keep joke nominations at the bottom. Joke nominations are indicated by this template.
For voters: DO...
- Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
- Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), adding your sig/comment, preceded by a #, like so:
'''#'''This article isn't funny. ~~~~
- Remember to sign and timestamp your vote with four tildes. Unsigned votes will be removed and their owners defenestrated. You have been warned, again.
For Administrators: DO...
- Allow 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
- Remove and archive closed nominations from the voting page.
- Delete any unused images from deleted articles. If necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Delete any broken redirects left behind.
- Add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page if it is kept.

DON'T...
- Revert administrators.
- Re-nominate any kept article for at least a month. If you do, you will receive a bollocking.
- Remove ANYTHING from VFD if you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith. If you do, you will be banned for a very long time.
- Increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20. This means, do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes look like this (after the page's deletion), and closed nominations look like
THIS to indicate that they have been kept.
Nominate
Pages for Deletion
New entries will be at the bottom of this page.
|
Score: 1 Elapsed Time: 424 hours
|
| Keep (3) |
Keep. But only because I'm a nerd who gets the joke. π gergdownπ(talk) βοΈ 01:21, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Keep. or Move to Illogicopedia. i kinda get the joke. GlitchyZorua π©π¦ (give floofy hug) 03:01, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Keep.  17:51, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
|
| Delete (4) |
WTF? πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 01:20, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Napalm. AHAHAHAHAHAHHA! REPEATING THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AGAIN IS FUNNY AND HILARIOUS AND HAS NEVER BEEN BEFORE! Ever. Boner. Napalm Yankeesees! 14:25, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
BASH ITS SKULL IN! I know, that's supposed to be DNA or something, but the article never really seems to explain why we are downloading DNA. An article about genetically modifying yourself, or someone else, or attempting to transform your computer into a living organism, could be funny though. OαΓΆαααα HAWK TUAH! (vandalize my talk page) 16:20, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
bleh OR, or... Userfy. Adobe DNA is a real thing... the genexa platform from (infosys?) decodes data (the DNA) from customers for marketing slop purposes. Yeah, the joke here is that you're "downloading" the chemical base code that makes up someone's DNA, but it doesn't make sense thanks to Adobe DNA being an actual thing already. If it were to stay, maybe change the look of it so it more closely represents a shitty webpage from that time period, complete with annoying popups? idk. I get the feeling a lot of articles use this same style of 'dated' humor, and its just more of an older generation joke we don't quite 'get'. Lucyna K 16:23, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
@GlitchyZorua: @Gergdown: please explain the joke which seems I'm not getting. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 03:07, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
- @DaniPine3: It's kinda similar to the articles in Template:Nonsense, except there's a lot more actual stuff in it. The "CCTGCAC" stuff is DNA code. Basically, you're downloading DNA through a shitty website. The joke could've been done more effectively, but right now, it ain't that bad. π gergdownπ(talk) βοΈ 14:31, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Gergdown: I still don't get the whole "downloading DNA" thing. It seems to me a tad nonsensical. And this website already has many nonsensical things. Maybe this'd fit Illogiclopedia better. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 14:37, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
- @DaniPine3: Yeah, good idea. Whether this gets keeped or not, I'm 100% porting this to Illogiclopedia. π gergdownπ(talk) βοΈ 14:39, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment. I think the joke here is this. GlitchyZorua π©π¦ (give floofy hug) 15:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Gergdown: You STUPID DUMBASSARY USER! How do you not know the proper way to speak the English language, Gerg? As we all know, the correct way of spelling kept is kept!!! Obviously not keeped!!! In fact, since you said that, not only have you offended me, but the entire history of the Anglo-Saxon language chain, Gerg. Sir Turb0-Sunrise de la Boston 12:50, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Turb0-Sunrise: You STUPID DUMBASSARY USER! How do you not know the proper way to speak the English language, Turb0? As we all know, the correct way of spelling keeped is keeped!!! Obviously not kept!!! In fact, since you said that, not only have you offended me, but the entire history of the Anglo-Saxon language chain, Turb0. π gergdownπ(talk) βοΈ 14:02, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
- Awww wTools made me mess up the template. Why would wTools do this to me?!? π gergdownπ(talk) βοΈ 14:03, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Gergdown:You STUPID DUMBASSARY USER! How do you not know the proper way to speak the English language, Gerg? As we all know, the correct way of spelling Illogicopedia is Illogicopedia!!! Obviously not Illogiclopedia!!! In fact, since you said that, not only have you offended me, but the entire history of the Anglo-Saxon language chain, Gerg. --Dame Fish on skates
CUN 18:54, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
|
|
Score: 3 Elapsed Time: 354 hours
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (3) |
Pray for it. wouldn't be a bad idea for an article if it wasn't that there's nothing more than the logo, a searchbar and some links. no segment about Jesus actually answering, no punchline, no setup, no anything. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 23:18, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
Delete. The concept is decent (assuming none of you in the comments are lying), but that doesn't change the fact that the article itself sucks.  09:39, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Zombiebaron. cool concept, zero execution Lucyna K 04:25, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Neutral. A great concept, but horribly unfinished. OαΓΆαααα HAWK TUAH! (vandalize my talk page) 23:21, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment. Agree with Opossum. Appears to be a parody of "AskJeeves", which was/is pretty much bare-bones (are they still even active anymore?) but we should program it to be as if Jesus were giving some quippy response. That, or maybe an article covering when they made a chatbot to mimic Jesus (not to be confused with AI Jesus which is just a collection of AI images that I'd like to unsee!) OranguTang94 (Complaint board) (Damage trail) 02:18, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
No consensus. Β―\_(γ)_/Β― GlitchyZorua π©π¦ (give floofy hug) 20:48, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
|
|
Score: -2 Elapsed Time: 4 hours
|
| Keep (3) |
winnie the boo(b)! ehhh, it's an odd one alright, but already has a cleanup tag. If edited, it'll be ok I think. If no one wants to clean it OR it's still trash after, then I'll change this vote. Lucyna K 14:05, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Strong keep. This was created three days ago. And also, it already has a cleanup tag.  14:48, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Keep. For now, at least. OαΓΆαααα HAWK TUAH! (vandalize my talk page) 15:58, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
|
| Delete (1) |
- yesOh, Kurtz, you can do stupid things! 13:25, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|