User talk:Javascap/Archive 3

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RotM[edit source]

It's still too early in the month for me to cast a vote in good conscience, but rest assured I will give you every consideration. You've done alright by me and right now I'm leaning in your direction. --OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN 17:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Your Powers of Perception are Incredible![edit source]

Hey, like most of the other lame-o's who seem to leave comments on your page, I just wanted to thank you for your review. Contrary to unpopular belief, I am not a very good speller. Thanks for the catch. There were a few others. And I definitely enjoy the props. Just throwing them on back. --Beavnation 01:45, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks[edit source]

1925945.jpg Well, well, well. I never would have guessed that Javascap was stupid enough to vote for this tripe! Goes to show you never can tell.
Thanks for voting!

Thanks for the review and the vote! -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN00:03, 30 Apr

Thankees![edit source]

Thanks for the review, Javascap, I'm just getting to changing those things right now... The links did prove a problem because I was struggling for things to link to. - 16:59 2 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Thanks![edit source]

Thanks for reviewing Veteran for me, you gave me some really good points. Perhaps you'll nom it for me after I make the necessary improvements? People don't really like self noms, I've noticed. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 19:25 May 5

HALP![edit source]

CatBrain.jpg Doctor Miles Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Skullthumper
has awarded you a cat brain
for being part of the largest HALP! chain on IRC, ever

 Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  critchat) 03:33 May 06, 2008

The List[edit source]

OK, an attempt to explain how it works:

  1. Edit the appropriate table, update no. of reviews + no. of in-depth reviews next to the name accordingly
  2. Add the latest score to the end of the score average bit and remember to increase the nuber they're divided by accordingly
  3. Update the percentage box, date of most recent review and the most recent review itself
  4. Go to the foot of the table, to the three long total expressions; find the no. of reviews for that person and increase it accordingly, then do the same for the no. of in depth reviews
  5. Hit the preview button
  6. View the person's new average in the preview, then change their average in the final total box at the bottom
  7. Put the latest checked review, who it was by and the date in the final space in the table
  8. Put the name and the article checked in the edit summary
  9. Save the page
  10. Cross off the review you just checked on the maintenance list
  11. Do it all again for the other reviews
  12. Wonder exactly why we bother
  13. ???
  14. Profit!

Alternatively, just look through the history at my last few edits on it and see if you can figure out what's going on. It started out quite simple, but it's constantly growing and mutating to the point where it needs this level of explanation. Fun, isn't it?! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 11:40, May 6

Hmm, that was close... The trick with the bit at the end is not to add in extra numbers for people already on the table (as for Flumpa), but to change their existing number in that bit at the bottom. So Flumpa is 10 before the bottom of the table at the moment - count back 10 in the first mathy bit at the bottom and increase his 1 to a 2. Don't increase his 0 to a 1 in the second mathy bit, and then hit preview - that shows you his new average, so find his old average in the final long mathy bit and change it (I look for the average above his, which won't have changed, makes it easier to track down). Only add new numbers on the end and increase the "divided by" count if you add a new bod to the table. It really sounds long winded when you explain it like that, but you get used to it. Honest! Also: glad to hear the golf club missed both your legs! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 12:55, May 16

Veteran[edit source]

I don't need you to re-review the whole thing, but just tell me if you think it's ready with what I added. I don't think I'm going to replace the image at the end, but I think I've followed your other advice and I'm pretty pleased with the results. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 12:08 May 6

PeeReview[edit source]

Thanks for the kind, thoughtful review of my play. I shall certainly take your advice on board - though allow me a moment of slight pedantry - paedophile is simply British English for the American pedophile- so not a typo strictly speaking! --Knucmo2 15:19, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Ah, yes, my apology fr that, I completly forgot, for the moment, the AE usage in Brithish spelling (But it doesn't change the fact that was a good article!) Warm Regards, Javascap

UnSignpost Sunday Edition: May 11th, 2008[edit source]

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 04:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

You busy at the moment man?[edit source]

Just wondering, because you've had Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/James Brown tagged for nearly a week now, and you're usually quite quick with the reviews. Everything OK on planet Javascap? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 08:57, May 14

That wasn't meant as a hurry up, I was just wondering if all was OK! However, thanks for the review - a better score than I was expecting, to be honest! However, have you never encountered the FU Spang phenomenon on here? I feel there's always a place for an in-joke in an article if it's subtly done and most casual readers won't even spot it. Anyway, I feel confident that I've not given you cake before, so have a slice for a good review:

Cake.gif Under User has blessed you with cake for being friendly and/or useful.
Eat it quickly before he changes his mind.


Warning: cake prepared in an environment which also processes nuts,
and contains lactose, gluten, ground glass and arsenic, which gives it a lovely tang.

--SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 18:52, May 14

UnSignpost: May 15th, 2008[edit source]

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 00:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

the list[edit source]

Yep, looks like you did okay on editing the list. Thanks for pitching in, Javascap! It may look like a waste of time at first, but it's actually a good weathervane for how pee review is doing. If only there was a list of people who edit the list, THEN we would have some good times! User:Javascap/Pee/Pee thanks again!   Le Cejak <May 17, 2008 [2:34]>

UnSignpost: May 22nd, 2008[edit source]

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 20:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

UnSignpost: May 29nd, 2008[edit source]

THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 02:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Siggy things[edit source]

Dude, can you get around to adding the date to your sig in some way? Or at the very least, add the date on reviews you do - it's a pain having to check through to the history on your reviews when I update the list. It's a small thing, but it would please me greatly. Ta! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 13:03, May 29 Yeh about this: they way you've added the time doesn't exactly work, because what your using is the "current" variables. They just display the current time, not the time at which you posted. - [17:14 30 May] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise I think I've fixed it for you, now. That should work. - [17:17 30 May] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

Ninjastar[edit source]

For 50 reviews, you get this. For 50 in-depth, it's the far more rare Platinum Pisser - so well done, and keep it up! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:55, Jun 3

Also, I'm putting together a little page of pics of decent folks. Care to donate your likeness? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 11:38, Jun 3

Late thanks![edit source]

Portrait-of-Homeless-Man-IMG 3825.jpg Thanks, son!
But Uncle Sam didn't thank me! All you bastards can GO TO HELL!! Eh, got any change, son? I sure hope no one writes an incredibly offensive article about me. Wait, where ya goin, son?

Thanks for voting for Veteran.


~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUNWotMRotMAotMVFHSKPEEINGHPBFF @ 18:43 Jun 3

Your sig[edit source]

You've got a sig page, but you appear to paste all of the code on a page when you sign. Am I confused, or is it just me? Do you need help? Are you drowning in a sea of debt? Are those high interest rate credit cards sapping away more and more of your income? Does 4.7% financing sound good to...oh. Sorry. These aren't my cards. Who swapped my cards? /me storms off

me storms back. Also, your automated comment making thingy doesn't work properly. It makes a new page. That's just silly. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Ah, yes, that pesky signature. IF it worked as I hoped it would, I would just use {{User:Javascap/sig}} but sadly, it doesnt work, yielding this, Warm Regards, ▀ĴαVắśСąР▀. For that reason, I am reduced to copying and pasting the ENTIRE code, to get this result. Warm Regards, ▀ĴαVắśСąР▀ 03:11 August 12 2024 . I think you will agree as to which one is fancier. On the side note, to leave a message, you just click the button so it adds a new section to the default page (in this instance, my talk page!). If you type something into it, it instead tries to write a new page at the designated target (in that instance, whatever you typed in the box!)

Didja ask on IRC for some sig help? I'm no expert, myself. All I know is:
1) Click "My Preferences"
2) In "Nickname", add {{SUBST:nosubst|User:Javascap/sig}}
3) Click "Raw signature" (so that there's a checkmark)
4) Click "Save"
5) Make a page called User:Javascap/sig
6) Enter your sig code (--<span style="color:orange">[[User:User:Javascap|J]]</span><span style="color:purple">[[User_talk:User:Javascap|talk]]</span>) there
7) Save page
What's the problem with your sig, anyway. Did it stop calling you after it moved away to college? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Javascap, what you need to do, is actually this...
Create a page User:Javascap/time. At this page put the date formatting you wish to use (include all colour tags, size tags etc. You should enter it like this for each variable (I think you've already been doing this, or I changed for you (actually I think I did it for you, but meh): August. Then go to "My Preferences". Go to the "Nickname" box and enter the code Modus suggested ({{SUBST:nosubst|User:Javascap/sig}}, but with {{SUBST:nosubst|User:Javascap/time}} after your main sig substing bit). Then you can sign all your posts with THREE tildes. That should work. - [18:27 4 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

Y'know, you don't see many VFH thanks templates about these days, do you?[edit source]

Don't care. I still use 'em. Here's one now:

Bubbledress.jpg *pop*
Yeah, er, thanks for *pop*
your vote for *pop* that...
oh lord, her whole dress is made of...
*popop* *pop*

Thanks Javascap. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 13:21, Jun 4

UnSignpost: June 5th, 2008[edit source]

THEDUDEBOT Armed and Ready Say The Word 05:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)


Join The CMC! Make Your Inner Cow Happy!

Moo, Javascap!

Cmc.gif
What is it about cows that gets us all hot and bothered? Where do cows come from? What are cows?

These are the questions that drive the Cow Moo Cult and its brethren, who are very, VERY interested in cows and cow by-products.

The CMC is devoted not only to cows, but to helping Uncyclopedia through general acts of goodness and through motivating people with cow-treats and the like.

So, Javascap, why not join the CMC? It's free (unless you count virginity as money) and it's fun (and it's full of clichés)! You'll get a pretty template for your userpage and a nice title for your signature! What could be better? Sign Up Now!
Double moos from your cowy friend,
the CMC

Consider this as a way of "paying me back", because that cleverly hidden SPECIAL:USERLOGOUT had me fooled. Also, let's pretend it says "Berry" instead of "{{{1}}}", because it would be embarrassing to admit that I'm not using it properly. // Xyr.png Berry; speak to me // 19:12 7 June 2008

Pic[edit source]

Hi Javascap, fancy adding your likeness to this? (Use this in case you didn't know). --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 13:36, Jun 9