Uncyclopedia:VFH/Self-aggrandizement (2nd nomination)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Self-aggrandizement (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Self-aggrandizement	Score: 9
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:26, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
For: 12	Nom+For. This is a good article, good enough to be featured in my opinion. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:26, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Sure. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:06, May 1 For. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:16, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Weak For. per above Mnb'z 16:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC) For. I'm awesome for voting for this JackOfSpades (talk) 20:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC) For - I'm pretty sure this article has been quasi-featured twice now. Let's feature it already. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:06, 2 May 2009 (UTC) For. —Sir Guildensternenstein 20:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC) For. --Dame 12:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC) I think this is a good article so it must be featured immediately. Seriously, I have spoken, what are you waiting for? -OptyC Sucks! CUN18:00, 5 May  For. Sexy Chick Zeitgeist 13:02, 10 May 2009 (UTC) For. As per last time. I'm still expecting it to be a link to STM's userpage. --UU - natter 11:50, May 12 For. --Docile hippopotamus 07:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Against: 3	Against.. Not arrogant enough. --Romartus 07:39, 5 May 2009 (UTC) Against per Romartus.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 20:18, 19 May 2009 (UTC)  Against. –Flashfreez 18:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Comments	I'll have to abstain: I liked it but it didn't make me laugh. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 10:29 5 May 2009 abstain as per orian. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC) Abstaint. Doesn't seem like something I'd get get excited about if I saw it on the Main Page. Don Puttano cHeDDs 02:52,15May,2009

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH