Uncyclopedia:VFH/Crossbow

Article: Crossbow	Score: 4.5 against the plants
Nominated by:	Nominally Humane! some time Tuesday, 21:50, Jul 20 2010 UTC
For: 11.5	I lolled, therefore I nom. Nominally Humane! some time Tuesday, 21:50, Jul 20 2010 UTC For. It reminds me of something I now can't recall but this is an eccentric yes in favour *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 22:46, July 20, 2010 (UTC) For. Lo! M'su Carencro - Talk - Contributions - Blag 00:22, July 21, 2010 (UTC) For I was crossbowed once. Animals laughed at me. Aleister 00:49 21 7 Damn Manholes. They'll kill us all! ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 02:36, July 21, 2010 (UTC) For*. I have no idea what I just read, but I enjoyed it. --UU - natter 09:36, Jul 21* What the living fuck was that??! I didn't laugh at it so much as I just stared there with my mouth open, in disbelief that someone had made this thing. I can hardly believe I'm actually voting for it. pillow talk 19:59, July 21, 2010 (UTC) Fucking epic. Megaman126512 23:47, July 21, 2010 (UTC) For. I wanted it to get on VFH and it did. I hope it makes it to the front page. Some Idiot 09:42, July 22, 2010 (UTC) lulwut? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:34, 24 July 2010 For. Interesting Read 59.178.163.79 13:18, August 1, 2010 (UTC) For. Scarily good.--HM (T)
Against: 7	Against. Runs the joke into the ground very, very quickly. I did finish reading the article, but with great difficulty. All humor of the non-sequitur could be summed up in the pictures. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 10:15, July 21, 2010 (UTC) Smite. It's very interesting, and well done. I didn't laugh once though. I don't get what's really funny about it. »» Back ² Tha Hood»» 04:06,22July,2010 Against It's really uninteresting. Only reason I laughed when reading this is because the word "manhole" which makes me think of "The Manhole." Those guys are funny. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:30, July 23, 2010 (UTC) Against. I like the style and the article itself but didn't laugh. Lordarcadian 21:34, July 23, 2010 (UTC) Wow, that was an interesting study of an apocalyptic, back-to-basics fantasy tale and an intriguing character study, with creative, clean layout and pictures. It actually scared me more than it did make me laugh, though, and I didn't see the satire in it (pastiche, perhaps, but not satire), so unfortunately I must say that I am misaiming the point. Sir Mac Mania GUN—[21:34 23 Jul 2010] Against. While I highly respect it's aesthetic design and effort, I am still clueless as to what the joke is. It's always quite depressing when I'm on the "don't get it" side of the line. --Matfen 19:29, July 24, 2010 (UTC) Against. O)))Bow Wilytank 13:16, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Unless the joke is just one giant non sequitur, I don't get it.User:Mrthejazz/sig 04:18, July 21, 2010 (UTC) Abstain. I'm torn on this one. On the one hand, the feel and aesthetic of this article are extremely unique, with the tie-in to the article on manholes being another interesting plus. On the other hand, because this is basically just a non sequitur, this article could be about damn near anything and have more or less the same effect. Also, the whole "they are coming!" thing gets old pretty quickly, per what TKF said. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:33, July 21, 2010 (UTC) Abstain. It only confused me when I read it. I'm going to try dropping some acid later and then re read it. If it makes me laugh then I shall vote yes. --—John Lydon 15:42, July 23, 2010 (UTC) Ah, a yes vote for sure! Aleister 16:02 23 7