Uncyclopedia:VFH/Call from Grandma

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Call from Grandma (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Call from Grandma	Score: 6 times too many that Grandma pressed the subtitle button
Nominated by:	Docile hippopotamus 00:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
For: 14	nom and for. It's funny. --Docile hippopotamus 00:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC) For Produces laughter from me every time I read it. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC) For. InMooseWeTrust 02:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC) For. I like it, no linking though? Also this article applies to my mum and dad too -- El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 07:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC) Nice. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC) For. Thank you, Docile hippopotamus, for nominating my article! I am still a noob, so I really appreciate it...thank you to all voters. Even being nominated for this is pretty overwhelming. —AlbinoZombie 03:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC) For. Made me laugh it's all good. Sir Sunbeam no u F@H KUN 10:01, 4 August 2009 (UTC) For. Nice work from my adopted n00blet. -- tense Ape (analyze) (Riot Porn) 12:44, 4 August 2009 (UTC) For. So true! —Mazaka (talk) 19:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC) Tuesday is the day I help your mother use the video machine again. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC) For. I liked. ChiefjusticeDS 19:43, 5 August 2009 (UTC) What? –Flashfreez 20:57, 5 August 2009 (UTC) Sure. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 03:40,8August,2009 For. This is really hilarious...and kind of true. Lazyanimangafreak 18:23, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Against: 8	against. didn't pass the chuckle test. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)  Against. It needs to renew it's prescription first. Has some a good ideas but not enough to sustain it as VFH contender IMV. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 22:36, 3 August 2009 (UTC) against. too long.--Dinosinatra 20:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC) The article is too long? How so? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 20:19, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Against. It's a one-trick pony that soon wears off. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 20:17, Aug 6 Against. per above. Mn-z 15:08, 8 August 2009 (UTC) Against. I found it funny until about five sections in when she says "kiddo", from there on down it just loses it. Not funny and not inkeeping with the rest of the article. --Atomik Spongeface • Ⓣ Ⓒ 17:38, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Against. I reviewed this, and I saw an article with potential, but that still needed work to really shine. Despite one or two of my points being taken (I'm glad it's not such a wall of text now), I still feel it needs work. Like the others, I think it runs out of steam too quickly, and there's more that can be done with it. About two thirds of my review comments still stand. I want this to be good enough to feature, but I don't think it is yet. --UU - natter 09:46, Aug 10 Against. I found this far more annoying than I did funny. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 05:31, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain The introduction set it up real nice, and the next section was good, but in my opinion, it fell apart after that, almost as if the author was out of ideas. So I'm Abstaining cause of the first two sections. Staircase CUNt 00:17, 3 August 2009 (UTC) Abstain. I do find it funny, but it feels like more can be done with this. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 10:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC) Acrolo, what could I do to fix it? I really want to use this to get any possible feedback so I can make the article the best I can. —AlbinoZombie 03:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH