From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Bad things have happened recently
|
Score: 11 issues raising appropriate concern
|
| Nominated by:
|
mAttlobster. (hello) 22:58, December 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
For: 14
|
- For Nice surreal daft satire. Just as it should be. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:58, December 15, 2011 (UTC)
- For Nice one.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 23:36, December 15, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Love it!
 Mattsnow 07:14, December 16, 2011 (UTC)
- For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)
 07:17, December 16, 2011 (UTC)
 For. Creepy muddas wrote this. Nice pics! Aleister 15:38 16-12-'11- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:30, 17 December 2011
- For despite Shabidoo deciding to use that kind of font and stuff everywhere. I, like Lyrithya, don't understand, though I also don't find it too objectionable.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  09:37, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
- For. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 20:43, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
- For. -- Lost Labyrinth
 • (t) • (c) • (a) 01:47, December 18, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Bad things happened to your mother last night.
 (talk) 01:28, 19 December 2011
- For. -RAHB 01:20, December 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Probably for Apart from the dismal formatting problems, the clichéd jokes and the very predictable nature of this so called "article" I have to admit I didn't completely hate this. While I don't really see this as a featured article, I'll vote for it anyways cause it will be featured and I want some brownie points. --ShabiDOO 01:47, December 20, 2011 (UTC)
- For -- The Zombiebaron 08:57, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Nah. --Black Flamingo 17:17, January 10, 2012 (UTC)
|
Against: 3
|
 Against. Didn't laugh. Pup 03:14 20 Dec '11- It's a good idea, but I don't find it incredibly funny. --
 Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:16, December 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Nah. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 08:57, Dec 23 2011
- Wonderful and beautiful constructive criticism. "Nah", thats even better than a pee review. "Nah" as though one clearly agonised over yes or no and finally decided "nah". The voting options should be changed to "for", "against", "comment" and "nah". --ShabiDOO 17:03, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Comment. Someone tell me what the big font is for and then I may vote for depending on the answer. 1234 ~
 03:07, 17 December 2011
- Theres a big font because this article it talking about some pretty big sh*t! Like its like an iminent emergency. We are talking about a big time crisis. BIG BIGNESS! I should have made the font ginormous...but big will do for now. --ShabiDOO 15:57, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Unlike TKF, I find that somewhat objectionable, sorry. Good article, though. 1234 ~ 16:52, 17 December 2011
- You are right. I suppose you might vote for one of my articles in 2012. I'll simply have my fingers crossed. You are also right about the font. There's something wrong. It simply isn't big enough. I should also change the colour a bit too! xoxoxox --ShabiDOO 18:36, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Abstain. No great pay off for the build up but won't vote against.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:25, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For. Creepy muddas wrote this. Nice pics! 
Against. Didn't laugh. 
