Uncyclopedia:VFH/Armenian Genocide

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Armenian Genocide (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Armenian Genocide	Score: 13 happy camps
Nominated by:	T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:17, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
For: 18	Leave it to mrthejazz. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:17, May 10, 2011 (UTC)  For. I like the redirect better, but this is cool too -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 22:21, May 10, 2011 (UTC)  Duh. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:01, 10 May 2011  For. mrthejazz and other black birds have once again punched a hole in that stupid uncy slogan about not having content or something. the last time i was Armenian i punched out a Turk over stuff like this. aleister 23:05 10-5-'11 For. Peace of history--Funnybony    23:09, May 10 For. ShabiDOO 03:09, May 11, 2011 (UTC) For -- The Zombiebaron 08:22, May 11, 2011 (UTC) Mrthejazz is a beautiful man. --Black Flamingo 13:30, May 11, 2011 (UTC) Phor --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 17:39, May 11, 2011 (UTC)  For. because genocide is always funny --Sog1970 22:01, May 11, 2011 (UTC) Fore Mattsnow 18:48, May 14, 2011 (UTC) Four. Way back in high school, we spent a week studying this. Yet the materials were so vague and long-winded, I think I learned more from this Uncyc article than I did in that week. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 09:32 May 16, 2011 (UTC) For. Mimo&maxus 11:17, May 16, 2011 (UTC) For. --Dame 20:36, May 16, 2011 (UTC) For. MrN 21:02, May 17 For. I Liked it. The people complaining about the article are just not big fans of genocide. User:CandidToaster/sig 23:37, May 25, 2011 (UTC) For. Sycamore (Talk) 18:26, June 5, 2011 (UTC)  For. I liked it. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 22:50 Jun 05, 2011
Against: 5	Against. I understand where this is coming from but it's too bitter in my own view and is relying on shock to make a point. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:56, May 11, 2011 (UTC) Against. per above. It relies too much on shock to make a point, and is way too long for being a 1 trick pony. Mn-z 00:12, May 12, 2011 (UTC) Against. Maybe I'm too squeamish...and yea it does go on a bit 20:37, May 18, 2011 (UTC)  Against. Just wrongfully sickening. This article Got Some Sick. User:DJ Mixerr/sig DJ Mixerr 22:33, May 20, 2011 (UTC) I dunno; this just seems forced, to me. Add the touchy nature of it all and it doesn't really work. 1234 ~ 07:35, 22 May 2011
Comments	I suppose it will only take maybe another 200 years of bitterness until Turkey can admit that just maybe a government a few generations ago perhaps went a little overboard. Humour and shock and bitterness are great ways to drive through a point. --ShabiDOO 17:42, May 11, 2011 (UTC) I just think it's plain sickening. Which is just wrongful. The shock value is not that laughable at all. DJ Mixerr 22:41, May 20, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.