From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD. |
Sid the Squid
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. another one of Crablogger's works. This one isn't as bad, but it really doesn't go anywhere, and its as obscure as possible. (The character gets two sentences worth of material in wikipedia, and appeared in only 3 episodes plus 2 nonspeaking cameo appearances.) The original author won't be back, and I seriously doubt anyone will improve this one. --Mnb'z 16:59, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:34, 14 Mar
- Delete. - It could have a lot better. As the original writer isn't coming back then I agree - fried calamari time. --Romartus 13:37, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:16, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Template:Slappy's Angels
Scary Movie 3
Keep |
- Week Keep Not the worst in the series. Pointless parody but does it deserve the pixel acid bath treatment ? --Romartus 16:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. fortunately, this one doesn't have Slappy (Only Minerva Mink and Rouge the Bat), but its still part of Crablogger's alternative universe, and I don't see much that is worth keeping in it. --Mnb'z 04:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- lol crablogger -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 05:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:04, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:34, 14 Mar
- Delete. MrN 17:42, Mar 14
|
Comments |
- Also, when this is deleted, can the deleting admin please consider QVFDing Image:The secret lover SUSPECT dundunduuuuuuuun.jpg? It is only used on that page, and its not quite gratuitous enough for QVFD as its being used semi-reasonably right now. However, its only used on that page, and is quite vulgar. --Mnb'z 04:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Slappy Squirrel
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. the Coup de Grace. It looks like Crablogger's main works have been removed. Although, there are some hints of slappycruft in other articles. I was thinking we might want to hold off on this one to find more slappycruft, but one can use Crablogger's edit history to find those and purge/delete them. --Mnb'z 04:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 05:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:04, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:33, 14 Mar
|
Comments |
|
Monkey Ninjas
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Despite being comprised of what is typically a highly successful combination of both monkeys and ninjas, this article fails to capture my imagination. Possibly because it's pants. MrN 05:48, Mar 14
- delete A good monkey ninja article needs 2 things. First, it needs an image of a monkey-ninja, not a monkey with a gun. Second, it needs to avoid any and all references to Slappy the Squirrel fetishism. --Mnb'z 06:10, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:14, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.-- Agreed. Going with flow on this one. --Romartus 16:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:04, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Cartoon Movie 3
Cartoon Movie 2
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Slappycruft. It's kind of amazing, the scope of the mess Crablogger left us to clean up. pillow talk 23:05, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- $4,000,000,000,000,000,000.003. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:27, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:54, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:05, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mnb'z 04:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Minerva Mink
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Yet another terrible article in the "Slappy's Angels" universe, much of which no longer exists, rendering the article largely a navigation template to articles that do not exist. Also: can you find the ludicrously enormous number? Mmmhm. pillow talk 23:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- she has also confessed to having a strong sexual relationship with Lola Bunny,and Tupac Shakur although this was yet another fling and another attempt to get in the papers. Tupac Shakur. Somebody who was once alive, in real life, had a sexual relationship with a cartoon character. Tupac Shakur. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:35, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! She deserves better. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mnb'z 04:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Skippy Squirrel
Lola Bunny
Azamat Bagatov
Scream 4
Keep |
|
Delete |
2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I would say - redeploy in the flowerbed but it might kill the roses.--Romartus 19:54, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill That guy had a Slappy fetish. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Also, once this is deleted, {{Scream}} will be link rotted to the point of being QVFD-worthy. --Mnb'z 16:11, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Duckula: Dead and Loving It
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. moar Slappyscruft. --Mnb'z 16:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:44, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- $86,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,009.99. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.. I would have gone more neutral but I made a mistake and read it. And then my heart turned to stone. --Romartus 19:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill Seriously, I thought we had gotten rid of all his stuff... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- weak keep - Poor, yes, I don't think this is quite up to the gold standard of crapness.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- weak keep. Well at least it isn't some tired Warcrap/LOTR Crap/ etc knock off. Can we encourage the writer to spruce it up ?--Romartus 13:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Just. It's not bothering me. MrN 23:23, Mar 11
- Keep It is redeemable. Just like your mom. Yeah, I went there! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Could use some improvement, but unlike most epithets, is redeemable. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. random nonsense. --Mnb'z 14:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Weird and unfunny. pillow talk 16:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Changed my mind. Actually it is bothering me... MrN 12:34, Mar 13
|
Comments |
- Am I missing a reference in the article's name or something? It looks quite random to me. --Mnb'z 15:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Kept MrN 22:43, Mar 13
|
As The World Falls Down
Keep |
- Weak Keep It is one of those articles that deserves purgatory . Can the writer be contacted again and warned this is for the chop unless it is edited and rendered more coherent ? --Romartus 07:27, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- I refer you to the word "banned" in the original nomination comment - he's not in a position to do anything with this. --UU - natter 09:48, Mar 13
- In that case, let's unban him so he can fix up the article. pillow talk 15:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Dude, he was banned for good reason... MrN 15:04, Mar 13
- I'm sure that, whatever he did, he's very sorry. pillow talk 15:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, as his IP sockpuppets state with monotonous regularity, he doesn't seem to be sorry in the slightest. --UU - natter 15:19, Mar 13
|
Delete |
- Delete. Random oddity started a while ago by a banned master of sockpuppets. It's not funny, it's not going anywhere, and I think we should get rid. What say you? --UU - natter 10:14, Mar 12
- Delete. MrN 12:00, Mar 12
- Delete per above. --Mnb'z 15:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:18, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Kerkill He was a puppet master? Uh... Another one bites the dust. This won't get better now. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:25, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't know who wrote that, but man does it SUCK! -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Wimp-out abstain there is Nuance in the VFD process - how bad does bad have to be to VFD? This is not very good, and rather random, but VFD? Maybe. Maybe not. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 22:26, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Comment - Although I doubt it will be kept, somehow I feel this is a litte bit vendetta like - he would be imploring us to keep, but now that he's very recently suffered wikideath - his work is to be nuked one by one, including his userpage. Its not out a liking for the guy, but somehow this is awkward to me.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:15, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- As nommer, can I say that I didn't nom it because of who wrote it - I came across it and wanted to get rid of it anyway, then I looked at the history and saw who it was by. So this is nothing personal on my part. Maybe I shouldn't have mentioned the circumstances in the nom. My bad. --UU - natter 15:29, Mar 13
- It's shit either way. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:33, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- (Dam edit colide) Thats not it, I know you nom in good faith Mr Toodles;) - maybe its just the general case of that user, I felt it got a lot uglier that I thought it would - usually most will just stop whatever crap they're doing but this was a drawn out saga if you know waht I mean--Sycamore (Talk) 15:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
|
World War XVIII
Keep |
- keep Ah, it's not that bad, I enjoyed the political stereotypes. --Aethix 00:01, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. - Per above--Sycamore (Talk) 17:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- delete the same as below, imageless meme-y random future history. --Mnb'z 17:41, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete -OptyC Sucks! CUN19:18, 7 Mar
- ||Delete|| Take it away and shoot it to encourage the others to write with a bit more humour ! Otherwise they read like a 'Risk' game report. --Romartus 20:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:34, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Oh jesus, meme-ridden random pointless future war thingy. Ballmer, Norris etc. No. --UU - natter 11:53, Mar 12
- Delete. Better than some of the others in this series, but still... MrN 11:57, Mar 12
- Kerkill The whole series should be gotten rid of. They all suck. And WW18?!? The world was destroyed in WW7. We all know this! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:14, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Date Movie 2
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. moar slappycruft. --Mnb'z 04:44, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. - Per last time--Sycamore (Talk) 06:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. - Buffing the brown stuff again. --Romartus 07:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Hnng. --UU - natter 09:50, Mar 13
- Delete. Oh dear. MrN 10:59, Mar 13
|
Comments |
|
Cartoon Movie
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. more Slappycruft. --Mnb'z 15:57, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. It's no good. pillow talk 23:52, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Turd polishing. All the Scary Movies are turds to being with so what is the point in spoofing them ?? --Romartus 07:36, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Oh d-d-d-dear. --UU - natter 09:49, Mar 13
|
Comments |
|
Tentacles (film)
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Slappy-cruft. --Mnb'z 15:52, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. - At last Dexter will have his revenge against Slappy cruft.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN 20:01, Mar 12
- Delete. Crablogger was... a weird guy. pillow talk 23:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. A weak concept to start with - and about 32 years out of date as well. Has this writer been asleep since 1977 ? --Romartus 07:34, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Weak abstain WTF? Weak abstain? Is that like extreme moderation? I'm leaning VFD here is what it means. Convince me. Or don't. How bad does bad have to be? This is listy and random. OK Maybe delete. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 22:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Slappy's Angels: 10 Seconds to Armageddon
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Slappy's Angels-cruft. (I.e. namedrop laden perverted, with a hint of Slappy-the-Squirrel-fetishism) --Mnb'z 06:48, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 07:31, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I thought we got rid of all the Slappycruft. This can definitely go. --UU - natter 10:14, Mar 12
- Delete. MrN 11:45, Mar 12
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
World War XVII
Keep |
|
Delete |
- delete random future(?) history.--Mnb'z 16:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:42, 10 Mar
- Delete. I fell asleep after the first comma. No seriously. IF anyone thinks this is funny - let me see you laugh at this line. 'War of the Ring Roads' is about Jesus as a Jedi Knight in which he goes to France and surrenders to himself'. AAAAGHHHHH. --Romartus 13:33, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Another pointless future war thingy. Bleh. --UU - natter 11:52, Mar 12
- Delete. Na. MrN 11:53, Mar 12
|
Comments |
|
World War XV
Keep |
- Keep. - Although it's not great there have been some like Enzo who have feature worthy ones of this saga line. I like the idea that the only stuff deleted is not ever going to get better and is just crap. I can't say I think this is the case here or with the other world war type articles.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. Another article in a very unfunny canon about a World War. To write a decent parody - at least know or read about the subject you want to send up . --Romartus 13:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)??
- Delete. The whole future world war series seems extremely pointless to me, and this is particularly random, unfunny and generally deletable. --UU - natter 11:49, Mar 12
- Delete. Pants. MrN 11:50, Mar 12
|
Comments |
- I basically agree with what Sycamore said, but that doesn't mean we can't delete the ones that are utter crap. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- This is a wholly fictitious subject though. I don't think the existent article adds much base material, and a long string of weak articles on the subject is probably does more harm than good. It may make the author try to be consistent with other articles in the series or decide to write at the end of the series, putting his article ridiculously far into the future. For example, World War XXI is actually better than many of the wars before it in the series. --Mnb'z 18:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
|
The Mighty Beep!
Rocket Knight Adventures
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete as nominator - unfunny gamecruft that would need a major rewrite to have any satirical value. The Star Wars references are a nice idea, but they just aren't hitting my funny bone. --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 03:08, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Mnb'z 04:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Dragon food. Shame we can't put some of these in a 'purgatory' section here - where it has to be 'humored/humoured' up before it can enter Uncyclopedia Heaven (where ever that is). --Romartus 13:23, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete MrN 22:57, Mar 11
- Delete.-- 07:35, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete & Redirect to King Harkinian. I tried to merge the two, but besides the images, there was not much of value in the King of Hyrule article. Its one of those "name drop/the subject has gay/incestuous sex with everybody" type articles. --Mnb'z 14:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN 16:20, Mar 10
- Delorte. pillow talk 16:27, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Deleted and Redirected -RAHB 18:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- 'Stong keep'--Sycamore (Talk) 09:05, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Not that bad. Certainly not "cancerous". ~ 09:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:10, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. I could see this becoming cancerous if there was a "United States Emperors" template on all "United States Emperorors" pages, and I'd probably support the deletion of such a template. But there isn't, and the article is of reasonably qaulity. pillow talk 18:32, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Considering what could replace it (teen scribble about some game I have never heard of..) - it has a stay of execution from this contributor.--Romartus 19:22, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Strong delete cancerous article that has the potential to (and in fact did, and still does to some extend) fill high profile articles with historical nonsense. --Mnb'z 03:10, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Mnbvcx: Maybe you could explain a bit more what you mean by a "cancerous article" and how this article damages others? MrN 03:42, Mar 9
- by "cancerous" I mean it has high potential to harm other articles, more so than its rule as a "bad example". Cancerous articles mainly include random succession lists and "perverse instruction" templates, this one is a form of the former.
- Basically, this is the younger brother of the Mythical Presidents of the United States. Its not as bad, as it does have some comic value, its short, and isn't totally off the wall and/or anachronistic. Still, it does inspire noobs to fill articles with random fictional history, often crowding out real satire. When I read the Richard Nixon (for example) article, I don't want to hear about his acts as Emperor of the United States long after he fell from power.
- This article and its template (which was deleted) have caused a lot of random history to appear very notable articles. Granted, its not quite as bad as the mythical presidents list was. --Mnb'z 04:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Kept MrN 19:25, Mar 9
|
Beverly Hills Chihuahua
Keep |
- Keep. I... hope—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 23:58, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Keep It probably could use improvements, but certainly not deletion. --Aethix 02:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- It is not my cup of rosy lea either but the article has been formatted and done properly - so can't be slated for that. Personally it isn't for me but there are plenty more articles like this one which should be put down first. --Romartus 11:02, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Could be improved. The way I see it, the joke is in the repeated mention of how horrible this movie is. Perhaps we should put a template on it saying it's not NPOV. The Linkifier!!!!!? 22:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. Poorly written rant about how horrible some Disney movie that nobody cares about is. Also written by a user who has been banned multiple times for sock puppetry and can't take a hint. Or whatever, I'm just trying to get rid of whatever it is that keeps bringing this guy back (ex: his horrible articles), and blahblahblahblahgribble. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 23:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN 00:00, Mar 8
- delete maybe a blank slate will work here. --Mnb'z 01:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- very delete--Sycamore (Talk) 13:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Kaboom! aka delete --Kit talk 14:34 8 March
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:40, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Reboot/retry -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Destroy. ~ 09:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - a blank slate is better than this. If it survives, might I suggest a hard rewrite tag? pillow talk 18:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- It is not my cup of rosy lea either but the article has been formatted and done properly - so can't be slated for that. That it isn't very funny at all is a problem so it
- OH MY GOD THIS ARTICLE IS HORRIBLE. Calling it an article may even be too generous. It's about TIME this thing got put up for deletion. Did I mention that it's a really bad article? The Linkifier!!!!!? 22:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- So you voted keep? MrN 22:07, Mar 8
- I userspaced the article here so those who want to keep and improve it can move it to their userspace, since the original author is permabanned. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, we have not even decided to delete this yet dude. We may not. Also, please leave moving to userspace and such to the admins. Cheers. MrN 03:44, Mar 9
- Yeah, last time I did that, I got banned, and then I got all butt-hurt about it, and the end result was that MrN lost his pants privileges. pillow talk 18:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, sorry, I'll try not to do that again. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 19:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- /me waves ban stick around a little bit trying to look all big and impressive. MrN 19:31, Mar 9
|
Keep |
- Undictionary This is one of the early ones which may well have been tried on at Wikipedia before it appeared here. It's worth keeping, but it's best place is probably Undictionary as has been suggested. MrN 11:46, Mar 7
- Redirect to Undictionary entry. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Move to Undictionary - Yes this is after the fact but thought I'd put my 2 cents in-- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 00:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. unfunny fictitious animal stub from 2005. --Mnb'z 06:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Redirected to Undictionary (although I'd prefer that you waited until after voting was done, sycamore). Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:59, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
|
World War XX
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete one of the worst (i.e. most random and incoherent) articles in this family. --Mnb'z 17:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! Per what I said earlier. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Delete I need to talk to ?pedia about how you transfer articles to them... MrN 17:50, Mar 7
- D-lete -OptyC Sucks! CUN19:16, 7 Mar
- Delete. Guilty. Black Cap it m'lud. --Romartus 11:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Template:Chicken