Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive141

Untruth device

Keep
Delete	Delete. Lonely page. Short. Random. Unfunny. Oh noes, teh false articles! Whatever - get rid. --UU - natter 10:40, Jul 8 Delete.Elassint Delete not good and rather short.--Sgt. Fluffy 17:11, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. MrN 17:13, Jul 8 Delete More proof that (excluding the wikipedia template), typing "wikipedia" in search will probably get you something VFDable within the first couple pages, at least. -RAHB 08:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Will Dockery

Keep
Delete	Delete. Another nother lonely page. Created last month, with no subsequent edits. It's random, redlinky, I see no humour and I suspect vanity. Get rid. --UU - natter 09:20, Jul 8 Delete.Elassint 14:06, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. Per UU. MrN 17:11, Jul 8 Delete Such a weird page. It's a page about the Noid, which just tells us what jokes The Simpsons and Family Guy have made about the Noid - and for some inexplicable reason, the word "Noid" has been replaced by "Will Dockery." --Hyperbole 18:47, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Fail -RAHB 22:39, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Wingle wangers

Keep
Delete	Delete. Another lonely page. This one escaped ICU a year ago, and has had pretty much nothing done to it since. It's kinda random, not funny, and won't be missed, so can we get rid? --UU - natter 09:16, Jul 8 Delete.Elassint 14:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. I have no idea. Sniff of vanity maybe, but who knows. Get rid. MrN 17:09, Jul 8 Delete Pretty good formating, unfortunately that's all it has going for it.--Sgt. Fluffy 17:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Meh -RAHB 22:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Awesome title though... MrN 22:59, Jul 8

Zangetsu

Keep
Delete	Delete. It's been here over a year, yet nothing links to it, giving you a good idea of how much this is loved. It may not be atrocious, but it is unfunny, dull and pretty pointless. --UU - natter 08:44, Jul 8 Delete.Elassint 14:04, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. OK, kill it. MrN 17:06, Jul 8 who?--Sgt. Fluffy 17:52, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Per Fluffy -RAHB 22:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Uses for Uncyclopedia

Keep	Give me a minute here - I rewrote the page into a stub, and I actually kind of like the stub. I'll try to do more work on it tonight. --Hyperbole 19:15, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Hyperbole -RAHB 22:40, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Tis Passable Now MrN 22:50, Jul 8 Hyperbole per RAHB   Le Cejak • <23:37, 08 Jul 2008>
Delete	Delete. Another lonely page. So ignore the ignorable policy box. It's not been changed since 2006, and it's nothing but a list. One or two of the lines are OK, I guess, but do we need this at all? --UU - natter 09:32, Jul 8 Armageddon it,it's stupid. --LOLsupreme 10:11, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Elassint 11:51, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. MrN 17:12, Jul 8 Hyper removal. MrN 22:50, Jul 8 Delete stupid list--Sgt. Fluffy 17:12, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Forget Hyperbole. I'm a rebel. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Kept just to spite that bastard admin, me -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Observational Humor

Keep	Keep. Very accurate and funny and I hate you both -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:03, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Keep. Modusoperandis write comments like this. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Keep. Ah, self-reference. --UU - natter 08:26, Jul 8 Keep. Not all shorts are pants... MrN 16:59, Jul 8 Jealous Keep Whenever I try to make a novelty stub like that, some narky admin huffs it on sight. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 18:56, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Keep And airline food! Hoo boy! --SirIsaac 22:30, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete I count three lines, none of them funny.--Sgt. Fluffy 20:39, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. Uh, okay. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:03, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete Mainly because I've been planning on writing one with this title for PLS. But not really just because of that, because I really plan on writing Observational Comedy. Meh. -RAHB 00:57, 8 July 2008 (UTC) re-userfy - it's probably too meta for mainspace, and it should get out of the way to make room for the article that RAHB thinks he's going to write, but will never get around to. --Hyperbole 01:09, 8 July 2008 (UTC) What? didn't get it.Delete. --LOLsupreme 10:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Exactly how is it accurate or funny?--Sgt. Fluffy 00:37, 8 July 2008 (UTC) "It's funny because it's true!"? MrN 21:45, Jul 8 that "White people make articles like this"? Am I missing some sorta stereotype joke here?--Sgt. Fluffy 23:30, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Kept. ~ 09:10, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Power

Keep
Delete	Delete. So, it's a bit of random stuff with the usual memes (Norris, MrT, blah blah) followed by a list cunningly disguised as a tble. And it is arse. --UU - natter 19:34, Jul 7 Delete gibberish--Sgt. Fluffy 19:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Chuck norris,(of course). -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:04, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Elassint (talk • contribs) Delete.  Mitch 05:33, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. MrN 16:58, Jul 8 HELP ME BUILD A SUPERIOR RACE OF MIDGETS! -RAHB 22:22, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Shit

Keep	Keep It's shit. But it can be fixed. If we delete it, what are we going to get? Moh shit me thinks... One day, someone will turn this pile of manure into something considerably less smelly. MrN 19:19, Jul 7 OK, but there will be shit everywhere... MrN 22:54, Jul 8
Delete	Delete, or redirect to Feces - What Mordillo said, and I can't even stand to look at that article. --AAA! (AAAA) 14:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. I used my secondary web browser Opera to look at this without images, and I say delete! --Elassint 19:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. I thought it was fixable, and I nipped in to have a try. I started by getting rid of the lists that account a for a good half of it. Then I wanted to trim the sections above and below them, with the bits about 2 girls 1 cup and somebody's school. Then I wasn't impressed by the next bits I saw, and I was quickly left with... nothing. Feces isn't much better, but it is better. Delete and redirect there. Or if you think there are any decent bits in here, merge them. Mind you, the images on this version are actually better, I'd say. --UU - natter 19:25, Jul 7 Redirect to Feces. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:29, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete and Redirect to Feces --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 00:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Shit -RAHB 08:15, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Something tells me this is NSFW, so I'm not gonna click on it. If someone determines that I would have voted "delete," go ahead and vote me in by proxy. --Hyperbole 19:02, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Actually, the images on this aren't too bad. They're worse on Feces. --UU - natter 19:25, Jul 7 Deleted and redirected to Feces. ~ 09:03, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

HOMG CLICK FOR N00DZ

Keep	Keep. Yes, it's short with poor spelling/grammar - that's the point. In this case, I think it's fine. We may want to put a self-reference category or similar on it though. --UU - natter 14:18, Jul 8 Keep. Per UU. Some stubs are OK if there is a good idea behind them which has not been used a lot elsewhere. MrN 17:27, Jul 8 Keep but change the thing about UnNews articles to ED articles. --Hyperbole 18:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Strong Keep. As the author of this fine work, I would find it insulting if this were deleted. Also, it's hilarious to watch noobs who don't get the joke complain about it. sirsysrq @ 21:19 Jul 8 Am I the only person who can see a split in who the keeps and deletes are? Just wondering. Anyways, keep, but yeah, self-reference. ~~Heeren ["Meh"] [tecħ] [kurk] [8/07 21:22] I have no idea what Herenveen's talking about. Also, keep. Also also, would you like to be my myspace friend? -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:38, 8 Jul Keep -RAHB 22:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Keep I think I get it now (it's amazing how much sense things make after a cup of coffee). I am still worried it will encorage vandalism of other article but one must make allowances. It is worth saving if only for the history.--Sgt. Fluffy 22:13, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Delete	KILLLLLLL,It's a crappy horror mega shit. --LOLsupreme 11:33, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Delete.Because some gullible idiot might actually post it onto 8 unnews articles. And its short, with poor spelling/grammar. Elassint 14:12, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Delete or merge with vandalism--Sgt. Fluffy 16:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments	HOMG Kept. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:44, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Tønsberg

Keep
Delete	Delete. We seem to get quite a bit of Scandinavian towncruft. Why is that? Anyway, this is a good example of a bad towncruft stub, and should go. --UU - natter 12:51, Jul 7 Delete. Cruft of Scandinavia does sounds like a delicious soup, though. --Hyperbole 13:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Sounds more like a furniture store to me. --UU - natter 14:38, Jul 7 Or maybe a brand of ham --Elassint 18:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete --Elassint 18:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 05:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. MrN 16:57, Jul 8 Delete -RAHB 22:09, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Soulja Boy

Keep
Delete	Delete.Trashy --Elassint 19:26, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. Just threw up in my mouth a little bit. Let's make sure that doesn't happen to others. --Hyperbole 19:32, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. Why am I not surprised in the slightest that this article is random, badly written shite? --UU - natter 19:36, Jul 7 Well, I'm certainly surprised. I mean, look over VFH, and ask yourself: were any of the FA's not written by hip-hop fanboys? --Hyperbole 19:43, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete just another piss poor music article.--Sgt. Fluffy 19:52, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Who? -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:59, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Battle of Guadalcanal

Keep
Delete	Delete I've read better stuff on bathroom walls.--Sgt. Fluffy 18:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Truly a tragedy --Elassint 18:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC) With this fire, I thee kill. --Hyperbole 19:01, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. I was tickled by the idea of "tit pounding speed", but the rest was utter bollocks. --UU - natter 19:16, Jul 7 THE END NIGGAZ -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 05:33, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Tim Glebocki

Keep
Delete	Delete. Vanity. --UU - natter 12:48, Jul 7 Delete. Wow, whoever wrote this certainly had a high opinion of Tim Glebocki, whoever that is. --Hyperbole 13:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete vanity--Sgt. Fluffy 18:24, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete vanity----Elassint 18:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC) We don't care. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:35, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 05:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Crazy Al

Keep
Delete	Delete. If it ain't vanity, it's bollocks. --UU - natter 12:32, Jul 7 Delete. Vanity: probably not. Bollocks: absolutely. --Hyperbole 13:58, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Elassint 19:02, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Who?--Sgt. Fluffy 19:26, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 05:30, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments

CowGoat

Keep	Keep - Yeah, it sucks. But it sucks in a way I find funny. Maybe it's the sleep deprivation, but I don't want to see this one go. --Hyperbole 17:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete A poor stub. MrN 10:53, Jul 6 Delete It's coherent, it's just horribly unfunny. -RAHB 23:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Delete - The picture is good, but other than that there's not much going for it... (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 7, 10:04 Delete. What? --UU - natter 10:57, Jul 7 Delete.--Elassint 19:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 05:29, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Look! Everyone forget all that nonsense above... The real issue if the CowGoat article! Come on guys! Its future lies in the balance! MrN 20:34, Jul 6 My biggest complaint with the CowGoat article is that it unfairly vilifies American goats. Look at the sociopolitical subtext: you'll notice that despite the fact that the animal in question has the head of a goat, its name begins with "cow." Just like the unacceptably anthropocentrically-named "Manbearpig," which implies that men > bears > pigs, "Cowgoat" is a subtle slur aimed at goats. The nation's Goatists need to rise up and educate the public about what's really going on here. Is there a "secret goat level" in Diablo 2? Does the California Dairy Consortium bother to mention that happy goats can also provide happy cheese? Did Gary Larson ever draw an inscrutable cartoon called "Goat Tools"? I've had it up to here with goat-bashing articles. Goat-bashing has no place in the national discourse, let alone on Uncyclopedia. Now donkey punching, on the other hand... that's gold. --Hyperbole 21:00, 6 July 2008 (UTC) First of all. You leave the donkeys alone. Who exactly are you calling an ass? Secondly, don't think that you are fooling anyone with all your political mumbo jumbo. We all know you are just trying to impress some wacky cult, with your bovine related objections, and hidden hoof shakes. You are not fooling anyone mister. MrN 22:10, Jul 6 Oh, shake that sand out of your panties. I've never harmed a donkey in my life, unless donkeys can feel punches. --Hyperbole 22:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC) You mean donkey punch isn't a kind of drink? That would explain so much. --UU - natter 15:50, Jul 7

Z-Phone

Keep
Delete	Delete This is so terribly bad. -RAHB 23:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Delete Yes it is. There are some less worse versions in the history, but they all sux balls. MrN 05:40, Jul 7 Delete - Not funny in the slightest Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:58, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. ZZzzzZzzZZzzz. --UU - natter 12:18, Jul 7
Comments

Ssshhh

Keep	Keep. We have so many worse pages. And this one even has a picture of a hot librarian on it. I think this is salvageable. --Hyperbole 01:04, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Keep. Yea, this gets a week keep from me. It's not offensively bad, and is probably better than nothing. Hea, Hyperbole... Why not nominate some of those articles which you think are a lot worse than this one for VFD? MrN 05:38, Jul 7 Keep - Not to bad really, and I laughed at the picture caption. Needs expanding though (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 7, 10:03 Very weak keep. Expand tag, please. --UU - natter 12:17, Jul 7
Delete	Delete Bah. -RAHB 23:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments	I love hot librarians. Kept. ~ 12:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Phantom Limb

Keep
Delete	This is pretty much for the same reasons as The Monarch below. Plus, it looks like it was mangled slightly by IP stupidity. And I quote, "Out of sheer rage the Phantom tore out Billy's arm and repeatedly fucked the hell out of his eye socket thus resulting in his current appearance." -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 02:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Weak delete - there's a version on 1/30/07 that's a little less crappy, but still not very good. --Hyperbole 02:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Delete Starts nicely enough, then just gets crappy. -RAHB 23:47, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Delete - "The ORGASMIZER!" Good lord... (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 7, 10:06 Delete. Per Frankie. --UU - natter 10:55, Jul 7
Comments	And, not surprisingly, the beginning is the work of the original author. --Hyperbole 23:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Goetia

Keep	Keep It's not that bad. I laughed a couple of times off the bat, and it looks well put together to me. I don't know anything about the topic, but it seems find to me. -RAHB 01:19, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Keep Look pretty good to me, has potential to become even better. Ace Attacker 04:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Keep Doesn't really make me laugh, but certainly isn't an embarrassment to Uncyclopedia or anything. --Hyperbole 08:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Keep MrN 09:42, Jul 5 Keep - Needs sprucing up, but it's not as bad as some of the stuff we get here (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 7, 10:11
Delete	Ix-nay. Satancruft. sirsysrq @ 18:02 Jul 4 Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 18:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Maybe you can do a better job of convincing me this is total shit Sys? It's about a real thing, and I'm sure there is some good stuff in there? Someone has put a lot of effort into this... MrN 19:44, Jul 4 I listen to my shit radar, and it was blaring when I found this. I got this while searching for Billy Mays. Also, it's just a little...weird for my tastes. I dunno. sirsysrq @ 22:58 Jul 5 Kept. ~ 12:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Kyle Petty

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Even worse than the old version --Kurgan's Back. Prepare to get pwned. (Unless you are Chuck Norris) 00:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC) LOL WUT -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 02:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC) lol racism --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 16:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC) lol NASCAR -RAHB 23:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Lol HATECRUFT - (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 7, 10:08 Delete. Nascar hatecruft. --UU - natter 10:54, Jul 7
Comments

‎Furies

Keep
Delete	Delete As we have Furry I don't think we need this stub. MrN 16:43, Jul 5 I laughed at this one line ("The second fury, Bugs Bunny dressed as a valkyrie, gave him a King Crimson album.") for some reason, but otherwise, delete it. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 02:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. Although Hyperbole makes a good point. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 04:26, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Delete -RAHB 23:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Delete - Well, there was a lot of content there... (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 7, 10:09 Delete. Would look forward to a Hype article here, but what's in place now is pointless and can go. --UU - natter 10:31, Jul 7 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:59, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments	You are aware that furies and furries are two very different things, right? Actually, conflating them could be pretty hilarious. Not that this article does a good job of it or anything. --Hyperbole 17:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Maybe a redirect would work better... Like you say, this article is poor. MrN 17:08, Jul 5 A redirect would be a decent placeholder. I'm actually thinking about writing an article here, now, that's about furies that are also furries. --Hyperbole 17:10, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Gangsta Lexicon

Keep
Delete	Delete A list of ebonics. A quote from Borat. Got kind of a math thing... -RAHB 10:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Delete Get rid. MrN 11:21, Jul 5 Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 15:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Delete - Nothing good there. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Delete - A poor list (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 7, 10:09 Delete. Really, really poor. --UU - natter 10:27, Jul 7
Comments

UnNews:Bush was right, Saddam did have Yellow Cake

Keep	Keep It was sporked and only a small part of the article was used and modified like any other UnNews article. A lot of material was added to it, and the original article is cited as a source, so it isn't plagiarism if you cite a source. If you have a problem with it, rewrite the lines. I suspect you only want to delete it because it does not agree with your political views. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 17:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Keep. It's a bit random for my taste (too many characters with too little to say), but it's not crap. Oh, lose the Chappelle bit. It adds nothing (and using other parodies' punchlines as punchlies is generally a bad idea). Having a byline seems a bit off for UnNews, too. I can't complain to loudly, however, as I've done a similar thing, if in a different way. Buy me a drink, sailor, and I'll tell you all about it. Make sure it's got an umbrella in it. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Keep Sir Orion Blastar sir... You WERE using Uncyclopedia as a platform through which to further your political views. That's not cool dude. It did contain much that was really just a rant about how much you hate the liberals, and that's just not funny. Not to me anyway. So... I removed some of what I thought was over the top, and replaced it with some other stuff. Hopefully you will decide to keep what I have done (change it a bit maybe obviously). I think it's OK now, so I'm voting accordingly. Sonic80 and Hyper... Take another look... :-) MrN 19:46, Jul 6 I like what you've done. But now the article is really inconsistent. It starts off talking about yellow cakes and moves on to talking about uranium. I feel like the rewrite needs to be more complete. --Hyperbole 19:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC) I will see what I can do... MrN 19:56, Jul 6 It is actually yellow cake uranium, not yellow cakes and uranium, but yellow cake is the type of uranium. The yellow cake article seems to have confused you as did that W's missing donuts article about yellow cake donuts. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 19:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Thanks for that Orion Blastar, I am aware of that! MrN 20:15, Jul 6 Ok uranium is removed and it now says yellow cake instead. No way someone can accuse the article of being serious now. Thanks for the assist. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 20:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete I believe that this is plagiarism of a real article, more than half of it is copied from the source. ----Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 17:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Delete - Okay, I don't think this is plagiarism. Copying a joke is plagiarism; copying something meant to be serious and displaying it for laughs, IMHO, is not. Context is everything. On the other hand, there's something about partisan politics that makes people think that articles that boil down to "suck it, libs" or "suck it, neocons" are funny. They aren't. I didn't see any jokes in this whole article - except the Dave Chappelle "yellow cake" joke, which IS plagiarized. --Hyperbole 18:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC) That sounds exactly like something a liberal would say Rightwing Nutbar Sr. 18:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC) The Dave Chappelle joke has been removed. Anything else? yellow cake article seems to use the same Dave Chapelle joke though.--Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 18:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC) But it doesn't say suck it libs, it just says it is weapons grade yellowcake instead of natural yellowcake, and it justifies the Iraq war, and it lampoons the Republican's reactions to the news and makes them sound funny. It takes something serious and makes it funny by modifying it and exaggerating, as most Unnews articles seem to do anyway. It is an example to Conservapedia that our jokes are not always liberal biased, and it seems that many of the non-liberal viewpoint jokes get deleted here. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 18:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Well, it's my opinion that both liberal viewpoints and conservative viewpoints have no place on Uncyclopedia, and that "x viewpoint jokes" is an oxymoron. And just to prove that I apply that principle consistently, you can look at this and this (which nearly got me banned, by the way). I come here to get away from political screeds. --Hyperbole 19:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Kind of hard to avoid here that Liberal viewpoint joke that Bush is Hitler seems to be the basis for the Neocon article. Not to mention the Republican Party and George Dubya Bush articles overuse too many Liberal viewpoints. I could cite more, but I refuse to prove Conservapedia's points. I've tried to write articles that are not based on Liberal viewpoints to disprove their argument. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 20:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Have you tried writing about kittens? Everybody loves kittens. Adorable! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC) There was a time when I tried to discourage people from putting comments in the voting boxs... Oh happy days. Order! Order! I must have order! mine's a pint please governor... MrN 20:20, Jul 6 And you know what those three articles have in common? None of them are funny. The appropriate solution would be to delete or rewrite them - not to try to "balance them out" with more unfunny articles. If you want to try to politically "balance out" something on the Web, try Usenet:alt.politics or something. Yeah, there's a lot of inertia to getting rid of that stuff, because so many people have contributed to it, but it's still the right thing to do. --Hyperbole 20:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC) You have a point, and technically while still having a political viewpoint it can still be considered funny. I thought the whole point of Uncyclopedia was that it does not need have a neutral point of view to be funny. Like some articles are written in the point of view of someone else like William Shatner. You can still have a viewpoint and not be biased, but it is debatable as to what is biased and what is funny. It is something that I have to work on I guess. I seem to botch jokes that way. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 21:04, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Yeah, my view on this is that Uncyclopedia articles should never be NPOV, but they certainly shouldn't be "SomeMainstreamPOV", either. Rather, they should be AbsurdPOV. Take, for example, I lost your pet ferret. Whose POV is that? I don't know, but it's fucking hilarious. --Hyperbole 21:13, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Uhh... this is less than seven days old, I believe. ~~Heeren ["Meh"] [tecħ] [kurk] [6/07 17:40] True but... Plagiarism shouldn't be tolerated. And then there are the Youtube links, for some reason. And the self-feature. And the lack of UnNews formatting... --SirIsaac 17:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC) @ Orian Blastar I recently had an article removed for "plagiarism" where I clearly cited my sources, and used my own words, where as on this one, it was directly copied from the article. ----Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 17:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC) So you are doing this out of malice because you are bitter about your deletion Sonic80? That's not good. Your article was deleted because it was not funny, not because of the plagiarism issue... MrN 18:05, Jul 6 Nobody seems to understand the difference between spite votes, and actual votes. Whenever someone does something to me, and then immediately does something stupid, I point it out, It doesn't mean it is a spite vote, it means that I just don't like hypocrisy. And as for the not funny vs. plagiarism, I seem to recall that it was put on VFD for plagiarism. ----Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 19:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC) I don't know if this helps, but I read your huffed page (UnNews:Metal Gear Solid 4 is Satan), and would have voted to keep, if I'd noticed it at the time (even thought the page that inspired it is this, which is Poe's Law in action). Of course, I have terrible taste. You should see my haircut. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Sonic80 But I edited most of the words so that they were different and the bulk of it is not copy and paste but heavily modified with only few original words remaining. I even converted the Youtube embedded videos to links. You mean that even if 90% of the article is my own words that it is still plagiarism? --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 18:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Dammit Orion Blastar you are forcing me to actually think. You know I hate doing that! MrN 19:04, Jul 6 Thinking is good, it is the way of solving the world's problems by using real world solutions. Most colleges teach you not to think, to just believe everything the media tells you and also everything your professor tells you. I was one of the few students smarter than most of my professors who kept asking them questions about inconsistencies and mistakes in their lectures and materials as well as logical fallacies using my analytical mind and deductive reasoning to figure out the truth. So they would tell me "Orion Blastar, do you want to pass this class or teach it?" to which I replied "That depends, how much salary does one earn as a teacher, and would I get paid more for teaching the truth, instead of propaganda and fear mongering that seems to pass for education these days?" eventually they learned not to mess with me anymore. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 19:17, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Yes, you're much, much smarter than everybody else in the world. Perhaps you'd like a biscuit. --Hyperbole 20:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Not everyone, just smart enough to use critical thinking to figure out mistakes and flaws and fallacies. It doesn't make me Stephen Hawking, and I never claimed to be smarter than everyone else in the world. I'm not perfect either, I just happen to be able to tell when someone is bsing most of the time. It is like being Daredevil not Reed Richards, like detecting the lies and figuring out the truth due to a disability that took something away but gave me an extra ability that enhanced my senses. Not like I could cure cancer or AIDS, though. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 20:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Sorry somehow I had a dupe comment here that messed up the formatting and I thought I had moved the comment here is the view of the dupe comment it was created via an edit conflict. I thought I was moving the comment up, but somehow it looks like I blanked it out. I didn't mean to do that. But the original comment that I moved is above this one, so technically it was not blanked as it is still there in context and not removed. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Kept. It's less than a week old. I was going to mention it earlier, but then lunch arrived, and it's rude to talk with my mouth full of lunch. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:35, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Grand Theft Auto: FunkyTown

Keep
Delete	Delete GaysexGaysexGaysexGaysexGaysex -RAHB 10:16, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Gay sex. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 15:04, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Gay sex--Kurgan's Back. Prepare to get pwned. (Unless you are Chuck Norris) 23:57, 5 July 2008 (UTC) It might interest you to know that gay sex once transpired on a bed that I was passed out on. True story. I had far, far too much Captain Morgan's and 7-Up, and the guys at the party were not deterred by my lifeless form next to them. Wait, what was I doing? Oh, delete. --Hyperbole 02:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Comments