From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Uncyclopedia made my life more different
|
Score: 12.5 IPs Lives changing
|
| Nominated by:
|
Sir NoNamesLeft (GUN) WotM NotM 05:49, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
|
For: 18.5
|
- Nom and for--Sir NoNamesLeft (GUN) WotM NotM 05:49, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
- For. 71.8.107.176 06:50, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
- For. It's more different alright! :)
 Mattsnow 09:23, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
- For. I want to this article more different. Sloublues 12:33, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
- My head hurts. --ShabiDOO 15:10, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
- For. 121.214.178.123 15:19, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Dr. Fenwick 17:39, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
- For. I cracked up on president. 78.150.121.190 17:56, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
 For... but in a weakish kinda way. This isn't really a weak for, it is a regular for vote... but in a weakish kinda way. Anyway, I read this a little while back and thought it could be featured, but I didn't like it enough to nom it. Anyway, I'm babbling, aren't I? I tend to do that... -- 23:39, July 10, 2011 (UTC)- For. 99.229.225.62 00:25, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
- For -- The Zombiebaron 01:41, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
- For. I like it... Funnybony
   08:06, Jul 11 08:06, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
- For It has a lot of heart and humour. It works. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:33, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
- For ---
  TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 23:16, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:42, 12 July 2011
- For. 116.227.169.240 12:46, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Because I can, wait this toolbar-thingy is cool!!! RebelFighter1995 00:34, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
- For. I was lookng forward to giving this a pee review, but what the hell. It's like having a kid who teaches himself how to ride a bike so I can watch the game. Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)
 06:37, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
- For. -- Lost Labyrinth
 • (t) • (c) • (a) 10:35, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
- For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)
 10:43, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
- For. OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 12:57 21 July 2011 12:57, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Against: 6
|
- Against. It's 'navelism', a good enough article but not a feature in my view.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:26, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
 Against. → L A B O R A T O R I E S 14:58, July 12, 2011 (UTC)- I love it, but I'm not in love with it. --Black Flamingo 19:34, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Still reads like a rough draft that needs proofing, even though it's been significantly cleaned up since I last read it.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  08:11, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Against. --EMC [TALK] 00:36 Jul 21 2011
- Against. Not bad, but not good enough to feature yet another self-referential meta-article about Uncyclopedia. -- ridiculous Ape (deter) (Riot Porn) 14:16, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
I promise I have nothing to do with those IP votes. I didn't quite think this article ready, but I did some flash edits and will touch it up over the next days if it ever makes it. I have no idea what navelism is. Thanks for the nom Sir NoNamesLeft. Nice to get a nom...especially from a prolific awsome writer like you. --ShabiDOO 18:12, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. Sorry. The article is funny, and I do love meta humor, but I don't think it would be wise to put this article on the front page where potentially new visitors could be confused. User:CandidToaster/sig 20:33, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. 88.241.164.183 13:09, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh damn, that's the funniest comment I've ever seen. -- 14:55, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you 88.241.164.183, if only everyone saw it that way. --ShabiDOO 18:22, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
- If you dont like this article or want it featured thats fine, but the whole "will scare new visitors away" is pure speculation. Consider there are 5 IP votes, that this is the first article of mine my friends (of whom none particularily like this website) read and liked. As I said before, trying to guess how many visitors we have and how they react to a feature article is like trying to guess how many people will come to your birthday party in 10 years and if it will be a success or not. Thanks for your votes anyways.
- Please take this nomination down...for the love of god...its anus is leaking all over the website. Save the main space!! SAVE IT!!! --ShabiDOO 01:11, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Seriously...i wouldnt mind a pee review at all.
Honestly, do the pee review and ill re-nominate it. Even if it does survive this vote by the skin of its teeth, I would really like to have a pee review :) Especially from you. --ShabiDOO 07:18, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For... but in a weakish kinda way. This isn't really a weak for, it is a regular for vote... but in a weakish kinda way. Anyway, I read this a little while back and thought it could be featured, but I didn't like it enough to nom it. Anyway, I'm babbling, aren't I? I tend to do that... --
Against. 
