From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnScripts:Pixar: An Introduction for Uncyclopedians
|
Score: 12 standing desk lamps
|
| Nominated by:
|
There's no I in RAPE (lol contribs) 00:09 Aug 21, 2009
|
For: 13
|
- Nom & For. I did a Pee Review on this article, and it struck me as a high-quality piece of work. There's no I in RAPE (lol contribs) 00:09 Aug 21, 2009
- For. Because this is absolutely excellent (though I still think it should just be called "Pixar"). Also, Macmania reminds me of a young, wide-eyed version of myself. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- You're not even that old. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:48, Aug 21
- I mean in Uncyclopedia terms. Particularly my glorious month of April. Ah, April, so far away. So far... —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:36, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Weak For. The article itself is well done, but like the "you" take, the script/dialogue article is a concept that is quickly wearing thin. This gets a pass because it's clever, and also it's actually an UnScript
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  02:36, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 Without a doubt Although I find it funny that the two votes before this, while both for, completely disagree on that one factor. Have a look at the PEEreview on Pixar as well, by Pup t 03:03, 21/08/2009- For. This is great, but I agree that it should be just called Pixar, because then people are more likely to see this exceptional work. --—Mazaka (talk) 04:29, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. Nothing should be changed about this. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:59, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Weak For. The .gif is the highlight of the article, IMO, but Mac's clever writing saves it in my eyes. And since Pixar redirects to this article, I don't see a problem. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:48, Aug 21
- For. Although, I really don't like the way it says "Hero", then gives a discription of how they say it followed by what they say. That annoys me. Sir Sunbeam
no u F@H KUN 22:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Self-For There was a really long duration between my abstaining and voting for because I have been mulling over for some time on whether I should support this nomination. Oh, who am I kidding? I didn't have the time because I was playing [the name of the game has been redacted to protect all Uncyclopedians from deserting the site for weeks on end].
               Sir MacMania GUN—[23:50 21 Aug 2009]
- For. It's absolutely ingenious Tukkoo 13:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- B=============D~~~-- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!)
- For. Sir Severian
  (Sprich mit mir!)  15:47, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. Per Romartus. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN18:04, 29 Aug
|
Against: 1
|
- Against. Per my standard objection to making anything about uncyclopedia a VFH - however good and this is good. Can it go somewhere else ?--
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:09, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Discussion moved to talk page
|
| Comments
|
- Abstain. Meh... I dunno. Le Cejak • <3:57 Aug 21, 2009>
 Abstain.- What are you doing!? Get in there and vote for your own work, dammit! —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was barely conscious that this was not a self-nomination and that I had actually abstained, and was playing computer games. (Portal never gets old, even after two years. But I digress.) Sir MacMania GUN—[23:50 21 Aug 2009]
- Abstain Very funny, but it seemed a bit listy in my opinion. Tagstit talk contribs awards 18:17, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
Without a doubt Although I find it funny that the two votes before this, while both for, completely disagree on that one factor. Have a look at the PEEreview on Pixar as well, by 
Abstain.
23:19, Aug 29