User talk:There's no I in rape
Welcome![edit source]
Hello, There's no I in rape, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for people like you:
- Beginner's Guide
- Our Vanity Policies - why we don't care about your friends
- How to be funny and not just stupid
If you read anything at all, make it the above three links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:
- About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
- How to get started editing on uncyclopedia
- Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue
I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.
At Uncyclopedia, writing articles is not a requirement, but it certainly is a fun and easy way to express your creativity. To write an article, it's recommended that you start it in your userspace (for example, User:There's no I in rape/Article about stuff) so you can edit it at your leisure. If you decide to create it in the cold world of mainspace, make sure it is in accordance with the policies laid out above, and if you're not done put the "Work-In-Progress" template - {{construction}} - onto it as well.
If you want to write and don't know where to begin, consider contributing to Uncyclopedia's current colonization of the week, a group writing project to improve a single popular article. Anyone is welcome to contribute, so come help out!
If the current colonization doesn't suit your fancy, then browse our rewrite and idea categories. We have lots of articles just sitting around for someone to improve, so don't be afraid - dive right in!
If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or ask an administrator on their talk page. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply leave a message on an adopter's talkpage to join. Again, welcome! --UU - natter 09:40, Aug 18
- Thanks for the welcome :) There's no I in rape 17:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Your Comment on Pee[edit source]
I saw that you wrote something, and then deleted it shortly after. First of all, I very much resent essentially being told what to do by someone who's been here less than a week and whose name is "There's no I in rape". That being said, I appreciate your initial review, though it wasn't very in-depth--it's hard to revise something when you get very little feedback on it. I don't fault you for this, however--when I started here, I did a number of less-than-in-depth Pees. They're part of Uncyclopedia growing pains, as it were.
As to my "moron" comment, I was referring to InMooseWeTrust's review, because it was not only totally unhelpful, but because he/she/it apparently doesn't understand the very concept of the Pee Review. So yeah. In short, I was not calling you a moron. I mean, for all I know, you may indeed be a moron, but I wasn't calling you one.
Now that that's been cleared up, I read your Progressive Bike Insurance article, and very much liked it. It's a fuckload better than my first effort, I'll tell you that much. However, you had the misfortune of having it get reviewed by Moose as well. Sorry you had to endure that.
In summation, I meant no insult to you, though I should also mention that I resent the presumption that was implicit in your now-erased comment. Just saying. Carry on, and have yourself a good Uncyclopedia career.
—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- I just wrote that because I rushed to assumptions before I had even read what Moose wrote. I took it down when I realized that I actually agreed with what you said (and I realize you weren't referring to me). Secondly, I've been on Uncyc for over three years now, I've just taken time off and I got a new screen name. And thanks for your compliment about my article. I realize we've had a rough start now, but I'm hoping we can put all that past us now.
- Absolutely we can, no hard feelings Mr. Rape. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 06:17, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- I hated what Moose did, so...
03:09 Aug 21, 2009
- Absolutely we can, no hard feelings Mr. Rape. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 06:17, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Cash for Clunkers Pee Review[edit source]
Disorganised Crime[edit source]
Thanks for reviewing my article. More than anything, the article is satirising workplace jargon and so it requires a quite a formal writing style. I actually rather like the introduction, so I'm focusing on the first section instead. That could use a few more jokes. If you could help me out by being more specific about which parts of the article you like or dislike, that would help. Thanks again. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 11:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Reviews in general[edit source]
Hi there No I - first up, thanks for taking time out to do a few reviews, we really do appreciate it when people take the time to help others on here. That said, people would find it more helpful if you gave a bit more feedback in your reviews - particularly, don't just say "add more jokes": people do understand that's what they're supposed to do. The trick of a good review is telling people where to concentrate on, and suggesting what might make the article funnier. Take a look at recent reviews by ChiefjusticeDS for a good example. And have a good read through the review guidelines. I'm not trying to put you off reviewing - far from it, new reviewers are always welcome - just suggesting that your reviews will be more useful (and hence your own time not wasted) if you give more considered feedback. Perhaps do fewer reviews, but put more into the ones you do. Any questions, have a word on my talk page - and good luck! --UU - natter 11:11, Aug 23
- Yeah, I know I sometimes have trouble with that. I know exactly what I want to say about the article I review, too, I just have trouble putting it into words sometimes. 00:05 Aug 24, 2009
Pixar[edit source]
Thank you for supporting! Sir MacMania GUN—[16:20 30 Aug 2009]