Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Cure for homosexuality found!

Article: UnNews:Cure for homosexuality found!	Score: 2 gaywalkers
Nominated by:	• • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 16:24, Oct 8
For: 13	Nom&For. Found this on the UnNews sidebar on the Main Page and liked it so much I put it up here. Vote away. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 16:24, Oct 8 Against gays. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:26, 8 October 2009 For. Indeeed ChiefjusticeDS 16:27, October 8, 2009 (UTC) For. although, it does seem a little ranty in places. Mn-z 17:11, October 8, 2009 (UTC) For. Fun Fact: In spite of my brilliance, I've never had a featured article here before! Wouldn't this be a dandy first one? --Clemens177 17:29, October 8, 2009 (UTC) For Seems like a good 'un. --Sog1970 20:27, October 8, 2009 (UTC) For. enlightenment —Mahmoosh (Talk•stalk•Boobs•Anus•Poop) 23:18 October 8 '09 Twilight sucks. -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:23, 8 Oct Probably Fucking homophobes. *Orian57* Talk 00:13 9 October 2009 For. Liked the idea even though I think someone is perhaps confusing camp with gay here. You can be both or just camp like Russell Brand. *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate). 21:31, October 9, 2009 (UTC) Lol. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 11:54, October 10, 2009 (UTC) For. Completely untrue but very funny! Reads like a real news story! DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 16:17, October 10, 2009 (UTC) LOL --121.214.60.1 00:51, October 12, 2009 (UTC) For. Cure for Sexual Homolaty - clever! It looks very will done, and a great unnews headline. Seems strange to treat that as a "disease" (where does it hurt?) - for people who are cured, then how do you uncure those who don't like being cured after all?--Funnybony 01:33, October 12, 2009 (UTC) For**. 75.100.95.35 12:28, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 11	Against I dunno, the article didn't make me laugh. Ok the caption under the 2nd picture did, but the last 2 paragraphs felt rushed, trotting out the old "conservatives/old people hate gays lol" and looking for a way to end the article quickly - gaywalker? A pun? Really? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 05:29, October 9, 2009 (UTC) Against. The lols are few and far between. And by that I mean I only laughed at the NAMBLA bit because NAMBLA is the acronym for every organization. I'm having trouble finding the satirical relevance between vampires and homosexuals. I might see it -- maybe -- in Jr. Highs (which nobody cares about since children don't have souls) and the queering up of immortal vampires by that fat Mormon cunt that wrote the Twilight books, but that's a stretch given the content of this story. In more well-written and respectable literature and the better vampire movies, vampires are portrayed as hetero Romanian manwhores or mindless sociopaths with crazy awesome abilities, not the Edwardian faggot bitch boys like Lestat and Edward Cullen. I would've liked to see something about vampires becoming increasingly metrosexual. That would've been better satire. This is just not feature-worthy. Also, the article appears to have been written by a 12 year old. --EMC^[TALK]20:33 Oct 10 2009 Against Yeah. It wasn't funny to me. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:57, October 10, 2009 (UTC) Against. Sir Sunbeam ~~no u~~ F@H KUN 10:02, October 11, 2009 (UTC) Against. Concept didn't strike me as featureable sorry Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 11:17, October 11, 2009 (UTC) Against changed my vote. • FreddThe Metalhedd • • • 11:21 October 11 '09 Stop hitting yourself IronLung 08:47, October 12, 2009 (UTC) Against. TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 09:05, October 12, 2009 (UTC) Against. I really don't see it. Strikes me as unsubtle and ranty in places, and it didn't make me laugh. --UU - natter 09:25, Oct 12 Against Males are superior, so faggotry is also. Irrelevance aside, it needs a quote from a gaywalker.OrangeAipom 11:40, October 12, 2009 (UTC) against per comment #1 -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 17:45, Oct 12
Comments	Jeez, was that second 'against' a vote, 'constructive criticism' or just a screech? I get the idea of the old style vampires, the whole point of the article was the homosexualization of the modern vampires and kids - even in High School - buying into it. And while I don't think all my shit is all that funny, there sure as hell were laughs in this one. I think someone should check the instructions pertaining to not being a 'dick'. --Clemens177 21:11, October 10, 2009 (UTC) The answer is D. All of the above. I think I got the aim of the story (thanks for clearing it up), but like I said I think it's a bit of a stretch. Could've been executed better. Perhaps you're British and your humour is too subtle and dry compared to my humor, which is slapstick (i.e., pies in faces and people slipping on bananas peels) and fart jokes. Perhaps I'm a dick by saying that this isn't feature-worthy, wasn't very funny to me, and that I can see the homosexualization of vampires (and hence fanboys and fangirlies) in modern culture, and because it addresses the fagging up of modern vampires and kids -- and that because you wrote about such an issue -- you are a 12 year old (which was a joke; feel free to disrespect this in a similar manner. Also, Simpsons already did it. --EMC^[TALK]21:25 Oct 10 2009 Also, Clemens, chill out. I don't want to see any dramas around this voting page. He voted against, it's his right. Get over it. ~ 21:34, October 10, 2009 (UTC) So, we're all indenting different ways? Cool! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:38, October 10, 2009 (UTC) Comment. My personal advice is, if this doesn't get featured, to get it Pee Reviewed. With just a few improvements, I'd vote for. But to me it needs just a little polish and maybe a little more content. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 16:38, October 12, 2009 (UTC)