Uncyclopedia:VFH/Filial Piety (July)

Cabal Decree #125/aaa! "No VFH Dramas" is now in effect.
Any further discussion on this page other than votes For, Against or Pie will result in wide spread bans and public flogging at dawn.

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Filial Piety (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Filial Piety	Score: -1 re-re-renoms
Nominated by:	Saberwolf116 02:45, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
For: 8	/me waits for Modus' against vote Saberwolf116 02:45, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Sure. ~~Sir Fightstar Rocks! CUN 09:09, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 4 - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 18:41, Jul 19 2 images used twice = FOR - To all the douchebags who don't understand the satire here. -Almost Sir Random Crap for I do still like this. but maybe wait a while before re-nomming it. *Orian57* Talk 18:54 19 July 2009 Weak For. The child abuse angle has been done before, but I did laugh. -- incompetent Ape (baste) (Riot Porn) 19:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Changing my vote. -- incompetent Ape (baste) (Riot Porn) 17:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Uh, alright. But put a little bigger buffer of time between this nom and the next, okay? Maybe 2 months? TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:42, 19 July 2009 (UTC) For If you guys don't want the annoying renoms, why don't you get over it and feature it? Staircase CUN^t 20:08, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Magical MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:35, 20 July 2009 (UTC) This is funny to me And whoa is me for having THE GALL to dare vote for something so pitiful, so stupid, so spectacularly dumbfoundingly dumb. I must have no sense of comedy whatsoever. HOW DARE I vote for something that I find funny when there are so many other articles out there that OTHER people find funny. I might as well shoot myself in the face now because I'm such a dumb fucking asshole. Who would vote for this article when it is so fucking terrible?! A backwards monkey with a sideways baseball hat could write better satire than this. Whomever wrote this article is a dumb fuck, and I say to him: "You dumb fuck." In conclusion: Fuck off. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Against: 9	Against. Stop it. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Not until it's featured. Saberwolf116 15:31, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Spoiler. This article isn't even funny, and can barely be classified as satire, and is bad, and is overly obvious, and is totally inferior to several of my own articles. I will make my opinion on this matter known to every single person who votes for--even though a simple vote of against on my part would have more than sufficed--because I'm such a nice guy. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Against. Per Last time it was nommed, nothing's changed since then Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 17:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Against. Per the annoying renoms. ~ 18:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Just for that I'm switching to against. ~~Sir Fightstar Rocks! CUN 04:32, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Against. Has it changed since last time? Nope. Then my vote is the same as last time. --UU - natter 09:36, Jul 20 Against. Article nom bullying. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate). 13:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Against. Not happy with this renom thing. -- incompetent Ape (baste) (Riot Porn) 17:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Against** For the third time... Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:35, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Is voting against an article just because it was recently nominated even a valid reason? Come on people, vote on whether or not it was funny, not because of the annoying re-noms. Basically, just say "not funny" instead of "annoying renoms". That's all I ask. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:39, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Still not VFH worthy. If I add : ReNom bullying, fake vote ballot stuffing, whingeing , attempted steamrollering the opposition , bad precedent, a Trolls Charter...etc..--*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate). 16:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Also, the flyer said that this page would be catered. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Sometimes, you have to fly in the face of the almighty flyer. I have no regrets. Woody On Fire!** Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:56, 20 July 2009 (UTC)