From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFD. |
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- It needs something... Life Support Maybe? Meh, pull the Plug, I say! User:TD TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Smells like vanity (ewwwwww!). --DW III 00:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Random humor is not funny. --Sbluen 02:19, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Kill User:TD03:20, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- BURN! ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Murder. --DeathByPie 00:46, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- delete.--InfiniteMonkey 01:26, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Sometimes, the initial 3 seconds of an article will tell you how bad things are. This was one of those times. User:TD03:20, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Demolish this piece of crap, we already have this article.... -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 11:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- 6x damage it to hell. The world will be a better place without it. --BLAPS priest #1 10:40, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Crap. Crappity crap crap crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 19:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Word play is not funny. --Sbluen 00:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Deserves Death more than Paris Hilton. Just simply Disgusting. User:TD 03:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Die.--Rataube 20:55, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- ~CaputosistheHorrible13:24, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Demolish. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:12, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Trash & burn. --DW III 19:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Grind into Dog food, then Burn User:TD 03:22, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete* Or move to: Santa clause's existence in full
|
Comments |
- The author can't spell "Minnesota". Rather than correcting it, I think we're best served by simply throwing away the attempt. User:TD 03:22, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Vanity. Die. The purge is well underway, I see.----OEJ 03:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Yes, another vanititious chancre.----OEJ 03:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
What, more vanity?----OEJ 03:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Does not appear to be vanity. See its en.wp entry. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 06:09, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
Appears to be devoid of any vanity, and since I am from the same state, many of the jokes are funny to me, as I suspect they would be to many people in the upper mid-west. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 05:54, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Go away.----OEJ 03:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Made me laugh, and I've been pretty damn heartless with Uncyclopedia articles in the past, so that's an accomplishment. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Apparently Real. Permissible Vanity ~CaputosistheHorrible15:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- Quite well known in the UK I believe. And follows all the vanity rules. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 15:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Utter cruftly garbage.----OEJ 03:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- I studied at UCL and I can confirm that the article is crap. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 06:48, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Vanity school page.----OEJ 03:29, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- I found it a funny page regardless, one that seems more focused on mocking the liberal basis of most college institutions more than anything. Maybe keep while just removing a few obvious vanity sections?Secondwhiteline 05:02, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- This is not vanity. Period. Again, this is a well-known institution in the US, and the material is appropriate for a satire of it. A good rule of thumb here is that if a printed encyclopedia would have an article on it, it is never vanity merely because of its subject. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 06:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Permissible Vanity ~CaputosistheHorrible15:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- The page isn't that bad, isn't vanity if it's well known. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 15:42, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Vanity school page...OK, it's a long one but burn them all.----OEJ 03:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
Not a terribly good page, but this is a college that a real encyclopedia would have to have a page on and there is some material that could be used by future authors. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 05:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Permissible Vanity ~CaputosistheHorrible15:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- Permissible, but definitely needs a rewrite/expansion. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 15:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- I found it sort of funny, but that's probably only because I'm going there next year. --Spin 16:27, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Vanity school page. ----OEJ 03:25, 30 May 2006
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Vanity school page. (Hope I'm using the new page code rite.) (Fuck, I was not.) ----OEJ 03:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Ok, I admit I haven't heard of this college, but there is nothing here that constitutes vanity. It is short, but actually has humor value. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 06:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- but only for it's discussion page. --Usewho'sname? 17:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Because I don't see the harm in it. --~ sin($) tan(€) 20:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Then i should go make an article about famous Menoscwiczs... --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ 01:11, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- Doesn't appear to be any threat. ~CaputosistheHorrible15:38, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Not because i don't like User:MoneySign, its that the article sucks. --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ 03:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. Smash into little pieces and recycle. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, the article does pretty much suck. --Spin 16:25, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
*Gay Gay Gay. Dicks Dicks Dicks. Fag Fag Fag. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 20:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- It wasn't that bad. If it got a picture it would be a lot better, but I confess I never figured out how to do that.--Woody 01:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
KEEP! i wanna nom this for vfh. - jack mort | cunt | talk - 19:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- It passed the "I can actually read all the way through it" test with flying colors. It sucks, but it has originality and charm. --Spin 16:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Bad, short, crap, too old to NRV. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 10:23, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- this article could've been good if it wasn't so bad. someone rewrite the idea good, add something about the timeline, like when the cavemen die other soldiers disapear cos they were never born anymore. - jack mort | cunt | talk - 14:28, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Lacks proper grammor and is not funny.--123Fat123 16:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Very funny, and I think it should be kept. SonicChao 20:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Meh...needs work... --PiOfFive 02:59, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete page, ban everyone who edited or even looked at it. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 23:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Rape the users involved, pillage everything involved, and burn the article to oblivion. ~CaputosistheHorrible15:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- No Comment. --Spin 16:14, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- VFDing this as there seems to be a dispute (22 reverts today or so). NOTE: Please do not close this VFD until tuesday unless there is a clear consensus, as the two parties involved are banned for 24 hours. --Splaka 05:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- again just move it to his userpage where it belongs - jack mort | cunt | talk - 14:14, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Submitter is candidate for Gobshite of the month award for May. This page should stay until june 1:st to simplify voting process. -- Swami A. Suresh 03:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- i don't really want to keep it, i just feel bad voting to destroy all those pages of words - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:51, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- I'm on the same line. I do not want to delete bad pages. I want to delete catastrophes. -- Swami A. Suresh 16:36, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- not infectious. ~CaputosistheHorrible15:45, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Anon IP has proved beyond a doubt that lots of time != a quality article. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 13:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Destroy!™ ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:41, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- I made a valiant effort to read it, and failed. --Spin 16:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Short, rubbish, too old to NRV. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 10:03, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- What a waste of 30 seconds of my life that was.Still cheered me up, at least i'm not the unfunniest article writer here.--Usewho'sname? 10:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- kill. - jack mort | cunt | talk - 14:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- instead of deleting it just move it straight to his userpage, cos that's what it is really. - jack mort | cunt | talk - 14:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 1) not funny 2) partially factual 3) short 4) old 5) actual picture of the band. DELETE IT. --ZB 15:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- 6) bad formatting 7) many red links. --Sbluen 04:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- 8) total crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:44, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- 9) someone please use the farming technique of SLASH AND BURN on this--Usewho'sname? 10:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- kill. - jack mort | cunt | talk - 14:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Pointless and contentless. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 21:12, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed Modusoperandi 02:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- It's classic, but what was once classic is now QVFD-quality. Rising standards, you know. - Sikon 13:30, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- March it to the gulag --ZB 15:21, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Tear it to shreads and recycle the bytes into something good. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:43, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- huff. - jack mort | cunt | talk - 14:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Aweful stuff. To old for a QVFD. --ZB 20:24, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Burn. And nothing is too old for QVFD. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 07:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- huff. - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:58, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Old Nick is a paraphrase for the Devil. Why not write a page about the diabolic nature of aged IRC chatters? -- Swami A. Suresh 16:39, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- It's not that bad, i'm gonna slap a picture on it and expand it, so hold off killing it for the minute - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Read it and see for yourself... too old to be NRV'd. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 08:02, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, look at all of the pretty dead links... Modusoperandi 08:21, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Just plain awful & going nowhere. --DW III 04:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- NRV'd. Voting closed.--<<>> 04:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Donno... was deleted by an NRV expiry.. but I personally think it's worthy. Since this is the rpoper NRV removal process, and because ZB told me to, I decided to post it here. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- I think it needs to be rewritten significantly. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 02:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Er... It's been NRV'd. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:51, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- NRV'd. That's because there's no {{VFD}} on it. We'll catch it the next time around if it survives this round.--<<>> 04:35, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- It's satire. Not great parody, but good enough to not need VFD. Don't you remember going to school with this guy? The one with the badly thought out idea that he thought was deep shit? Modusoperandi 17:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Check the talk page, it's extremely in dry humor. You know, the kind that whacks you over the head.--Moogle.EXE 17:27, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Because it's my page Because it's parody. If any of you have ever been to a sprite comic forum you know exactly what I'm talking about. --Hobelhouse 19:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- —Hinoa KUN (talk) 00:05, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Seems all right to me. Not wildly fantastic, but okay. FreeMorpheme 07:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Antidelete! -L 16:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Nah. I like it. --Kalir, Savant of Utter Foolishness! (yell at me) 17:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- This article is the reason I first got a modem in 1988.--<<>> 04:33, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- What part of humour doesn't this guy understand? --Hpesoj 17:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete anyway. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 14:51, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- looks satirical. At least, I hope it was meant to be so. ~CaputosistheHorrible17:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Kept.--<<>> 04:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Verbatim from HHGTTG; what's the point? If vote goes -5, will huff
both. --DW III 00:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- You can't have two articles in the same huff, per rule 2, section 2, subheading 2. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 00:56, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Verbatim from HHGTTG; what's the point? If vote goes -5, will huff
both. --DW III 00:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- You can't have two articles in the same huff, per rule 2, section 2, subheading 2. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 00:56, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- and more: random megalomania. Fun? Not enough.-- Swami A. Suresh 05:39, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- I found this whilt cleaning out the wanted categories. I would have NRV'd it, but it was to old. --ZB 17:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
The article was created May 20, 2006. So I have a question for you: Do you like your words fried or baked? NRVd, voting closed. –H. 17:54, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- What? Are you commenting on my "Delete reason in a can" method? --ZB 00:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- No, I'm just asking how you want to eat your words. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 13:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- I found this whilt cleaning out the wanted categories. I would have NRV'd it, but it was to old. --ZB 16:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Burn. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- We don't need no water... —Hinoa KUN (talk) 16:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Not good. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 02:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Deleted. Copied from wikipedia without significant changes. --Spin 23:46, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- I found this whilt cleaning out the wanted categories. I would have NRV'd it, but it was to old. --ZB 15:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- —Hinoa KUN (talk) 15:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Demolish. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- It's not a real important subject, the people who most view this site probably think he's a real person. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 02:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Wait, you're saying he's not a real person? --Spin 23:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Just too short ~CaputosistheHorrible17:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- I found this whilt cleaning out the wanted categories. I would have NRV'd it, but it was to old. --ZB 15:33, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- —Hinoa KUN (talk) 15:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Destroy. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- This article is short, it has many red links, and it uses bad jokes. --Sbluen 23:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- I do get it, it's just really stupid and short.--~~Ampi~~meowarchives 00:50, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- It looks like crap...huffinate it. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 02:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- WTF? It's terrible. If this is the standard I can expect around here, I'm not coming back. (Yes, I can hear you Hinoa4, very funny)
--Frogturd 12:59, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Came across this one while cleaning out NRVs. Technically, it shouldn't have been NRVd in the first place (as it's too old). So, I leave it to you, the voters of Uncyc, to judge for yourselves. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- I think we all agree. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Kill the beast. --ZB 15:33, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Der Richter Und Sein Henker, Ich bin der Richter, die Adminses sind die Henker;-) You guys are the hangmen!-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 02:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Egad!!!, it's terrible. I have to agree with Hinoa4. (This doesn't mean I forgive you for trying to delete Huddersfield)
--Frogturd 12:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
This article should have been NRVed. It is now NRVed. Please check to see if an article is NRV-worthy before adding it to VFD in the future. Voting closed. –H. 14:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC) Memo to self: Check history before NRVing. Carry on. –H. 14:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- This is terrible. Almost a year old and it hasn't significantly changed/nor does anyone care to. Tags are would be pointless here. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 20:32, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- Too short. Exterminate. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 01:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- This article is as short as NRV articles and it has red links and a spelling mistake. --Sbluen 02:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Destroy. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:04, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep this page and save me the trouble of re-creating it.
--Frogturd 11:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Voting is open again, as I have revised the page.
- Who the is Hinoa4, and why does he keep trying to delete my favourite pages?
--Frogturd 12:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
NRVed, voting closed. –H. 01:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC) Okay, I'll grant you a trial. By the way, I'm an admin here, so quit with the mouthing off or I'll ban you. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 13:21, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Wahey.... thanks Mr Hinoa4, I'll try to do you proud, you see if I don't. (Doffs cap, backs away respectfully)
|
Keep |
- Somebody has gone to a lot of trouble to write this. This Hinoa4 is really getting on my tits. I know the page is shite, but it IS in keeping with all the other shite here, especially the shite written by Hinoa4. I vote "Keep It", it bulks up the page count. --Frogturd 12:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep your shite up and I'm banning you. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 13:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Appears to be vanity, but I'm not sure so... ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:09, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- Too bloggy for my taste. Die. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 01:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- We already have Cow arson; not worthy of merging/ingesting. --DW III 16:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Probably should have been NRVd, but hey, whatever. Smashy. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 22:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. BURN! ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Burnt & redirected. --DW III 21:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- It's just dumb, it's been around for nearly a year, no one rewrote it, it isn't an important topic...trash it. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 14:02, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
- Expired rewrite tag, anyway. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 01:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Nytrospawn got it, and if the red link up top didn't tip you off, voting is closed. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 01:31, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Why not edit it and make it funnier then? This show deserves to be mocked. That's all I'm saying. I say let it stay. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thenickelmanisme (talk • contribs) at 17:52 EDT, 20 May 2006
- Agree. This should deserve a rewrite.--Jtaylor1 06:13, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- This article actually has real info about the TV show, It sounds like Wikipedia and it's not funny or good. --SU182 01:21 20 May 2006 (UTC)
|
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- It has been told to merge with Jar Jar Binks, but I don't think it has any redeeming value; it's mostly an opinion and a recycled SNL reference. It should be made into a redirect for the other page. --epynephrin 19:40, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
|
|
Keep |
*KEEP IT!! Supmyman7 01:19, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Acutally, it's previously deleted vanity. ~CaputosistheHorrible13:39, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- As I see it, it follows the vanity guidelines.-- Swami A. Suresh 17:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
* Recreated vanity.--Jtaylor1 08:46, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- What's wrong with it? FreeMorpheme 20:12, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep The pictures are enough.-- Swami A. Suresh 11:29, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- I like it.--Rataube 18:48, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Because it's dumb, it's a vanity page, and it's creator has been adding crap Nuke Sword/vanity references to every page he edits. If you can't be funny, just read, don't edit. Or better yet, learn how to be funny, then come back and edit. Modusoperandi 17:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- I've seen what you put about him/her/it/aardvark in the ban patrol and I agree. Demolish. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 18:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Banned user for spreading self-referential vanity links. Deleted links. Article should go too. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 21:09, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- CVP this vanity because it will keep on getting recreated.--Jtaylor1 09:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- I absorbed the idea into my article. Now you can destroy it. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 21:08, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
*Sucks, and I found it via: Category:Votes for Deletion as having a very old {{vanity3}} tag. --Splaka 09:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I thought this was deleted a while ago. Apparently not. ~Cap'n SimzorzAr, Matey! 16:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Removed from vfd as it was kept the last time it was VFD'd. See Archive 34 if you care. Not that there's much there to see. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 21:09, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- (Spouts some weak pretense for keeping this crap.)--<<>> 16:03, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Replace this page with a link to the real deletion log. --Sbluen 23:17, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to newer deletion log per Sbluen. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 10:45, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- *see comment below* ~Cap'n SimzorzAr, Matey! 15:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- It's not about anyone I've ever heard of but it doesn't really seem to be vanity either. It's well enough written, might as well leave it be. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 21:07, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Few google results and no en.wp, but it seems slightly non-vanity? --Splaka 06:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Demolish. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Weak delete I don't really think google results have anything to do with humor, but the thing just isn't funny in my opinion. Maybe it should be moved to where Simulacrum says.--George VI 01:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Not funny and probably English-teacher worship: the worst kind of teacher-worship. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 04:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. Delete. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Walk the Plank ~Cap'n SimzorzAr, Matey! 15:36, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- whoever wrote this, the teacher probably doesn't even like you, just thinks you're wierd, bet you think about him when you wank...... - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 21:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Perhaps if there was a page for his school this could be moved under it. ~Cap'n SimzorzAr, Matey! 15:36, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- I've just read this article through three times and I still don't even know what it's about, but i love it anyway. - jack mort | cunt | talk - - 21:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep I have to agree, I think there's a place for some nonsense humor, and this is decent as they go. --George VI 01:13, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- It could just be that I don't understand this... but I don't think there's any humor to be found. Not horrible, just... void... of funny. --Legion 23:48, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Sounds eerily like a video game. I don't get it, either... —Hinoa KUN (talk) 03:07, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- As per ^ and ^. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- ... ~Cap'n SimzorzAr, Matey! 15:28, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|