User:MrN9000/TalkArchives3

re Wild Weasel article

You suggest that I expand it into a full article. Well, it IS (or was) a full article swiped (and extensively rephrased) from Wikipedia. It is as much a parody of Wikipedia as it is of the Wild Weasels. I can't really expand it, but it does link to my other Vietnam era contributions, which I am still composing. Currently working on the SAM-2 missle. ThruthinessBee 02:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh, OK. It's still a little bit short in my opinion but I think it's fine as it is. The 'Expand' tag on it does not mean that I am suggesting there is anything particularly wrong with the content, or that it will be deleted. It really just adds it to the "Articles to be expanded" category which if anything will make it more likely to be edited by other people. It's up to you if you wish to expand it or not. I think it might be a good idea to have some more links to other articles however. We need links to make Uncyc work. You do have some, but not many... It's really up to you. Have fun. MrN 02:54, Dec 22

I just noticed that the links which your article does have mostly link to other articles which you have written. Those articles also (mostly) link to other articles which you have written. I think it might be a good idea generally if you put some other links into these which link to different parts of Uncyc. MrN 03:04, Dec 22

/me bursts in extremely unexpectedly But isn't it NORMAL to whore on your own articles?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 13:56)

Anything to flash your wares... MrN 14:31, Dec 22

I am not familiar with Uncyclopedia, and so don't have a clue as to existing articles that may be worth linking to... I'll try to do better! ThruthinessBee 21:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Why?:Give Up

User:Cajek has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

For all that great technical stuff you did to spruce up mah article!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 01:15)

Ahh, my first one. :) munch munch MrN 01:17, Dec 23

Be careful, I added... a special ingreeeeedient!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 01:19)

/me wanders lonely as a cloud that floats on high o'er vales and hills, When all at once I saw a crowd, A host, of golden daffodils; Beside the lake, beneath the trees, Fluttering and dancing in the breeze. Dam, now I have got the munches again...

That's a test of your literary knowledge? Who was that? And no looking it up! MrN 01:22, Dec 23

THAT, my friend, was an excerpt from the Barney Friendship song, first sung to a group of angry villagers in 1160.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 01:24)

Well at least you did not cheat. Nothing wrong with your Wordsworth. MrN 01:25, Dec 23

I'll feed yer back

Okay, sure. About your article... I like where you start out with it. Simple and somewhat reminiscing. Past this point though, it just starts getting needlessly vulgar. Of course, with this topic, it's almost expected to be vulgar... maybe that's something you can work on. If they expect vulgarity, dance around it. Do a funny dance, with one of those clown wigs. The section of links at the end, also, needs to be seriously trimmed. A few of the existing parts are pretty good though, like the Biblical quotation, but I think they're a bit disconnected (sections that consist of just lists can have that problem unless each element is fleshed out, and a few could stand to eat some more meat).

So in conclusion, go around the vulgarity, and make it flow gooder. And hey, this is a better against vote than any "just not feature material" you've ever seen, eh? Ж Kalir _{with all the grace of a tin can} 05:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. I appreciate you taking the time out. I don't really understand what you mean with having an issue with the 'reminiscingness' of the article, but I guess that's a view you're entitled to. It is rather vulgar I agree, maybe it could possibly be smoothed out a little, but the vulgarity is rather important to the idea behind the article. Maybe you're right and perhaps this is not suitable for the front page. As I said on the VFH page, this is not 'My' article, and I will not get a FH if it does make it. Many thanks for your time. MrN 06:00, Dec 23

You are extremely awesome

but I won't say why, because then I would be whoring!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 14:57)

I think you need to be banned if you win really. Keep up the tradition and all... MrN 14:58, Dec 23

I won't even say anything for fear I'll jinx it. Also, those guys I'm running against are two of my oldest friends on here! IF I win, I don't want to rub anybody's nose in it on your filthy talk page of all places!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 15:00)

Smileys all around!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 15:03)

Mr. N, take a look at User:Cajek/Ideas and see if there's anything you want to co-op with me. I honestly believe that your little edits of give up made it go from 50% chance of getting VFH to... way more. Think about this opportunity: a co op... WITH CEKAJ!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 15:54)

Why?:Take Your Fish To Work looks like the funniest tittle to me, but I'm not really sure what you would put in the article. I think I'm going to put some more serious effort into my re-write of the Beginners Guide though. I think the poorness of the beginners guide is probably the biggest problem in Uncyc at the moment, so I'm going to focus on that for a while. Your obviously very welcome to help. It's still very much in layout mode at the moment, but feel free to have a mess with it if you fancy. Your still going for WotM though, so I guess your more into writing new stuff at the moment.

While you were complaining, I already wrote it. I think you'll find that this is probably the stupidest thing I've ever written.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 19:01)

Joyous victory for political correctness!

	The Led Balloon thanks you for keeping our school systems politically correct to the point of absurdity.
	But really, does anyone care?

Thanks for voting, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:30, Dec 23

Check out page.

Hey Mr.CC... Dunno if you're into motorsport or not, but there's a page called Keke Rosberg that before it can be made funny, needs to make sense. It was obviously written by someone Finnish before the check every page watershed. You're the kind of guy for nosing your way into new/unchecked articles, so I thought I'd tell you. Happy Giftmas. ALCUS 12:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm not really that much of a fan of motorsport, I watch a bit if it on TV, but no real expert... Now I know this guy who I think might be though... Maybe he's the man for the job! MrN 14:30, Dec 24

Wow. And I didn't think admin could be so cold. I'll hop right to it, and I did what you recommended with my first page (myChampCar parody). ALCUS 22:33, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Admin??? Dam! Who are you calling admin? I'm far from one of those my friend! I'm just a lowely normal user like yourself... I do keep an eye on new pages a little, but I have none of the powers of the admins around here. Really I just offer a bit of friendly advice here and there if it's welcome...

I like what you have done with your page. It's looking a lot better. Best of luck with the page. Oh, and happy XMAS! MrN 18:16, Dec 26

Congratulations on your promotion, Mr. N. Oh, could you unban me?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 26 / 18:36)

Merry Xmas!

~ Merry Xmas MrN9000/TalkArchives3! ~ Ye Olde Luke

--YeOldeLuke 08:00, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Mrs J is new and improved!

I have totally rewritten Mrs J At least its coherent now, and I would ask that you reconsider your vote. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 20:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

But of course fair maiden. For though hath truly blinded mine with your most most generous of re-writes! Your gentle fingers have caressed those once wicked pages into ones of true equity and spender...

DAM GIRL! Seriously! Is this the same article??? I will removed my vote forthwith. Nice work. MrN 20:50, Dec 27

Thats why they award me the Awards that I've been awarded. Actually, this is based upon a real ad for brown Lysol that talks about "Why Mrs. J. never recives a second invitation back..." I just co-opted idea of the ad and the premise that she was one great spy, but that her "unforgivable sin" kept her from saving the world. By the way, thanks for your edits - it makes the article much better. Hugs, Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

It's a huge improvement. Congrats! I actually did not know who she was until now... I thought it was actually about a persons school teacher or someone. Guess Google let me down for once. Still it's all fixed now. :-) MrN 22:55, Dec 27

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Deadpan

somebody got pantsed. Why does N use that term so much? It's because he's missing his own pants.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28) 13:55

Yes, hey, take a look. I might have been too insulting here. Also, this needs special help. Thanks   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28 / 02:51)

Um, OK. I will have a look! MrN 02:53, Dec 28

Awesome, thanks N. It needs more than one person's help, I think.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28 / 03:08)

I put my comments at the bottom of the review... MrN 04:07, Dec 28

Yes, I felt like I was mising something from reading that article. I thought deadpan was more subtle than that!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28) 05:34

What's not subtle? You did not get it! :-P I thought it was good... I think our friend can feel happy that he got a good review between the two of us...

I'm not sure about your 'total no list' policy you know. Surely sometimes a good albeit short list can add to the humour sometimes? Check out the list at the bottom of Arms. Tell me that's not funny. :) MrN 05:52, Dec 28

That list was good. Most lists, however, need to go. Take a look at Why?:Cancer is Great and Why?:Hunt Unicorns. Both were basically just lists that went in depth.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28) 13:23

I get ya. I think the point is... If it's a list the alarm bells go off (as this is often a sign of pantsness), but if the list is warranted, and does actually make the article more funny then that's OK. You just have to pay special attention to them, cos many lists are rather rubbish and pointless. MrN 13:45, Dec 28

And if you liken Mrs J, then you'll love

the rewrite of The Master of Love.

Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:41, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Cajek/Pee

Hey Mr. N, do you think you could update the Pee count for me? I'm not going to be able to be on very much in the next few days. You know how to do it, right?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 29) 20:09

Where the hell do you think you're doing?! I don't remember I had a request for some time off! /me shuffles papers on table. No! I didn't think so! ~ Mordillo where is my CHICKEN FRIES? 20:10, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

I know I signed Mordillo form #11492b !   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 29) 21:47

That's the STD inoculation concession form! ~ Mordillo where is my CHICKEN FRIES? 22:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry I missed ya Cajek. I have been away myself for the last 7 days. Bin snowboarding in the Alps. Am sure you have the list sorted now. :) MrN 19:19, Jan 6

Dear MrN9000,

SON OF A BITCH. I... just... Christ. Thanks for voting for HowTo:Mail a Letter to the first featured article of 2008. Maybe I'll just call you next time. a friendly message from your local post office.

My excuse of an excuse of absence:

MrN9000 apologises for being absent without leave. Snowboarding cut the network cable. MrN 19:38, Jan 6

Welcome back!   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 6 (19:39)

Hea dude! I have bin catching some carves in the Alps... Congrats on the WotM and UN:RotM awards! Looks like some fool has nominated me for a few this month... MrN 19:47, Jan 6

Oh! That was me! I was that fool!   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 6 (19:58)

Heyy

Sorry I've been AWOL over christmas, but I guess alot of people have too... like you, I see. I'll work to make up for the Pees I haven't done (there's loads that havent been reviewed!) and shall also cough pointedly towards NotM in the hope that someone might, yknow... *cough*... ~Fag x FS

Um, cough, er, cough. Just had a look through your contributions. Just checking up on ya a little... ;) In a nice way of course. Er... Woops. Your defiantly worthy of a nom, lots of good stuff +.

Woops Fag. Sorry I have ballsed it up. I may be entitled to the modified B00b of the month Cajek awarded me.. I looked back to when you joined Uncyc. It was 18:51, 26 November 2007 waz it nots? Grr. woopsiedoooo. Yew too old by 4 days dude. Sorry. //me runs for the door hoping not to get hit with flying projectiles... MrN 14:02, Jan 7

Too late, I nommed him!   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 7 (14:21)

It's a spambot

Thanks for the revert, though. :D -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 19:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Rejoice, MrN9000! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

Thanks for the review on UnBooks:The Winkler impersonator who cried GAY GAY GAY. --Æ 01:52, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

It was a tricky one to do. I hope you understood what I was trying to say. MrN 01:54, Jan 10

I added links and expanded, is is funnier now?--Æ 19:39, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

It's better. Well done. MrN 23:44, Jan 12

UnNews:Ron Paul is disliked by ABC and Fox News

Thanks a lot for the changes, they were good--Æ 20:01, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Your welcome. MrN 20:01, Jan 11

Thanks!

Yes! I put my article on Pee Review because I know it sucked. I appreciate the feedback. It's kind of hard for a 14-year-old to write an article on here without making it overtly explicit and yet still funny. Thanks man. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Schlondak (talk • contribs)

Cool. MrN 11:35, Jan 12

FSM

Actually, good point, probably shouldn't of removed it. It just seemed unnecessary in that article and I still think it is. See what you were doing now from VFD. Anyway I apologise for just removing that stuff like I did, I should have at least left an explanation. I'll leave it to you if you want to put it back in. I personally think your imagination is probably a better tool than a VFD article for this article. mAttlobster. (hello) 00:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Polish Inquisition

Hellair MrN. First, thanks for the very meticulous review. My two cents is, I think you may have missed the point of the article, but that's probably due to the fact that it's sort of a Polish-Jewish oriented humor. The Polish Jews (and I actually got some feedback from non Jewish Poles that it works for them as well) are considered to be the most pesky sort of Jews. The women are the worst. That "sitting alone in the dark" catchphrase is usually used by mothers in the sense of - "it's ok, don't come and visit me this Sabbath, I'll just sit alone in the dark". My mom actually says that as a joke :). So, if you could, reread the article thinking about a bunch of old Jewish ladies, roaming about with obscene haircuts with nothing better to do except for looking at you and Tsk tsking distastefully. Thanks! ~ Mordillo where is my CHICKEN FRIES? 09:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Ahhh, I understand now. I read it again. This is defiantly more funny now you have explained the joke! There actually is a reference to women, and mothers in there, I missed it when I reviewed before. Subtle, subtle subtle... I think most of the comments from the review still stand though. Now that I know what you are talking about I can appreciate the humour/humor (I have no idea how Jews spell humour) but I still think that most people will miss the point. Unless you are planning on banning all the non Jews? Oh, you are planning on banning all the Non Jews! Well fair enough this will work fine then... OK, just in-case you don't manage to ban all of them, I think it might be an idea to put something in the first paragraph which explains the joke a little. This concept does not really just apply to Polish Jews in my view, it's applicable to anyone with a mother really, the article is just tailored to a particular type of mother I guess, but why not make it a bit more accessible to other people? It's up to you of course.

I was only as harsh as I was in my review because you said that you were thinking of VFH. As it stands, this is a great article but I think that like me, many people will miss the joke and that would surely spell a failed VFH nomination. If you have to explain the joke individually to everyone who reads the front page you might not have enough time left to ban all those pesky non Jews!

If you don't want to change the article, that's fine. Obviously it works well for people who get the concept straight away, and if you did change this then perhaps it might actually not work so well for them. Enjoy. MrN 10:22, Jan 13

Got any ideas as to how to explain the joke without ruining the article? ~ Mordillo where is my CHICKEN FRIES? 10:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Maybe that will do it. With my change the reader has a chance to spot the joke before getting to the bit about polish mothers, and hopeful it's not spoiled too much. MrN 11:14, Jan 13

All right, thanks for that! Hope you don't mind if I ask for another opinion just to mesh everything up. ~ Mordillo where is my CHICKEN FRIES? 11:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Go for it. Maybe try to find someone who has not read this conversation. If they get it, then maybe it's ready for a VFH nom. MrN 11:40, Jan 13

No, I didn't forget.

My script adds the VFD tag at the bottom of the article. Did you read it all? ;-) --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

My bad. Don't know how I missed that, mother did warn me I would go blind... I normally put them at the top myself, but it's all good. MrN 11:48, Jan 13

Hello again

Gosh, fancy seeing you here! What are the chances?

Anyway, since I have happened upon your good person in this co-incidental fashion, would you consider peeing an article for me? I've been Cajeked and OEJed in the past, and as you're the front runner for RotM, I'd like to keep a complete set (plus I want a good review!) Ta awfully. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Sure, will have a look, but it will have to be tomorrow now. I actually have some real world things to do for a change! MrN 02:21, Jan 15

Under User has blessed you with cake for being friendly and/or useful. Eat it quickly before he changes his mind. Warning: cake prepared in an environment which also processes nuts, and contains lactose, gluten, ground glass and arsenic, which gives it a lovely tang.

Here y'go, the UU equivalent of the Golden Shower (I don't like the Golden Shower). Thanks for a tip top review! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Another review request

Would you be nice enough to review Alberto Gonzales? Thanks--Æ 02:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

As Per UU, I will have a look tomorrow if no one else has done if before. Sorry AE, rare real world responsibilities catching up! MrN 02:21, Jan 15

Sorry, I missed your review for ya AE. I have been away for a work thing... Looks like you got a good one from someone else however. Good luck with the article. Your writing is improving. MrN 21:42, Jan 18

Thanks, I'll hold off on you doing a review until I write my next draft. BTW, guess what I'm currently writing? Fat Americans (yes the rewrite of the one you love)!--Æ 21:45, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

GTFO!

SHOW ME YOUR TITS! Thanks for voting my tits to the front page. -Zana Dark

Look at her boobies going up and down. --Uncle Dee 03:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm sure you are exadurating, Zana, but they looked good enough to eat. If however a little difficult to run with. :-) MrN 21:45, Jan 18

Fat Americans

I finished it!! It's on Pee Review if you want to review it, can you review it? Do you think it's funny, as funny as the original, VFH?--Æ 13:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC) Good review man: Have this:

Rejoice, MrN9000! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

Hopefully, I'll finish this sometime soon--Æ 17:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I worked on it a bit more, do you think it's better now?--Æ 19:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Getting there. From your text: why should I and you Brits who is he talking to? You still need to decide this, and make it consistent throughout. Try reading thought again, thinking about who is saying what to who and why... MrN 19:35, Jan 20

My intentions were this would be an international audience, talking to both Brits and Americans as the article claims this is "an international problem." I'll have to play around with it a bit more I guess--Æ 19:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I actually like the fact that the original was specifically not intended to be read by Americans. That was probably the most funny part of it for me. The idea that no Americans would actually read it, so it was just written for the rest of the world. It's your call... Just make it consistent whatever you do. MrN 19:44, Jan 20

I might just have a British Audience, and the into will say "several of you have mates that are America" as with the original article--Æ 19:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Now it's a British Audience, think it's better, VFH yet?--Æ 19:56, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

If I'm honest, I just don't know... It's good, don't get me wrong, but those voters over at VFH can be rather hard to please sometimes... I would probably recommend that you leave it a week or so and try to get some other people to contribute if you can. Maybe you can talk that Lazy bugger Cajek into helping out. Whatever happened to him anyway? I hear he was eaten by a Goblin or something... As for my thoughts on the article as it stands, I would probably go with international people at the seminar, with a British author. Make it like the members of the seminar are from everywhere except America, that's just what I think though... You need to remember that to be successful in VFH you need to appeal to a wide range of voters, and most of them will be Americans, like yourself. Some of them possibly fat Americans! This article is funny to me, probably because I'm a skinny Brit! I remember that when I found the original that a few people actually took offence to the thing! Seriously though, I don't think it's quite ready. Maybe try to come up with another section (the article is a little short) and keep reading through what you have done making sure that it reads right. Probably the most important thing would be to sort the pictures out, and get some more input from other people. Keep trying, you will get there! Maybe! Just one final thing though AE. You are obviously putting a lot of effort into this one, so don't be too disappointed if (when it does get nominated for VFH) if it does not do that well. As I said, VFH can be rather fickle, especially when people are starting to make their first attempts. Good luck! MrN 22:23, Jan 20

I changed it back to an international audience. I'll have to continue fiddling around with and might resumbit to Pee Review and even though it's not on VFH, would you support it in its current state? It should be noted even though I'm American, I'm not a fat one. --Æ 22:42, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry I thought I explained, I don't think it currently will make it. Give it some more work. That's just my view. MrN 22:53, Jan 20

Well, I worked on it a bit more and it's on VFH if you want to vote (please do)--Æ 02:11, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

beep beep!

Thank you for the kind words, N! Real life is intruding into my uncyc time! AAH! I will be back writing and so forth, just not right now! Thank you for helping with the Pee!   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 21 (15:29)

Re: America

Thanks sir for your detailed review of mine and THE's rewrite of America. I can see where you're coming from in a lot of places, and it does have just ever-so-little to do with your being British. Your comment about most of the images was well-informed, as they were added afterward in a somewhat haphazard fashion. Plus, for the most part, the "humor" there was more American than in the rest of the article (for example, Dwight D. Eisenhower said in his final presidential address to the people that we had to control the military-industrial complex, otherwise it would control us. Not sure if you knew that, but now you do). I just would like your opinion on this particular image, as I spent a great deal of time trying to make it look crayon-drawn. That was just a parody of the sad state American education is in, and how ignorant we all are (ahem). Plus a dig at Canada, because it's fun and easy.

Anyway, it's very refreshing to have a non-American perspective on things. You should know that any references to "country" are purely copyediting mistakes, as originally THE and I were going to make the article about the restaurant PLUS the country. I shall get right on the revision/editing of the article in the interest of making it more succinct (as opposed to this comment). Also, my exclusion of your sig was a vain attempt to fix the template. Turns out you threw in an extra set of [[ brackets when comparing our work to Thinker's. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to eat.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:08, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

OK, I have to admit I had to look up "succinct". A succulent word for the occasion if ever there was one... Regarding the pic, I did not know you had done it yourself. Is the cross though (is it boston) a deliberate comment on the large percentage of English people who live there? It's a great effort of a pic for sure. It actually looks rather like the kinda think you might find left in a McDonalds, and if that's the effect your after, it defiantly scores well. Perhaps some people might miss the joke, but that's their problem I guess.

Perhaps work on the caption a little... How about:

The definitive map of the known world as created by America's foremost cartographer Ronald M Donald

Good job with the pic. MrN 01:38, Jan 26

Er....I didn't intendfor there to be a cross in Massachusetts, but it certainly is appropriate. Also, funny you should mention McDonalds, because the America mission statement that's in there is the McDonald's mission statement, unaltered except for a change in restaurant name. When I said "I'll get right on it", by the way, I meant "within this weekend maybe"-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Jerome James

Hello. I added some to the Jerome James article as suggested by your tag. I think you will find it to be 4.23% more useful to the community as a whole. I've added a whole new section, links, etc... I reckon it's time to take it off the crappy article list. My calculations suggest that 34% more value has been added to the article with these new edits. In conclusion I hope you'll find the article both informative and ready to be taken off the list. Kindest regards, KielyDimes 06:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Hea! Wow, well most people actually don't bother to reply when we put those 'tag' things on the articles, thanks for getting back to me. :-). I re-organized your article for you, and changed a few things here and there. OK, here's the deal... First of all, don't think I'm an Admin around here, I'm most defiantly not, and don't actually have the power to delete articles. I really just put that tag on there to stop the Admins from deleting it, and to give you a chance to improve it. I noticed that you have added that new section, but I still think without the ICU tag you might find that your article still gets deleted. If you can add to it some more, it would really help. If you want me to remove the ICU tag now, just let me know, and I will change it to a {{stub}}s, but without adding some new stuff I fear that one of the Admins may still delete it. I would love to add some myself, but unfortunately being a Brit, I have no idea who this guy is... Enjoy. MrN 13:01, Jan 27

I see. British eh? My brother-in-law is British which makes me like 0% British. So you and I are practically family! Small world eh? But seriously, thanks for the pointers and I'll try and add on a few more sections. KielyDimes 16:48, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Howdy ho!

Ah, what ho there MrN my old PEEING compadre. It seems like it's just you and me these days, doesn't it? Well, OK, that's harsh, but every time I pop in to update the list it's you, then me, then maybe a couple of others, then you, then me... So I want to clear one thing up: I'm not trying to catch you up, honest! I don't care who's done the most reviews, just that somebody is helping to keep the urinal from overflowing! I thought I'd mention this in case you kept seeing me pop in a few more reviews and thought I was trying to prove a point!

Anyway, that's quite enough of that. Hope life is treating you well good sir. Um, and that's about it really. So I'll be off. Pippings! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 20:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Not in a bad way at all Sir... I does not look like that at all! In fact it appears you have gone and pipped me again anyways! It's all in good sport and all fine chap.

Anyways, on a more serious note, it's actually great that you are taking the effort of updating it. It's just a bit of a pain to do it now. I was thinking of putting a post into the peeing talk page about it. Maybe try to find a way to make it a bit less effort to update. Maybe let a few more people have a word about what they think of the list and what it can do. MrN 18:30, Jan 30

Hello again. Quick one re: RotM - justice done, I think. Congrats! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 08:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Many thanks. I actually thought you had me on the ropes for a while there... Your reviews have become very good, and you have been knocking them out like there is no tomorrow! You're going to be hard to beat this month. MrN 09:08, Feb 1

Woah, woah, WOAH! Become very good? Man, I was knocking out decent reviews before you joined this place! I think I should be saying that about YOU! ;-) Being serious though, when it comes to awards, I'm happy to get a nom (it's nice to be noticed), but I generally keep a low profile, and don't like to blow my own trumpet, so I try to help make sure people I've seen do good stuff actually get the awards (vote Mordillo on UotM!) Anyway, off to the shops I go, so have a good one as ever. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 11:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

It sure was a close thing, I was lucky to win... RE UotM Ahh, the noble art of whoring... One of the many skills I have yet to master... I will probably vote later in the month, one does not like to blow ones load too early after all... MrN 15:03, Feb 2

Is it still whoring if you're doing it on behalf of someone else though? I thought that would class as pimping or something! Also: blow one's load? Ooooh, maaatron! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

So are we still active?

I hope so, because I think I'm returning, at least for a little while. --Andorin Kato 00:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Sure, will be good to see you around again. MrN 13:02, Jan 31

Much More Ado About America

How is it looking? Did I miss anything? Anything I failed to address?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:19, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

It's looking good. I think the opening section needs looking at, (and constituting the sole part of it that is cared about), I'm not sure that's helping. It's also still a bit wordy for me in places, and I'm probably missing half of the jokes as I'm not American... I think you are still short of a picture, but it will make it in VFH I think. MrN 19:07, Jan 30

I might be able to cook up another 'chop as I did with the logo (turned out quite nice). However I'm already on my next project (top-secret), so who knows? Thanks a bundle for all THE input. Heh-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

A suggestion

I think that, for the next while, whenever you archive VFD, you ought to add in your edit summary somehow what you are a poopsmith. For example Archiving votes — Zombiebaron made me poopsmith or something of the like. That way the admins'll know. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 16:04 Feb 02, 2008

Great suggestion. I was doing that this morning actually. I put a post in the Ministry of love too, so we can see how long it take me to get banned again. Lolz. Cheers for all your help with this one. Dr Skullthumper smashes the case again. :-) MrN 17:22, Feb 2

Oh. Hah. &mdash; doesn't work in edit summaries. Yep. I so knew that. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:28 Feb 02, 2008

EPIC FAIL!

	All Praise and Glory Be Yours!
	You have been emphatically thanked for voting for EPIC FAIL! on VFH.
	Due to the nature of the article, your thanks
	template has been stolen from the template
	that tells people a user has been infinibanned.
	EPIC FAIL!

_^(sir)Fag!chat|pee|fail|vote!

Overused urinals

Hey there, mr. steel kidney :P I'd just like to point out I've done a second review of an article (Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:AIDS "support" group leads to outrage; dead Africans) in the same page because I was asked to. Just thought I'd point that out 'cos otherwise it might be ignored on Cajek's Pee list :P --_^(sir)Fag!chat|pee|fail|vote! 14:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Generally, I'm patrolling the list these days, while MrN is busy with his Poopsmithery. I had noted it, and it will get added, don't worry, O bent-as-a-nine-bob-note-ish one! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 15:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay then :P I didn't see yew were on, and I've been seeing MrN on alot lately :P And, also, lol, nine bob note. xD --_^(sir)Fag!chat|pee|fail|vote! 15:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Under_user to the rescue.... Hmm, maybe I should get of my poopy arse, and do some reviews also. Good job guys. ;) MrN 15:45, Feb 5

Ethernet

This is my account.. It is brand new, and I got it only after Writing the Article on Ethernet. I have to ask, whats wrong with kittens or Grues? Well... Other then being generally over used...?

And yeah I am kind of new to writing things on here. The ring needs more tokens aye?

GrueGrewsome 22:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Regards to my Boyle's Vengeance

You;ve just issued ICU on my new article article on Boyle's Vengeance. Yes its new but its been revised a few times and its done. No doubt Boyle's Vengeance is pure parody to EA's attempt on expansion sets in various games. It has already met all requirements of ICU or even exceeded it.

links to other articles. Done

few red links. Done

paragraphs, headings, correct speeling and grammer, Done

tables, whitespace, and an image or two. Done with more than two parody images.

So can you have the ICU safely removed? Thanks. – Preceding unsigned comment added by ASHPD (talk • contribs)

OK. Since you made the effort to get back to me, I'm happy to remove the ICU. It does look like it has the makings of a good article, but I still think it needs more work (especially with the formatting which is why I left the "Needs formatting" ICU). It just looked a bit messy to me. A lot of people on here are not fans of lists in articles, and I think you would be doing well if you moved some of the pictures around a bit. Especially the one at the top. I'm not sure if there are many articles on here with just a big picture like that at the top. Just try and make it look a bit more pleasing to the eye... Sorry to be a pain, it's obvious that you have put a fair bit of effort into this, I really just put the ICU on to let you know it does need some more work.

Also, some of the Admins around here can be rather harsh with the articles they delete, and articles written about games can be a particular target. I will replace the ICU with a {{WIP}} which lets the admins know that you intend to work on the article some more. If you want to remove the WIP yourself, feel free to do so, but while it's there, so long as you keep working on it, your article will not be deleted. Oh, also, don't forget to sig your posts on talk pages with ~~~~ Enjoy. MrN 19:15, Feb 7

Mmmm Hmmm

Yo. I recently put up Cream the Rabbit for VFD and followed all the rules and now its gone without a word. Not trying to be critical but every time I try and be helpful it gets beaten down. What gives? Sir DJ ~ Irreverent

Hea. Sorry dude, I'm not too sure what you are talking about here. Do you mean that you put it onto the VFD page? I can't see any evidence that this page has been listed on VFD. Are you sure you saved it correctly? Sometimes I hit preview, rather than save, and then forget to actually save the page afterwards. Maybe you did that? I noticed that you did put the VFD tag onto Cream the Rabbit, but you know you actually have to add the nom to the page also?

Regarding Cream the Rabbit, personally, I think I would vote 'keep' if that were put onto VFD. It's a little silly, but I don't think it's huffing material. Probably not the kinda thing which I personally think should be being put onto VFD (that's just my view ofcourse). If you check the "What links here" for the article you can see that quite a lot of other people have thought it's worth linking to, so they probably think it's OK. Also the "what links here" will also tell you if it's been listed on VFD before. If it has, check what people said when it was nominated then, and seriously think about not nominating it again. The 'rules' are really just a guide. Mostly its common sense combined with experience of what you have seen happen on VFD in the past.

Hell Cream the Rabbit is not awesome by any stretch of the imagination, but there is far worse out there! Also the history shows that it's been edited by a few people. Now those things are obviously not the only way to decide what's worth keeping and what's not, but they are a guide of some sorts. My personal current quest is to try to get rid of the really bad short stubs. You can find these by looking on short pages, and going down a few hundred and looking at what's there.

Talking about you being helpful, and getting beaten down about it... Again, I'm not sure what you mean. Who is doing that? People sometimes say things which can bite at ya, but try not to take it too personally or seriously... In my experience, if someones opinion is worthy of your respect, it's rare that they say things which are genuinely nasty.

You do have to consider when making a nom for VFD that people will get a bit upset if you nom something which is obviously not VFD material, it just kinda wastes peoples time.

Oh, and you ARE being helpful!! I don't know what makes you think that your not... Please keep voting, but do your homework before making a nom. If you are pretty sure its got a very good chance of getting voted to be deleted then go ahead and nom it. Just make sure you do not go over the 20 noms limit. That may get you banned. Enjoy. MrN 02:23, Feb 10

Yes, a small supplement to this: DJ, VFD is just trial-and-error. Putting it to a vote is being helpful. Not doing VFD at all can still be helpful. There are all sorts of users that this site needs to make it run - the beloved techies (RIP Splaka), the brilliant writers, the schmucks like me, and the ever-vigilant janitors (of which MrN is a part). And then there's the cross-pollination (Modus votes on VFD, TKF writes (as do many janitors), and our techies are just as funny as us non-inclined). Don't worry about niching and bureaucracy. Just do everything in good spirit and you're guaranteed at least lukewarm reception.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:25, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Rough Pubs

Rabbi Techno is sending you this undoubtedly delicious beer to say thanks for voting for Rough Pubs! From Rabbi Techno

Wonky Edits

I made so edits to my Wonky and would like you to take a look at them. I added so words and a few pictures. Hope you see this! (PC MAJOR 19:04, 16 February 2008 (UTC))

Hi. Well, as you were not logged in when you wrote this message, it's kinda hard to tell who you are... I'm guessing that you are PC MAJOR? I had a look at your changes, and it's defiantly getting a lot better. Personally, I would be happy to remove the ICU now, but it's just possible that one of the other users might add it again later. I think if you could find another picture to go at the top, then it would be fine. Do that, and I will be more than happy to remove the ICU. Let me know when you have... Oh, don't forget to log in next time! MrN 17:20, Feb 16

Okay, I found an image of a homeless person and plan on uploading it, and yeah, it was PC Major, I also plan on expanding the article in the future. Thanks for the feedback(PC MAJOR 19:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC))

Adopt-A-ASHPD

Adopt-A-ASHPD now! He is in serious un-ICU condition.

{{Adoptme}}

Sure. Consider yourself adopted. MrN 16:55, Feb 16

Wanna adopt another one, n00bdaddy extraordinaire?

My Second evil twin St.Helena, who is generally considered to be the nicer and least social one of the three of us has put herself up for adoption. Care to have a look? ---- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 15:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, well I only see that she has done a few (very minor) things since she got here, and I'm (not yet) actually that sure that she intends to stick around... I don't adopt just anyone you know! When she has done a few more edits and I think that she is serious about Uncyc I will be more than happy to oblige... It would help if she asked herself also! In the mean time, it's obviously fine for her to ask me anything she wants using my talk page...

Oh, on a different subject do you know what a Sockpuppet is? It's when a user creates more than one account, and uses both to edit the site. It's a REALLY big no no, and the Administrators come down like a ton of bricks on people who use them. Obviously people use them to 'cheat' in votes, and support their arguments when debating a point on a talk page. UNSOC is the Uncyc organisation which tracks them down... Now I know that's not the kind of thing that a nice girl like you would get involved in, but I'm just mentioning it so that you know to watch out for them... Basically, you have to suspect that anyone that you don't know, especially new users. Some people have "joke" Sockpuppets, but even that is not recommended, and generally pisses the admins off... MrN 17:50, Feb 18

Don't worry, she's not me. She's about as intelligent as me, but not as computer literate as I am. Last time I tried to fix her computer I ended up jamming it completely... Behold, my new improved sig! ---- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 18:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Help needed with a Pee

'Scuse me there old chap, could I prevail upon your skills for a moment? Specifically, have a shufti at this please. My first, second and third instincts tell me that it's an unfunny, short article, and I reviewed it as such. I couldn't even find enough to say to give an in-depth review, which is most unlike me. But... Something about the talk page of the IP who set it up (he had a chat there with Mordillo) sounds like he has a smidge of intelligence,so I wondered if I was just wayyy out in my assessment of this. If you agree with my review, leave it as it is and just respond here. If you think I'm being crap, give a second opinion and explain why I don't know what I'm talking about. I'd be much obliged. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 17:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I see what you mean. This is an odd one... Looks like the user is no ones fool, I guess they are just really new to Uncyc. From the way they are talking, I think the IP is probably a Wikipedia user, who just decided to try their hand at an Uncyc article. I thought you were a little harsh with your scores, I would maybe have given them one more each for humour and concept, but I think you basically got the review right. I don't think there is anything particularly clever going on here, and suspect that the article may have been deleted when the ICU expired. Personally, I think this needs to have the ICU put back onto it. If the IP does not want to work on it any more, throw it to the mercy of the Admins... A pleasure to help out as always good buddy... MrN 18:00, Feb 18

I'll keep an eye on it for a wee while, see what happens. Many thanks for the second opinion. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 18:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, now let's see... I've given you cake already... /me has a rummage through odds and ends... got to be something here somewhere. Ah!

That should be ample illustration of my gratitude. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 18:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Ninjastar!

---

DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 17:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Well thank you very much! Looks like your really getting the hang of stealing other people sigs also! Oh, change the colour of your name though, anything but red. With it being red it looks looks like 'this user has not bothered to make a user page yet' and as such may not get the credit you deserve from some less observant users. How about a nice Pink? MrN 18:06, Feb 18

It was a pwetty pink already, but I changed it to slightly more pink. Better? ---- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 18:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Nice... Very "tasteful"... MrN 18:23, Feb 18

*Makes an excited squeaky noice...* (Someone with common sense would go for the "don't encourage her" bit now...) ---- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 18:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Encourage her: there's no telling what will happen! Common sense? What's that? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 18:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Have you voted for me already? Go vote...---- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 19:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Ohh, you N00b... Now why can't I do that??? MrN 19:09, Feb 18

*lower lip begins to shake, eyes water...Sniffle...* You're all doomed now... ---- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 19:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Patience, my nooby one. Patience... Do the good stuff, and the votes will come... If you want, check out what happened when I won my N00b award. I had to wait till the last day. The voting system here is more sophisticated than you might give it credit for. Seriously... Some of the guys on here really know what they are doing... Patience. ;) MrN 19:19, Feb 18

I know, I know. We all have our weak moments... Don't worry, I'm up to no good (from Wikipedia's point of view) again...---- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 19:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Pants Related Enquiry

If you're missing your pants, I'll buy you some new pants. --Uncle Bill 00:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer, but I'm in the UK. In that picture I AM wearing my pants... MrN 00:32, Feb 19

Lokomotiv Arroios' article

(oops-goddam laptop)

Lokomotiv Arroios' article

Hi there :) The idea was to write an article about a virtual team, indeed. However, the intention was not to auto-promote a virtual soccer team. What would be the benefits of that?? The are lot's of virtual clubs, much better than this one. And by the way... who can be interested on a virtual club? (Even a real soccer club is usually stupid, so a virtual one would probably be even worse!) The article's main goal was to talk about the neighbourhood (Arroios/Lisbon), using a virtual team as a "mobile". When written in english, specially by non-portuguese people, it may be seem as a kind of weird (totally absurd, I would say)... ...I just thought that it would be better for uncyclopedia if written in english. Please, feel free to delete it as soon as possible.

King regards,

Omissirev.

Ahh, I get the idea now... I think the person who nominated if for VFD (was not I sir!) may have been mistaken into thinking that it was actually about a real team. I thought it was also I must admit, but perhaps I did not do the research I should have done before voting... Now that I know it's not, it is actually a bit more funny... To be honest, it's probably still failing a bit on the humour side, but it's really not all that bad... We have far worse... Looks like the vote is going against you though, so if you wanted to create and account, make a copy of it, and work on it in your userspace (not the main space) then by all means do so... Problem is that an article like yours is probably only going to be worked on by the author, so it's a bit of a tricky one... If you read this too late, and it's gone before you get there, you will have to speak to an administrator (which I am not) who will be able to help you to do this. Ahh, sod it, I will make a copy for ya now just in-case you do... If you want it, let me know... Thanks. MrN 03:07, Feb 19

Princess K-Train's article

I sporked the Princess K-Train article from Uncyclopedia in Traditional Chinese (TC). There is no any problem in Uncyclopedia TC but ICU label is stamped in English version.

I would like to get some more information about the culture of Uncyclopedia in English, and, what contents may be extended, from your standpoint. Because Princess K-Train is the article discussing the K-Train (Korean made rolling stock) of MTR (Mass Transit Railway) Hong Kong but anthropomorphization (make it as human-like) to the object is applied. There are various such productions in Japan.

Moreover, in fact, there is a really the costume of Princess K-Train and is ready for cosplay.

Thank you. Jacaranda 07:25, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Well hello! Thanks for getting back to me about this... Ah, well what happened was that I saw your article, and thought that I should put the ICU on it, or else it could potentially have been deleted by an administrator. As it is, you have until the ICU expires to add to and improve it, and I hope that you do. However... From reading it I do see two problems. Firstly, as you said, it does appear that this article has been sporked from a non English language version, and it's rather noticeable. Although I understand that you have made an effort to write in English here, I think that you really need to make the sentence structure flow a little better, as some people may get the impression that you used an automatic translation tool to convert to English.

Also the article needs considerably more content. Yes I know that we already have some articles on Uncyc with similar levels of content currently, but we are trying to do something about that, and in my opinion it's likely that yours would not survive our deletion process in it's current form. Your work is really not much more than a series of lists, and we rather prefer to have paragraphs, rather than simple lists. List's are OK in moderation, but your article is really not much more than a list, and we try to avoid that. I guess the Traditional Chinese Uncyc has slightly less users, and so perhaps allows a different standard of article. I don't know...

Anyway, what I am saying is that I think you need to put a significant amount of new effort into your article if you want it to survive here. Make the language less broken, and add significantly to the content. I hope you decide to do so... Enjoy. :-) MrN 12:26, Feb 19

Thank you for your suggestions. I will try my best to improve the articles. Please feel free to give opinions even corrections for the contents and grammar, since my English is not perfect as it is my second language :-)

I will also synchronize the contents of the same articles on Uncyclopedia TC. Please give me some time to do so.

Hope the Uncyclopedia will be more flourishing with cultures' blending such as British (or even Western) black humour, Japanese moë, Chinese implication/euphemism, uncyclopedial side-write, and ...... etc., ;-)

Jacaranda 12:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm glad you are going to try... I feel it might be difficult for you as your English is not that fluent, and you do need to add significant new content, but I wish you luck. MrN 12:55, Feb 19

I love you...

...oh yes I do. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:03, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I was just passing... No problem... MrN 01:07, Feb 21

I also love you, in a purely platonic manner

I also left you a response regarding the VFD issue @ my talk page. ~ 13:29, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Back already?

/me tacklehugs teh n00bdaddy MrN. You're back! I've been up to no good. I even peed on something. And now I'm shamelessly whoring myself here. Sowwy. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 23:05, 26 Feb

Grr now I have told you not to call me that in such a public place. Good to see that you have been keeping up with Recent changes. Now I can hide no longer! I noticed you chatting with UU about your review. I liked your review also. Also noticed that you are doing well after your last telling off, taking the piss is obviously not a problem for you... On a reality related issue, I'm actually not really 'back' as of yet. The slopes are still calling for another day...

Oh, thought I would mention something or other, but I forget what. MrN 23:18, Feb 26

Yeah, yeah... I thought about giving RC Murphy a vote to tip his balance back to zero. Poor fella... I was kinda hoping my Hello Kitty or Cruise Heil would have received any feedback... Ah well. I'm off to bed. Early morning tomorrow. Gotta go make my English professor's life a misery in the morning ;) -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 23:27, 26 Feb

Hmm, that "poor fella" won n00b of the year last year you know... Perhaps you might not like the competition this year? Hmm... Well I liked the pic. It's obviously taken some work, and looks good. I guess it stands better when in the article than on it's own (I would say), but I'm really not a big one for chopping pics myself, so I'm probably not the best to ask. I like some of the ideas behind it though... I'm also not a great one for un-news, as I have not actually written one myself yet. There, I admit it... I do like the idea behind your un-news. It's cool, but for me it could perhaps have a section or two cut out ,and maybe make the writing style a bit more "news like" whatever that is, which as I said, I don't really know. MrN 23:45, Feb 26

I know, I should be asleep already, it's past any decent n00b's bedtime... The article was a rewrite, completely so. I took an existing idea and whipped it into shape, so though the idea is not mine originally, the content is. Though I just filched the images from the guy's blog who made the Real Life (what is that Real Life anyway?) Hello Kitty rifle for his wife. Hmmm... Me being a gal and knowing my firearms may be a bit worrisome. Don't worry, I'm not a gun-toting madman. I'm all woman... /me gets that glazed look in her eyes... -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 23:55, 26 Feb

Presentation of "Yu-Gi-Oh! Jee Ex"

After seeing the ugly template I decided to cut the Plot into several subsections. Any other ideas for how to make the article pretty? Vzvartnots 15:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Sure, thanks for getting back to me... I think it would be a lot better with some more pictures. Try to find some, and add them in appropriate places. I really think you should loose the list in the "see also" section. Most of those links are not relevant, and not helping the article. It's looking better already, but still needs some work. I also recommend that you read through the article, looking to see if there is anything you can cut out. Less is sometimes more... Feel free to get back to me... Enjoy. MrN 15:36, Feb 28

Adoptee n00b asking questions again...

I thought I should ask you what the policy is, an IP just a while back went in and edited my article on Dragonology, and not even very well. Can I slaughter the IP... go in and revert it back to what it was or what to do? -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 23:34, 28 Feb

Hmm, I actually saw that earlier... I thought about reverting it myself, but it was not really 'vandalism' per say, although possibly not the greatest of edits... I thought I would leave it to you... Anyway, to answer your question, yes, you can revert it. It's 'your' article, so you actually have a little more 'say' over it than anyone else (whatever that means). As it's your article you can QVFD it leaving a comment of "authour request" and the admins will delete it (even if it's older than 7 days). But basically, regardless of who created an article the same rules apply which you normally follow when handling reverts. I think there is something called the three revert rule You can revert whatever you want to at any time (so long as it's done in good faith) but never revert a revert of a revert. I'm not sure that makes any sense! You get what I mean... You don't want to get into a "revert war" with someone who wants something one way, and you want it another. If that is going to happen, talk to the user on their talk page, and encourage a discussion on the talk page of the article. If it's your article however, the other person will probably have to back down, although it's best to bring some other users into the discussion if you can not reach a compromise.

When dealing with an IP it's a bit more tricky as you are never sure who you are talking to (IP's can change their IP address). Also mostly when an IP does an edit they do not come back to check on the page afterwards anyway, so it's usually not a problem. Don't forget though, that many very useful users make their first contributions as IPs, so sometimes it's worth considering what they have done. If someone thought that a particular section of your work was poor enough to remove it, then maybe, just maybe it's not the best piece of the article.

OK, revert lecture over... Go and revert that nasty IP person! Grr! Oh, but why did they do it? Hmm... MrN 00:04, Feb 29

Did I do right? Did I? I've never reverted anything before...Mmmm... Cake... -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 00:50, 29 Feb

Hmm, well you were a little rude to that nice IP person, but I doubt if they will be back to take offence. It was a "good faith" edit, so I might have been a bit more polite. They were trying to help, just did not understand your writing style. Oh, just thought I would mention as you have been working you socks of in a mad panic for the n00b of the month... You would be eligible for N00b of the month next month too... Just thought I would mention that. :-) MrN 00:58, Feb 29

I would? Ooo... I can see the headlines already... "Writer of the Month..." wrong daydream... ;p I think it takes a wee bit longer to get the WotM competition eliminated countered with something appropriate. As came to the IP and the edit. The edit was way too close to the truth about the book... What does Uncyclopedia say about truths in articles? -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 01:13, 29 Feb

He He. Well I would not have wanted to tell you before about being eligible for next month now would I now... As per the IP edit, it was not a good one, and you were right to remove it, although I think the IP highlighted what was probably the weakest part of the article. Any 'good faith' input is always worth considering... As per the truth? Hmm, personally I think it works best when you blend truth with together with fiction in some funny way. It adds colour to articles. MrN 01:28, Feb 29

Speaking of colour, I've already put in a link to it in my Sandbox in an article I'm working on. It's still a work in progress, but I'm slowly getting there. I need to give it more contents, structure, pictures and then I need to make sure the tone is consisten throughout the text... -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 11:48, 29 Feb

Two Things

1. Congratulations. As I am now an admin, you are sole poopsmith of VFD. Godspeed.
2. Archive your talk page.

Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Nice. I just watched you do your first huff... Archive me talk page! pah! never! Oh, I mean... Yes Mr Admin sir! Right away... MrN 02:06, Mar 1