From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion. |
Jeffree Star
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete Seems like a lot of jumbled stuff put together, doesn't seem Uncyc-worthy (is that a word?) -
 Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate  05:00, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 Delete. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 11:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)- Delete. The usual I-hate-a-celebrity-because-I'm-talentless garbage. Says more about the mental condition of the anonymous IPs who created it than anything else. ----OEJ 18:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- What the fuck is this? --
 Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:35, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Also, all you buggers forgot the VFD tag. :P MrN
 19:38, Sep 1
- Delete. I didn't. Because I didn't vote yet. Laziness FTW. --Mr. Monkey
 Pant-hoot here. 20:33, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
Astro Empires
| Keep |
 Mild Keep Needs work but the descriptions of the battles were mildly amusing}}--Count of Monkey Crisco 20:31, 30 August 2008 (UTC)- Keep. - It's not that bad — Sir Sycamore (talk) 18:11, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- When it landed, nearby residents feared a second alien invasion and bludgeoned Geraldo to death with sticks, rocks, cow patties, small children and other less-famous mustaches. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. If only for that sentence alone. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 20:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Keeped. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon  (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:35, Sep 1
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete - No, I don't get it either. --AAA! (AAAA) 20:15, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete And I quote: "Current affairs suck shit." How true it is. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I made a few little edits to this article, see if you like. Simsilikesims 21:21, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Suzuki-san
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Note: I believe the satire here is that for some bizarre reason, everyone in Japanese language textbooks is named either Tanaka-San or Suzuki-San. I think it's because those Kanji are comparatively painless. I can sort of see how someone studying Japanese could become deranged by the constant mentions of Tanaka-San and Suzuki-San in an infinite number of situations. As for whether the article has merit, I'll decide later.
 pillow talk 23:34, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- Mostly nonsense: There is such a thing, by the way, as the Suzuki method of learning violin. This article has nothing to do with that though. Simsilikesims 18:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- comment on simsilikesims comment That wouldn't be coherent to this article, but a good concept nonetheless (I took violin before I switched to the Alto Saxaphone...). Chocolate Rain 19:05, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- I'd imagine an article about the Suzuki method would be a lot like Pokemon but with Twinkle Twinkle Little Star variants instead of colors. A better one would repeatedly insist on the reader memorizing the article. (::finger to nose::) (Never used the method myself.) --monika 00:06, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- This does have some potential, but humor needs to be accessible to all readers (doesn't HTBFANJS say this?), and this article is not. Userfy perhaps? --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 04:49, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- On a completely related note, the Suzuki method can be used to teach any string instrument (By that I mean the cello, violin, viola, or bass. Not the guitar, or, at least, I don't think so...), not just the violin. It also isn't a good way to learn, as you never learn to play by reading from the music. They learn by ear. This isn't good. It severely impedes on ones ability to play in groups. How do I know this? I'm a cellist, baby. Cello forever!!! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:53, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- (Arbitrary outdent) BTW, there's already an article on the Suzuki Method, and it's a lot better than the article being discussed for deletion here (which cannot easily be edited to relate to the topic of the Suzuki Method). --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 06:27, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Free trade
| Keep |
- FEATURE! What the fuck? Is that Kurt Cobain? --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Rewrite Yes indeed, that is Kurt Cobain. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 05:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Feck yes! --
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  14:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Looking back, the picture's pretty funny. Otherwise, though, the article is pretty terrible. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 14:16, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep If you have read the article, why not vote? MrN 14:23, Sep 1
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- I don't know, really. It's not really funny, just amusing in an Illogicopedia sort of way. In fact, I kind of regret voting to keep it. It's too bad votes are permanent or I would change my vote, I really would. God, I'm so ashamed. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 05:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
|
Biscuit Game
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. - Horrible stubby piece of crap, awful concept and execution — Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 18:41, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete I am not very pleased with this article. See me after class. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 05:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- It's disgusting, but yeah, not as disgusting as the 'real' biscuit game. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 14:22, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Oddly boring. ----OEJ 18:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
PUPR
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- delete. incredibly long, yet barely any content. listy, random, only about 75% english. not linked from anywhere. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 18:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- D1337 Is crap. Chocolate Rain 18:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Blarg honk. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 20:59, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Kerkill Oh, should I have read it all? Maybe you should put it ALL in ENGLISH next time! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. That hurt to read through. --UU - natter
 11:30, Sep 1
|
| Comments |
|
HPEIR
Da Void
The Book of Mozilla
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
 Comment. - my page, not sure what to do with it. (Intentionally did not add {vfd} to article Chairman of the Soviet Republicks (Keep Talking) 16:00, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- If you don't like it and you want to get rid of it and it's your own page, you could qvfd it. Write "author's request" next to it and they'll gladly clean it up for you. You could also move it to your user space if you want to keep it for later. (But I guess this works if your goal is to get feedback...) --monika 23:57, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah. You could QVFD it. You could also improve it. Or you could do nothing and let it get deleted out of ICU. Or you could move it into your userspace. Or you could go try to drink a gallon of milk in an hour. Your choices are myriad. pillow talk 01:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- (Arbitrary outdent) What do you want me to do about the UN:REQ listing for this article? Also, can we userfy what has been written so far? --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 04:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Let it stay. Shoot, if anons and new users are going to constantly edit this page, this is probably a better starting point than a blank slate. pillow talk 19:13, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. As per Hyperbole. Either keep this and ignore it, or just delete and CVP. For a concept like this, we could get a lot worse. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep It's Uncyclopedia folk law --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     08:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per everyone else plz don't ban me srz Le Cejak • <4:49, 31 Aug 2008>
|
| Delete |
- delete. deleted 8 or 9 times, the most recent version of this article isn't worth keeping around. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:34, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 18:42, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- D1337 Well of course the Orange Kitten is going to fight back...that's how you know it'll fuck you up real good!!! Chocolate Rain 18:59, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Huffable Page, non-huffable kitten Chairman of the Soviet Republicks (Keep Talking) 15:55, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete This is a lot worse than the article that was previously deleted at this title. --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 04:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Why the hell did Simsilikesims remove the ICU??? MrN 18:44, Aug 29
- It looked done to me. It even had an image. Then again, I'm not exactly the most experienced around here at humor. Simsilikesims 18:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Kept, but with an {{Expand}} tag -- The Zombiebaron 12:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Super Bowls
| Keep |
- Keep - this article actually does critique and satirize this show without just repeating its jokes. I think it's more suitable for {{rewrite}} than outright deletion. pillow talk 21:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Probably better than nothing. MrN 18:04, Aug 29\
- Keep Not sure why this is on VFD.... --Masterd
09:33, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete. - Probably my favorite comedy of all time. However this article does not work; its unfunny, vanity in parts and very poorly put together, mostly by IPs. I don’t think this can be saved and it's a poor topic to work from. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 14:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 15:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Badly, badly written piece on something that is awesome. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 16:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Kept, voting closed. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:29, Aug 31
|
| Keep |
- keep. As embarrassed as I am to say this, I giggled at the title and also at some of the article. I'd like to see this improved rather than deleted. pillow talk 18:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. - No comment. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 18:31, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- This is the worst article on Uncyclopedia. Also, this. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 18:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Leave it as it is. It's a terrible article, but it made me laugh due to its terribleness, which is rare. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 20:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Per Mr Monkey. Simsilikesims 22:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- delete. weird, listy. the self-proclaimed 'worst article on uncyclopedia.' SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:25, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- ABSTAIN I think it could be kept and used as an example as the worst article on uncyclopedia...but I wouldn't be too shattered if it got huffed. Chocolate Rain 19:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Kept -RAHB 07:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep. - Lets just delete all maths related topics — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- keep. --monika 15:54, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- keep. MrN 18:26, Aug 22
|
| Delete |
- delete. some of the randomest stuff i've ever seen. tasty, though. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- delete. ...this seems really random to me. Did I miss something, people who are voting Keep? --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Not so good. --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:29, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Namedroppy, seems random, none of it made me laugh. --UU - natter 11:07, Aug 26
|
| Comments |
- Beats me, but it looks like people are getting tired of all the math articles being put to the test. At this rate we're going to have a lopsided mathcruft-to-everythingelsecruft ratio. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 02:59, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- that's not cool. what does 'a lopsided mathcruft-to-everythingelsecruft ratio' even mean? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:39, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Survived QVFD. Not vanity. Simsilikesims 02:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Run3sc4p3
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Not terribly consistent in the humor. Tries to take both the angles of imaginary weapons (legos?!) and the idea of 30-somethings wasting their lives in their parents basement. Simsilikesims 19:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Metallurgica
SimShitty
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Maybe a section on Listcruft (or at least a reference to it) could be added to HTBFANJS by one of the admins. Simsilikesims 19:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Jagex
RuneScape 2
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete - Same reason Runescape was deleted and protected from recreation. It's full of useless clutter and sounds like something ED would say (and yes, this is my most common excuse to VFD things). Since Runescape is also protected from recreation, this should probably be as well. --AAA! (AAAA) 17:10, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:17, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Excessive bum-rape. pillow talk 17:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- D1337 All things runescape should be deleted on sight. Chocolate Rain 17:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeah, this does suck. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 17:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Hmm, umm... Ah, nothing links to it. Delete. MrN 18:12, Aug 29
|
| Comments |
- Comment - Runescape 2 should probably be protected from recreation as well, as it's red-linked and other silly absent-minded people might create it. --AAA! (AAAA) 17:24, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Yes men
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Comment: There is actually a movie coming out sometime this year called The Yes Man. It's not really that random of a concept, it's just very poor execution. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:32, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Rent-a-cop
Francium
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. - Another stubby offering, poor concept and it has had little done since early 2006, just crap — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:39, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:35, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Weak delete - I don't think there's anything wrong with the concept that Francium (a real element) has properties reminiscent to those of France itself. But this article isn't funny. pillow talk 16:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete: I like the concept, but I don't think you can make it much funnier than a small list. In the meantime, there's no point in keeping this. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:27, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN 18:08, Aug 29
|
| Comments |
|
France II
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. - Stubby pointless crap, little progress over time/ dire concept — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. I have a question. WHAT IS FUNNY ABOUT MENTIONING EIGHT TIMES THAT THE FRENCH SURRENDERED IN 1940? Hey, fun fact of the day - Compiègne, where the French surrendered to the Germans in 1940, was the same place that the Germans surrendered to the French in 1918. You know, we could do with fewer articles written by people whose comprehensive knowledge of world history comes from one line delivered by Groundskeeper Willie. </screed> pillow talk 17:06, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Hyperbole: Did you know the French surrendered in 1940? Isn't that fucking hilarious? I think it is. I'm gonna write a new UnNews, and it's going to be called French People Always Surrender. It's going to be so incredibly awesome. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN 18:05, Aug 29
|
| Comments |
- Oh wow...
16:56, 28 August 2008 TheLedBalloon (Talk | contribs | block) huffed "1st rule of warfare" (content was: 'France always loses unless they fight italy' (and the only contributor was '195.226.142.87')) (restore) - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:58, Aug 28
|
WWC
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- delete. incoherent wrestling-cruft. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 14:16, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Pro wrestling is a subject matter for which 97% of all articles will necessarily be bad. pillow talk 19:50, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- D1337 They will necessarily be unnecessarily bad. Chocolate Rain 01:59, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
X-Treme Ballage
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- delete. survived QVFD, but inescapably clear vanity, in my opinion. --Sreveehc Yrreg
- Delete. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:35, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm not sure if this is vanity, but it's definitely not worth keeping around. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:20, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm not sure if this is vanity, but it's definitely not worth keeping around. pillow talk 03:16, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN 12:19, Aug 28
|
| Comments |
|
Delete. — 
Cornish National Liberation Army
Mild Keep Needs work but the descriptions of the battles were mildly amusing}}--
Comment. - my page, not sure what to do with it. (Intentionally did not add {vfd} to article 
