Uncyclopedia:VFH/Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Trogdor the Burninator

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Trogdor the Burninator (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Trogdor the Burninator	Score: -9 Hilarious Reviews
Nominated by:	Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 19:17, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
For: 2	Self-Nom and ForI worked really hard(ish) on this review, and I think it needs to recognized. I think it meets the requirements for VFH, if no, do what you will. Great review. We've featured a category so I see reason we can't feature this. For . --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Also, official nom --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC) For. I don't know what I'm doing. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC) For. --Docile hippopotamus 00:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Against: 11	Budding monitors? --Nachlader-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 20:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Against. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)  Against.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC) against. we're not featuring your review. also, perhaps when reviewing you should focus more on helping the author than being funny. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC) No. Per Gerry. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:38, 15 Apr That is a really funny article. You know what someone ought to do, is nom it. I'd vote for it. ...or would I? pillow talk 21:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Against. Oddly enough, I found this review helpful and not all that funny. —Sir Guildensternenstein 23:18, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Okay. I regained control of my actions. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:56, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Bandwagon against per everybody else. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 00:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Mob Mentality Against. I've never seen negative double digits before.--    00:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Just to make this have the lowest health ever --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Can I see the Pee Review for this Pee Review?--    20:00, 15 April 2009 (UTC) It isn't necessary, cause I claim to have nominated it! Unless you just want one to add to the hilarity... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC) That's OK, I found the Pee Review here.--    20:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Everyone! Vote against! Let's get this to -1000% health!!! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH