Uncyclopedia:VFH/Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Trogdor the Burninator

Article: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Trogdor the Burninator	Score: -9 Hilarious Reviews
Nominated by:	Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 19:17, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
For: 2	Self-Nom and ForI worked really hard(ish) on this review, and I think it needs to recognized. I think it meets the requirements for VFH, if no, do what you will. ~~Great review. We've featured a category so I see reason we can't feature this. For . --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)~~ Also, official nom --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC) ~~For. I don't know what I'm doing. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)~~ For. --Docile hippopotamus 00:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Against: 11	Budding monitors? ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 20:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Against. TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 20:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Against.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC) against. we're not featuring your review. also, perhaps when reviewing you should focus more on helping the author than being funny. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC) No. Per Gerry. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:38, 15 Apr That is a really funny article. You know what someone ought to do, is nom it. I'd vote for it. ...or would I? pillow talk 21:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Against. Oddly enough, I found this review helpful and not all that funny. —Sir Guildensternenstein 23:18, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Okay. I regained control of my actions. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:56, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Bandwagon against per everybody else. Sir Groovester \| Contributions \| Talk Page 00:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Mob Mentality Against. I've never seen negative double digits before.-- 00:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Just to make this have the lowest health ever --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Can I see the Pee Review for this Pee Review?-- 20:00, 15 April 2009 (UTC) It isn't necessary, cause I claim to have nominated it! Unless you just want one to add to the hilarity... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC) That's OK, I found the Pee Review here.-- 20:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Everyone! Vote against! Let's get this to -1000% health!!! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:58, 16 April 2009 (UTC)