Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:You Are Reading This Headline; About To Click On It

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnNews:You Are Reading This Headline; About To Click On It (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnNews:You Are Reading This Headline; About To Click On It	Score: 16
Nominated by:	Æ 00:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
For: 19	NF - a QFA which I loved, brilliant self reference--Æ 00:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC) 4 - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:46, Jan 24 I doubt it'll make it, but still For. The podcast is great too. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 01:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC) For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC) For. Why dost thou doubt, oh ye Wehp? It's amazing! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 03:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC) This vote is in the "for" section, so you're assuming this must be a for vote. You await a witty comment, only to find that there is none. Unless, of course, you found the last comment slightly funny. You are going to read the article and vote on it if you haven't already, or perhaps you're just checking on the voting page again because you've got nothing better to do with your life. You're expecting a signature to appear. You are correct. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:38 Jan 24, 2008 For. Heh, really quite good. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC) For. I like it. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 11:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC) For. I admit it, I did laugh.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 21:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC) For How exciting - one of my old articles gets renominated. Maybe as a reward I'll write some new UnNews articles soon... --Composure1 22:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC) For - I seem to remember casting this vote before. However, I can't seem to find an archive. Hell, I'm not even sure how this got to be a QFA. I'm at a loss. -- The Zombiebaron 23:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC) For Very amusing. - UnIdiot | Talk? | Theme - 01:19, Jan 25 For. Only a link should go on the Main Page. --BurekSP 15:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC) For – Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Fenwick (talk • contribs) For - oldie and a goodie. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 12:49, 26 January 2008 (UTC) For I tire of bad nominations. But this isn't one.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)  Timeless. No matter what day it is, it is always accurate! Amazing! --Vana 21:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC) For - Get out of my head! --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 23:38, Jan. 26, 2008 For MrN 03:16, Jan 27
Against: 3	lols, but not as an FA --THINKER 20:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Against. I did, and did. My vote, however, was not predicted. Pity. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC) I tire of metahumor ever since I joined the Internet at the ripe old age of... what was it, nine? I dunno. Ж Kalir totally not Wario at all 17:18, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Comments	I dunno. Vague memories of the last time this was nominated. Plus, self-reference is so 2005. This is better than most, but the stigma is still there. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Comment. The title joke won't work if the first part of the article is copied onto the Main Page. Maybe we should just leave it as a link? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:07 Jan 24, 2008 Second Skullthumper's suggestion, for the same reason. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC) Honest to God, I thought you were Dr. Skullthumper going off his meds again, UU. They grayness of your signatures burns my corneas! Or is it corneae? Hmm....Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.