Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:Obama doodles random shit

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnNews:Obama doodles random shit (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnNews:Obama doodles random shit	Score: 12.5 space octopi
Nominated by:	T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 09:26, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
For: 15.5	Absolutely Flawless -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 09:26, June 28, 2010 (UTC)  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:33, 28 June 2010 The people's prez. --nldr 11:48, June 28, 2010 (UTC) For and  Forer An UnNews exclusive. Others were there but wouldn't report it. Censorship! Aleister 12:36 28 6 MMX  For. If you can't be proud of your own work, then why even bother existing. - kingkitty ~Fuck you~  For. It's funny because it's true. --EMC [TALK] 23:27 Jun 28 2010  For. what can i say? whoring works. Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 02:09, June 29, 2010 (UTC)  For. —Pelozurian (talk) 02:44, 29 June 2010 (UTC) SUPER 4 Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 02:54, June 29, 2010 (UTC) SUPER DUPER 4 - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 04:18, Tuesday 29 June 2010 - For. It made me jizz 99.31.156.114 06:34, June 29, 2010 (UTC) For. Funny. Plus Spike's comment on the talk page pissed me off. --UU - natter 10:27, Jun 29 For. --Black Flamingo 16:33, June 29, 2010 (UTC) SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 18:36, June 29, 2010 (UTC) For. It leaks depth and good style. Things would have been much different had this unnews never come. Skizzerz 04:56, June 30, 2010 (UTC) For. HAAAAA!!! Funnybony    19:29, Jun 30 19:29, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 3	Against. Plausible until penis joke. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:57, June 28, 2010 (UTC)  Meh. It has quite a few bad things about. Also, I dislike the entire concept. It might get a for if it gets rid of some of the bad stuff.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Monday, 09:36, June 28 2010 UTC Against. Not feeling this one, I think it's the ejaculation. ChiefjusticePS3 19:37, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. It would have been a For for sure, but then the President ejaculated on a bunch of reporters for no reason. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:43, June 28, 2010 (UTC) Huh, that was my favourite part. At least it was out of the blue. --nachlader 17:47, June 28, 2010 (UTC) I laughed again just reading these last two comments. Aleister 17:55 28 6 MMX In regards to everything, I do not intend to take out the masturbation. Without the masturbation, the article is just a hollow shell. The doodling is just part of Obama's breakdown. A breakdown that leads him to revert to his childish ways (drawing penises), and really wanting to sink deeper into his unhealthy habits of smoking (drawing animals smoking). It is an issue that when encountered by the press, a press that he does not like (his public disdain for Fox News supports this), his breakdown worsens, and he simply goes to his most primal. The cumshot onto the press is just him finally losing it. The cool, no drama Obama is destroyed. He no longer hides his vehemence towards the press. In this case he believes the press deserves a good cumshot to the face. There is also another layer as part of the press core. You see instead of the press asking the most important questions like the oil spill or the War in Afghanistan, they concentrate on trivial shit, like Obama's doodles. And while they question him on his doodles, they don't go for the obvious "why are you wasting your time, there's shit to do", instead they concentrate on the illogical doodles. Which is pointless since doodles rarely follow human logic. The article also contains a comment on Wikileaks. You see Wikileaks earlier this year said they were sitting on "history changing stuff". This is just me thinking that Wikileaks likes to hype shit up to such a degree, when it's so unnecessary. - kingkitty ~Fuck you~ A masterful description. People have to give most proven users the benefit of "knowing what they are doing". I "saw" most of this on the page itself, but missed the point about not asking the 'important questions'. Make my "for" that much "forer". Aleister 22:20 28 6 MMX Yes, I got all that indirect criticism of the press and Obama's obvious chagrin with them thing, and thought it was quite clever. Then the President whipped his dick out, which, in my opinion, detracted from the cleverness you had going on before. Guess it's just a manner of personal taste. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:35, June 29, 2010 (UTC) I knew whipping the dick out was going to be controversial. But I think it's quite necessary to the tone of the article. But c'est la vie. - kingkitty ~Fuck you~ You're right about that. Remember the last time a President whipped his dick out? —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:56, June 29, 2010 (UTC) Naw, Idiot W. Bush did much worse with his old dick. Aleister 4:28 29 6 I believe you're all mistaken as to who was the biggest, baddest Dick of them all. --nachlader 05:26, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.