Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:My testicle might have partially detached

Article: UnNews:My testicle might have partially detached	Score: 5
Nominated by:	Kip
For: 11	SN+F - I've been on a roll lately, so let me test my luck. (Pee Review.) -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 21:57, Mar. 7, 2011 For. Made me laugh so hard my t....never mind. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:59, March 7, 2011 (UTC) Advocacy TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 23:38, March 7, 2011 (UTC) For. ~ 12:37, March 8, 2011 (UTC) For. Balls!--Sog1970 12:41, March 8, 2011 (UTC) For. Why didn't the BBC cover this, or that Katy Couric woman? Aleister 19:14 8-3-'11 For. Bastards. -I have a talking zombie 12:15, March 9, 2011 (UTC) For. Doesn't appeal to me, but a lot of people out there enjoy toilet humour. If anyone who does happens upon it, they might be tempted to delve deeper into the site. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 13:26, March 9, 2011 (UTC) For The true depth of this piece is clearly above most of your heads, which is pretty pathetic considering that my testicle is now even lower than normal. You must all be midgets. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:57, March 9, 2011 (UTC) Funnier than any featured article. --Roman Dog Bird 09:45, March 10, 2011 (UTC) For. :) ShabiDOO 18:24, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 6	Naw. Amusing if you're into that sort of thing, but... eh. 1 2 3 4 ~ 01:02, 8 March 2011 I care much less about what is on the main page than what calls itself an UnNews, but Froggy's vote can only be read as a personal summons. So: No, a mundane first-person report of a masturbation regimen should not be featured. If it is, then that too is self-pleasuring. Spıke ¬ 14:18 8-Mar-11 As an experiment, I read this article, and then I removed my pants and observed my own testicles in the mirror. The degree of mirth I gained from each experience was similar. Thus, I conclude that this article is no funnier than simply removing my own pants, and I can do that essentially any time I please. pillow talk 21:34, March 8, 2011 (UTC) Against. Didn't see it as news story so don't see it as a feature either. *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 22:11, March 8, 2011 (UTC) Against. per above. Mn-z 03:24, March 9, 2011 (UTC) Against. I didn't find that this was front page material. It isn't bad- I am a n00b, so I wouldn't personally know. — Yipyapper (talk)** Yipyapper 05:17, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain It is funny, but it's primarily toilet humor, and not quite featurable in my opinion. Lyrithya shouldn't have nominated this on vfd though. Bad girl! --Scofield 11:11, March 8, 2011 (UTC) Abstain. Balls. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:21, 8 March 2011 But don't you see Spike? That just lends a whole new level of comedy to it! This article is self-aware without being completely obnoxious about it, like most "meta" articles. It's like that Poochie episode of the Simpsons (bad example). -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:05, March 8, 2011 (UTC)