From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Prime Directive
|
Score: 10.5 space-farers just eager to coexist
|
| Nominated by:
|
Spıke ¬ 03:55 2-Jul-12 03:55, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
|
For: 12.5
|
 Self-nom and For. The absurdities of the Star Trek non-interference mandate. Spıke ¬ 03:55 2-Jul-12- For. Funnybony
   14:43, Jul 2
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:25, 2 July 2012
- For. --
 Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:05, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
- For.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  00:21, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
- For.
 Mattsnow 07:38, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
- For. 98.221.158.104 04:13, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
- For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)
 11:29, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Very For. Sycamore (Talk) 10:07, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
- For. Uncyclopedia's Prime Directive is to make this article by Spike a feature.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:25, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
- For. User:Matthlock/sig2 20:18, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
- For. Works very well. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:53, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
- I like it well enough. The Woodburninator
 Minimal Effort ™ 21:54, July 14, 2012 (UTC)
|
Against: 2
|
 Nah. --QZEKЯOM    Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 22:09, July 6, 2012 (UTC) Boner. Nothing particularly wrong with it, but it's pretty low on funny to me. Perhaps more absurdity would work, seeing as we're talking about the absurdities of the whatever SPIKE said up there. -RAHB 04:45, July 12, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Ran it by Mattsnow; he gave me a passing grade for composition, but pleaded unfamiliarity with the TV series. Spıke ¬ 03:55 2-Jul-12
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Self-nom and For. The absurdities of the Star Trek non-interference mandate. 
Nah. --
