Uncyclopedia:VFH/Corpsearian

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Corpsearian (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Corpsearian	Score: 13 users who melt in Aleister's mouth
Nominated by:	Aleister
For: 13	SelfNom & SelfThumbsUp Gather around all ye corpsearians and non-corpsearians and gasp in horror at this article. There is much to be said for chewing on things, and a big chewey thank you for any vote plastered here. Aleister 17:02 7-9-'11  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:48, 8 September 2011  For. Loved it! Although I felt compelled to mew all over the floor. I understand and I wish to continue. . 12:37, September 9, 2011 (UTC)  For. This makes me happy I'm not a corpsearian. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 18:30 September 11, 2011 (UTC)  For. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 21:05, September 11, 2011 (UTC) For -- The Zombiebaron 10:53, September 15, 2011 (UTC) Pretty schizo, but unlike those pussy abstainers, I've got the testicles to cast an actual vote instead of just being a pussy... pussies. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:09, September 16, 2011 (UTC) Too lazy to review it. 1234 ~ 22:33, 19 September 2011 4 Mattsnow 04:14, September 20, 2011 (UTC) Weakish For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:35, October 5, 2011 (UTC) For. Interesting concept, I still like my T-bone steak though (Well done) Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 15:59, October 6, 2011 (UTC)  For.:--    17:32, October 7, 2011 (UTC) For. Why is this still here? -   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 21:16, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	Comment. I am finding the shock image a problem here Al. Can you consider changing it? RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:53, September 8, 2011 (UTC) Comment. Bro, scrapping under the barrel is worse than scrapping the bottom Funnybony    07:25, Sep 9 07:25, September 9, 2011 (UTC) Al, I am one not so good with grammar and spelling mystakes...but I did quite a few of them in your article. I am not sure that was intentional or not. I also find it a little hard to follow. You seem to be throwing a lot of concepts into each section (also something Im guilty of). Though I disagree with Romartus...I found the sock image the funniest part of the article. --ShabiDOO 16:34, September 9, 2011 (UTC) Just to be clear, about this "shock image" everyone is talking about: is it the one with the skeleton, or the one with the dude eating somebody's arm? I know it's probably the latter, but I just wanted to be sure. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 01:01 September 12, 2011 (UTC) When it can't be agreed upon which image is shocking, then neither image is the shock image. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:10, September 16, 2011 (UTC) Abstain. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:28, September 11, 2011 (UTC) I love it but I'm abstaining for now. I've left a comment on your talkpage Al, which explains further. --Black Flamingo 16:33, September 13, 2011 (UTC) Thanks for the comments! I didn't get a pee on this as yet, so these help. Shock image? To some of us any photo of meat eating is a shock image, we just have to get used to them. I'm assuming the shock image people are talking of is the first one, with the woman with bedroom eyes. Ummmmmmmm, bedroom eyes. Aleister 17:25 15-9-'11 *Abstain. I dreaded that day: the day I would not vote "for" an Aleister article. Mainly because with some work it could be a lot better, but it already is good. I sometimes got the sense the article is switching path on a dime, going in all directions which is confusing to the reader, and there are a couple "dry" passages as well. As always though, Aleister's prose is awesome. Sorry. Take revenge on my articles! :P Mattsnow 18:09, September 15, 2011 (UTC) I just reread it without beer glasses and it made me lol, so I change to for. Mattsnow 04:16, September 20, 2011 (UTC) That's fine and finest. I'm not on enough to polish these things like I used to, and I'll work on this one and another one or two I've got on the burner. This one was hurt by no pee review, and I may have jumped some guns. Ummmmmmmm, guns. Aleister 18:22 15-9-'11

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.