Uncyclopedia:VFH/Adolf Hilter

Article: Adolf Hilter	Score: 3.5 one-man invasions of Poland
Nominated by:	TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:20, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
For: 9.5	For. I liked this article lots back in the day, then forgot about it, then remembered it, and right now I'm renomming it. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:20, 25 June 2009 (UTC) I remember this. Good stuff. For. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 19:40, Jun 25 For. --iseditor.user ^Comments/_Criticism 20:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC) For. You forgot Poland. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC) For. I love it. 24.20.173.77 02:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC) For. I was half expecting more jew-german stereotypical ripoffs but to my pleasant surprise it was different :) Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 05:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC) Whoa. -- Roman Dog Bird 05:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC) For. So this guy... ISN'T Hitler? Le Cejak • <20:58 Jun 26, 2009> Wow. I was so expecting this to be shit. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:50, 26 Jun For. ^Dame 14:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Against: 6	Against. Per the theft of Monty Python jokes. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:16, 26 June 2009 (UTC) Against. The initial idea is good but the rest of the article is essentially a Not Hitler story where the writers simply say he didn't do this or that..ok..should have been shorter in that case as that is the basic premise here. Also uneasy about using photos from a real concentration camp...--*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate). 20:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC) Against.** Just because it's not awful doesn't mean it's feature worthy. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:01, Jun 27 Reluctant Against. funny at the start, but too long and repetitive to be featured. I wanted to vote abstain . But, I could see a casual reader reading all the way through this, expecting a strong ending, and winding up very disappointed. Mn-z 01:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Against. Starts out well, but is just too much of a one-trick pony. --UU - natter 13:17, Jun 29 Against Exactly what Mxz (dude, we need a better name for you.) said. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 15:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments	I prefer the one you get if you just type in "Hitler". This one just isn't as good. This article has just been ~~ruined~~ edited by ~~an idiot~~ a genius. abstain. i have no strong feelings one way or the other. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC) Commment. Has no one else seen the Mr. Hilter sketch? For shame. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:09, 27 June 2009 (UTC) Well yes, but apart from the spelling of the name, how else is this similar? --UU - natter 13:17, Jun 29 The whole concept is exactly the same, in that there's someone called "Mr. Hilter" who is clearly not "Adolf Hitler" and has nothing to do with "Adolf Hitler," even if they were born on the same day/looking at a map of Stalingrad at the dinner table. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 12:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC) Are we thinking of different sketches? Because in the Mr Hilter sketch I remember, the joke is that he is Hitler, hiding out in a crappy English guest house with a badly changed name with Mr Bimmler and so on. Jokes about not having much fun in Stalingrad, holding rallies in Minehead, standing for the National Bocialist Party and the like... Different concept, surely? --UU - natter 13:04, Jun 30