Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive166

The King of Town

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Random 2006 junk, nothing to redeem it, just stupid--Sycamore (Talk) 14:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. MrN 14:44, Dec 7 Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 18:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Delete - Ugh, no. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 18:31, 7 December 2008 (UTC) delete. Short 'n' shit. --UU - natter 10:48, Dec 8
Comments

:Image:Cdperfume.jpg

Keep	Strong Keep I've seen much, much worse. If this image is unused, it should be deleted by the admins (or whoever does the deletions of unused images.) I nominated an image recently which speedily kept that was ten times as obscene looking. (And in hindsight, it should have been kept.) This page if mainly for dealing with mainspace articles that nobody cares about.--Mnbvcxz 18:25, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Keep. I'm not fond of this image. But I can see how it would be funny to some, which is better than some of the shit on here. It's alright. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 01:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC) Compassionate Keep Cum Dumpster? Well, I'm saving this picture unless they keep this. It's funny. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN|IC Kill | 05:28, 8 December 2008 (UTC) Keep. Not a great pic, but that's not the point of pics. It's not repellent, and it's used, so it stays. --UU - natter 10:51, Dec 8 Glorious Keep I actually like this. --JasonBoer
Delete	Delete - Totally unfunny pic that probably took 5 minutes to make in Photoshop.--Uncreative Username 20:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Comment - I didn't nominate it because it was "too obscene" for Uncyclopedia. In fact, I have uploaded some of the most explicit images on this website. I nominated this image because it sucks.--Uncreative Username 20:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Being "unfunny" isn't a good reason to delete an image. The funniness of an image is mostly dependent on its context in an article, some of the best image/caption pairs have complete deadpan images. Getting rid of an image by a VFD vote won't improve the quality of the the wiki. If an image is that unfunny, you should orphanize it; that is, remove it from every article. If the image is on a userpage or somewhere else where you can't remove it, that means somebody cares about it; therefore, it shouldn't be deleted.--Mnbvcxz 21:46, 7 December 2008 (UTC) The image itself is the "joke", and no caption will make it any more funny.--Uncreative Username 00:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC) Kept. Invalid vote, no VFD template, too many for votes, nominator banned for a week and so on and so forth. ~ Mordillo where is my SHITSKIN? 16:21, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

One Piece (anime)

Keep
Delete	Delete. The only Japanese comic that I still give a crap about. And, yeah.....this sucks and stuff. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 03:05, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Delete - I didn't read the whole thing, but... yeah, it's one piece of shit, no doubt about that.--Uncreative Username 04:21, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. This article is going down. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN|IC Kill | 10:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. MrN 14:41, Dec 7
Comments

Harmony Korine

Keep
Delete	Delete - A worthless piece of garbage that would make even ED cringe with embarrassment. Ugly, nasty, vile, and totally unfunny. Images from the article should also be deleted. Once again, it's a dreadful attack page of the ED variety. HUFF, HUFF, HUFF!--Uncreative Username 22:25, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 05:42, 6 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. RabbiTechno 09:46, 6 December 2008 (UTC) Delete - I agree with Uncreative Username. Also, is that Colin Murray in the picture? -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 18:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments

J'adore de parler français

Keep
Delete	Delete. - A fairly hidious peice fo work, nothing redeeming it, little progress and suspected vanity.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:06, 5 December 2008 (UTC) D'leet., although it has more content than most. However, the content... let's not go there. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:32, Dec 5 Merde. RabbiTechno 16:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 18:48, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments

TISM

Keep
Delete	Delete. Stupid band article, not linked from anywhere, and not funny. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:29, Dec 5 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 18:22, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Listy, silly, shitty. RabbiTechno 18:28, 5 December 2008 (UTC) List list list list list list list list. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:19, Dec 7
Comments

Milksheikh

Keep
Delete	Delete. Unfunny IP stub from '05, not linked from anywhere, get rid. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:38, Dec 5 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. per above.--Mnbvcxz 18:19, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. No doubt it seemed a good idea at the time. RabbiTechno 18:31, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. MrN 20:39, Dec 5
Comments

Baba

Keep	Very Keep--Sycamore (Talk) 18:32, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Keep per above it looks like someone is working on.--Mnbvcxz 05:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Keepish. Eh. --UU - natter 09:27, Dec 5 Keep. Same reason as them up there. RabbiTechno 16:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Keep. MrN 20:47, Dec 5
Delete	Delete. Unfunny orphan. In Your Face 18:30, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Is someone working on this? If so, definite keep. If not, delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:29, Dec 5 Keept -RAHB 01:48, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Archimedes Plutonium

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Cool name, I don't know about this crap random stub.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:56, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 05:48, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Vanity? --UU - natter 09:26, Dec 5 D'leet. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:27, Dec 5 Delete but sell rights to the name to DC Comics who will make it into a new superhero. RabbiTechno 16:47, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments

sci.* hierarchy

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Lousy stub, nothing good here, and no improvment.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Unfunny sporkage. In Your Face 18:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. per above.--Mnbvcxz 05:41, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Short, pointless, just a little list. --UU - natter 09:23, Dec 5 List. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:26, Dec 5 Delete. Yawn. RabbiTechno 16:49, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments

AMSWWBUW

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Lousy 2005 article, random and no substantial improvemnt.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:52, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Delete Random crap. In Your Face 18:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 05:31, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Per Syc. --UU - natter 09:22, Dec 5 D'leet. Way too listy, as well. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:25, Dec 5 Delete. RabbiTechno 16:50, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Hashish

Keep	Keep. --Sycamore (Talk) 20:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Keep. Tis not the same thing as the more generic term 'Mary Jane'. /me pretends not to know too much about these things... MrN 20:50, Dec 2 I proudly display my marijuana knowledge Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 23:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC) on the bandwagon--Mnbvcxz 05:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Penis -RAHB 01:50, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Not the worst article out there, but has been around for a while without improving. We already have Marijuana which is far better. Suggest this is deleted and redirected to that? RabbiTechno 20:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Just isn't funny. --FlyingFool 22:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. We already have a featured article about this topic. I know there's a lot of drug names and types, but doesn't anyone else find this sort of redundant? --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:02, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Crap. --JasonBoer Delete Unfunny, crappy. In Your Face 18:09, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Nah. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:19, Dec 4
Comments	If you're going to adopt and improve it, Sycamore, I'll change my mind. RabbiTechno 20:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC) This looks like an alright stub to me - maybe a few of the voters are a little trigger happy...--Sycamore (Talk) 17:50, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Keept -RAHB 01:50, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Seal defenses

Keep	Keep it passed the giggle test, and its fairly consistent.--Mnbvcxz 05:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC) O RLY? In Your Face 06:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Keep I'm in a good mood. MrN 20:46, Dec 2 Eh. It's a little bit funny. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Weak Keep. Marginally funny, might be fertile ground for a funny image if anyone ever got round to making one. RabbiTechno 16:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Unfunny orphan, orphaned since 06. In Your Face 02:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Uh, what? --UU - natter 09:37, Dec 2 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC) D1337 Is unfunny. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 23:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC) D'leet. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:18, Dec 4
Comments	Keept -RAHB 01:47, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Sweet Cuppin' Cakes

Keep
Delete	Delete. It's very listy, it's not funny, it's not much else. --UU - natter 14:52, Dec 5 Sweet Cuppin' Cakes! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:34, Dec 5 Delete. RabbiTechno 16:37, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 18:24, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete MrN 20:45, Dec 5
Comments

Surtsey

Keep
Delete	Delete. Crap 2005 stub. No funny, no links to, no point, get rid. --UU - natter 14:49, Dec 5 Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:33, Dec 5 Delete. Fascinating place, rubbish article. RabbiTechno 16:38, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:51, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. per above.--Mnbvcxz 18:26, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Glaucoma

Keep
Delete	Delete. It's crap filled with memes. Fail. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 18:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 19:07, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Delete Full of memes, no actual laughs. In Your Face 20:04, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Memes. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:21, Dec 4 Delete. I managed to get as far as "eye beams" before the FFS reflex became unbearable. --UU - natter 09:19, Dec 5
Comments

Fargo (film)

Keep
Delete	Delete: Absolutely dreadful. Obviously written by someone who loves this film and is afraid to make fun of it. Littered with horrible grammar and embarrassing typos. Not even ED-worthy (since it doesn't have enough Goatse) and I can't imagine Wikipedia accepting it either. It doesn't really fit on any website, especially not Uncyclopedia.--Uncreative Username 01:11, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Throw it in the woodchipper Unfunny stub. In Your Face 05:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. per above.--Mnbvcxz 05:37, 4 December 2008 (UTC) D'leet • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:24, Dec 4 D1337|Shit for tits Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 19:31, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Charles Kovess

Keep	Keep. I think it could benefit from a rewrite, but it's not a total loss at this point. – Preceding unsigned comment added by JasonBoer (talk • contribs)
Delete	Delete. Unfunny, listy, random, and short (if you discount the lists). --UU - natter 10:33, Dec 3 D1337 Because of this (aka. Supreme Divine Guru Master of All in the World) Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 17:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:43, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Delete Hopeless, listy, random, unfunny, shrt. In Your Face 18:08, 3 December 2008 (UTC) D'leet • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:20, Dec 4
Comments	Abstain--Mnbvcxz 19:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Panini

Keep
Delete	Delete ASAP. Been sitting in Quick VFD for two days and nobody's touched it. Clearly a cut & paste from Wikipedia. In Your Face 20:12, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Cut and paste, you say? Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 20:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Kinda Big War

Keep
Delete	Delete. Random 2005 thingy. Unfunny, just a handful of edits, and just seems pointless. --UU - natter 10:43, Dec 3 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:42, 3 December 2008 (UTC) D1337 For the persistent misspelling of Ben Affleck. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 17:43, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. random historical nonsense.--Mnbvcxz 18:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Kill it with fire Not one iota of humor. In Your Face 18:08, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Rocket Power

Keep	Keep Notable subject matter. Its not that bad, and its definitely not beyond redemption.--Mnbvcxz 05:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Unfunny attack article, not linked from almost anywhere. In Your Face 02:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Well, I could see nothing I would like a reader of Uncyc to find. MrN 20:41, Dec 2 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Unfunny. --FlyingFool 23:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC) D1337 Unfunny article about a sub-par Nickelodeon cartoon. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 23:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC) GAY PEOPLE! Lololololololol! But seriously, now. This is terrible. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 23:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Rugrats

Keep
Delete	Delete. Unfunny crap, never been expanded, even lousy pics. In Your Face 02:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Sometimes, a blank canvas is preferable to what's there. A really bad page can put people off trying to improve it. This is just random rubbish. --UU - natter 09:36, Dec 2 D'leet as per UU. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:27, Dec 2 Delete. MrN 20:44, Dec 2 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. --FlyingFool 22:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. This deserves better, so clear the crap. Asahatter (annoy) 23:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC) D1337 Per MrN's tits' comments below. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 23:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Present This isn't even worth the weakest possible abstain; however, I believe every article about notable subject matter should be kept, in order to give the future re-writer ideas; however, I also am aware that I am about the only person that holds to that crackpot theory.--Mnbvcxz 05:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Crap articles stop people creating good ones sometimes. MrN 18:03, Dec 2

Marcon

Keep
Delete	Delete. Unfunny, has been a work in progress for 3 years with 0 improvement. In Your Face 06:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. What the fuck? --UU - natter 09:39, Dec 2 Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 14:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC) D'leet! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:27, Dec 2 Delete MrN 17:59, Dec 2
Comments

Cybermen

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Terrible, words fail me--Sycamore (Talk) 20:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Kill it with fire. In Your Face 02:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. per above.--Mnbvcxz 05:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Utter crap. Plus, could we also get shot of the image in the article (Image:Raperdave.jpg) as obvious vanity? --UU - natter 09:33, Dec 2 D'leet! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:27, Dec 2
Comments

Redneck Empire

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Lousy 2005 article, little progress, unfunny and random throughout--Sycamore (Talk) 19:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Absolutely unfunny, listy. In Your Face 02:14, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Needs more white space at random locations--Mnbvcxz 05:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Listy, pointless, crap. --UU - natter 09:30, Dec 2 Listy. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:27, Dec 2
Comments

UnBooks:Queer Times and Queer Adventures

Keep
Delete	Delete. gay and more random than a drunk retarded monkey with a typewriter.--Mnbvcxz 02:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Wow, that's random. My head is spinning from a quick read through. I need to lie down for a second. --UU - natter 15:47, Dec 1 Delete. Unfunny. In Your Face 02:15, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Way too random. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:27, Dec 2 Delete and definitely import to ?pedia. —talk 18:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Nicktoons

Keep
Delete	Delete. Crappy attack article, reads more like a bad ED article. In Your Face 03:14, 30 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Random, listy, unfunny, hitler, porno, oh dear oh dear... --UU - natter 15:44, Dec 1 D'leet!! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:27, Dec 2 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Delete MrN 18:04, Dec 2
Comments	Abstain its bad, and it looks listy and attack-filled with more than a hint of random. However, it just doesn't look quite delete worthy for some reason.--Mnbvcxz 21:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

The Presidential Battle Royale of 1975

Keep
Delete	Delete. historical nonsense.--Mnbvcxz 17:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Boring. In Your Face 03:04, 30 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. I... Uhh... What? --UU - natter 15:49, Dec 1 Delete. The title is the best part about it. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:27, Dec 2 Delete MrN 18:00, Dec 2
Comments

UnScripts:Horror on a Field

Keep
Delete	Delete. Random thing that Gert started a while ago and seems to have forgotten about. If he still wants it, maybe a copy in userspace would be a better option? --UU - natter 14:07, Nov 28 Per above--Mnbvcxz 03:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:37, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Not funny at all In Your Face 02:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Get rid. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:27, Dec 2
Comments

UnScripts:The Fat Guy on the Roof

Keep	Weak Keep sorta funny, in a profane, rambling sort of way.--Mnbvcxz 13:47, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. What. The. Fuck? --UU - natter 13:35, Nov 28 Delete Profane and rambling is much less than funny. In Your Face 01:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - HTBFANJS--Sycamore (Talk) 09:39, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. MrN 02:29, Dec 2 D'leet. Way too profane for my taste. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:27, Dec 2
Comments

Vyse

Keep	Keep article isn't that bad, it makes sense, and has notable subject matter.--Mnbvcxz 13:45, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Short, listy, unfunny gamecruft that was created in May '07 and hasn't really been touched since. Not linked from anywhere, not going to get much better. --UU - natter 12:47, Nov 28 Delete I saw nothing. MrN 21:38, Nov 28 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:41, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Unfunny list, never heard of the game. In Your Face 03:08, 30 November 2008 (UTC) D'leet. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:27, Dec 2
Comments

Windows Compton

Keep
Delete	Delete (as nominator). This article is not of sufficient quality to be worth including in {{windows}}, or anywhere on Uncyc for that matter. It is functionally orphaned (the only links to it are a redirect created by a move as well as this VFD page). --Pentium5dot1|t~^_^~c 03:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. per above.--Mnbvcxz 03:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Short, poor concept, no laughs. --UU - natter 15:48, Dec 1 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Unfunny. In Your Face 02:14, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Line Rider

Keep
Delete	Delete. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Delete - per above.--Mnbvcxz 02:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. Fairly lengthy, but it's filled with nothing - it's one step from a list, basically, and an unfunny list at that. --UU - natter 15:46, Dec 1 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Salad Days

Keep
Delete	Delete. Somewhere in a parallel universe, this is a good article. Asahatter (annoy) 22:16, 30 November 2008 (UTC) Delete It was already on my VFD list.--Mnbvcxz 01:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Delete. A limp stick of celery of an article. --UU - natter 15:45, Dec 1 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments

∩niverse

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Lousy 2005 stuff. Random and poor throughout--Sycamore (Talk) 09:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 14:22, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Unfunny. In Your Face 03:05, 30 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. No worthwhile ideas, no funny. --UU - natter 15:42, Dec 1
Comments

ROFLism

Keep
Delete	Delete. Random 2006 thingy that's had little love since, and is, once again, not linked from anywhere. Makes no sense and won't be missed. --UU - natter 19:04, Nov 28 Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 04:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:37, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Unfunny in every way. In Your Face 03:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Ronny Jhutti

Keep
Delete	Delete. I was going to remove the serious text added by someone who seems to be a fan of Ronny, but then I looked at the rest and wondered why I should bother. There's a couple of lists, and a line or two. I don't see anything worth expanding here either. Am I in a bad mood today or something? --UU - natter 19:15, Nov 28 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:37, 29 November 2008 (UTC) The only thing about this article that amused me was that attempt to salvage Mr. Jhutti's credibility. Also, if this guy's so notable, why haven't I heard of him? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:29, Nov 29 Delete -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Weakest Possible Abstain As per my crackpot theory about never deleting any article about notable(-ish) subject matter.--Mnbvcxz 04:05, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Ed Gein

Keep	Weak Keep looks fairly popular, notable subject matter, has some humor. Looks like a purge or rewrite.--Mnbvcxz 02:30, 28 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. It needs a trimming, and it's not great, but I don't think it's complete crap. It may have sat in rewrite for ages, but that's what it deserves more than deletion. --UU - natter 12:57, Nov 28 Meh. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 18:05, 28 November 2008 (UTC) KEEP! Guys. Just because something needs more work is not a reason to delete it. We only delete if there is nothing there worth saving. This has something so lets not go deleting stuff like this... MrN 21:36, Nov 28
Delete	Delete. - Lousy Crime Biography, has sat in re write for years, with little progress.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Not quite good enough.--Count of Monkey Crisco 05:27, 28 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. since no one wants to bother cleaning it up. In Your Face 05:34, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Too close to call. Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:15, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

That Movie

Keep
Delete	Delete. Delete and redirect to That one movie‎, which I've merged all the decent content from this one into. --UU - natter 14:35, Nov 28 Delete and redirect. That one movie is better. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  15:16, 28 November 2008 (UTC) Delete, but a couple of the parts merged into that one movie don't quite fit because of the switch from first to second person. I'll take a look, but you might wanna check through for the things I'll inevitably miss. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:26, Nov 28 Delete MrN 21:39, Nov 28 Delete per above.--Mnbvcxz 03:56, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Redirected to That one movie‎. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:06, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

GG

Keep	Keep It a great idea and I already love the pictures on the page. We can improve the article by Deorphaning it an]d doing some more expansion on funny GG moments like the ones there. Also you should make Good Game Redirect there or vice versa. Anyway I Played a Fisher Price game with 4.252.99.182 and I told him GG and he told me go eat shit fuckers. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 08:08, 26 November 2008 (UTC) Keep What? It's worthy of an article, and this is a good, game start to such. You abstainers get of the fence and vote dammit! MrN 01:43, Nov 27 Keep. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 18:03, 28 November 2008 (UTC) Keep.-Alexander the Great 07:54, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Random, short, not funny, somehow survived since 2006, probably because it's not linked from anywhere. --UU - natter 21:59, Nov 23 D'leet • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:49, Nov 24 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. I don't get the joke for one, and it's just plain pointless and orphaned. In Your Face 04:17, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Strong Abstain for reasons other than my crackpot theory about NEVER EVER deleting notable material It doesn't look that bad for the topic, I'd suggest a rewrite. However, I don't like it enough to say keep.--Mnbvcxz 01:12, 24 November 2008 (UTC) I'm on the fence It could use some help from more seasoned Uncyclopedians, and I love the pictures. But in this form, it's not good enough. --JasonBoer Abstain|useless I like teh imagez. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 04:20, 26 November 2008 (UTC) No, really... People need to take another look at this. Look at the articles which are linked... I cleaned it up a tiny bit, but it really did make me laugh. It's actually not a bad article at all. Surely there is worse than this around? Agreed, it needs work, but so does my garage roof. I'm not going to delete that as I would get wet. No I don't live in the garage. Honest. MrN 23:54, Nov 27 No clear winner. Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:08, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Bad Wolf

Keep
Delete	Delete On a scale from 1 to 10 this is total shit. --Count of Monkey Crisco 05:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Repetition is only funny on AAAAAAA!, Developers!, HeadOn, HeadOn and HeadOn. In Your Face 05:33, 28 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. AAAAAAA! clone. --UU - natter 12:58, Nov 28 Dr. Who. I assume some of you Brits got the reference. Userspace this. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 18:06, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Probable Userspace It looks like the author is still active.--Mnbvcxz 13:40, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Jason E. Hamlin

Keep
Delete	Delete. Unfunny 2006 crap from the same asshat that made Samuel Hardy‎ which is also up for deletion. In Your Face 05:12, 27 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--MrN 20:13, Nov 27 Delete. per above sans author bashing.--Mnbvcxz 02:23, 28 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Not funny, reads like a spork. --UU - natter 12:49, Nov 28
Comments	Easy on the piss taking In Your Face. Let's keep this about the article, not the author. MrN 20:15, Nov 27 My bad. In Your Face 05:32, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Template:Pie-stub

Keep
Delete	Delete. Not funny, red linked, used only on one page. In Your Face 23:10, 26 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. per above.--Mnbvcxz 01:11, 27 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC) Delete OK then. MrN 23:56, Nov 27 Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 12:48, Nov 28
Comments