DO...

For nominators: DO...

... Find articles that suck by checking here, here and here. Many articles avoid the police for years before someone trips over them.
... Read Uncyclopedia's deletion policy to make sure the article is eligible. If you abuse VFD you will be abused with the claw-end of a hammer.
... Check the page-history! It may have been vandalized or just edited by morons. If so, find a better version and revert to it.
... Add {{vfd}} to the article. Failure to do so may result in hemorrhoids. You have been warned.
... Vote and include a comment as to why you have nominated the article.

For voters: DO...

... Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
... Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), adding your sig/comment, preceded by a '#', like so: '''#'''This article isn't funny. ~~~~
... Remember to sign and timestamp your vote with four tildes. Unsigned votes will be removed and their owners defenestrated. You have been warned, again.

For Administrators: DO...

... Allow 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
... Remove and archive closed nominations from the voting page.
... Delete any unused images from deleted articles. If necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Delete any broken redirects left behind.
... Add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page if it is kept.

DON'T...

... Revert administrators.
... Re-nominate any kept article for at least a month. If you do, you will receive a bollocking.
... Remove ANYTHING from VFD if you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith. If you do, you will be banned for a very long time.
... Increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20. Violators will receive a free 1-day ban. This means, do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes look like this (after the page's deletion), and closed nominations look like THIS to indicate that they have been kept.

Pages for Deletion

New entries will be at the bottom of this page.

Template:Daniel Brandt and all most subpages

Score: -1 Elapsed Time: 928 hours
Keep (2)	Keep. That's an awful lot of articles that aren't even that bad. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:05, 7 April 2025 (UTC) Keep. it seems these articles have historical significance within this wiki, so deleting them seem a rather stupid move for me. they migth not be the best quality, but they definitely should be ketp as historical reliques. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 13:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC) Keep.. We need more articles written in Norwegian. Herostratus (talk) 06:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. To be honest, according to my research, this person is only known due to being a pest who doxxed some people on Wikipedia and some other wikis in 2006. Additionally, most, if not all, of the jokes throughout the articles either fall horribly flat or are just terribly outdated. Note: The Daniel Brandt article on Wikipedia is NOT related to this one. Just wanted to note that. Norb (talk) 17:51, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 2 Elapsed Time: 698 hours
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2)	Delete. Cruft from 2007. Norb (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC) Delete. 20:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 0 Elapsed Time: 498 hours
Keep (1)	Keep. Not good, but not bad enough for me Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 21:03, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Nom. Useless 2012cruft – Preceding signed comment added by Squaw Dee (owns uncyclopedia • talk • contribs)
Comments

Score: 1 Elapsed Time: 119 hours
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Delete. WTF is this article supposed to be? Norb (talk) 17:52, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 1 Elapsed Time: 63 hours
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	EXTERMINATE! how hasn't this been QVFD'd earlier? not only is it about an unknown game, it's completely unfunny and incoherent. maybe I should just delete it without nominating first, but I prefer democracy. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 01:38, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments