User talk:Zombiebaron/archive16
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User talk:Zombiebaron. |
What are you doing?
You're removing VFH nominations unnecessarily, that's what. Only remove noms when the health is negative or there's over 20 nominations, please.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:42, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- I guess you've never read "The Little Red Book of Zombiebaron". If you had, you'd know that "Zombiebaron zombiebaron zombiebaron zombiebaron; zombiebaron zombiebaron!" -- The Zombiebaron 20:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh no, I've read every little book of Zombiebaron. Including the erotica. As I've said before: "Unholy union, Batman!" Now where's STM?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- God, I love it when you make refrences that the two of can only possibly get in the full view of everyone else. -- The Zombiebaron 20:59, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with Ljlego here. Try not to remove anything from VFH when it's dangerously sparse as it is now, unless it's got terribly low health (read: less than 10%). --
- Also, why do you delete the ones that fail? What's the purpose of having Uncyclopedia:VFH/Failed then? Or archiving anything? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:48 Nov 17, 2007
- I have no idea what your talking about. -- The Zombiebaron 15:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
23:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- Also, why do you delete the ones that fail? What's the purpose of having Uncyclopedia:VFH/Failed then? Or archiving anything? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:48 Nov 17, 2007
- Oh no, I've read every little book of Zombiebaron. Including the erotica. As I've said before: "Unholy union, Batman!" Now where's STM?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
I would put a big ugly thank you template on your page, but...
Your talk page has an intimidating absence of big ugly thank you templates. So I'll just thank you for voting on Society for the Intervention and Rehabilitation of Supervillains and scurry off before your talk page starts having more intimidating absences of things. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 03:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- God I hate those templates. -- The Zombiebaron 19:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
OH DEAR GOD YOU'RE DELETING UNNEWSAUDIOS
Yes, You're deleting UnNews Audio files... now, how much do you value your testicles? -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 16:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Only the ones which are not linked to by articles... -- The Zombiebaron 16:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Oops, you fucked it all up!!! not really.
now, I'm no sysop, but you're only supposed to remove one article from VFH per day for lowest health, I believe. Am I wrong? • <-> Nov 16, 15:57
- Yah, you're probably wrong. -- The Zombiebaron 15:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- WHEN WILL I BE RIGHT, ZB? WHEN WHEN WHEN??? • <-> Nov 16, 16:00
- Ummm...when carrots taste like cake. -- The Zombiebaron 16:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- WHEN WILL I BE RIGHT, ZB? WHEN WHEN WHEN??? • <-> Nov 16, 16:00
Maybe you were thinking "under 50% fails"? Only one article per day, I'm pretty damn sure, can be failed unless it's rm -3... right or wrong? ...wrong? are you sure? Did you... did you look it up? ...you didn't? ...okay. • <-> Nov 16, 16:04
- Just fucking renom your article. Douchebag. -- The Zombiebaron 16:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Whoa, whoa calm down. I don't care about that: it was on the chopping block for today anyway... jeeesus... • <-> Nov 16, 16:07
- Ah, it makes me smile when people back peddal like that. Keep it up. Also, since you asked, all three of those articles failed under "The Zombiebaron Rule". -- The Zombiebaron 16:09, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Do I fail under "The Zombiebaron Rule"? Cuz I can back peddal even more if you want! • <-> Nov 16, 16:10
- Yes. No. -- The Zombiebaron 16:11, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Do I fail under "The Zombiebaron Rule"? Cuz I can back peddal even more if you want! • <-> Nov 16, 16:10
- Ah, it makes me smile when people back peddal like that. Keep it up. Also, since you asked, all three of those articles failed under "The Zombiebaron Rule". -- The Zombiebaron 16:09, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Whoa, whoa calm down. I don't care about that: it was on the chopping block for today anyway... jeeesus... • <-> Nov 16, 16:07
What the deuce?
09:23, November 15, 2007 Zombiebaron (Talk | contribs) m (Reverted edit(s) of Andorin Kato (talk) to last version by MrMetalFLower)
You took off about a dozen articles. What's up? --Andorin Kato 16:30, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oops. Just ment to take off the last of those, because I deleted it before you added it. Feel free to readd them. -- The Zombiebaron 18:19, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Just in case you don't know...
We have a new Fisher Price. And I'm writing the follow-up. --Andorin Kato 03:58, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Has it been nominated on VFH yet? -- The Zombiebaron 03:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Codeine wants to "pull an rc." --Andorin Kato 04:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, as you may remember, Euroipods was nominated for VFH. -- The Zombiebaron 04:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Codeine wants to "pull an rc." --Andorin Kato 04:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
YAY!
- (Block log); 19:15 . . Zombiebaron (Talk | contribs) (blocked User:Zana Dark with an expiry time of infinite: Several things, including, but not limited to, being a dick. [DO NOT UNBAN])
I wuv u. --Andorin Kato 02:18, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- You gonna wuv me everytime I ban a vandal now? -- The Zombiebaron 02:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- *A-hem* ;) - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:57, Nov 13
- No LBJ. The words are "I wuv Zb too". -- The Zombiebaron 07:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- *A-hem* ;) - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:57, Nov 13
Thanks
I'm tired of you too. laters =( ~Formerly Annoying Crap 23:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- So, you want to get into my pants, then?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Why yes! That is, if that's an invitation... And of course, if my Mr. Mister ZB doesn't mind sharing me. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 02:14, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- *cough* Oh, what's this then? A shiny penny! Hot damn, I'm rich! -- The Zombiebaron 15:36, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Why yes! That is, if that's an invitation... And of course, if my Mr. Mister ZB doesn't mind sharing me. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 02:14, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
I have a dime for you ZB, whenever you tire of pennies... ~Formerly Annoying Crap 17:58, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Is that a tried and true "veiled" refrence to drugs, Miss? -- The Zombiebaron 01:56, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- No, I think she was REEFERring to herself, and you're quite the collossal idiot for banning her. Bluemaven 02:59, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- And you. -- The Zombiebaron 03:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- No, I think she was REEFERring to herself, and you're quite the collossal idiot for banning her. Bluemaven 02:59, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
HEY, BUDDY!
Can you pop into IRC for a moment? We have an issue that needs some attention from someone as dignified as yourself. --Andorin Kato 05:02, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well in hand. -- The Zombiebaron 07:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Gee, you reply to everything, don't you? --Andorin Kato 07:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, why not? -- The Zombiebaron 17:06, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Gee, you reply to everything, don't you? --Andorin Kato 07:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Oh Noes Huffed
Just wanted to ask to recreate Copy & Paste. that masterpiece was a work in progress, and i forgot to add construction.--TimJohN 03:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Nvm, some good soul moved it to my userpage--TimJohN 03:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- I only huffed the redirect, my good man. -- The Zombiebaron 14:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Eh?!?
Why did you huff Template:QVFD unchecked? It was a useful template, to ensure that QVFD actually got checked. I had to list about ten articles on ICU with {{User:Administrator/CustICU|~~~~~|sub=QVFD}} because it wasn't checked. It may not get used too much, but it will probably still be used. So please unhuff it. --SPY 22:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- No, I will not. And here's why: some admins do check QVFD, and those of us who do, often see the {{qvfd checked}}, and then read up from there. There is no purpose at all for having a template that looks the same (when read quick enough), but means the exact opposite. Basically, what I'm saying is that it was a worthless template. Also, please never tag articles with any of those terrible "CustICU"s. Have a nice day, -- The Zombiebaron 23:20, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, if you checked the revision history, you'd notice that I made it look different at one point, but it was consequentially ugly. Also, I LIKE my CustICUs. They can be a lot more helpful than the regular ones. (Not that they ever get the chance...meh.) --SPY 23:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- I don't care what you did at one point. It was a worthless template. As are your "CustICU"s. Seriously. -- The Zombiebaron 00:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- You're probably right. (Well, no, you're not, but you have more power and influence than me so I'd better back down.) Still, Zim would get mad at me if I didn't preserve the UnNews one in some form, so is it all right if I move that to the regular ICU template? --SPY 03:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Try creating a Village Dump entry, because I'm sure if it were up to me, I'd just say no, in huge, bold, red letters. -- The Zombiebaron 14:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- You're probably right. (Well, no, you're not, but you have more power and influence than me so I'd better back down.) Still, Zim would get mad at me if I didn't preserve the UnNews one in some form, so is it all right if I move that to the regular ICU template? --SPY 03:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- I don't care what you did at one point. It was a worthless template. As are your "CustICU"s. Seriously. -- The Zombiebaron 00:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, if you checked the revision history, you'd notice that I made it look different at one point, but it was consequentially ugly. Also, I LIKE my CustICUs. They can be a lot more helpful than the regular ones. (Not that they ever get the chance...meh.) --SPY 23:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
My Image
Chili_Powder.jpg Please DO NOT huff this image. Thanks. -Razorflame 15:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Excuse me? -- The Zombiebaron 16:17, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Not that i'm in a huff or anything but
Ok i'm new to wiki's so let me off if i'm beign an ass, but I was wondering why you huffed Project Manager? User:MrN9000 12:38 GMT. It would appear that you also huffed 10 others all within 1 a minute period. Presumably you can read and critically appraise an entire article in less than 6 seconds?
- It was huffed due to an expired {{ICU}} tag, to answer you're first question. And, I can "critically appraise an entire article in less than 6 seconds" when its only three lines (and two sentences) long. However, if you would like the page back, I can recreate it at User:MrN9000/Project manager, where you can spend as much or as little time as you want making it a good article. -- The Zombiebaron 14:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your speedy reply. I would be grateful if you would recreate Project manager as I did not save a copy. I agree that it's rather lame and shorter than it should be, so I will attempt to improve this. I was not aware that there was a minumum size that an article had to reach to avoid being huffed, but as I said i'm new to this. Im afraid that I also don't know what an "expired ICU" tag is but will try to find out. Thanks in advance User:MrN9000 16:10 8 November 2007 (GMT).
- Here is your page. While it remains there, it will not be huffed by any fully-functioning admin. Also, there is no "minimum size", per se, but, in practice, we/I prefer to see longer articles, due to the fact that the origninal author is ussually the person who lays the groundwork for everyone who edits the page after. You cannot rely on the community to flesh-out your articles. Also, {{ICU}} is a template that is used to delete articles (that meet a set of guidelines), and it "expires" 7 days after the last edit to the page. -- The Zombiebaron 16:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, I only created the article yesterday, so am not sure what happened re the "expired ICU", but hea tis not a problem now. Anyway, I think my project manager is about to come into the room, so I better look like im doing something work related... User:MrN9000 17:55 8 November 2007 (GMT).
- Here is your page. While it remains there, it will not be huffed by any fully-functioning admin. Also, there is no "minimum size", per se, but, in practice, we/I prefer to see longer articles, due to the fact that the origninal author is ussually the person who lays the groundwork for everyone who edits the page after. You cannot rely on the community to flesh-out your articles. Also, {{ICU}} is a template that is used to delete articles (that meet a set of guidelines), and it "expires" 7 days after the last edit to the page. -- The Zombiebaron 16:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your speedy reply. I would be grateful if you would recreate Project manager as I did not save a copy. I agree that it's rather lame and shorter than it should be, so I will attempt to improve this. I was not aware that there was a minumum size that an article had to reach to avoid being huffed, but as I said i'm new to this. Im afraid that I also don't know what an "expired ICU" tag is but will try to find out. Thanks in advance User:MrN9000 16:10 8 November 2007 (GMT).
Untitled Document
Why did you huff Retroactive legal syndrome? Rickyrab 04:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Probably because you didn't read HTBFANJS. -- The Zombiebaron 04:05, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Would you mind taking a look at Forum:QFVD employed too quickly on article? I Village Dumped the issue surrounding my article because I believe it has the potential to be "funny and not just stupid". Rickyrab 04:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- I see that Flyingfeline seems to have come up with a solution that you will enjoy. -- The Zombiebaron 14:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Teh award
--Andorin Kato 04:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- Its wonderful how you could have copied Capercorn's, but didn't. Lazy bastard, thank you. -- The Zombiebaron 04:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
AWARD
The Capercorn Award |
--Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 23:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Umm...I don't know if you understand...but...I was acctaully making Tommy's sig better...y'know? It wasn't "vandalism". It was a superfunnyandcool joke. -- The Zombiebaron 00:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Uhh...
Yeah... I've got nothing... This spamming thing is hard, you know? --Mr. Alberto "Letters" ℜwg ☃ FU ☃ 22:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- "YOU DABLATED MA PAGE. GO MAKE IT BACK. I HAS OLDER BROTHER WHUT WILL KICK YAR A$$." That took me 10 seconds. You lazy bastard. :P -- The Zombiebaron 22:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you, Captain Obvious! I AM lazy :P --Mr. Alberto "Letters" ℜwg ☃ FU ☃ 22:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Is this the part where I shake your hand and send you on your way? -- The Zombiebaron 22:30, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you, Captain Obvious! I AM lazy :P --Mr. Alberto "Letters" ℜwg ☃ FU ☃ 22:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Whoosh!
Faster than a speeding Zombie! Time between ban patrol nom and ban: very little. For quick work (or just passing through at the right time) I give you this:
It's not much, but I kind of like it. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh boy. I love "Give Zombiebaron Ninjastars" week. But seriously, thanks. :) -- The Zombiebaron 21:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
And You
And you, you humourless fool. SmackBot Again 22:47, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yah. I tottaly missed the humour behind sockpuppetry. -- The Zombiebaron 22:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
You sir, are a ninja!
- Yar, thanks matey. -- The Zombiebaron 22:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Wait... you're a pirate, too??? :O The universe is about to implode! Actually, it might not, but you never know. Well, no point in doing homework now. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:29, Nov 4
- A zombie ninja pirate jew? Its the way of the future. -- The Zombiebaron 22:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Wait... you're a pirate, too??? :O The universe is about to implode! Actually, it might not, but you never know. Well, no point in doing homework now. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:29, Nov 4
Your Reanimated Royalness, Reciever of Flowery Kissassery
I was wondering when I would receive highlight on the front page as part of winning NotM. Seeing as how you won WotM, it's a bit curious that the changes to the front page haven't been made yet. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 07:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- I completely forgot about that. I'll get right on that...thanks for giving me something to do... -- The Zombiebaron 21:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Juan Rovere
hey im new at da page n i was making a bobby lashley page n before i finished it u deleted it, could u explain y?
- Stay in school. -- The Zombiebaron 23:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Sweet!
- "Dirty"...what an...apt description... -- The Zombiebaron 22:14, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Has Template:Fundraiser been added to the notice yet?
“It was, but zombiebaron removed it without giving a reason I saw anywhere. Maybe you should ask him.”
--L 03:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- That thing annoys me whenever I visit Wikipedia. Alot. I couldn't bring myself to stand by while we were inflicting that on the good(er) people who visit Uncyclopedia. -- The Zombiebaron 20:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Mr Baron, Sir (redux)
I see you have seen that I renommed that Skywalker image you did. I particluarly liked the part where my caption ruled. What do you think?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Are you whoring my own images to me on my talkpage? -- The Zombiebaron 22:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Mr Baron, Sir
Irakattack (or however he spells it today) would dearly like to plead his case on irc, should you have the time to spare. RabbiTechno 19:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- I can't come on at the moment. I don't believe, however, that there is anyway that I'm going to unban his current account. -- The Zombiebaron 19:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Totally up to you, my friend. I'll pass on the message. :) RabbiTechno 19:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- If he'd like to talk with me via IRC, tell him that I can be on (probably) around 6pm EDT. -- The Zombiebaron 19:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Message passed on. RabbiTechno 19:18, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- If he'd like to talk with me via IRC, tell him that I can be on (probably) around 6pm EDT. -- The Zombiebaron 19:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Totally up to you, my friend. I'll pass on the message. :) RabbiTechno 19:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Feature queue
I know this is nitpicky, but in the Feature queue, I've noticed that the slot containing American (species) doesn't show the "lead" picture in the article (check the article and you'll see what I mean). Will this be corrected when it appears on the main page, or will it stay that way? I'm asking because I really want the displayed image to be the "patriotic iguana" one.
I don't know if this is your thing, but I really want it fixed before 12:00 (UTC) rolls around, and I saw that you were actively editing.
P.S. I going out, and won't be back before 12:00. So I won't really be able to respond. Apologies for inconveniencing you, --Acolyte MUN RA My cat is better than Benson harass stalk 17:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- I can understand how you would want your image on the Main Page, but, quite frankly, its pretty terrible and doesn't sum up the article quite as much as the current image. On a side note, your signature needs to be fixed. Try creating a page called User:Radioactive afikomen/sigfix that contains {{:User:Radioactive afikomen/sig}}, and then set it as your rawsignature in the prefrences. -- The Zombiebaron 17:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
So
It looks like we're skipping my article for the front page, or how's that supposed to go? Is it getting bumped up in the feature queue? --EMC [TALK] 19:34, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes? -- The Zombiebaron 15:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Logo changing as per IRC
I *think* it was you that was the guy who was going to change the logo on MS Paint. Anyway, I fixed it. Here ya go. --SPY 12:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, twas me. And I hath done the deed. -- The Zombiebaron 13:20, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- WOOOOOOOO!!! LOOK AT THE LOGO!!! --SPY 15:56, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Nobody cares
You deleted it. I'd ask you to unhuff it, but I don't really care. --EMC [TALK] 13:45, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oh wow. Not sure how that happened. Thanks for pointing it out :) -- The Zombiebaron 13:47, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- "Don't forget mee!" --AAA! (AAAA) 05:17, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Oh noes!
08:10, 25 October 2007 Zombiebaron (Talk | contribs) huffed "Image:Macpipe.png" (Homeless Image Housing Act of 1987.)
Small problem...it's not an orphan. It's used on my wildly popular and entirely pointless template,
Can you dehuff it? Think about the children. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:33, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- In future, {{notorphan}} is the way to save images linked by html from my mad rampage. -- The Zombiebaron 14:03, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Will do. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC)