User talk:Tagstit/Archive2

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.

DO NOT EDIT

RAPE

Initiation complete. Welcome to the Matrix. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Woot! This page seems so pure now...~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 04:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Not how it looks from my end, but whatever floats your boat.

Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:57, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Wood floats my boat my friend....wood. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 05:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

/me puts my wood inside Tag. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~

12:39 17 February 2009

...WOW what the!...damnit Orian.../me sighs ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 15:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

/me sighs of relief -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

/Me sighs after a nice orgasm. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~

15:51 17 February 2009

/me sighs after watching Orian have a nice orgasm —Sir SysRq (talk) 19:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

There is something seriously wrong with this place...~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 21:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Fucking homophobe. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~

21:25 17 February 2009

No, we're good at that. Tags is right though, there's something else... —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:35, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Maybe it's our lack of confidence? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~

21:37 17 February 2009

Your game

Am I, by any chance, "SR"? Does this mean I'm an alien invader? —Sir SysRq (talk) 02:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

No you are going to be a guy who writes stuff, and what ever he writes comes true. I think I am going to end up having you write about Gavin the Trex which will be the final boss for that path. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 02:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Cute. —Sir SysRq (talk) 19:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

You

N 20:54 Game:Tagstit's Super Duper Modern Day Adventure/Level Two Start Homo Perverted Boy1221 (diff; hist) . . (+195) . . Tagstit (Talk | contribs) (←Created page with 'Oh, ok fine...=( Fuckin heterophobics... '''Orian leaves your team...''' [[Game:Tagstit's Super Duper Modern Day Adventure/Level One Boy Pervert StraightHome|<spa...')
N 20:54 Game:Tagstit's Super Duper Modern Day Adventure/Level Two Start Homo Perverted Boy122 (diff; hist) . . (+578) . . Tagstit (Talk | contribs) (←Created page with 'All of the rally cheers and moves on! You run down a dark, dark ally. You see no doors, you start to get the feeling Orian is going to rape you. Then he knocks on a...')

Two pages. In one minute. What the hell are you? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:04, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

I am making a game and so I am making tons of new pages alot. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 03:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

The point is, you created two pages in less than a minute. That's not humanly possible, so it begs the question. WHAT ARE YOU??????

Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Its not WHAT am I! It's WHEN am I??? ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 04:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

WHO ARE YOU?????

Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:39, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Your conscience...~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 04:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

If you are, you really suck at your job. Is there any way I can get you replaced?

Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Awww...ya...you gotta shoot me first though. =( ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 04:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Fiona Apple review

Thanks, he who plays "you're it!" with boobs.

That was a very helpful, nicely done review. A couple of things seem a bit contradictory, but I'm sure that's just because I need a little more complete explanation to get your point through the steel plates in my head.

First, if you can try to be more exlpicit what you mean in the Concept it will be helpful. In humor, you liked the driving into the ground about her being insane (which if you know of Ms. Apple, there is a lingering concern for her emotional stability, if she's not completely bat shit nuts, but it's the satire of overstatement - i.e. I think she's not quite "normal" as you say, but I digress), but then in Concept you say I'm bashing her. So my question is, where are the pure bashing aspects, if they are not regarding her lack of sanity or her inablity to sing, both of which points you identify as humorous parts. So can you see my confusion?

I know it's too short and needs fleshing out, so maybe a good strategy is to try to find more comedy in other aspects of her mystique, or something, and not go much further along the talentless/craziness track?

Incidentally, being a gentleman at heart, I satire things I adore, and I love Fiona Apple's music and lyrics, so I hope not to purely bash. Thus your comment concerns me, and I hope to fix this if I can grasp it. Thanks again.

Sorry bud! I know it was confusing. I just thought, in a brief summarizing yet still confusing statement, is that I think this is a bashing arguement, in that you purely make fun of her, but you do it in a good way in some areas. I think a cure would be to add more. So I am interested in seeing what you do with it! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 17:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

About my wacky wavers

Thx for the review, quick and filled with informative feedback. I had thoughts on working on my sentences which was, as you pointed out, bit of a let-down. I'll definitely try to work those out. Otherwise I'm glad you enjoyed the concept. The second image is indeed an idea I came up with at the last second; which is why it doesnt really show in the article. Ill see if I can include it somewhere. I hope to have that done within the next few days =) Thx again! Cheers --kit 16:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Dealing with parents

What spelling errors are you talking about? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:18, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

"Driving your parents crazy can be an alternative, but crazy people may be somewhat difficult to handle. And even if you are successful". There, there are two problems. And even if you are successful is a fragment. And there is no period. Just an example. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 18:20, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

That's because the page isn't finished yet. Did you note the construction template at the end of the article? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:27, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Ya, that still doesn't mean grammar fix ups can't help... ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 18:28, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

That still doesn't mean you have to complain about it that much. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Also, the thingy with the TOC... is it alright now? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:49, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

That's exactly what it means, and yes. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 07:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Hooray!

Congrats on the feature, Tags! That makes three for you, right? You get to start keeping score here now, how exciting! —Sir SysRq (talk) 00:32, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Ya it is very exciting! My first two articles I have ever written have become features finally. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 01:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, just a reminder, this week's colonization is picked and ready to go. —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:04, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Sweet are you going to assign us parts? ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 01:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't assign nothin. Just go and join the discussion and help us flesh out a good concept. —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Will do! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 01:12, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, one other thing

I actually do chop on occasion. Opinions? —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Way better than I could ever do, what do you use? ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 01:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Photoshop CS3. I'm still trying to get good enough to earn my merit badge. —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh ya, well you were nommed for UotM! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 01:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

I saw that. Bit of an un-nom if you know what I mean, seeing as how it's already the 22nd. But perhaps that means something for next month. I think this all has something to do with the UN:IC thing, which is fine. After all, my revitalization of UN:IC was nothing more than a plot to get my grubby little hands on UotM anyways. —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

=O So you planned it all along. I knew it! There was SysRq stink all over the IC ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 02:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

That's just my most recent line of deodorant. It didn't go over well. I lost millions. —Sir SysRq (talk) 02:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Yes, well Monkey Poo isn't exactly a good idea for a flavor. Nice try though ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 03:12, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, here's another ~~bad~~ chop of mine. —Sir SysRq (talk) 03:17, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Hatstand

You are aware that "hatstand" is british slang for crazy, right? Like they say over there, "John is completely hatstand". Just making sure. That makes this is a pun like WristWatch. Perhaps you were aware but still did not like the idea? (that is to say, of course I don't think hatstands are funny at all either, in and of themselves...) --TPLN 22:18, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Are they really? Wow, I am American and have never heard of that! You can submit it again if you want, I just thought it was random. It does have a better concept now that I think about it. Ask UU to review it for you, he is a brit and might like it. Sorry bud I feel like an idiot! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 07:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm just a strange American. "Hatstand" is the only Britishism I have purposely incorporated into my vocabulary. It's my favorite slang for "crazy", probably because I can't for the life of me imagine how it got started. I mean, jeebz, there is nothing crazy about hatstands. Is there? This is why I wrote the article - I was really trying to imagine a world where there actually is something crazy about them, like the Brits claim. Maybe UU can tell me... --TPLN 22:18, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Ya, he probably could! He is a smart little brit. I am sorry though! Maybe you should tell people that in the beginning of your article so idiots like me will know! =) ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 07:20, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh yeah, yeah - like use that one "humour" vs. "humor" template or something. What is that template called? I'll find it - that might help. Thanks. --TPLN 22:18, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Hatstand - hmm, I think this is to do with our love of using dull everyday objects as synonyms for craziness. I've also come across "mad as a spoon", which is very similar. I think it's the irony of using such a dull object that does it, although hatstand does seem to have stuck - probably from being used in a popular sitcom, although I can't be arsed to track down the exact one. Mind you, there are some other good ones too, like "mad as a goose on stilts" - seriously, wouldn't the person who put the stilts on the goose in the first place be far madder? Hope that clears things up. --UU - natter

14:33, Feb 26

...At least I'm inconsistant about signing my posts. --TPLN 22:18, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

I read your article!

Okay, so I read Ocean's Fourteen and I have some thoughts. Your ideas are ultimately funny. Your broad themes are funny. I like the ideas here, I just don't like your syntax and I don't like your sex jokes. Take out the strip club scene entirely. Is there something I'm missing? Are these references to the actual move? Because I really don't know. All I know is that I don't like the cheap sex jokes, because they are unimaginative and I know you have written much funnier things.

My other major beef is your syntax. Like I said before, you have great ideas. You just really need to develop your writing ability. Everything, from punctuation, spelling, and grammar, to your word choice, your dialogue, and your characterization is important in an article like this. Really, it's important with all articles. And it's really suffering. Go back and look at Cardboard Box and check out all the edits I made when I "SysRq-ized" it. While those are more my personal style more than anything else, those would be the kinds of things I'm looking at here. You need to work on that, because while your overall ideas are funny, if you can't communicate those ideas, they're useless. Comedy starts with effective writing. You can be as funny as you want, but if you can't communicate those ideas in a way that maximizes the humor value, those ideas are useless. Just some things to think about. I'd say this is far from complete and needs some serious editing. Sorry if I'm kinda going to town on your article, but I just want to give you the straight dope as I see it, as is my obligation as your UnDaddy. Now, let's go get some ice cream. —Sir SysRq (talk) 22:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

I will definitely go through and check for errors. The problem I was having, is that I didn't want to create an article that was too personalized...that's not the right word at all but I mean I don't want only people who have seen it to think it is funny, so I added a few gay and rascist jokes in there just to keep the tone lighthearted. About the strip club, the two often meet in strip clubs (I think) in the movies and talk to each other without eye contact. I am not sure though. Anyways, I will finish it up and send it into pee and if needed, change everything up. I personally do not like the gay stuff, I just know some do...maybe. I will probably end up removing it. What about the finished monkey article? I just got Nachlader who put a template on saying he will review it but I am interested in your final thoughts as well. Finally, seriously, what is a plunger? ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 01:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Plunger = rollback. Rollback is just a fancy Undo button. And I'll look at the other article too if you want. I can also go poke Nachlader for you. =] —Sir SysRq (talk) 14:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh cool, ya the other one needs some critiquing. And poke Nachlader! It had been more than a day! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 20:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Pee Review

Thanks for the advice. I'll bear that in mind when I work on it in the future.--The House of Pigs _{everyone hates me...} 16:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Write Good

Great review, thank you - very helpful.

You are right about the errors - if you look through the history, I fixed a lot^[1] of typos. This is a hard one, because you can't spell check when you are trying to make common mistakes. "Imprtant" of course was a typo. I will pour through it and carefully fix any others.

Actually, I thought the "mars" simile was the most bizarre of the three similes. It's more bizarre in its apparent "normalness" - but it isn't normal because how the hell can footsteps sound like a planet? You know? I thought it turns the triplet on its head, and I found that amusing.

Anyway, again thanks. Nice review. --TPLN 18:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

↑ by the way, it's "a lot" - the misuse of "alot" in the article is intentional, just sos you know... :)

UnNews

Its difficult not to mention the admins, in the discussion I mention what inspired the article was a newspaper entry that said "this off gene allows the doctors to "huff" out the tumour" which is why the admins are mentioned. Will give it another go and remove all this but I guess it means just using the word "admins". Thanks for the review. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs) 09:12, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Cheers =D

This is my happy face

Unlike this monkey you appreciated my article. Nerds all around the world are rejoicing and praising you as their newest Captain. Thank you for voting!

The Force is strong within you.

Pee Review (Brute)

Thanks for the review, despite it being short and negative. It helped me alot. Your right about the grue article thing. i thought it would be funny. i guess not and i took almost everything down about them being about grues. Though i kept them in the Things that brutes eat to prove that Grues and ubergrues arent invincible as everybody say they are. Also i have a Question. whats really the problem about injokes, and is it ok to use like one or two. Thanks--User:Iwillkillyou333 04:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Iwillyoukill333

Although you might want to ask a few people, my opinion is that they should NEVER be used. Think about it. Everyone knows these jokes. They have been used before and your looking to find humor based off the fact people will know what it is. What I am trying to say is it is lazy. Plain and simple. Anyone can type out an injoke and hope it is funny. It is more impressive if you can come up with your own material. You know? Just my take. Ask others for their opinions if you want though ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 16:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Yeah i probaly need a full review cause when i tried to feature it, everybod hated it.--User:Iwillkillyou333 04:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Iwillyoukill333

You didn't ask for it but my opinion is teh same as Mr Tagboob. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~

02:01 2 March 2009

And by the way, most people consider the review I gave yours a full review...just condensed because it was deleted so I summarized. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 03:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks You

For the NotM vote. I appreciate it.

Also, thanks for suffering through my early, shitty Pee Reviews and my god-awful first few articles. Your advice was actually really, really helpful, even if I didn't realize or appreciate it at the time. I owe a large part of my Uncyclopedia career to you. *tears up* Thank you.

--Guildensternenstein 04:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh dude don't even worry about it. I was still a noob and was just pissed that you criticized my reviews and didn't give me UU quality reviews. They were fine I just was expecting too much. You really have grown into quite the review, article writer, and all around fun guy around here. You helped me learn to just chill out around here. Sorry for my nom for kit and talkin down about you. Keep up the good work bud! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 16:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Why don't you

Just go ahead and do that review. I don't think UU is gonna have time to do it, as I don't know the nature of his rl business. That is, of course, if you're still willing to do it. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Of course! Be done by tonight~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 21:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I said I'd get it tonight when America's Top Model was on. Well, the show's just finished, and so is the review. If I say I'm gonna do something, I do it - you should know that, my friend! Now, young Tagstit, brand new Steel Kidney that you are, you mentioned something about patrolling the list... There are currently 3 reviews in need of checking, you want to take a look at them and have a go at the list? Should be a good start for you, and I can have a look tomorrow and see if you missed anything. (One thing - Modus did a review or so last year, so you'll need to cut him from the Old Proletariat list and pop him on the new one - if you don't fancy tackling that, leave it for me!) What do you say, ready to give it a go? --UU - natter

22:20, Mar 2

Aw boo, UU already did it. Thanks UU! Like I said before, you got the next one, kid. —Sir SysRq (talk) 22:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Ya thanks for the opportunity UU! I will give it a shot and see if I do good or not. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 00:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh dear god...I checked the history to see what you do and it confused the heck outta me. Could you maybe just do one cross out and everything so I can model after that? I am sorry for the hassle. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 00:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

No worries, it is confusing as hell if you don't know what you're doing. Thing is, I'm low on time right now, think I'll ask Hv if he has any checkin' time... --UU - natter

15:48, Mar 5

A Template of Thanks

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article

Your support is greatly appreciated.

Guildensternenstein

Woot! Thaaaank you Guuuuildy! =) ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 01:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Typo

I read your Unbook and i found it really funny (and disturbing at the same time) However, on the second paragraph of Chapter 8, there is a typo, It says by a apartment, it should be buy. Just letting you know

Oh ya thanks alot. I just wrote that last night so there are bound to be some mistakes. Thanks alot! Glad you liked it! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 01:36, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Also, in general, it's okay to correct typos on other peoples' articles. —Sir SysRq (talk) 14:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Graduation

Alright, so it seems like you've been doing pretty well for yourself. You've been doing awesome Pee Reviews, you got yourself a few features, you won NotM, and you've got some great articles in the works. I'm proud of you.

But recently I've noticed that you haven't really needed my help as much anymore. This is fine, there's always a point where the noob has a good handle on his Uncyc life and doesn't need training wheels anymore. I think you're there already. So I was thinking about just graduating you, seeing as how you're not really a noob anymore, but a full fledged member of Uncyc.

What does this mean as far as our relationship? Really, nothing. I'll still be your UnDaddy, I'll still be here to help you with anything, but it means that you could (if you wanted to) adopt noobs of your own. I've already seen you helping newer users and you're good at it. I think it is time for the baby bird to leave the nest. And then stay around the same tree because all Uncyc really is is just a big tree. Literally. It's a website made of wood. Imagine.

Let me know what you think of this idea and I'll take care of everything should you decide that you're ready to shed your noob status. (And this is not because I don't love you, this is because I think you're doing really well!) Cheers, —Sir SysRq (talk) 15:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Wow I am honored! Well, if you really think I am ready than I would be happy to become a non-noob. I might still bug you if I have questions though. If you think it is a good idea than awesome, if you think I should stay a bit longer, that's cool too. I am interested in adopting some of my own though! I wanna konw how to get into that. So really it is your choice, and thanks for everything you have done for me so far! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 16:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Daddy?

--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 00:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Jesus dude get a grip on this place. First off all, you answer on your own talk page, and use your watchlist to see when others reply on theirs. ALSO an undaddy is a guy who takes you in when you first start out. Sysrq is mine and he is a really cool guy so don't mess with him. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 00:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Easy, killer. —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

PING!

Hi, just wanted to remind you that our current Colonization, Jew, is still going. While things may be looking a bit slow right now, all it takes are a few good Colonizers to breathe some life into it again. Sure, it's going to take some work, but that's what IC is all about! Come on down and give us a hand, won't you?

Much love,
—Sir SysRq (talk) 23:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Why Do You Watch My Page?

Are you stalking me? (hahahaha) But really why?--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 22:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Everyone is on everyone else's watchlists. It's not a huge deal. —Sir SysRq (talk) 22:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I am a stalker, creepy huh? Thanks for the explanation pops. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 00:06, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

There is nobody on my watchlist other than myself.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 02:35, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Tagstit/HowTo:Deal with your Girl's Best Friend

I made an edit to it. Changed level 100 warrior to level 80 orc warrior. 80 is the highest level a player can get to with the expansion Lich King out. It is a great article. --Docile hippopotamus 13:41, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh thanks alot! Do you think the article as a whole is any good? ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 16:24, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes. --Docile hippopotamus 20:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Any suggestions? ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 22:00, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Maybe naming it "Dealing with my Girl's Best Friend." And the usual (categories, images, etc). --Docile hippopotamus 10:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Archive template

There is an archive template you can add to archived stuff, such as Archive 1. Want me to add it? --Docile hippopotamus 13:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Ya sure! Thanks alot! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 16:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. --Docile hippopotamus 20:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks alot! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 22:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey

Hey thanks for the vote for the featured article, check me out for noob of the month I need votes bro and I'd greatly appreciate yours. Later. -- - StonedJeff TALK talk to me 01:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Voting

Don't forget to sign your vote here! ~Formerly Annoying Crap 01:49, 16 March 2009

User:Tagstit/Unscripts:Ocean's Fourteen

How are you going to end it? --Docile hippopotamus 10:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

You will see! I am almost done, just been busy with alot of stuff ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 21:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

When it will be finished? --Docile hippopotamus 04:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

This weekend probably why? ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 16:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

I want to know what happens next. --Docile hippopotamus 21:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh ya I have it outlined somewhere in my name space, but like they try to rob the hotel guy. Do you like it at all so far? ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 22:44, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes. --Docile hippopotamus 20:43, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Poo Lit Surprise

You entering it? --Docile hippopotamus 10:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Of course! Why? ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 21:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Just asking. --Docile hippopotamus 04:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for saving my ass

But I have one question, does an article become uneligible for PLS when a pee review is just requested? Or must it be actually reviewed? And, is the entry deleted when I blank its edit page? SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 07:30, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

mmmm I would ask an admin about that, go on UU's or MrN's talk page and tell them your situation. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 13:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Ever since those two buggers became admins, no one talks to me anymore. Sheesh. Mahm00shA, you'll be fine as long as you wait with the Pee Review for after the PLS is done. If you list the pee review link on QVFD or just drop it here, I'll remove it for you. ~

13:58, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

well, user:Sycamore "closed" the entry. Is this enough? SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 14:47, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Now it's gone. You can recreate it when you finish with the PLS. ~

15:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Neil thanks you for voting!

Obviously by Neil I mean 'I' cos you know that people who refer to themselves in the third person like that actually tend to be kinda narcissistic and I'm not - well I mean I wouldn't say I was - so from now on I'll say 'I', I just had to say Neil so you knew that it was me and not somebody else. So I came here to say thanks for advertising my daily torment I hope that now more people will have a greater understanding of why I'm so dysfunctional. Thanks, did I say that?

And I promise I'll read your monkey lover article cos I does look really amazing I just keep getting distracted. :S again thanks for teh vote! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 12:38 26 March 2009

No problem! I thought this was really good. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 14:07, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Your sig

Change the LOB in you signature to CPT, fool SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 23:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh wow, how correct you are my friend, thanks for that! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 23:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

You're a captain too, you know. —Sir SysRq (talk) 22:57, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

i know SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 23:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm just saying, since you don't bear any other titles (that I know of) on this wiki yet, CPT may look kinda spiffy in your sig. —Sir SysRq (talk) 23:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the review

I really appreciate the review for my D&D article. The only reason it's a full script in the first place is because My first review said it was too short. I'll revise it even more, and throw 'er through the pee review again. Again, I'm really grateful for the review. Gas Pump 01:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

No, no don't get me wrong, it needs to be an actual script, just don't kill the whole thing in the beginning. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 01:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry, kid, but this was the first time I do so. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 20:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

First: It's ok, Second: You did it twice, Third: Don't call me kid...child. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 02:33, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

first. sorry again, friend. second. would you mind pointing out what the second time was? third. Im leaving uncyc for 3 months this week. So, Goodbye SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 05:10, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Ya just go look at the history, it really isn't no biggie though. See ya later dude! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 14:16, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey There

First of all, it's been a while! How's the good ol' tit doing?

Second of all, I wrote an Overview main page to my two D&D articles like you suggested, I thought perhaps you could give it a Pee. I'd be eternally grateful if you did so. Thanks. —Sir Guildensternenstein 19:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Damn I might have to change usernames just because everyone here just sees the tit when they see my name. Anywho, well I am glad I helped out with your structure and you liked the format I hoped. I would be happy to review your article, but I want to be flat out honest with you though. I do not really like the whole idea when it started. I read the races and classes and it just seems like a collection of stereotypes. But with that being said, I do like your overview, and how you take things like sex and put the nerdy aspect on it. So it will be a HEAVELY mixed review with extreme ups and downs, and I completely understand if you would rather have someone else review it who loves this kind of thing all the way. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 07:22, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, don't feel obligated to review it or anything, I just thought you'd like to review the overview as it basically was your idea (which was a damn good one, by the way). —Sir Guildensternenstein 13:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Alright I will do it in a bit if it is still up. Glad I could help ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 17:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

VFH

Can I have your vote for my article at VFH, friend? SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 22:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

do it goddamit! /pulls out a shotgun SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 05:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- I SAID DO IT! AAAAAAA SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 17:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

In Graltitude

In gratitude for your vote

The GlobalTourniquet says "Thanks!"

Understandably, you voted for my article for featuring. Although your "for" vote was not extraordinary, as the article's genius was beyond question, it is still appropriate to acknowledge your dutiful participation in the process.

So, in gratitude for your vote, I will dedicate my next common typographical error to you. Thank you.

The following common typographical errors are available for this honor. Please indicate below this template which one you would like me to dedicate to your user name.

Typing "teh" for "the"

The old e/space swap; i.e. "ther eis" for "there is"

Confusing "Dr. Spock" and "Mr. Spock", again

Typing "Soluble fish" for "aaaand double drat!"

Imperial Colonisation

Howdy, would you mind adding my name to the IC board, and perhaps giving me a point, I contributed a lot of the stuff to the Great Britain Page (Politcal definition section, Falkland section, sheep image, france image, bridge image etc) I tried to do this myself but I was told off by SysRq. Thankee --CrabPope 17:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Like I said, you're good. I put your name back up, just don't edit the template yourself anymore. —Sir SysRq (talk) 19:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Ya, thanks for taking care of that SysRq. We just can't have the template being ran by everyone in colonization, just like we can't have the pee board being run by every one who pees. One person doing it keeps consistency. By the way Sys, whats up with Sockpuppets edit about stating the bloody obvious and less ordering? I didn't quite understand that. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 19:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh, um sorry. I just added SysRq's name since he also edits the template, thus stating the bleedin' obvious (namely that SysRq is also allowed to edit the template). I also removed the "get out" which was quite imperative if you get my point. (I almost replaced that part by Tits or GTFO! but I managed to restrain myself.) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh haha okay thanks socky. For some reason I thought it was an attack at us for some reason. My bad. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 20:16, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok thanks sysrq, didn't notice that before, cheers - --CrabPope 08:26, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

alternate ending

I made an alternate ending for My Girl's Best Friend:

I slammed her door and started walking down the stairs to leave when I heard Matty say, "You were right Stacy, that totally worked!"

Ouch...wait a minute...I should not have been tricked by her! I'll show her and her fat friend!

I walk back into the house and say, "hey bitch, you shouldn't be disrespecting me!"

Stacy says, "I don't know what your on about." and I bitch slap her.

"Don't touch her!" Her fat friend says.

"Shutup bitch!" And I pull out my handgun and shoot her in the head.

Stacy screamed at me, saying "WHAT THE FUCK!" and I yell back to her, "SEE WHAT YOU FUCKING MADE ME DO YOU FUCKING BITCH!" and fucking put a cap in her face. Than I go to her fridge and help myself to an ice-cream. And to think she didn't want me to have any of them. Meany. --Docile hippopotamus 11:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, I like it alot. After the review comes in I will see how to best revise it. Thanks for the nom though. I really appreciate it. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 01:43, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Do I re-nom it once the review comes in and you revise it? --Docile hippopotamus 08:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Ya that'd be great dude! Thanks alot. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 15:05, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

tell me when you want it re-nommed. --Docile hippopotamus 06:28, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

.

WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU'RE DOING!?!?

Do you realize that by supporting HowTo:Get Over Jenny, you are supporting insane, demented, homicidal stalkers everywhere? You should be ashamed.
--CheddarBBQ

Please Go Here

An d tell your friends--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 02:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

sexting unnews

hey tags, i've given your article a bit of a lift. i've cleaned up some language, thrown stuff into paragraphs, and added a picture to get rid of that nasty whitespace. i would say this is near ready for VFH. i could make some content-related edits if you'd like, to bring the tone and things up to what i was describing in my review and the subsequent discussion. i did like the changes you made post-review though, and if you want this to be totally your article then i understand, just let me know. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:48, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

I like it! Thanks alot for making this look alot neater, and read alot easier. I am open to any content related edits, but what exactly are you planning to do? ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 22:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

well some of the language i didn't change because it would have changed the content of sentences. i also think a few minor tweaks would help its VFH chances. i could make the changes, then you could revert any parts you didn't like; how's that sound? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 01:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Excellent. Do whatever you feel fit. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 03:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

i've gone and made some final adjustments, which you can review and re-adjust to your liking. i've also placed the article on VFH: good luck! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Alright I like all the changes! Thanks alot for everything Gerry! You were very helpful ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 15:32, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Tags!

Greetings From Four Corners!!
Thanks for sending us a copy of A Guide to the American Roadside Attraction. Look at us! We're in four states simultaneously! We're headed to Waco, Texas next and we'll be visiting The Branch Davidian Compound Site and The Dr Pepper Museum. I hear they used to call Dr Pepper "Waco" because you could only find the stuff within the city limits. They say it was originally sold in a drug store as a brain tonic! We'll send you another postcard when we get to Mammy's Cupboard for some biscuits and gravy!

It was like writing Apocalypse Now, so every For. vote means a lot.-- 15:12, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Danke schön!

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recent Writer of the Month campaign

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Sir Guildensternenstein

Signatures

Sure, why not? Thanks ^^ The Crazy Bitch, HouseMDfan 20:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

I have not, I'm just reading Uncyclopedia and posting in the forum once in a while right now. ~ House MDfan 20:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

im a whore

vote for me please--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 23:32, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Heya Tags

SO I just finished this article, HowTo:Build the Perfect Sandcastle, and I was wanting your opinion. And also thanks for the vote on VFH. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 10:53 2 May 2009

Oh no problem I hope it works out. And I got quite a busy day today so I will read it and give my opinion as soon as I return. But at first glance I say it looks great! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 13:40, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah me too, I know it's not my best but I like it. But I'm really exited about Sandcastle, it's my favourite thing I've written at the minute. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~

10:38 3 May 2009

Just got done reading it. For the most part I really liked it! You really captured the innocence and annoyingness of a young child. What I find to be a constant issue with your articles though, is that they are great, but they are never about what they are called. This is more of a story about a kid and his dad than the actual sandcastle building. I strongly suggest you change the title to something like, Unbooks:Daddy and I's Day at the Beach. This way it won't be such a...well...disappointment is a bad word because it is funnier than any article on sandcastles could be, but a misguiding. I think the reason Why?: Don't You get a Job didn't do as well as it could've with some people, is simply that the title isn't what it is about. Well, it is but just slightly. Your articles tend to be more about stories anyways. So I guess what I am saying, is that you should retitle it but other than that, it is another very funny article. Well done. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 18:05, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

I can just about see what you people don't like about why?: don't you get a job's title (they wrong but I can see where they're comming from) but I will be absolutely unshakable on this article. The fact that it misses the point is initself a joke. Joshy's dad has spent the whole day trying to teach him how to make a sandcastle and at the end of it he doesn't know, perhaps subtle but that's exactly what I was trying to do. And besides I've explained my view on titles anyway both here and here. Thanks though Tags I'm really glad you liked it! ~Orian57~ ~Talk~

18:26 3 May 2009

Oh I understand completely. I see the subtle joke and all. It is just other people don't seem to catch it and I would hate for another of your works to not make it for something as silly as a name. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 18:35, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

headlinefiller

The password is: 'operandi' followed by no space and the acronym of the lesbian, gay, bi and transsexual pride parade. For edits, I wouldn't suggest you take it to mainspace (to keep it lower) but fancy up the userpage a bit. Have fun. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 10:32, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Woohoo! Thanks alot! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 15:04, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

This all sound quite interesting. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~

15:24 3 May 2009

Oh but it is. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 16:25, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

ic update

hey tags. i've closed out this week's colonization, can you update out scoreboard? i've also compiled a list of users who can be removed ue to inactivity and the like here. thanks! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:00, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Ya sure thing! Thanks for the list. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 16:26, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

It's done, and I only really saw five people helping out. There were many minor contributions, but none that really did anything beyond add a sentence or two. But is it cool if I announce the points being put in for this week? I usually do it on the talk page but on the special news it might be more formal. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 16:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

sure thing. you don't have to be quite so strict i think, even minor contributions and discussions on the talkpage help, but you're in charge so what you say goes. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:59, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

I thought about that too. But then again, if we do that, then people might start going every week, adding a line or two, and expecting points. And we have people like you who contribute well more than half of the entire thing and get the same amount of credit. For now I think it is better to set the bar a bit higher so we don't have people trying to cheat the system ya know? ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 17:02, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Grrrr

I worked on Barak Obama colonization, tags. Check the history and the talk page if you dont believe me (I know you do) 17:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey dude nothing personal its just I can't give you the points for the two edits you did. I checked every edit to see if they deserve a point, and rechecked yours, but all I could see was a fix of words and one paragraph in a section that was later removed. When we got people like Gerry doing half the stuff I can't honestly give you the same amount of credit. You can take it up with SysRq and I will gladly change it but as it stands I need to set a bar. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 17:19, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Whatever.

17:28, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry bro ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 17:54, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

I worked on the Barack Obama colonization too. Significant edits. You can check. User:Zheliel/sigz2 07:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

We are currently looking into it. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 15:35, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Dearest Tagsy...

Thank you ...

... for supporting my recently featured picture.
A baby potato shall be mercilessly sacrificed
in your honour. - Sonje

I look forward to our future collaborations. --^Dame 14:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

further ic stuff

hey tags, i've been thinking. i think we should give credit for colonizers for pretty much any contributions, even if it's only a few sentences or some grammar corrections or some ideas on the talk page. if we demand a high level of input, then everyone is going to be making edits just to get credit rather than trying to improve the article, and that's going to lead to a decline in the quality of colinized articles. speaking as a main contributor to many of our colonizations, it doesn't bother me one bit that someone would get equal credit for fewer edits. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:53, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Hmmm...well I am fine with it too, but I think SysRq said I need to find a line somewhere and determine whether or not they should get the point. I think he said that anyways. I'll talk to him. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 15:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

[1] y the way, it's "a lot" - the misuse of "alot" in the article is intentional, just sos you know... :)

[1]