User:Hyperbole/Good articles/archive2

A wizard did it

Score: +5
Good	Magic You know it's the best article on the site. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:53, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Yes I find this good. pillow talk 21:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC) It's fucking magical or something. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:24, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Love it. Like I said, if I was here when this was nommed, I would have given it a for. Staircase CUNt 01:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC) For. --Docile hippopotamus 22:17, 21 June 2009 (UTC) One of the very few articles that genuinely makes me laugh. No shit! -- Roman Dog Bird 22:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC) The deciding vote Don Puttano cHeDDs 23:52,22June,2009
Not Good	meh no offense, I know there's a following for this "article," but...   Le Cejak • <1:45 Jun 20, 2009> per above --Mn-z 04:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Meh. It makes me laugh, but only because of the running gag. If I had never been to Uncyc before I would see this and just click on by without a second glance. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:31, 20 Jun Passed +5 and 7 for votes. Don Puttano cHeDDs 23:52,22June,2009

UnTunes:Still Hurting

Score: +2
Good	SNF. Is it so much to ask that someone you love put up with my constant, unrelenting article-whoring? pillow talk 21:29, 21 June 2009 (UTC) I geuss But I VFH'd it.    Orian57    Talk   21:40 21 June 2009
Not Good
Comments	Is this nomination invalidated now or not? --Mn-z 03:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC) Yeah, it goes off VFG if it's nommed. If it fails, we can put it back. An article should only be at one place at once. pillow talk 05:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC) VFH Nomed therefore, the VFG nomination is canceled. --Mn-z 15:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Fan service

Score: +4
Good	SNF. Maybe it's not as good as OptyC's super-secret page, but it's less secretive! pillow talk 20:39, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Bless. Don Puttano cHeDDs 22:20,21June,2009  See? THAT'S classy. Classy porn.   Le Cejak • <22:30 Jun 21, 2009>  Maintenance fetishism --Mn-z 03:40, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	I close this nomination with a VFH nomination. --Mn-z 15:40, 22 June 2009 (UTC) VFH Nomed therefore, the VFG nomination is canceled. --Mn-z 15:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Uterus or GTFO!

Score: +4
Good	sn+f it was on here earlier, but was nominated when the page was dead. 7 people voted for this when it was on VFH, but 8 voted against. --Mn-z 16:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Ew! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC) For. I thought I had voted for this on VFH! -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:26, 18 Jun Checking the VFH page, you didn't vote on it. --Mn-z 16:02, 18 June 2009 (UTC) I know, I thought I had. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:39, 18 Jun Who doesn't love preggo pics? Don Puttano cHeDDs 20:14,20June,2009
Not Good
Comments	Abstain on this one. Clever concept, but few if any smiles beyond the concept joke. pillow talk 01:41, 13 June 2009 (UTC) What's with the preggo jokes? Abstain.   Le Cejak • <23:34 Jun 18, 2009> During your leave of absence, Mnbvcxz wrote, oh, about seven hundred pregnancy-themed articles. pillow talk 23:39, 18 June 2009 (UTC) Hey, you wrote some pregnancy-themed articles too. --Mn-z 06:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC) I wrote UnNews:Sarah Palin's daughter's unborn child is pregnant. I don't think I actually did any others. pillow talk 07:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Yeah, but you also spam links to iCarly everywhere. Also, I think Uterus or GTFO! and the pregnancy portal are my only mainspace pregnancy articles. Supergirl was about vore (as was Superboi). Vore was an ip creation that I cleaned up. iCarly is about newts living in Miranda Cosgrove's uterus. And Sonic the Preggo and UnBooks:A UTP: Link Gets Pregnant and Dies are retarded mpreg articles. --Mn-z 17:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Nope try again (timed out, 7+ days)   Le Cejak • <1:49 Jun 20, 2009> There's no 7 day limit, it says about a week or two. Don Puttano cHeDDs 20:28,20June,2009 We probably need an official limit. What does everyone think? One week? Two? pillow talk 21:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC) I'd say at least 2 weeks, maybe 3. At least until this becomes a little more popular. Something shouldn't fail with no against votes simply because not enough people saw the nomination. I'd start with about 20 days, then shorten to 14 or 15 once this becomes popular. Don Puttano cHeDDs 22:12,20June,2009 I'd suggest closing nominations based on how many nominations there are (i.e. keep it at 15 or so total active nominations.) --Mn-z 23:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)  For. 7 days. Uncomplicated.   Le Cejak • <3:48 Jun 21, 2009> Actually, seven days is more complicated, because arguments are bound to start when articles are removed without a sufficient chance. There are two archives of voting things that were closed after 7 days, which have 2-3 votes on them. It shouldn't be removed simply because people haven't had a chance to vote. There's only about 8 or 9 people using this, so that means more than 50% of the population has to vote for within a week for it to be "good." Don Puttano cHeDDs 03:53,21June,2009 Less complicated. 7 days is more than enough.   Le Cejak • <5:52 Jun 21, 2009> Why don't we make it seven days, but if it fails due to timeout, you're encouraged to renom without prejudice next month. Cool? pillow talk 06:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Sounds good, Hype! Add it to the rulezzz   Le Cejak • <6:07 Jun 21, 2009>

Five tough life lessons I wouldn't have had to learn if I had listened to Flood by They Might Be Giants

Score: +5
Good	I just finished this and perhaps it's good. pillow talk 04:45, 18 June 2009 (UTC) Good but all these music articles are making me really how little I know about song lyrics. --Mn-z 04:56, 18 June 2009 (UTC) Yes even though I've never even HEARD of this song, it was pretty funny. A commentary on how stupid the lyrics are in songs nowadays.   Le Cejak • <23:32 Jun 18, 2009> Nice. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Istanbul. If I'm not mistaken, it's actually an album Cajek. Not that that's anybody's business but the Turks'. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:34, 20 Jun
Not Good
Comments	Promoted +5 Don Puttano cHeDDs 22:14,20June,2009

HowTo:Exploit 9/11

Score: +1
Good	Self-Nomination only I will let democracy decide if this is "good". It's one of my forgotten pre-second break articles.   Le Cejak • <6:43 Jun 13, 2009> Sure. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	abstain but that might be because I'm half awake. --Mn-z 05:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC) I'll abstain on this too. Funny ideas in there... they just don't seem to... come together exactly right. pillow talk 17:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Nope timed out (7 days)   Le Cejak • <1:48 Jun 20, 2009>

A friendly message from the supporters of John McCain

Score: +5
Good	In my opinion this is one of the two best things I've written here. I don't think it has a chance on VFH anymore since it is a little out of date, but I really do love it. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 18:08, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Definitely Good. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:13, 19 June 2009 (UTC) That is quite funny. pillow talk 21:08, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Yay! -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:31, 19 Jun Why not VFH it? You should talk about ponies - A letter to Bill Richardson was featured months after the election. Something that is humorous can't be out-of-date, and anyone who says so is a douche. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Well if you want to VFH it that would be cool with me. I always felt it deserved it..... (can I say that without being cocky? I really don't mean to be cocky.) Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 21:49, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Ugh. I just wanted to kick back and relax on VFG for a bit, and now there's cock all over the place. pillow talk 22:33, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	Promoted wow, that was fast   Le Cejak • <1:50 Jun 20, 2009>

UnBooks:Great Abridged Pop Songs

Score: +8
Good	Whore. I'm told this is one of the only articles ever to make Mrs. Under User laugh. That's got to be worth something. Right? Right? Okay, maybe not. pillow talk 17:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)  For. although, I only was familiar with a couple of them. --Mn-z 17:25, 15 June 2009 (UTC)  For. clever!   Le Cejak • <23:47 Jun 18, 2009> Yop. Not try it VFH, Hype?    Orian57    Talk   06:41 19 June 2009 Yes! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Indeed. This vote is cast on behalf of the missus. --UU - natter 18:27, Jun 19 Beautiful. Why isn't this on VFH? -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:57, 19 Jun Featurable it is MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	Abstain Would've gone good, but I didn't know enough songs. Staircase CUNt 20:45, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Promoted wow, +8!   Le Cejak • <1:47 Jun 20, 2009> I nommed this on VFH. It will probably get featured, turning this vote into a complete waste of time. --Mn-z 04:45, 20 June 2009 (UTC) YAY! Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 04:51, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

UnBooks:Grandma's House

Score: +5
Good	Nom and for I stumbled on this in random page, and I laughed abnormally hard. Staircase CUNt 05:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC) Yup. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:51, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Forry nice Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 15:10 June 15 '09 So So. Even So So's minor works tend to be pretty damn hilarious. pillow talk 17:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 's alright -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:26, 18 Jun Per OptyC   Le Cejak • <23:38 Jun 18, 2009>
Not Good	Not Good more confusing than anything. --Mn-z 15:33, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Promoted   Le Cejak • <23:38 Jun 18, 2009>

Gerbil (musical instrument)

Score: +5
Good	Good another one that was kicked off when the page went inactive. --Mn-z 05:20, 14 June 2009 (UTC) I'm gonna say yes because I thought it was funny. Wait, what are the GA criteria again? -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 12:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Whatever you like them to be, baby. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:36, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Yup. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:36, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Tentative for. Pretty funny, but the fact that it's illustrated with a pic from Icanhascheezeburger.com makes me question its originality. pillow talk 14:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Fawr Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 15:07 June 15 '09
Not Good
Comments	Promoted   Le Cejak • <20:35 Jun 15, 2009>

Why?:Can't Anybody Drive in this Town?

Score: +5
Good	SN&F. This'll never be featured, but I still chuckle when I look back at it. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:27, 12 Jun Yup. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:35, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Good per above. --Mn-z 16:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Definitely. Not VFH-quality, but I catch myself thinking about the concept out of nowhere, and laughing, from time to time. pillow talk 18:52, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Good Staircase CUNt 03:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC) Good. Saberwolf116 12:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Not Good	Against. I was gonna abstain, but this isn't VFH, and nobody should take this stuff too seriously. Anyway, tone this the fuck down.   Le Cejak • <0:44 Jun 13, 2009> NO! FUCK YOU YOU FUCKING FUCK FUCK! (The wildly inappropriate and over the top anger is intentional.) Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go cry because you voted against. -OptyC Sucks! CUN13:47, 13 Jun SHITTY SHIT SHITT-IDY-SHIT!! (well duh it's intentional, I just thought it was too much) ...SHITFUCK!   Le Cejak • <16:27 Jun 13, 2009>
Comments	There is a problem with the link, its going to http://clublet.com/c/c/why?Can%27t_Anybody_Drive_in_This_Town%3F for some unknown reason. (I would say its an inter-wiki link, but I don't remember a "clubnet.com" being part of wikia) --Mn-z 16:32, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Why?:Can't Anybody Link Properly in this Town? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:34, 12 June 2009 (UTC) NM its working right now. --Mn-z 16:35, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Yep, edit conflict   Le Cejak • <16:36 Jun 12, 2009> Abstain. I remember this, and it's still too angry, I think.   Le Cejak • <16:38 Jun 12, 2009> +5, Good Article. Saberwolf116 12:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Prison Break

Score: +2
Good	Self-good. I think this is a pretty funny article. pillow talk 00:41, 13 June 2009 (UTC) For I didn't even see this coming. Excellent   Le Cejak • <0:50 Jun 13, 2009>
Not Good
Comments	I invalidate this nomination with a VFH nomination. --Mn-z 04:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Samuel L. Vacuum

Score: +6
Good	Good was one vote away from VFG, then people stopped coming here. (I'm going to assume that articles were on here when the page went inactive can be re-nommed, since they didn't receive vote do to overall inactivity and not because they were avoided. --Mn-z 19:01, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Definitely Good. Clever and amusing. Staircase CUNt 00:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC) So weird. But I like it. pillow talk 01:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC) Is this Zana? It's funny.   Le Cejak • <6:43 Jun 13, 2009> Good Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 07:17 June 13 '09 Yup. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:38, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	Promoted   Le Cejak • <16:22 Jun 13, 2009>

Leprechaun

Score: +2
Good	Nom+4. Failed VFH, but it's an okay article   Le Cejak • <14:02 Jun 12, 2009> Yup. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	INVALID NOM quasi-featured. Quasi-featured articles are assumed to be better than "good" articles. --Mn-z 16:28, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Yeah, I think there was consensus earlier that the VFG list should not overlap with the VFH/QFA lists. pillow talk 18:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Conan O'Brien

Score: +5
Good	Nom+4. It's good enough   Le Cejak • <20:28 Jun 11, 2009> Good --Mnb'z 05:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC) good. needs work, and things like links, but certainly good. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Yup. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Good I reviewed it and it was swell. Staircase CUNt 17:31, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	Promoted   Le Cejak • <0:22 Jun 13, 2009>

HowTo:Live with UC

Score: +5
Good	sNom+4. Serious disease, people   Le Cejak • <20:28 Jun 11, 2009> Good --Mnb'z 05:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC) strong good. most likely vfh. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:01, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Yes, I would also vote for this on VFH. pillow talk 15:37, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Certainly. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	Promoted   Le Cejak • <16:22 Jun 12, 2009>

Lobster

Score: +6
Good	Strong Nom+5. A collab between Me, Gerry, and UU.   Le Cejak • <20:04 Jun 11, 2009> Good --Mnb'z 05:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC) good. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Good Staircase CUNt 15:32, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Yup. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Mmhmmm. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:28, 12 Jun
Not Good
Comments	Promoted   Le Cejak • <16:22 Jun 12, 2009>

Uterus or GTFO!

Score: +1
Good	Good got 7 for and 8 against votes on VFH. --Mnb'z 17:34, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	not promoted, sat too long, try again   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

UnBooks:The Holy Bible in BASIC

Score: +1
Good	Good this was funny, and I was considering noming it for VFH, but its not quite there yet, and its too much of a one-trick pony. --Mnb'z 16:48, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	not promoted, sat too long, try again   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

Copyright Shotgun

Score: +2
Good	Self-nom. I mainly spend time on VFD and Pee Review, though I occasionally scratch together enough material for a decent STUB. Saberwolf116 11:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC Good Enough --Mnb'z 03:32, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	not promoted, +2 sat too long, try again   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

Major Contributions of Those of African Descent to the Realms of Philosophy, Science, Literature, and the Liberal Arts

Score: +3
Good	Good one liner, VFH failure. (Its still on VFH, but at -6 now. I can assume some admin will remove shortly.)--Mnb'z 23:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Yup. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:53, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Pointless racism makes me smile. pillow talk 17:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	not promoted, +3 sat too long, try again   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

Gerbil (musical instrument)

Score: +2
Good	Good Funny short article. --Mnb'z 15:52, 30 April 2009 (UTC) Nice. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	not promoted, +2 sat too long, try again   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

Don't vote for my dog!

Score: +3
Good	Nom+Hilarious! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC) Fuck yes. pillow talk 23:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC) Good has this ever been on VFH? --Mnb'z 15:54, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	Yeah, it failed VFH just shy of a QFA. pillow talk 17:07, 30 April 2009 (UTC) not promoted, +3 sat too long, try again   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

Worst 100 Pick-Up Lines of All Time

Score: +3
Good	My first thing I made. I was still an IP then, but still. In 2007, I retook credit and tried to get it featured. I failed, of course, but it is good, dammit, unlike the structure of this sentence, but that, my dear sir and/or madam, doesn't matter, as we aren't here to discuss how this sentence should be structured, but to vote on making this have good article status, or, at least, I think that's what this is about... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC) Good stuff. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC) Good --Mnb'z 15:52, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	not promoted, +3 sat too long, try again   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

King Harkinian

Score: +2
Good	Fwhore a rewrite/merge that I did. --Mnb'z 04:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC) Good enough. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	not promoted, +2 sat too long, try again   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

User:Meganew/Aircraft Used By Uncyclopedia

Score: +1
Good	For. Although made by me, I think it deserves to be a VFG article. Sufficiently improved. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Not Good	Not good Listy, and I don't get it. --Mnb'z 16:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC) Needs formatting or something. Maybe you can make them into images. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Could you try and help? Maybe? --Absolutely Not Benson 23:09, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Fixed it. --Absolutely Not Benson 00:59, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments	I put a good sized amount of work into it. Joe9320, I think it is, and Hyperbole also helped (Slightly). --Absolutely Not Benson 21:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC) It's supposed to be a page filled with a variety of airplanes. From entirely ridiculous crap like the Fr-1 Euroipod, to more realistic planes, Like the A-22 Uncyclopedia, and the P-75 Eagle. --Absolutely Not Benson 15:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC) not promoted, +0   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

Gul Dukat

Score: +2
Good	For the article that inspired me to write the Constantine V article. --Mnb'z 05:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Good. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:44, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	Abstain. I don't get it; and also, I'm not going to vote something "good" that has so many red links. That needs fixing. pillow talk 17:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC) I did fix it up a bit, mainly formatting, spelling, and red links. --Mnb'z 17:25, 12 March 2009 (UTC) Yes, you did. Thanks for that. Unfortunately, I still can't see the joke, having never watched DS9. pillow talk 17:26, 12 March 2009 (UTC) not promoted, +2   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

Benson's 4-D House Of Pancakes

Score: +3
Good	Surprisingly awesome. IronLung 00:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC) close enough --Mnb'z 05:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Very Good. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:43, 11 March 2009 (UTC) I dig. pillow talk 21:23, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Not Good	Benson. --Absolutely Not Benson 21:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments	not promoted, +3 sat too long, try again   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

HowTo:Write a Techno Song

Score: +2
Good	From VFH, should be closed shortly. --Mnb'z 03:27, 8 March 2009 (UTC) Good. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:42, 11 March 2009 (UTC) Yes I find it amusing. pillow talk 21:23, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Not Good	Not good. IronLung 00:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments	not promoted, +2 sat too long, try again   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

User:Mnbvcxz/Christian Left

Score: +2
Good	fwhore This is stupid, cliche, preverted, random, and possibly disturbing. But I think it works. --Mnb'z 16:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC) Good. I only looked at the images and read the captions. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	Abstain. We didn't write a policy about VFG'ing userspaced articles, and I voted for the SSGP... but this one, I'm not really comfortable voting on in userspace. pillow talk 17:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC) Are you saying I should mainspace it? --Mnb'z 16:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Well, it's a rewrite of an article that survived VFD. I don't know if we have a process for getting consensus on whether to replace a page like that. pillow talk 16:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Go to the talkpage for Christian Left and ask if anybody minds if you do a rewrite (include a link to your version). If no one objects after 7-10 days, overwrite their version with yours (put "Rewrite!" or somesuch in the summary box). If they do object, then you have to think up a new title for your version (generally, I go with Poopy). Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:29, 14 March 2009 (UTC) The "should I mainspace it" was sarcastic. I think its a bit too close to slappy-cruft for mainspace. That, and it sets a really bad example. --Mnb'z 18:38, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Oh. Good luck with that, then. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:41, 14 March 2009 (UTC) not promoted, +1   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

My Favorite Presidents

Score: +1
Good	Good VFD save. --Mnb'z 19:19, 2 March 2009 (UTC) Amusing. Could stand some expansion/cleanup. Certainly not a feature. But I like it. pillow talk 17:16, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Not Good	Not that good. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Article was merged with another one. --Mnb'z 16:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC) It's fine, in fact I'm glad someone saved it and changed things up so it's more coherent. But I don't really think it's good. IronLung 00:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC) not promoted, +1   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

LOL

Score: +3
Good	Good. Just a stub, but I thought it was very funny. pillow talk 00:28, 28 February 2009 (UTC) LOL. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC) Good --Mnb'z 19:19, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	not promoted, +3 sat too long, try again   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

HowTo:Throw a Fireball

Score: +3
Good	Self-for: didn't make it through VFH, but I've always really thought this one one of my better articles. pillow talk 18:35, 27 February 2009 (UTC) Good Enough --Mnb'z 18:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC) Good. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:31, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	not promoted, +3 sat too long, try again   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

Samuel L. Vacuum

Score: +3
Good	For --Mnb'z 18:20, 23 February 2009 (UTC) Wow. This article is terrible. It's a bad concept, a bad execution, and the worst Photoshop ever. I LOL'ed. Good job, Monkey. pillow talk 22:19, 26 February 2009 (UTC) Hilarious! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC) Loved it. Saberwolf116 11:32, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Not Good	Kill. --Absolutely Not Benson 16:44, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments	not promoted, +3   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

Tails the Straight

Score: +2
Good	Fwhore --Mnb'z 01:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC) I like it. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:13, 25 February 2009 (UTC) mmmmmm... yeah, all right. pillow talk 22:19, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Not Good	Sonic. IronLung 10:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	not promoted, +2   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

WristWatch

Score: +2
Good	Fore and whore. IronLung 20:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC) I like it. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:11, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	abstain too saga-y. --Mnb'z 05:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC) abstain. I don't know. It's not bad; it's just not that funny to me. pillow talk 22:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC) not promoted, +2   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

Oval Office

Score: +1
Good	Self-good. I wrote this years ago before I became a regular. Some awesome IP has added a great Obama joke since then. IronLung 05:02, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Good enough. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:17, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Not Good	meh too rambling and self-contradictory. --Mnb'z 05:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Normally I'm not one to get precious about criticism of my articles, but: self-contradictory? Did you even read it? IronLung 08:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC) The history jumps all over the place, and you mention it was "soon remodeled" by Taft, yet in use in Washington's day. 112 years separate their terms, that is not "soon". --Mnb'z 18:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. A little random, and quite short. I see this as a very good starting point that needs work. I don't want to discourage work being done on it by voting for it. pillow talk 22:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC) not promoted, +1   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

Mondo Uncyclopedia

Score: +1
Good	Good stuff. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 20:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Not Good
Comments	Just interested in some feedback. Could the text be reformatted into VFH material? As-is it's just a fun, goofy page with lots of images.--    20:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Abstain huh? --Mnb'z 05:38, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Splaination. Mondo Film This is a parody of Mondo entertainment and ____sploitation done with Uncyclopedia as the subject, Hence the 70's magazine look. (when Mondo was king) It's OK to hate it, as long as everyone understands what it is, just like Gay Jesus.--    09:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC) Also abstain. I honestly just don't get this one. pillow talk 22:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC) not promoted, +1   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

Abe Simpson

Score: +1
Good	It was on VFH briefly. One of the few examples of good historical fiction. --Mnb'z 20:29, 15 February 2009 (UTC)  Good. IronLung 04:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Not Good	Hmmm it's got some great one-liners, but I just can't stand seeing Simpsons references in any context other than the Simpsons. Call it a peeve. pillow talk 04:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Um, its about a Simpson's character. --Mnb'z 07:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain.. Not sure about this one. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:34, 28 February 2009 (UTC) not promoted, +1   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

HowTo:Divide by Zero

Score: +1
Good	I've always liked this one. pillow talk 20:43, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Good enough. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Not Good	meh --Mnb'z 22:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	not promoted, +1   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>

Lipogram

Score: +2
Good	Nom+4. It's kinda smart and good. Might not pass VFH but is worth looking at. --UU - natter 15:39, Feb 13 for. rather clever, but i wonder how long before someone doesn't get it and mucks it up. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:46, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Like it. --Nachlader 17:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC) Good enough. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:36, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Not Good	Meh. Kinda smart, but not really funny to me. pillow talk 18:25, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Meh confusing and sort of condescending. --Mnb'z 05:37, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments	not promoted, +2   Le Cejak • <20:20 Jun 11, 2009>