Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnNews:NONSENSE WATERMELON CATASTROPHE

Article: UnNews:NONSENSE WATERMELON CATASTROPHE	Score: -3 walrus!! LOL
Nominated by:	– Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:51 Jun 11, 2008
For: 9	DO WANT A++ would read again!!!! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:51 Jun 11, 2008 Most fun I've ever had writing an article -- The Zombiebaron 02:54, 11 June 2008 (UTC) Indiscriminate For -RA HB 02:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC) PHNURR! Ж Kalir, Awesome Author_{(alliteration affords additional awesome)} 02:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC) For Great article. It's funnier than most things I see on the front page. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC) Kwyjibo It's whats for dinner! - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 03:05, 11 June 2008 (UTC) I was Against this article before I voted For it. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 05:24, Jun. 11, 2008 FOR because it'll never be featured anyway, and my last 2 votes were against --~FAG! +chatline "if it ain't broke, break it" (CUN·VFH) For There is an art to crazy. I agree that it's more amusing then most of the front page. --Sgt. Fluffy 21:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Against: 12	Sorry, but no. - Don *Leddy the Crunch* (Nyah, see, n y a h !) 03:17, Jun 11 Against These are so insanely easy to pull off. --THINKER 04:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC) No. I was against the whole VFD drama, but with all due something, this is not feature worthy. ~ 07:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC) Against. Raised a chuckle, and I was happy to vote keep, but feature? I agree with those above me. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH \| GUN \| Natter \| Uh oh \| Pee 09:02, Jun 11 Against. It's on the front page already as an un-news. Also... I... Oh, screw it. Mr N 11:44, Jun 11 Nein Not up to par for course --Nytrospawn 13:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC) ... -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:00, 11 June 2008 (UTC) HAW! -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC) Nyet It's already probably more featured than it should be, just by virtue of being on the front page. --Hyperbole 21:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC) WTF. I refuse to believe that the site is in such a bad state that random bollocks like this can be nominated for VFH. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:34, 12 June 2008 (UTC) Against - Stupid, and better as a mainspace article than an UnNews article. --AAA! (AAAA) 21:41, 12 June 2008 (UTC) Hell no per the above. --*Sir* Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 22:19, Jun. 12, 2008
Comments	You broke the template! i haz a sad :( – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:56 Jun 11, 2008 Meme? Wuv or no wuv? -RA HB 02:58, 11 June 2008 (UTC) You makes my firefox crash: – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:03 Jun 11, 2008 O_O ..... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA -RA HB 03:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC) HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH