From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Time travel
|
Score: 22.5 years in the future
|
| Nominated by:
|
– Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:39 Oct 18, 2007
|
For: 22.5
|
- Self-nomination and for. Well, it's been awhile since I've written anything, so naturally it's been awhile since I've been a selfish, impatient bastard and self-nommed anything, so, here goes nothing. (PR) – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:39 Oct 18, 2007
- No mayo on mine, thanks. Ж
 WHEEEEE! 05:06, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- For, I'll get into my Time Machine and check to see if this gets featured or not. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 06:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- For. Good work, although the history section did have me wondering if time travel has hallucinogenic effects... --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- For. I went forward in time and saw that I had voted for this article, so I came back and made sure I wasn't caught in a paradox. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 15:52, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Über Strong For. This article is amazing! There was never a dull moment. Excellent work, Thumper! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes! --
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  21:27, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes! I was going to ask what fool nominated this, but then I noticed that it was votes for HIGHLIGHT, not HUFFING. That Annoying Hello Feller 21:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes Yes and yes. Come on this is great. The Oblong Lobster 22:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Pee'd it, loved it, voted for.
 Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- For EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 11:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- For--Gaberou 17:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
    
- For --Aranherunar 05:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- LOL So do you know whether it wins or not? --Vana 13:12, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- For --General Insineratehymn 23:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- For --THE 01:07, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hellz Ye4h Skull -- Le Cejak • <-> 18:15, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- For. Goooood. RabbiTechno 18:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- foor FOUR Fore fr 4 --Moneke 08:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- How can I not vote For? An excellent article. -- Sir FS Doovad Read You got somethin to say? 00:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- ForAmazing amazing amazing CC-BY-NC-SA 2.0 - – Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.209.88 (talk • contribs)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
