Uncyclopedia:VFH/Time Cubicle

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Time Cubicle (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Time Cubicle	Score: 24 queer Jew Gods
Nominated by:	T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:55, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
For: 24	Nom + For. It took me a while to decide whether to nominate either this or Slime Cube. I decided. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:55, 28 October 2007 (UTC) Thank you, watchlist. ~ Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 28/10/2007 @ 21:17 For --General Insineratehymn 21:21, 28 October 2007 (UTC) FOR! NOT FEATURING THIS WOULD BE INGORANT AND EVIL. THE CABAL DOESN'T WANT THIS FEATURED BECAUSE THEY ARE STUPID AND EVIL. GO REDSOX! -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 22:30, 28 October 2007 (UTC) For--Sir Manforman 00:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC) ALL THOSE WHO DO NOT VOTE FOR THIS ARE BLINDED BY THEIR EVIL EDUCATORS WHO REFUSE TO GIVE MONEY!!!  Weasel 3689 00:21, 29 October 2007 (UTC) YOU ARE IGNORATN ASSES FOR IGNORING FOUR CORNERED CENTER TRUTH AND DESERVE DEATH. That is all. --THE 00:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC) For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 01:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC) For. I used to browse CrankDotNet just to be amused by pages like this one. Now I have Uncyc. Yay! ----OEJ 01:36, 29 October 2007 (UTC) For--Dr. Fenwick 04:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Bizarre. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 05:15, 29 October 2007 (UTC) FORWARD HO Bassguy 06:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Awesome, but maybe hard to get if you haven't seen the original For ((Relevant "Vote that looks like the thing it is voting for" vote comment))     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   18:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC)   For. I prefer Slime Cube, but this is still good. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 20:23, 29 Oct 2007 I am too much of a fucking uneducated Microsoft Word bastard to vote against. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 20:48 Oct 29, 2007 For Weird, and yet, I can't turn away! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 22:22, Oct 29 Genius. It breaks every other article's format and mercilessly parodies another website. I bow before your great and mighty humour, and wish to stay a while longer, that I may bask in your radiant presence. All other articles pale beside its divine glory! And so on and so forth... --Acolyte MUN RA My cat is better than Benson harass stalk 01:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC) For some reason I actually read the whole Time Cube page, and then I saw this. I pretty much peed myself. -- Spillin Dylan 02:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC) For featuring this now and Slime Cube soon afterwards. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:50, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Very much 4. Also, I am a cubist now. Four sides are the future! Have you ever seen a cube? They are gorgeous! Get on the path to salvation! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:12, Oct 30 For. There's such a fine line between clever... and stupid. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 05:56, 1 November 2007 (UTC) For strikingly similar to a chain email Azu 17:02, 2 November 2007 (UTC) YOU ARE EDUCATED STUPID BECAUSE YOU DO NOT REALIZE THAT YOU MUST VOTE FOR! AGAINST VOTE IS EVIL WORD SINGULARITY! — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 21:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	I prefer Slime Cube, but does Time Cube want the same background? Just say the word. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 01:38, 29 Oct 2007 I also think it needs some more color to some of it's words. I like pretty colors. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 06:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Woo! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 20:23, 29 Oct 2007 Nah. Slime Cube is too short to be an effective parody of a damnably long webpage. --Acolyte MUN RA My cat is better than Benson harass stalk 17:41, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Does anyone else realize that the article's narrator wagered ten sextillion dollars? --Acolyte MUN RA My cat is better than Benson harass stalk 01:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC) i cant vote on this. Maybe i'm missing the point, but aren't the articles supposed to look WIKI? Yes i get it, its a spoof page...but its not a WIKI page it's spoofing..maybe i should read the rules here.... Being that Uncyclopedia is not Wikipedia, we have an entire category for these things. The fact is, nobody cares as long as it's sufficiently long and funny. ~ Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 1/11/2007 @ 20:04

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.