Uncyclopedia:VFH/Quentin Tarantino

Article: Quentin Tarantino	Score: 7.5 motherfuckers
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
For: 15	Nom+For. Guildy is at it again. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Self-For. Obviously. After this, I think I'm going to take another month-plus hiatus from director articles, though. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:44, 7 August 2009 (UTC) For. per above. Mn-z 04:50, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Strong Fucking For. Motherfuckers... awesome just fucking awesome Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 05:03, 7 August 2009 (UTC) For though not everything Samuel L. Jackson says includes the word "motherfucker". Staircase CUN^t 05:08, 7 August 2009 (UTC) For. I liked the idea of Tarantino's characters talking about him. Very clever idea. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate). 06:07, 7 August 2009 (UTC) For. It's pretty good ChiefjusticeDS 06:25, 7 August 2009 (UTC) For. Brilliant, fucking lovely piece of work -- El Sid,** the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 08:39, 7 August 2009 (UTC) For. Mothafuckin' Great Funnybony 21:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC) For. Very nice idea, very nice execution. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:48, Aug 7 Bless. 17YEARSOFcHeDDaR 03:36,8August,2009 For. I fucking hate Quentin Tarantino. Just thought I'd throw that out there. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:28, 8 Aug What's wrong with Quentin Tarantino? —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC) For --Docile hippopotamus 00:42, 9 August 2009 (UTC) bandwagons. ~~Sir Fightstar Rocks! CUN For. Great article. Sequence 14:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Against: 7.5	Against--Dinosinatra 13:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC) ............ —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:06, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Against. InMooseWeTrust 01:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Against.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:09, 9 August 2009 (UTC) why is it written like that i dont understand -- Roman Dog Bird 22:27, 9 August 2009 (UTC) I hope to God you're kidding. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:02, 9 August 2009 (UTC) I'm quite serious. I "get" it, that it references Tarantino's style and films, I just don't understand why it has to be written like this. I don't think any articles are funny when they're written in this sort of style. -- Roman Dog Bird 23:06, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Against.--I don't get it. – Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.243.164.161 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 10 August 2009 (UTC) Not to be 'that guy', or anything, but I think the above fits anyone's definition of a 'stupid vote', so yeah. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 06:13, 11 August 2009 (UTC) Not to be this guy, but "fuck you and your article" is a strikeworthy definition of a stupid vote. Not getting it is, in-and-of-itself, a legitimate reason to dislike an article. While it's common courtesy to abstain or not vote at all, you it's still reasonable to vote against. Especially if you don't want to abstain because you're not a pussy. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 06:22, 11 August 2009 (UTC) Well, I think an IP voter who both failed to sign their post and failed initially to even put their vote in the right spot who didn't even get the fucking article and who will likely never contribute to the wiki again counts as a stupid, strikeworthy vote. As someone who gets pissy when when registered, established users vote against their work, I thought you of all people would sympathize, TKF. Apparently not. I won't argue, however. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 07:29, 11 August 2009 (UTC) Against per RDB. The dialogue has its moments, and the sequencing is nice, but the sections in between are thin, opinionated and jokeless. It worked for Sergio Leone, but I'm not seeing a similar profundity here. It's almost like you're beating a dead director then filming it in the style of another director. TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 17:12, 10 August 2009 (UTC) Didn't quite do the trick for me. And it doesn't even mention From Dusk till Dawn! - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 19:16, Aug 10 Against. TKF hit the nail on the head for me - interesting idea, and some good bits, but too many not so good bits. Almost a "Four Rooms" kinda deal. --UU - natter 09:43, Aug 11
Comments	Comment.Yes indeed not everything Samuel L jackson is motherfucker, but just about every serious Tarantino movie is! Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 05:29, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Author's Comment. Though I still think Mr. IP's 'not getting it' constitutes a stupid vote, I do agree with some of TKF's and Led's criticism (though I could personally go without the inclusion of Dusk), so if this fails on VFH, I'll revise accordingly. Also, sorry for the above snarkiness. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 08:23, 11 August 2009 (UTC)