Uncyclopedia:VFH/Pop Bomb (for the gajillionth time)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Pop Bomb (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Pop Bomb	Score: 11 pops
Nominated by:	T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:58, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
For: 17	Nom + For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:58, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Did I vote for this last time? Hell, I can't remember. An unfortunate Quasi, let's feature this thing. sirsysrq @ 21:49 Apr 19 For. I really enjoyed that. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  13:27, 20 April 2008 (UTC) For. Yeah, good stuff. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:52, Apr 21 For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 01:47, Apr. 23, 2008 I enjoyed it --The Improver talk • contribs • 06:41, Apr 24 2008 (UTC) For Nice, old uncyclopedic article --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC) *POP* - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 14:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC) For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:47, 30 April 2008 (UTC) Forfor the gajillionth and first time. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 18:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC) For Hardwick is good. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 17:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Hardwick > All -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:02, 9 May 2008 (UTC) Weak For. Not bad, not bad.--Garionepsilon 10:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC) Me likey. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)  For.--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 08:45, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Weak for per Garionepsilon.   Le Cejak • <13:13, 29 May 2008> For. ~ ★ БурекСП ★★ талк ★★ контриб ★ 10:14, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Against: 6	Who calls it pop? I mean other than the old people who were soldiers in the civil war? The whole "pop" thing put me off to the whole article. Also, the article never really interested me when I did read through it. Kinda bored me actually. Robertodole 18:51, 20 April 2008 (UTC) Must be a regional thing - usage of 'pop' is common in the UK. That said, Hardwick is Irish/Romanian so draw from that what you will. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 18:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)  Almost - there are a bunch of sentence fragments and usage errors that look more like mistakes than comedy. Can some English major sweep through it first? --Hyperbole 02:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Hmm, I'm pretty gay. Maybe I'll have a look after I'm done blowing this guy. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 02:41 May 3 To be honest, an english major probably already wrote this. Those fragments are intentional, proper grammar in context, and used for emphasis and easier reading. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 11:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Against This article has never really impressed me. I just get a "meh" feeling reading it. -RAHB 04:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Against --THINKER 21:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Against - It looks good so far, but it could be a lot better. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 03:06, May. 18, 2008 Against. It's readable, thanks to Hardwick's remarkable sense of rhythm, but the page somehow ends up as less than the sum of its parts. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.