Uncyclopedia:VFH/Normal

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Normal (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Normal	Score: 16 Completely normal people
Nominated by:	Nom - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:02, Dec 3
For: 18	N&F - A lovely little page that I reviewed and particularly liked. I don't wanna give too much away here, I think we've all been in this position, as either the narrator or his neighbor... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:02, Dec 3 SFor Yes, I am a normal, American citizen.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 3 @ 22:07) For--Æ 22:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC) For reaches a grand punchline. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC) For Spectacular —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Yar Perfectly silly, with an ending I didn't expect.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Normal For --Gaberou 04:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Huge for This rocks. A lot. Bassguy 08:43, 4 December 2007 (UTC) For ... --El Jefé de Pancho 09:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC) For. Well swipe me, another featurable slice of Cajekery. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 20:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Limewire -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Fwhore hehe. Seriously loved this article... reminds me of the great elements of Illogicopedia ~Fag x FS For As per cigarette above. MrN 18:18, Dec 5 For Normal, indeed.--UnTalented 21:16, 5 December 2007 (UTC) for yes it had the cliché', but its better than francis winkler for. great read.--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:11, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Weak for. Kind of like a milder version of Fire hydrant, which bugs me because a joke like that shouldn't be mild, it should be blunt. Not even close to a ripoff, though, don't get me wrong. End rambling. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 02:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Yarrr. ~ 15:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Against: 2	Dig up until the ending, which totally turned my smile into an eye-rolling frown. You go from quite excellent to internet cliché in one heading. Sad. I was going to abstain, but that really bothers me. Sorry Cajek. --THINKER 03:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Against Per my "Wrong fucking namespace, tard" rule     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   00:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)   Note: "Articles from all namespaces are eligible - votes based on namespace alone will be ignored." MrN 16:11, Dec 10 I can still vote against because it is in the wrong namespace for the content. If it's moved, I might like it more.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      I don't see how it could transfer to another namespace. HowTo:Convince Someone You're Not a Pirate? Why?:Are you acting like that? UnBook:Look at me! I'm Normal!? It just doesn't ring. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Hey, guys, don't give away the ending.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 4 @ 09:51) Abstain Pretty funny, I may have given a weak for, but the combination of it being written in a strange way for the namespace, and the random ending kinda annoyed me. Still, solid article! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 01:46, Dec 9

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.