User:MrN9000/TalkArchives2

Nagoya

Hello. I translated Nagoya(Japanese city) from ja:名古屋共和国 and you affixed {{ICU}} on it. So I wrote and modified moreover to suit English Uncyclopedia. Please read Nagoya and judge again if it is still ICU level. --かぼ 14:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Hea. Thanks for contacting me RE Nagoya. You did the right thing to do this rather than removing the TAG yourself. I find myself in a difficult position here. I put the ICU tag on it because it was obvious to me that had I not it would likely have been deleted. I'm glad that you are trying to fix it up, and I can see that you have been doing some work to improve it. For me there are still some problems with it currently... May I ask, is English not your first language? It appears to me that it is not. Although I'm sure that you have made your best efforts to translate what you have done into English I fear that as your article stands currently it does not meet the standard for readability which I would normally like to see. Although I'm sure that you have not used a computerised translator, it may appear to many people reading your article that you did. I hope you don't think I'm being unfair. It's just my view that if we did remove the TAG then your article would be deleted by one of the administrators... If you are willing to work on it some more, and try to improve the flow of the article, and perhaps add a few more jokes here and there then great, perhaps then it will be suitable. Unfortunately I currently feel that it's best to leave the tag on... Regards. MrN 15:50, Dec 9

Thank you for your comment. Yes I am Japanese and a little able to write English. Of course your judgment was not unfair, I think. And it may be the best that we leave Tag on it. Then I will try it easier to read and more enjoyable. --かぼ(ja:利用者:かぼ)16:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Best of luck my friend. I think you may have difficulty, but I wish you my best. MrN 16:58, Dec 9

Carry On Film

Many thanks for the great review. I notice that you said I should add some other 'joke' titles. If I can refer you to Carry On Films where 2 weeks ago I had done just that! So I'm glad I'm on the right track. Again, thank you - v. positive & helpful. --OliverKnight 13:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Your welcome. Don't forget to do some reviews yourself... The Guidelines have been update recently, check em out... Have fun. MrN 13:46, Dec 10

Hello, I have done a slight tweaking in view of your review. Can you take a peek and tell me if you like? --OliverKnight 22:58, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

I have had a little fiddle but is still needs a lot more work. More double entendres me thinks... Why are there so many red links? MrN 23:46, Dec 10

I've added a bit more to the article. But I need your help - How can I put it up for Pee Review again? Or does it just stay on Pee Review until I cancel it? --OliverKnight 21:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm really not sure how that works actually. I'm quite new myself... I think you can just add it again by creating a new entry, but I'm not sure. The article looks better, but at a quick glance I might suggest that it still needs some more links. Maybe spend a bit more time on it before putting it back into Pee Review? MrN 21:32, Dec 12

RE: My sig

ohh, thanks Mr 9000, hadn't seen that :P not sure they're too diligent on that but i guess yew can never be too careful.... thanks for the heads-up ^^ ~Fag x FS

He who must not be named.......can now be named

Tis I, the Dark Lord, come creeping in from the mists of a dark night, his newly stolen sole reclaimed from the devil....er whatever! Anyway, you should be glad to here that the Dark Lord has changed sides and gone the way of purity. Don't believe it? Check this out: [1] . Instead, the Marquis de Nofu is going to try and win this Hog Race sheerly through article brilliance and occasion PeeReview, QVFD, VFH, and VFD participation. Groovy baby, yeah! Such a radical change can only mean this user is currently smoking something! Fun, eh?

--Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 00:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

That's it! He's smoking the fuckin' hooha grass.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 02:04)

"Peace out brutha! Feel the looooovvvee!" --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 03:05, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Cajek likes your review

Here, have a thingy for reviewing UnScripts:Down Home Drug Commercial. I hope that, after I fix it up, you can take another look.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 05:57)

Rejoice, MrN9000! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

Add-on: I bet you think ALL Americans talk like that, huh?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 06:07)

Go ahead and take a look at it. It's gone through an overhaul.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 07:00)

SLOW DOWN YOU CRAZY MUTHAFUCKA!!!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 15:52)

Eh? I was only having a fiddle! Yous be wantings me to stops it all? The madness I mean? MrN 15:58, Dec 11

You haz my artickle! You has precious! Me likes precious, but me also no likes grammar that be crazy-as-fuck!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 16:00)

Fair enough. I though y'all were's asking mes to chip in! And the like's... He's meant to have bad grammar right? It's cool. I guess you have it how y'all like it. I will leave it alone for y'all. MrN 16:03, Dec 11

onay onay onay, adbay rammargay siay inefay utbay here'stay a ointpay ouyay ditedeay tiay otay hereway I ouldn'tcay eadray tiay nymoreay! eepKay ontributingcay noay hetay alktay agepay fiay ouyay ouldway.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 16:07)

Well I think your guy is still too formal... But tis ups to y'all... Pictures are better... MrN 16:12, Dec 11

better enough to... change the score??? :D   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 16:13)

I don't get what difference the score makes? I will change it for you... But could y'all explain why it's important? I don't understand. MrN 16:17, Dec 11

Uh, uh, uh... IT DOES KINDA MATTER! Even for steel kidney urologists like myself! I can't help it! I want you to like my article, and it's the most objective thing in the pee review! I remember someone giving me a 20/50 and saying "hey, cool article!" Put yourself in my shoes: that made me feel pretty bad. I can't shake my yearning for a good score, but I know what you're saying! YAAARRRR   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 16:21)

THANK YOOOOUUU   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 16:24)

Well I have given you a few more brownie points... But you know my views on this one, you need more slack jaw in there, he's still to formal for me. LOOSE THE MANATEE! It's not VFH yet. It's good that I can actually read it now without it being all italic MrN 16:26, Dec 11

Explain your thinking on the manatee. btw, that's the title of my one-actor surrealist play down at the community theater this weekend! ...no it isn't   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 16:28)

I don't get the purpose of it. Or was that porpoise? I's b reckonings that yous got enoughs of thems mood settn picture things like. This one should be an act of random violence! Blood bath! I get why you would not want to "spoil the joke" with it, but I think its already out by the time you get down there... I still think you should try to get an animated gif going also, this one is all about mood. A totally different style of picture might contrast well... Oh, and I take it you gave Uncyclopedian a poison pee? :) MrN 16:39, Dec 11

Yeah, poor guy is taking it personally. Of course, I take things personally a lot too, so I understand what he's going through. As far as the manatee goes, I think it might ruin the mood, but could I maybe try a few different pics on you below? These are just two ideas, you can add more (and further screw up your talk page)   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 17:49)

If your going to keep the same text one of these maybe? MrN 18:21, Dec 11

Take a look at it now --> UnScripts:Down Home Drug Commercial   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 18:25)

Well for me, the new pic is a bit random and does not add much. I would go with either a really gross one like the woman, or a really calm one.... If you search google for chainsaw blood, then you get some pics of, well a chainsaw with blood on it. That might work.MrN 18:37, Dec 11

• 

  I'm gonna keep the same caption that's on the manatee right now.

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• ViewBarn.jpg
• Catbrain2.jpg

  lol oh gross what the hell!

WHOOP! WHOOP!

VANDAL ALERT! VANDAL ALERT! SOMEBODY BAN HIM QUICK!!!!

  Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 13 / 00:03)

Hea Thanks for doing a Pee Review

We noticed that you have recently done a review of ******. Thanks for doing that, it's always good when people take an interest in Pee Review. We couldn't help noticing however that your review did not really explain why you had given the scores you did, and that you did not really give any useful suggestions for how the article could be improved. We would be very grateful if you would consider reading the Pee Review guidelines before doing another Pee Review. Thanks!

Edit the above as you feel appropriate bro... We can then just post this on people's talk pages, or maybe at the bottom of the pee-review itself? We would really just be using this text as a replacement of the poison pee...

Come on, chin up lad! Let's not give up on trying to improve pee review eh? I think we are getting somewhere. Let's not give up now? MrN 22:53, Dec 13

---

What's going on? Oh man, I still feel like that poison pee on Mayfair was justified.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 14 / 04:02)

Dude. I think It was not a good Pee Review. I doubt very much if it was particularly useful to the person who wrote the article regardless of the circumstances. I think it was fair enough for someone (if anyone you) to make a comment about the quality of the pee review. I must say though dude, that the way you worded the message on the poison pee was, well terrible. Seriously not good dude, we are not grading other pee reviews, or insulting them, just trying to improve them. In my view you stepped a little over the line of what I consider a reasonable thing for us to be doing...

cajek and I are trying to improved Pee Review, and that's not going to be possible unless we tell people when they do particularly poor pee reviews. We delete poorly written articles completely so what's wrong with commenting on poor pee reviews?

If anyone wants cajek and I to stop trying to improve Pee Review please tell us now. We are not interested in pointless conflict. We are just trying to improve a part of Uncyc.

I'm not sure what Mordillo's views are currently regarding the poison pee, at first he told us to get rid of it, and later told us we could keep it if we changed it. I sent it to QVFD and Zombie huffed the sucker. I'm really not sure Tom banning you for giving him a poison pee was appropriate, but it was clearly an example of how people can easily get upset.

The point is dude that that the poison pee thing is only going to keep pissing people off, for some reason people get all emotional when they see a red or orange coloured template thrown at them so it's best if we don't use it. Hell we have probably spent more time time talking about the poison pee now than we spent creating the thing!! I'm suggesting that instead of using that template, we try this? Don't know who else is stalking me these days but anyone else care to comment?

You out there Mordillo, Tom you out there?

	Hey, I don't mean to be a dick but...
	I noticed that you had done a Pee Review of Add your custom message here if you wish. Thank you. I was wondering if you could let me know why you had given your scores, and also wondered if you had any suggestions for how the article might be improved. Would you please consider giving another review? Thanks!

Any better?

RE the 'rank' system in PEEING. I hear where your comming from Mordillo we don't really want that sort of thing, but I belive we need a way controlling who should be commenting poor pee reviews. In my opinion that should only be the people who are experienced in Pee Review, as it obviously has the potential to cause drama. MrN 12:58, Dec 14

well, I like that template you made.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 14 / 17:42)

UnScouts

I am interested in starting a "Boy Scouts" like program to help mentor new and old users. This is like AAN but more collaborative, and with ranks similar to the ones in the BSA along with merit badges. The purpose of the program will be to raise users that will be more beneficial to this site and produce higher quality material. Rank advancement will be done based on a range of specific conditions, such as number of edits, number of pee reviews, articles written, good turns (VFD, QVFD, vandal watch), and lastly, the final requirement to achieve the highest rank, Uber Scout(Eagle Scout) is to get at least one article VFH. Experienced users and those involved in AAN can be Troop Leaders, and each foster parent in effect can run his own "troop" of noobs and those who want to join the organization. It is the ultimate scheme for betterment of this site.

Now the hard part, organizing this user controlled organization. Do you approve of my schemes and will you help support it?-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 03:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I have kinda got my hands full with a number of other projects at the moment, and am not sure that I can actually help out very much. I support anything which will have a genuine effect on the quality of Uncyc, but I fear that you may have trouble gaining large scale popular support for this. I'm not really sure exactly what your proposing either. It really just sounds like a new "rank" system and there are already quite a number of those in operation. I have no idea how you would judge it, and to be honest, I'm not sure this is going to work. I do support the idea of trying to improve Uncyc however and wish to encourage to try to do so. Have you set up a user page which has more details about what your actually proposing? I take it you are aware of the other "rank" systems which exist in Uncyc? MrN 03:36, Dec 15

Hey, you. Look at this thing I just wrote.

I'm creatively whoring to you.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 15 / 03:48)

What have you been smoking? You want serious criticism? Ok, I liked the start. It got a smile from me right away. The end was disappointing... And I think you need to loose one of the paragraphs in the middle.

You know how you lost your hand a while back? You remember? Your hand, the thing with the fingers that did stuff? You remember? Do you remember your hand? You remember the night it happened? You remember that you were a little tipsy? You remember? Do you remember waking up naked on a concrete slab in the middle of a forest? Do you remember? Do you recall that morning? Do you remember that slab? Did those symbols mean anything to you? Do you sometimes blank out for days at a time and wake up with a bloody knife in your hand? Do you remember that? Do you recall? The... the thing with the hand... your hand and stuff..

Not sure that's helping.

The idea does get a little bit repetitive, but that's obviously the point, but I think you need atleast a new idea or 3 thrown in there to make it into a flyer. But I'm sure you know that. What was the ending all about? You keep doing this with your articles you know. Good starts. OK middle, and then the ending is a bit pants. I keep reading that on the comments people write about your work. You have to fix that you know dude. The end is the bit they read just before voting don't forget. That's got to be the best bit.

And WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON? MrN 04:06, Dec 15

Dude. I just got a free review without asking.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 15 / 04:07)

Dude.

check it. ...it worked like a charm last time. That was pretty funny, actually!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 15 / 04:15)

Grr. Wish my girlfriend sucked as hard as you do... Sorry dude, it's like 4:45 in the morning here and I really have to go to bed now. I will do it later if no-one else has... Now where's that g/f of mine...  :) MrN 04:48, Dec 15

Fuckin' England time zone things.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 15 / 05:26)

What'd I miss?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 17 / 01:02)

Regarding a pee reviewed article of mine,

You seem like you've got your head screwed on tight about this whole pee review business. I was wondering if you would consider providing a second opinion on the pee review of my article, Academia. Though it's good to know that people like my work, the current review has very little regarding areas to improve. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 10:15, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Hea, looks like you asked a few people for a second opinion, so I guess you have got one by now. From just a quick look over the review I have to say that I have seen a lot worse. The review does give you some suggestions as to where the scores come from, and also makes some suggestions for how the article could be improved. In answer to your question. I have seen a lot worse. We are currently trying to improve the quality of Pee Review generally and are working on a template to send to people when they do a particularly poor pee review. I don't think we would have sent this guy one, it's not that bad. If you want to get another review, feel free to add your article to pee-review again by reverting the pee review back to before the review was done... Have you read the Pee Review guidelines and done some reviews yourself? MrN 13:15, Dec 15

That's reasonable enough. Hadn't thought about reverting the review.

As to your final question, no. I'm staying the hell away from pee reviews. I think they're too important to be left in my questionally capable hands. And you guys seem to be doing a good job with timely reviews, and doing them well, that my help probably isn't needed. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 13:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

That is defiantly not the case. Anyone is very welcome to do a Pee Review, especially you! Just give the Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/Guidelines a read and give it a go! The current state of Pee Review is not "normal" there are usually a lot more waiting in the queue than what we have now. Your help is most definitely welcome. Pee Review works best when people review as well as submit... MrN 13:36, Dec 15

You're just the politest arm twister ever, aren't you? Fine, I'll give a few a go. Maybe. Sometime. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 13:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I can be a right cunt sometimes as well mind... ;) But yea, give it a go. That's how you get the good Pee Reviews... As it says in the Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/Guidelines, you have to suck as well as blow. Enjoy. MrN 13:48, Dec 15

Iiit's christmas!

I just wanted to wish yew a faggy christmas! I mean... merry. Have a great one, yew deserve it Mister N! Honest, I meant merry! ~Fag x FS

Also, i got thinking, your comment on me being ywr tip for NotM next month... does that mean ywr willing to nominate me? hehe ^_^ ~Fag x FS

Yew will just have to wait and see... :) I'm not sure who the competition will be, but I think ya have a good chance... :) MrN 23:13, Dec 15

Have a not-shitty Christmas!

	Heya, The Led Balloon here, wishing you merry Christmas, or any other holiday you feel like celebrating. Just remember what it's all really about: NO WORK, NO SCHOOL, FREE STUFF!!!
	Here's to hoping your school(or work) calendar for December doesn't look too much like this...

Merry Christmas, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:19, Dec 17

Bloody Pagans

Pagans, the Whole Lot of Yous Premier Tom Mayfair has been a naughty boy this year, but he still deserves a kiss from under the mistletoe. His external organ is fair game.

Excuse me

Would you be interested in judging the "Best Noob Article" category for the upcoming PLS? If so, let me know via my talk page. Danke. --EMC ^[TALK] 01:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

XMas

	AE has awarded you a beer in which you help build your own Christmasbeerbottletree (shown right)
	Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!

--Æ 01:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

A WARNING

ARE YOU PREPARED? SANTA CLAUS IS COMING TO TOWN. WE ADVISE YOU TAKE PRECAUTIONS. TAKE HEED. TAKE NOTICE. TAKE COVER. a friendly message from your local Santa Awareness Bureau.

Merry Christmas

It's that time of year again!

And we're all asking Santa for what we want, while trying to find the perfect gift for our loved ones. This is just a reminder that for Christmas, rifles are always a hit! Even Santa agrees!

Hope there still aren't hard feeling between us. AE and I have mostly made up now. And yes, I should have listened to you all the long, but at least I learned my lesson. Have a Merry Christmas, and tell me why an (edit) thing is in my card (grrr). --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 04:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Christmas and stuff

Merry Christmas! or whatever it is you new-fangled Christians do at this time of year. From Rabbi Techno

FUCK YOU. IT'S HALLOWEEN.

HAPPY FUCKIN' HALLOWEeeEEEeeeN!!! Don't let: the crypt-keeper bite you. me catch you throwing eggs at my fucking house again, MrN9000/TalkArchives2. ...no, I'm serious about the egg thing, okay? I'm fuckin' serious. ...you can hide the eggs, but this ain't Easter. ...you could eat the eggs, but this ain't Thanksgiving. ...you could light the eggs on fire but this ain't the 4th of July. ...unless you're in a kitty costume. That's okay, cuz it's god damned Halloween, okay???!??! -- This preceding message was brought to you by   Le Cejak • <->

awesome

You are presented with one (1) serving of delicious flaming Baked Alaska in thanks for your vote for Alaska. Extreme caution should be used when making, eating, or igniting Baked Alaska. And be sure to keep Uncle Leo's oxygen tank at least 30 meters away.

enjoy!--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 03:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Christmas soon!

Uncyclopedian wishes you have a merry Christmas and a happy New Year's!

Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

HowTo:Have a Wacky Misadventure

Here you are, Mr. N9Insecure:

Rejoice, MrN9000! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

  Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 19 / 14:06)

Just an extra point.... the formula was manually made (i.e. with the <math></math> thingy). :P ~Fag x FS

Re:VFD Protocol

It is illegal, under any circumstances whatsoever, for a normal non-Poopsmith user to remove an article from VFD. Thanks for bringing it to my attention, though. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing that up. MrN 21:00, Dec 19

Thanks

Thanks for your vote! --UnTalented 21:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Also, have one of these:

Hey, y'all. It's me, UnTalented, here to wish you a joyous Midvinterblót! Don't forget to offer up your finest stallions and swine as sacrifices to the Norse gods, lest the chill of winter freeze you to the bone. Cheers!

Have a good holiday. --UnTalented 22:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

WHISTLING CASUALLY.

I AM NOT WHORING TO YOU.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 04:21)

Oh, take a look at PEEING. Jim Groovester wants in. You should look after him! :D   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 20 / 19:41)

PS GET ON IRC NOW from Cajek :P ~Fag x FS

I already got banned!

Don't say the magic words!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 23:14)

Ha! I win!-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 23:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank You!

Thank You!

Unknown_user would like to thank you for voting for his article, Why?:Stick Things in the Electrical Outlet.
To thank you, he has left a "golden surprise" in your electrical outlet. Use a screwdriver to get it out.

---