Uncyclopedia:VFH/Why?:So Serious? (2nd nomination)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Why?:So Serious? (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Why?:So Serious?	Score: 17 maniacal cackles
Nominated by:	IronLung 23:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
For: 17	For. Still makes me smile. Voluntarily, too. IronLung 23:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC) For. Pretty good, lol, but you shoulda made more references to the Joker.Saberwolf116 04:01, 4 January 2009 (UTC) For. Salamander03 07:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC) For. Per last time. --UU - natter 09:57, Jan 4 For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC) Shamelessly self-for, but only half, meaning half of the self part, and not the for part, as I co-wrote this with TKF, and voting with half of a for would just be silly. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 17:57, Jan 4  Epic Foar! not so seriously, though. Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 18:13, 4 January 2009 (UTC) Again, I suppose. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:12, 4 January 2009 (UTC) That was horrible. Horribly entertaining, that is! For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 01:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)  If I were serious, I would vote against. Since I agree with it, I am not serious and thus vote 2+2WTF? I vote 4, serious or not. Next!~ 03:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC) Huh? I vote for.~ 03:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC) --Gelert 06:35, 5 January 2009 (UTC) For. "Hey, who doesn't think that Jews are funny?" Pretty much all my articles are based on the tried and trusted method of taking normal situations and inserting Jews. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC) For - Why ain't this been done already? You bastards. BlueYonder - CONTACT Sure • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:03, Jan 5 For -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 18:34, Jan. 5, 2009 For --Mnbvcxz 18:47, 5 January 2009 (UTC) Wowowowow♥wowowowooooo —Sir SysRq (talk) 23:13, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

---

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---