From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Lyre
|
Score: 12
|
| Nominated by:
|
Self-nom This article has gone through two pee reviews and I have taken much of the reviewers' advice to heart, although I have disagreed on a few issues. I believe this article is hot and ready to be satisfied with a hard, thorough voting. Hope you like it! PericlesofAthens 02:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 12
|
- For. It's a good article, and the removal of the worst bits and some tightening up elsewhere earns my vote. ChiefjusticeDS 09:54, 14 August 2009 (UTC)\
- For. Definitely feature worthy... Love the way in which Liar and Lyre have been worked in to one article together and well written too Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 12:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. Filthy lyres! —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:28, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yes it is very well-written, my only problem was the same as that Chief picked up on in his Pee Review, the second half doesn't seem as strong as the first half. However the first three parts are excellent, so I'll go for -- El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 13:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. Impressive and well presented. Some of the humour may go over the heads of a few readers but I suggest they try reading it a couple of times. Also very thorough pee reviews have helped. --
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 15:56, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- For.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  06:15, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 For.                Sir MacMania GUN—[01:26 17 Aug 2009]- Strong For. Very nicely written. A standout. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:20, Aug 18
- Excellent. This article has exactly everything I could want from a satirical encyclopedia. I wish more articles were written like this. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 11:57, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Great. Easily a top three of the month. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 04:23, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
- Absolutely--Sog1970 11:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Sure. Not bad at all.
 pillow talk 22:49, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
The PEE reviews are here and here, this is a self nom after all. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:53, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
For. 
19:35, Aug 27 19:35, 27 August 2009 (UTC)