Uncyclopedia:VFH/Is the bear a Catholic?

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Is the bear a Catholic? (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Is the bear a Catholic?	Score: 15 bear-popes
Nominated by:	T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:42, July 15, 2012 (UTC)
For: 15	A question for the ages -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:42, July 15, 2012 (UTC) In Soviet Russia, ...religion banned. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jul 15 '12 16:14 (UTC)  For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:41, July 15, 2012 (UTC)  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:35, 15 July 2012 R.I.P. Gerry This site wasn't good enough to deserve you. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 19:26, July 15, 2012 (UTC) For, but what about pandas? Ovidius IV (talk) 20:59, July 15, 2012 (UTC) Boner. -RAHB 22:08, July 15, 2012 (UTC) For. Black Flamingo 19:34, July 16, 2012 (UTC) For. Winstanley1 (talk) 09:18, July 18, 2012 (UTC) For. With those changes, definitely. Nominally Humane! 01:06 18 Jul 13:06, July 18, 2012 (UTC) For. Funnybony    10:30, Jul 20 For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:03, July 20, 2012 (UTC)  Like --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 19:48, July 20, 2012 (UTC) For. Per Woody. ChiefjusticeDS 10:09, July 21, 2012 (UTC)  For. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:49, July 21, 2012 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	Comment. I have two minor issues here. The first is the Pedobear reference at the start. While this would suit as a footnote, because it's part of the else it detracts from the section further down where it refers to which bear is "the bear". As that section is one of the strongest in the article, that reference should be changed. The second is the last section relating to the Vatican and Pope Yogi. That comes in as a randumbo comment shoved in after what would otherwise be a strong article, and doesn't fit the overall tone here at all. Those two changes being made would sway me towards a "For" vote, as the remainder is a strong article. Nominally Humane! 11:34 18 Jul 11:34, July 18, 2012 (UTC) You are one careful reader, Pup. Interestingly, those two bits were the only significant stupidities added by IPs. Thank you SO much, Mr. 160.79.154.226. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jul 18 '12 12:49 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

---

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---